Click to expand


Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 21
Video Games Played: DotA and all of it's bastard children
Date Signed Up:2/03/2010
Last Login:7/31/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#13258
Highest Content Rank:#11521
Highest Comment Rank:#929
Content Thumbs: 107 total,  124 ,  17
Comment Thumbs: 10976 total,  11731 ,  755
Content Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 10 Content: New Here → Level 11 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 91% (91/100)
Level 293 Comments: Post Master → Level 294 Comments: Post Master
Content Views:11503
Total Comments Made:949
FJ Points:9549
Been on the internet since i was just 6 years old and been on funnyjunk since 2007 with an account made only in 2010

latest user's comments

#10 - Implying those ******* mongols are European. 02/12/2015 on Humor Not Received -1
#70 - Picture 02/11/2015 on Too soon? +5
#8 - Poe's law. 02/11/2015 on Tumblr is becoming self aware +5
#37 - Implying people do it for "teh lulz". Peopl…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/11/2015 on Deep inside tumblr +3
User avatar #44 - trollmobile (02/11/2015) [-]
hey, at least they're not bronies.
#67 - willys (02/12/2015) [-]
#29 - I am making a scrapbook of retail robin maymays to inspire my … 02/11/2015 on Retail Robin Comp: RAGE... +1
#12 - Then he got back up and pwned him. 02/10/2015 on When you tell somebody to... +1
#18 - Damnit, whenever I read "Ayy" my mind automatically …  [+] (1 new reply) 02/10/2015 on WTF Japan? +3
User avatar #23 - kalimah (02/10/2015) [-]
Its hard to not do it nowdays...
#29 - Thing is, 3 of these are evidently true. 02/09/2015 on Words can kill -1
#49 - "Recoiless" 02/09/2015 on Newton's Third Law of Motion +1
#48 - Someone please find source to this!  [+] (1 new reply) 02/09/2015 on Newton's Third Law of Motion +1
#53 - cyberpunkdude (02/09/2015) [-]
Javelin fail! MW2 source
MW2 - Javelin Fail / Spawn Fail
#6 - "You are wasting the dick potential in that position" 02/08/2015 on The best thread /v/ ever made. +93
#14 - The judge went to ******* law school for this **** .  [+] (7 new replies) 02/06/2015 on That must be worth dozens... +162
#59 - anon (02/07/2015) [-]
It's America dude...what did you expect
User avatar #45 - rangerofthesea (02/06/2015) [-]
and yet they are making 100k plus for watching stupid shit like that...i wouldnt complain...
User avatar #21 - kiaserzerg (02/06/2015) [-]
actually, sometimes no. in some cities, all you need to be a judge is zero arrest record, and pass a 50 question true or false test.
User avatar #22 - malinko (02/06/2015) [-]
I've never been arrested but i have had the cops out to my house like 100 times when i was 20something for playing my guitar really loud.
User avatar #23 - kiaserzerg (02/06/2015) [-]
you can still be a rockin judge
#24 - malinko (02/06/2015) [-]
Fukken sweet
User avatar #31 - dorfdorfdorf (02/06/2015) [-]
we find the defendant...RADICAL *guitar solo*
#102 - The same country that voted gay marriage unconstitutional.  [+] (3 new replies) 02/05/2015 on (untitled) +13
User avatar #123 - komandantmirkoo (02/05/2015) [-]
well yes and no.

the word marriage itself was the problem with the religious right.
but gay people can still get "married" per se.
and actually the people that banned "gay marriage" are now butthurt because everyone still calls their civil unions marriages.
#109 - anon (02/05/2015) [-]
And good for them, every country should do that.
User avatar #269 - thijsofbodom (02/05/2015) [-]
care to explain why people who have sexual and romantic attractions to the same sex can't have the same rights as the ones who feel that way about the other sex?
#86 - Yeah, that's what I meant, thanks. 02/04/2015 on Object-oriented programming +1
#78 - Alright, but what's the difference between a C++ object and a …  [+] (2 new replies) 02/04/2015 on Object-oriented programming +1
User avatar #85 - Fgner (02/04/2015) [-]
You mean C++ class vs struct? A class is private by default and a struct is public by default.

You mean a C++ class/struct vs C struct?
> C doesn't support visibility restrictions.
> C doesn't support methods, although they can be implemented via function pointers.
> C doesn't support inheritence. Which, combined with above, excludes virtual methods for sure.
> C doesn't support constructors or destructors.
User avatar #86 - Tazdingo (02/04/2015) [-]
Yeah, that's what I meant, thanks.

#6 - Polandball was funny while /int/ was doing it, subtly playing … 02/04/2015 on comp +1
#304 - Seems like you made a logical error, friend. Whoops! Let me he… 02/02/2015 on Asexual +3
#207 - Agnosticism is considered preferable to atheism on this site p…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/29/2015 on Bar Joke 0
User avatar #209 - TheHutchie (01/29/2015) [-]
My point exactly. But I bet a lot of Muslims aren't exactly happy with the way people think of them based on Charlie Hebdo and all the ISIS executions. It doesn't make the worldview any more accurate, but yeah, the discrimination can send people running.
#194 - I am by all means an expert on gym and gym related topics and … 01/29/2015 on Bar Joke +1
#192 - Agnostic atheist means "I don't know whether or not there… 01/29/2015 on Bar Joke 0
#148 - Agnostic is probably the most reasonable stance. Seei…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/29/2015 on Bar Joke 0
#164 - sequencefour (01/29/2015) [-]
Then you are a agnostic catholic. Admitting that there are no absolutes, especially in regards to metaphysics have nothing to about you believing or not believing in a certain god/religion.
#13 - Assuming the hole is empty with vaccuum and the Earth is perfe…  [+] (3 new replies) 01/29/2015 on Earth Facts +33
User avatar #99 - serpens (01/30/2015) [-]
Also an Important note, is the rotation of the earth. It must also be at the poles, or the earth must stop spinning for this jump. There is also likely a slightly more dense side of the earth, and if this were substantial enough you would not go all the way through (if the greater mass was in line with the hole and on the side of the planet you jumped from), go too far out the other side of the hole (If the greater mass was in line with the hole but on the opposite side of the planet from where you jumped), or crash into a wall regardless of whether the earth was rotating (If the mass was not in line with the hole)

I'll do the math in the next comment to show how long it would take if the mass of the earth stayed in tact and all the above assumptions (in my and tadzingo's comment are fulfilled. (most importantly the vacuum)
User avatar #104 - serpens (01/30/2015) [-]
First the numbers. The diameter of the earth is 12,720 Km from pole to pole (aproximately), the acceleration from gravity on earth at the north pole is 9.834 m/s^2.
There are very important mathematical calculations left out due to simplicity's sake that involve the increase of mass behind you as you accellerate through the ground, for our purposes I will exclude those forcesuntil the other side of the earth where they become the force that slow you down (faster than your acceleration.) If I can calculate them later (again assuming a homogeneous Earth uncondensed by gravity) I will and it will be the appropriate time.

I'll convert the distance to meters for the acceleration and divide by 2 to calculate only the period in which it is becoming faster. = 6,360,000m
If accelerating at a natural velocity for the altitude (measured by the distance to the center of mass from where you jump in) it would take you (D = .5*a*T^2 for T) 1137s

Again, assuming you were not being slowed down by the increasing earth behind you, you simply double the time (given the assumptions earlier) due to the same acceleration slowing you down now you get (1137*2)/60= 37.9 min

This is the amount of time it would take for you to move through the earth given that you only use the theoretical gravity singularity at the earth's center of mass. If I have the time I'll calculate the other stuff assuming a homogeneous density to the earth.

User avatar #105 - serpens (01/30/2015) [-]
Gah, I'm too tired for this, I would need to find how to apply the mass being left behind in the dome to the 9.834m/s^2. To do this I could take the central angle to take the ratio of the distance covered to the distance yet to be covered. This would have the added bonus of ending naturally when the 2 accelerations cancelled each other out and you had a velocity of 0m/s. I just don't know how to start with the one end having no mass and a central angle of 0 degrees (this makes sense but from here I need to find the algebra to apply to the 9.834x), I could figure it out but I should have been asleep hours ago. Thought I'd tell you what I'd been thinking though, maybe someone could finish this for me, it's hardly calculus. (But for all I know I'll come back to this tomorrow and the answer is just something pathetically easy and I've been rambling over nothing for an hour.)
#218 - Dear God, this **** is spilling over into real life. 01/27/2015 on Mail Time +14
#319 - Such as yours. 01/26/2015 on It's my party, and I'll lie... +1
#13 - If the guy didn't make jokes for at least two hours while play… 01/26/2015 on Merry Christmas +4


Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 600
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#4 - jonnyfrosty (03/09/2015) [-]
Tazdingo, mon
Tazdingo, mon
User avatar #3 - adunsaveme (09/29/2014) [-]

 Friends (0)