Upload
Login or register

XanicLyoka

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 25
Date Signed Up:9/10/2010
Last Login:12/07/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#3978
Highest Content Rank:#7827
Highest Comment Rank:#1390
Content Thumbs: 270 total,  465 ,  195
Comment Thumbs: 3818 total,  4279 ,  461
Content Level Progress: 90% (9/10)
Level 26 Content: Peasant → Level 27 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 13% (13/100)
Level 237 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 238 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:0
Content Views:33828
Times Content Favorited:37 times
Total Comments Made:1795
FJ Points:4528
Favorite Tags: actual tags (4) | fail (4)

latest user's comments

#95 - Game Explanation: Having multiple currencies in the game would…  [+] (1 reply) 10/31/2016 on Economic stability level:... +4
User avatar
#109 - thechosentroll (10/31/2016) [-]
Not so much complicated as just pointless. Functionally, currencies are identical, they do the exact same shit, the only difference is whether or not a trader would accept that particular type of currency. If he accepts all currency, then it's pointless to have different types. If he only accepts one type and there's no currency exchange nearby, it's annoying as fuck to keep track of what you've got. It adds very little and can even be an annoyance.
#128 - Disney how?  [+] (1 reply) 10/30/2016 on /a/ dog bringing heat +6
User avatar
#182 - cormy (10/30/2016) [-]
Lots of animal characters who are designed to be very human-like in their intellect and priorities/morals. This makes them very easy to grow attached to as just another person.
Then there is the clearly human traits in their appearances and mannerisms.
And finally, Disney nearly ALWAYS has their characters put into romantic situations that is once again very human in its execution.

Just ask the masses how they feel about Nala, Duchess and Maid Marian. Now you might be thinking that men feeling attachment towards animated female animals has nothing to do with women getting fucked by dogs but there is a transition to be made. I think most straight men tend not to like seeing other naked men in their porn, which is why lesbians 'n' tentacle stuff are so popular and I believe the same thing applies to the animal situation. Replace ugly man with dog you don't really care for and you still get sex but you don't get the disgust of seeing another man.

I can't speak for the women here but I'm sure there are some similarities in the thoughts involved.
I think there's also just a widespread fetish for women being fucked by "beasts" in general. Big things with big dicks just going ham on them, just look up StudioFOW. Since people started spamming "Off to e621" on FJ, it's become abundantly clear that these fetishes are WAY more common than you'd think.

I think the main issue is how young a lot of people were when exposed, the feelings took hold and festered for years, emerging as an outlet for their desires in their teens if they hadn't really made many human relationships.
Like... We've got all these basement dwellers whose strongest relationships were ones experienced through other characters in media they've watched. It's like the general populace have become voyeurism experts.

But yeah... Basically... You look up to some of the characters and feel attraction for others and imagination does the rest.
I dunno man, it's weird. I can try to rationalize it but I think it really just boils down to people being horny and wanting to cement things they have thought of into reality.
I mean, physically there are differences in the sex between humans and animals, but that's only with the male dogs. There isn't really a difference when it comes to the females. So some may feel attraction to that difference. We know that priorities in sex is very different from men to women, perhaps dog sex has some characteristics that appeal more to what women look for in sex. I can think of reasons for this to be a thing, I've read and seen a lot... But of course this is mainly speculation on my part. I don't really know.
So there's your answer.
#71 - I solved it first and then double checked.  [+] (9 replies) 10/27/2016 on Alternate Ending +1
User avatar
#72 - mcmanybucks (10/27/2016) [-]
I'll just mix 2 cyphers together then ;)
#76 - dohickey (10/27/2016) [-]
Challenge accepted
User avatar
#77 - mcmanybucks (10/27/2016) [-]
ihjunws sedt, kdsje.
User avatar
#109 - dohickey (10/27/2016) [-]
Wow this is confusing, best guess is "recount this, bitch
User avatar
#110 - mcmanybucks (10/27/2016) [-]
Close, "Decrypt this, bitch"

I atbashed a caesar.. didnt think peple would get through ;P
#111 - dohickey (10/27/2016) [-]
Close enough, that's a win in my book, figuring out the number you shifted by with the ceaser was time consuming enough, combine that with another cipher that could be anything amounts to repeated mind fucks
User avatar
#113 - mcmanybucks (10/27/2016) [-]
Try my new contents cipher c: that one was fun to make
User avatar
#114 - dohickey (10/27/2016) [-]
Will do
User avatar
#112 - mcmanybucks (10/27/2016) [-]
I wanted to use a polybius square to really fuck it up but it got wierd on me
#68 - Picture  [+] (11 replies) 10/27/2016 on Alternate Ending 0
User avatar
#69 - mcmanybucks (10/27/2016) [-]
Well thats no fun..
User avatar
#71 - XanicLyoka (10/27/2016) [-]
I solved it first and then double checked.
User avatar
#72 - mcmanybucks (10/27/2016) [-]
I'll just mix 2 cyphers together then ;)
#76 - dohickey (10/27/2016) [-]
Challenge accepted
User avatar
#77 - mcmanybucks (10/27/2016) [-]
ihjunws sedt, kdsje.
User avatar
#109 - dohickey (10/27/2016) [-]
Wow this is confusing, best guess is "recount this, bitch
User avatar
#110 - mcmanybucks (10/27/2016) [-]
Close, "Decrypt this, bitch"

I atbashed a caesar.. didnt think peple would get through ;P
#111 - dohickey (10/27/2016) [-]
Close enough, that's a win in my book, figuring out the number you shifted by with the ceaser was time consuming enough, combine that with another cipher that could be anything amounts to repeated mind fucks
User avatar
#113 - mcmanybucks (10/27/2016) [-]
Try my new contents cipher c: that one was fun to make
User avatar
#114 - dohickey (10/27/2016) [-]
Will do
User avatar
#112 - mcmanybucks (10/27/2016) [-]
I wanted to use a polybius square to really fuck it up but it got wierd on me