Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

aaronjzc    

Rank #1808 on Subscribers
aaronjzc Avatar Level 254 Comments: Contaminated Win
Offline
Send mail to aaronjzc Block aaronjzc Invite aaronjzc to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:8/29/2010
Last Login:1/18/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 22262 total,  24216 ,  1954
Comment Thumbs: 5403 total,  6358 ,  955
Content Level Progress: 26% (260/1000)
Level 222 Content: Mind Blower → Level 223 Content: Mind Blower
Comment Level Progress: 3% (3/100)
Level 254 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 255 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:45
Content Views:35110
Times Content Favorited:2307 times
Total Comments Made:1181
FJ Points:27925

latest user's comments

#62 - Picture 05/24/2012 on I'm serious +4
#30578 - can you diablofags try to convince a nondiablofag to buy diabl…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/24/2012 on Video Games Board - console... 0
#30699 - keloman (05/24/2012) [-]
I wouldn't suggest buying it now.You'll get bored of it in 3 days.

Hopefully the expansion and patches make the game better,if not,I'm selling my copy.
User avatar #30595 - Fezzle (05/24/2012) [-]
Honestly, look for someone who has a guest pass. Try it, if you don't like it then don't buy it, also vice versa. I personally love the game and i've never played any of the Diablo games.
User avatar #30584 - danielph (05/24/2012) [-]
the demon hunter gets a huge shuriken that kills everything in its path.
User avatar #30586 - danielph (05/24/2012) [-]
if thats not awesome i don't know what is, no seriouly though its a good game if u like the style.
#30477 - CoDfag here. say what you will, but I only buy Treyarch games.…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/24/2012 on Video Games Board - console... +2
User avatar #30810 - dragonzard (05/24/2012) [-]
EPIC.
360 or PS3?
And don't worry,no one is a "CoDfag"
CoD is the best selling game in the world.
It outsells BTF3 in BOTH 360 and PS3.
#30514 - anonymous (05/24/2012) [-]
it's sad to see cod fall, I used to love playing cod2 and cod MW.
User avatar #30508 - thenameschuck (05/24/2012) [-]
Cant wait for the blops2 zombs :D
#30492 - russianbro has deleted their comment.
User avatar #30486 - desmax (05/24/2012) [-]
A non-linear campaign? So I can walk right instead of left without the game saying "GET BACK TO THE BATTLEFIELD"

Interessing.
I really liked the first Black Ops, but I didn't like Modern Warfare 3 that much. I... guess I'll buy this one
User avatar #30500 - pinnacleofponies (05/24/2012) [-]
Main characters can live or die depending on how effective you were in the mission, main villains can die sooner if you do good in it. There will be different endings to it.
#30483 - unclecreepy has deleted their comment.
User avatar #30813 - dragonzard (05/24/2012) [-]
I hate the way to take cover.
I always hate it in GTA,FEAR,etc.
#27 - AC3 is being developed by Ubisoft, which is actually here in C…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/22/2012 on How Canada sees the new AC 0
User avatar #33 - bbboy (05/22/2012) [-]
but is about how america won the war
#11 - Comment deleted 05/22/2012 on PC gamers -2
#145 - I'm okay with this 05/22/2012 on Well fuck. +1
#1124 - little terrifying ass. 05/22/2012 on Unwanted Turd 0
#54 - FALSE. this could not have been a nokia, because if … 05/22/2012 on This Was Near Your Ear +2
#59 - Comment deleted  [+] (1 new reply) 05/18/2012 on turtle and mouse 0
#61 - wickys Comment deleted by aaronjzc
#56 - Comment deleted  [+] (3 new replies) 05/17/2012 on turtle and mouse 0
#58 - wickys Comment deleted by aaronjzc
#59 - aaronjzc Comment deleted by aaronjzc
#61 - wickys Comment deleted by aaronjzc
#244 - **aaronjzc rolled a random image posted in comment #87 at … 05/17/2012 on Forever a Whale -3
#65 - that was actually an awesome movie 05/17/2012 on like a sir 0
#149 - i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming t… 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#145 - it's ok. i respect your beliefs, my friend. and i know many re… 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#140 - one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang hav…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar #149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar #148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#132 - so is the theory that god created himself, or has always been  [+] (9 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#134 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Created himself would be, yes. How is it paradoxical that God always existed?
I think you need to find the definition of omnipotent.
User avatar #143 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Who is to say god is omnipotent? None have met god face to face but only go off the word of a book written by people who claim to have met people who met Jesus. And if god has always existed why did Judaism only appear around 1800 BC when the earth (By biblical standards) has been around 2000 years before that?
#150 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Source, please.
I think your dating is off.
User avatar #155 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Here's a few backing up when Judaism began (With Abraham as the founder)
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/religion/jewish.htm
http://www.jewfaq.org/israel.htm
www.uri.org/kids/world_juda_basi.htm

Now on the 6000 year old earth:
http://www.missiontoamerica.com/genesis/six-thousand-years.html
User avatar #140 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang have always existed as well.
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar #149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar #148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#129 - you mean your claim that god exists?  [+] (11 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#130 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
My claim that the Big Bang could not have caused itself. That's paradoxical.
User avatar #132 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
so is the theory that god created himself, or has always been
#134 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Created himself would be, yes. How is it paradoxical that God always existed?
I think you need to find the definition of omnipotent.
User avatar #143 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Who is to say god is omnipotent? None have met god face to face but only go off the word of a book written by people who claim to have met people who met Jesus. And if god has always existed why did Judaism only appear around 1800 BC when the earth (By biblical standards) has been around 2000 years before that?
#150 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Source, please.
I think your dating is off.
User avatar #155 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Here's a few backing up when Judaism began (With Abraham as the founder)
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/religion/jewish.htm
http://www.jewfaq.org/israel.htm
www.uri.org/kids/world_juda_basi.htm

Now on the 6000 year old earth:
http://www.missiontoamerica.com/genesis/six-thousand-years.html
User avatar #140 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang have always existed as well.
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar #149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar #148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#127 - that's where i think you're wrong, my friend. anybody who beli…  [+] (27 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#128 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
But it's not the cause. It's the effect.
Do you have any other theory to combat my claim?
User avatar #135 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
It's infinitely harder to understand what caused the big bang occurred (And addressing a previous statement, the theory of the big bang states that there was a single molecule of infinite mass and density that collapsed into itself) just as impossible it would be to explain were god came from. Simply stating that god has always existed is a complete fallacy since everything has to come from somewhere and I think if you are going to argue where the first molecule came from you should first explain where god came from for fairness.
#194 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Someone I was arguing with before sent me a video saying that C14 dating wasn't used anymore. If you care, I can find it for you.
#158 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I don't have anything very specific at the moment, but I found this.
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/08/archeology.htm
User avatar #166 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
So archeological evidence is valid when disproving Moses yet the dinosaur bones that date back a 200 million years ago (far longer then the bible states) isn't?
#169 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Ah, here's an interesting bit.
How do you know your dating methods are accurate?
User avatar #173 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Because of carbon dating which has been scientifically proven to be accurate within a few hundred years of something that old.
How do you know the documents you believe disproves when Judaism began are accurate?
#175 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
The scientific community no longer uses C14 dating.
www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
User avatar #186 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
That's not true at all, they still do use C14 (Or K14) dating.
Also, that (very bias) source says nothing about C14 not being used.
The source also states that Carbon dating is a theory and thus discreditably. It is indeed a theory but it is a more scientifically backed up theory then anything stated in the bible. Gravity is also a theory but if I were to throw my keyboard I can guarantee that it will fall to the floor.
#153 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker
User avatar #154 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker is no clock at all.
#159 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
Obviously a reference to watchmen
User avatar #168 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Oh, then it would be "A clock without a craftsman." said by Dr. Manhattan
#142 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Again. Omnipotent. Google.
User avatar #146 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A claim of omnipotence means nothing without a show of such power. If that's the case I too am omnipotent. Prove I'm not.
User avatar #129 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
you mean your claim that god exists?
#130 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
My claim that the Big Bang could not have caused itself. That's paradoxical.
User avatar #132 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
so is the theory that god created himself, or has always been
#134 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Created himself would be, yes. How is it paradoxical that God always existed?
I think you need to find the definition of omnipotent.
User avatar #143 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Who is to say god is omnipotent? None have met god face to face but only go off the word of a book written by people who claim to have met people who met Jesus. And if god has always existed why did Judaism only appear around 1800 BC when the earth (By biblical standards) has been around 2000 years before that?
#150 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Source, please.
I think your dating is off.
User avatar #155 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Here's a few backing up when Judaism began (With Abraham as the founder)
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/religion/jewish.htm
http://www.jewfaq.org/israel.htm
www.uri.org/kids/world_juda_basi.htm

Now on the 6000 year old earth:
http://www.missiontoamerica.com/genesis/six-thousand-years.html
User avatar #140 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang have always existed as well.
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar #149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar #148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#123 - i never said anything of the sort. what is your outlook on it?  [+] (31 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#133 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
Sorry this guy is being an asshole religious guy. Most of us aren't like him.
User avatar #145 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
it's ok. i respect your beliefs, my friend. and i know many religious people who respect my beliefs, as i respect theirs. thank you for being considerate.
#126 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I believe I exist because humanity was created by God.
But if there was no cause, there was no effect. Anyone who claims the Big Bang was a cause effectively claims their own nonexistence.
User avatar #127 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
that's where i think you're wrong, my friend. anybody who believes in the big bang theory effectively claims that as the origin of their existence.
#128 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
But it's not the cause. It's the effect.
Do you have any other theory to combat my claim?
User avatar #135 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
It's infinitely harder to understand what caused the big bang occurred (And addressing a previous statement, the theory of the big bang states that there was a single molecule of infinite mass and density that collapsed into itself) just as impossible it would be to explain were god came from. Simply stating that god has always existed is a complete fallacy since everything has to come from somewhere and I think if you are going to argue where the first molecule came from you should first explain where god came from for fairness.
#194 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Someone I was arguing with before sent me a video saying that C14 dating wasn't used anymore. If you care, I can find it for you.
#158 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I don't have anything very specific at the moment, but I found this.
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/08/archeology.htm
User avatar #166 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
So archeological evidence is valid when disproving Moses yet the dinosaur bones that date back a 200 million years ago (far longer then the bible states) isn't?
#169 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Ah, here's an interesting bit.
How do you know your dating methods are accurate?
User avatar #173 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Because of carbon dating which has been scientifically proven to be accurate within a few hundred years of something that old.
How do you know the documents you believe disproves when Judaism began are accurate?
#175 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
The scientific community no longer uses C14 dating.
www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
User avatar #186 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
That's not true at all, they still do use C14 (Or K14) dating.
Also, that (very bias) source says nothing about C14 not being used.
The source also states that Carbon dating is a theory and thus discreditably. It is indeed a theory but it is a more scientifically backed up theory then anything stated in the bible. Gravity is also a theory but if I were to throw my keyboard I can guarantee that it will fall to the floor.
#153 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker
User avatar #154 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker is no clock at all.
#159 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
Obviously a reference to watchmen
User avatar #168 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Oh, then it would be "A clock without a craftsman." said by Dr. Manhattan
#142 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Again. Omnipotent. Google.
User avatar #146 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A claim of omnipotence means nothing without a show of such power. If that's the case I too am omnipotent. Prove I'm not.
User avatar #129 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
you mean your claim that god exists?
#130 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
My claim that the Big Bang could not have caused itself. That's paradoxical.
User avatar #132 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
so is the theory that god created himself, or has always been
#134 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Created himself would be, yes. How is it paradoxical that God always existed?
I think you need to find the definition of omnipotent.
User avatar #143 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Who is to say god is omnipotent? None have met god face to face but only go off the word of a book written by people who claim to have met people who met Jesus. And if god has always existed why did Judaism only appear around 1800 BC when the earth (By biblical standards) has been around 2000 years before that?
#150 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Source, please.
I think your dating is off.
User avatar #155 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Here's a few backing up when Judaism began (With Abraham as the founder)
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/religion/jewish.htm
http://www.jewfaq.org/israel.htm
www.uri.org/kids/world_juda_basi.htm

Now on the 6000 year old earth:
http://www.missiontoamerica.com/genesis/six-thousand-years.html
User avatar #140 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang have always existed as well.
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar #149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar #148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#119 - now there's a completely different argument right there. are w…  [+] (33 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#120 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Oh, so you don't think you exist?
User avatar #123 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i never said anything of the sort. what is your outlook on it?
#133 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
Sorry this guy is being an asshole religious guy. Most of us aren't like him.
User avatar #145 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
it's ok. i respect your beliefs, my friend. and i know many religious people who respect my beliefs, as i respect theirs. thank you for being considerate.
#126 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I believe I exist because humanity was created by God.
But if there was no cause, there was no effect. Anyone who claims the Big Bang was a cause effectively claims their own nonexistence.
User avatar #127 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
that's where i think you're wrong, my friend. anybody who believes in the big bang theory effectively claims that as the origin of their existence.
#128 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
But it's not the cause. It's the effect.
Do you have any other theory to combat my claim?
User avatar #135 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
It's infinitely harder to understand what caused the big bang occurred (And addressing a previous statement, the theory of the big bang states that there was a single molecule of infinite mass and density that collapsed into itself) just as impossible it would be to explain were god came from. Simply stating that god has always existed is a complete fallacy since everything has to come from somewhere and I think if you are going to argue where the first molecule came from you should first explain where god came from for fairness.
#194 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Someone I was arguing with before sent me a video saying that C14 dating wasn't used anymore. If you care, I can find it for you.
#158 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I don't have anything very specific at the moment, but I found this.
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/08/archeology.htm
User avatar #166 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
So archeological evidence is valid when disproving Moses yet the dinosaur bones that date back a 200 million years ago (far longer then the bible states) isn't?
#169 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Ah, here's an interesting bit.
How do you know your dating methods are accurate?
User avatar #173 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Because of carbon dating which has been scientifically proven to be accurate within a few hundred years of something that old.
How do you know the documents you believe disproves when Judaism began are accurate?
#175 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
The scientific community no longer uses C14 dating.
www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
User avatar #186 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
That's not true at all, they still do use C14 (Or K14) dating.
Also, that (very bias) source says nothing about C14 not being used.
The source also states that Carbon dating is a theory and thus discreditably. It is indeed a theory but it is a more scientifically backed up theory then anything stated in the bible. Gravity is also a theory but if I were to throw my keyboard I can guarantee that it will fall to the floor.
#153 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker
User avatar #154 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker is no clock at all.
#159 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
Obviously a reference to watchmen
User avatar #168 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Oh, then it would be "A clock without a craftsman." said by Dr. Manhattan
#142 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Again. Omnipotent. Google.
User avatar #146 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A claim of omnipotence means nothing without a show of such power. If that's the case I too am omnipotent. Prove I'm not.
User avatar #129 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
you mean your claim that god exists?
#130 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
My claim that the Big Bang could not have caused itself. That's paradoxical.
User avatar #132 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
so is the theory that god created himself, or has always been
#134 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Created himself would be, yes. How is it paradoxical that God always existed?
I think you need to find the definition of omnipotent.
User avatar #143 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Who is to say god is omnipotent? None have met god face to face but only go off the word of a book written by people who claim to have met people who met Jesus. And if god has always existed why did Judaism only appear around 1800 BC when the earth (By biblical standards) has been around 2000 years before that?
#150 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Source, please.
I think your dating is off.
User avatar #155 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Here's a few backing up when Judaism began (With Abraham as the founder)
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/religion/jewish.htm
http://www.jewfaq.org/israel.htm
www.uri.org/kids/world_juda_basi.htm

Now on the 6000 year old earth:
http://www.missiontoamerica.com/genesis/six-thousand-years.html
User avatar #140 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang have always existed as well.
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar #149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar #148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#116 - well let's see here. your generic run-of-the mill jar is going…  [+] (35 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn 0
#117 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
>completely empty
Before the Big Bang, there was nothing. NOTHING.
So what was the cause of the Big Bang? NOTHING.
You don't exist.
User avatar #119 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
now there's a completely different argument right there. are we still on religion vs non religion, or are we now moving on to existence vs non existence?
#120 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Oh, so you don't think you exist?
User avatar #123 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i never said anything of the sort. what is your outlook on it?
#133 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
Sorry this guy is being an asshole religious guy. Most of us aren't like him.
User avatar #145 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
it's ok. i respect your beliefs, my friend. and i know many religious people who respect my beliefs, as i respect theirs. thank you for being considerate.
#126 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I believe I exist because humanity was created by God.
But if there was no cause, there was no effect. Anyone who claims the Big Bang was a cause effectively claims their own nonexistence.
User avatar #127 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
that's where i think you're wrong, my friend. anybody who believes in the big bang theory effectively claims that as the origin of their existence.
#128 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
But it's not the cause. It's the effect.
Do you have any other theory to combat my claim?
User avatar #135 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
It's infinitely harder to understand what caused the big bang occurred (And addressing a previous statement, the theory of the big bang states that there was a single molecule of infinite mass and density that collapsed into itself) just as impossible it would be to explain were god came from. Simply stating that god has always existed is a complete fallacy since everything has to come from somewhere and I think if you are going to argue where the first molecule came from you should first explain where god came from for fairness.
#194 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Someone I was arguing with before sent me a video saying that C14 dating wasn't used anymore. If you care, I can find it for you.
#158 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I don't have anything very specific at the moment, but I found this.
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/08/archeology.htm
User avatar #166 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
So archeological evidence is valid when disproving Moses yet the dinosaur bones that date back a 200 million years ago (far longer then the bible states) isn't?
#169 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Ah, here's an interesting bit.
How do you know your dating methods are accurate?
User avatar #173 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Because of carbon dating which has been scientifically proven to be accurate within a few hundred years of something that old.
How do you know the documents you believe disproves when Judaism began are accurate?
#175 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
The scientific community no longer uses C14 dating.
www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
User avatar #186 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
That's not true at all, they still do use C14 (Or K14) dating.
Also, that (very bias) source says nothing about C14 not being used.
The source also states that Carbon dating is a theory and thus discreditably. It is indeed a theory but it is a more scientifically backed up theory then anything stated in the bible. Gravity is also a theory but if I were to throw my keyboard I can guarantee that it will fall to the floor.
#153 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker
User avatar #154 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker is no clock at all.
#159 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
Obviously a reference to watchmen
User avatar #168 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Oh, then it would be "A clock without a craftsman." said by Dr. Manhattan
#142 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Again. Omnipotent. Google.
User avatar #146 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A claim of omnipotence means nothing without a show of such power. If that's the case I too am omnipotent. Prove I'm not.
User avatar #129 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
you mean your claim that god exists?
#130 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
My claim that the Big Bang could not have caused itself. That's paradoxical.
User avatar #132 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
so is the theory that god created himself, or has always been
#134 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Created himself would be, yes. How is it paradoxical that God always existed?
I think you need to find the definition of omnipotent.
User avatar #143 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Who is to say god is omnipotent? None have met god face to face but only go off the word of a book written by people who claim to have met people who met Jesus. And if god has always existed why did Judaism only appear around 1800 BC when the earth (By biblical standards) has been around 2000 years before that?
#150 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Source, please.
I think your dating is off.
User avatar #155 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Here's a few backing up when Judaism began (With Abraham as the founder)
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/religion/jewish.htm
http://www.jewfaq.org/israel.htm
www.uri.org/kids/world_juda_basi.htm

Now on the 6000 year old earth:
http://www.missiontoamerica.com/genesis/six-thousand-years.html
User avatar #140 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang have always existed as well.
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar #149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar #148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#113 - the big bang is a valid theory. i do not say that the theory o…  [+] (37 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#114 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
That's the part where I explain.
If you have a jar, completely empty, and leave it for a billion years, assuming the seal doesn't break, what happens?
User avatar #116 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
well let's see here. your generic run-of-the mill jar is going to be made of glass. typical glass is soda-lime glass, composed of about 75% silica (SiO2) plus Na2O, CaO, and several minor additives. now these could not have existed prior to the creation of the universe, because there is evidence that elements were created via the big bang. nothingness had no container. nothingness's container was nothingness. now assuming you sealed that jar on earth, it would be filled with oxygen. the nothingness that emerged from the bag bang was not oxygen. your statement has little to no valid points.
#117 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
>completely empty
Before the Big Bang, there was nothing. NOTHING.
So what was the cause of the Big Bang? NOTHING.
You don't exist.
User avatar #119 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
now there's a completely different argument right there. are we still on religion vs non religion, or are we now moving on to existence vs non existence?
#120 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Oh, so you don't think you exist?
User avatar #123 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i never said anything of the sort. what is your outlook on it?
#133 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
Sorry this guy is being an asshole religious guy. Most of us aren't like him.
User avatar #145 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
it's ok. i respect your beliefs, my friend. and i know many religious people who respect my beliefs, as i respect theirs. thank you for being considerate.
#126 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I believe I exist because humanity was created by God.
But if there was no cause, there was no effect. Anyone who claims the Big Bang was a cause effectively claims their own nonexistence.
User avatar #127 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
that's where i think you're wrong, my friend. anybody who believes in the big bang theory effectively claims that as the origin of their existence.
#128 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
But it's not the cause. It's the effect.
Do you have any other theory to combat my claim?
User avatar #135 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
It's infinitely harder to understand what caused the big bang occurred (And addressing a previous statement, the theory of the big bang states that there was a single molecule of infinite mass and density that collapsed into itself) just as impossible it would be to explain were god came from. Simply stating that god has always existed is a complete fallacy since everything has to come from somewhere and I think if you are going to argue where the first molecule came from you should first explain where god came from for fairness.
#194 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Someone I was arguing with before sent me a video saying that C14 dating wasn't used anymore. If you care, I can find it for you.
#158 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
I don't have anything very specific at the moment, but I found this.
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/08/archeology.htm
User avatar #166 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
So archeological evidence is valid when disproving Moses yet the dinosaur bones that date back a 200 million years ago (far longer then the bible states) isn't?
#169 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Ah, here's an interesting bit.
How do you know your dating methods are accurate?
User avatar #173 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Because of carbon dating which has been scientifically proven to be accurate within a few hundred years of something that old.
How do you know the documents you believe disproves when Judaism began are accurate?
#175 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
The scientific community no longer uses C14 dating.
www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
User avatar #186 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
That's not true at all, they still do use C14 (Or K14) dating.
Also, that (very bias) source says nothing about C14 not being used.
The source also states that Carbon dating is a theory and thus discreditably. It is indeed a theory but it is a more scientifically backed up theory then anything stated in the bible. Gravity is also a theory but if I were to throw my keyboard I can guarantee that it will fall to the floor.
#153 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker
User avatar #154 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A clock without a maker is no clock at all.
#159 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
Obviously a reference to watchmen
User avatar #168 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Oh, then it would be "A clock without a craftsman." said by Dr. Manhattan
#142 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Again. Omnipotent. Google.
User avatar #146 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
A claim of omnipotence means nothing without a show of such power. If that's the case I too am omnipotent. Prove I'm not.
User avatar #129 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
you mean your claim that god exists?
#130 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
My claim that the Big Bang could not have caused itself. That's paradoxical.
User avatar #132 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
so is the theory that god created himself, or has always been
#134 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Created himself would be, yes. How is it paradoxical that God always existed?
I think you need to find the definition of omnipotent.
User avatar #143 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Who is to say god is omnipotent? None have met god face to face but only go off the word of a book written by people who claim to have met people who met Jesus. And if god has always existed why did Judaism only appear around 1800 BC when the earth (By biblical standards) has been around 2000 years before that?
#150 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Source, please.
I think your dating is off.
User avatar #155 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Here's a few backing up when Judaism began (With Abraham as the founder)
www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/religion/jewish.htm
http://www.jewfaq.org/israel.htm
www.uri.org/kids/world_juda_basi.htm

Now on the 6000 year old earth:
http://www.missiontoamerica.com/genesis/six-thousand-years.html
User avatar #140 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
one may say that the means necessary to start the big bang have always existed as well.
#144 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
If an explosion is omnipotent, what happens?
I'm pretty sure I said don't say the Big Bang.
#157 - anonymous (05/16/2012) [-]
FUCK ALL OF YOU! MY LEATHER BOUND BOOK SAYS I AM RIGHT, AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER! PRAISE JEBUS, BITCH!
User avatar #149 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
i'm not saying the explosion is omnipotent. i'm not claiming that anything is omnipotent, in fact.
User avatar #148 - trimageryan (05/16/2012) [-]
Saying others can't use their own beliefs in this argument is like saying you can't say god did it.
#111 - expansion and growth cannot occur without there having origina… 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#108 - yes. and i think single cells have more than enough complexity…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn 0
#109 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Said single cells existed in the first place how, exactly?
User avatar #111 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
expansion and growth cannot occur without there having originally been smaller organisms that have reproduced at a rapid rate.
#106 - I havn't heard much about it. I do know that it is a certain t…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/16/2012 on I don't play games to learn -1
#195 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
So you're implying that said smaller organisms always existed?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olbers'_paradox
#107 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
You realize that they would need a certain complexity to be able to become more complex, right?
User avatar #108 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
yes. and i think single cells have more than enough complexity to be capable of becoming more complex via reproduction
#109 - whofortytwo (05/16/2012) [-]
Said single cells existed in the first place how, exactly?
User avatar #111 - aaronjzc (05/16/2012) [-]
expansion and growth cannot occur without there having originally been smaller organisms that have reproduced at a rapid rate.

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #39 - TheFixer (03/05/2012) [-]
well, well, well what do we have here a no good commet deleting fag... op better deliver
#38 - creamymcgee (03/05/2012) [-]
Don't forget that pony costume. DELIVER OP!! DELIVER! you have to do what you said you would when you roll. because if you don't your racist. and racist is illegal. so i'm gonna have to call the cops on you. kthxbai
Don't forget that pony costume. DELIVER OP!! DELIVER! you have to do what you said you would when you roll. because if you don't your racist. and racist is illegal. so i'm gonna have to call the cops on you. kthxbai
#40 to #38 - anonymous (03/05/2012) [-]
DO IT FAGGOT
#37 - belligerentchris **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#36 - kridane has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #28 - howuncreativeofme (09/04/2011) [-]
u croatian? :)
User avatar #29 to #28 - aaronjzc (09/04/2011) [-]
yeah u? :)
User avatar #30 to #29 - howuncreativeofme (09/04/2011) [-]
cool where in croatia? my parents are, but we're in australia now :)
User avatar #31 to #30 - aaronjzc (09/04/2011) [-]
yeah my mom and grandmother are Croatian. from Zagreb. I live in Canada, though.
User avatar #32 to #31 - howuncreativeofme (09/04/2011) [-]
nice. do u speak it?
User avatar #33 to #32 - aaronjzc (09/04/2011) [-]
not fluently. you?
User avatar #34 to #33 - howuncreativeofme (09/04/2011) [-]
yeh, my parents couldnt speak english for a long time so i always speak croatian at home
User avatar #35 to #34 - aaronjzc (09/04/2011) [-]
aah yeah my mom didn't speak english when she was a little kid.
#16 - bobJML (07/07/2011) [-]
Hey man, what's up?
User avatar #17 to #16 - aaronjzc (07/07/2011) [-]
lol not much u? (pic related?)
#18 to #17 - bobJML (07/08/2011) [-]
Good I guess, also what pic?
User avatar #19 to #18 - aaronjzc (07/08/2011) [-]
hank hill
#21 to #19 - bobJML (07/08/2011) [-]
My pictures are always related sir.
#22 to #21 - aaronjzc (07/08/2011) [-]
as are mine
User avatar #42 to #26 - jingleforth (08/21/2012) [-]
first comment I ever favorited.
#27 to #26 - bobJML (07/08/2011) [-]
It is now day 15 without any Scooby Snacks.
It is now day 15 without any Scooby Snacks.
User avatar #13 - darkoneten (06/28/2011) [-]
Your a idiot and a child. go jump off a cliff
#15 to #13 - bobJML (07/07/2011) [-]
*You're
*an
User avatar #20 to #15 - aaronjzc (07/08/2011) [-]
precisely, my good man
User avatar #14 to #13 - aaronjzc (06/28/2011) [-]
shut up bitch what the fuck was that for
#6 - bobJML (04/02/2011) [-]
How are you doing?
How are you doing?
User avatar #7 to #6 - aaronjzc (04/02/2011) [-]
Not bad, bro. And you?
#8 to #7 - bobJML (04/02/2011) [-]
Oh man I have this star, and I don't know what to do with it.
Oh man I have this star, and I don't know what to do with it.
User avatar #9 to #8 - aaronjzc (04/02/2011) [-]
Hate to tell you, man but that will probably run out soon. Just run into all the people you can:)
#3 - bobJML (02/27/2011) [-]
What's up?
User avatar #4 to #3 - aaronjzc (03/01/2011) [-]
not much hbu?
User avatar #5 to #4 - bobJML (03/01/2011) [-]
lol notta lot.
User avatar #2 - afromann (02/25/2011) [-]
the 90's comic was genius
 Friends (0)