|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #4426 on CommentsLevel 271 Comments: Ninja Pirate
OfflineSend mail to Tazdingo Block Tazdingo Invite Tazdingo to be your friend flag avatar
Been on the internet since i was just 6 years old and been on funnyjunk since 2007 with an account made only in 2010
latest user's comments
|#19 - Comment deleted||08/19/2014 on Johnny Depp||-2|
|#12 - Comment deleted [+] (2 new replies)||08/19/2014 on Johnny Depp||0|
|#61 - "The exception does not prove the rule." Wh…||08/18/2014 on What a bright future :D||-2|
|#56 - "But if we let Hitler have Alsace-Lorraine he will surely… [+] (2 new replies)||08/18/2014 on What a bright future :D||-3|
#58 - anonymous (08/18/2014) [-]
The exception does not prove the rule.
Also, Britain and France were in not too good positions for war. They had trouble in parts of their empires, and the populace did not want another war. So the politicians stuck to the appeasement policy.
#61 - Tazdingo (08/18/2014) [-]
"The exception does not prove the rule."
Which is exactly why we should not conform to accept something just because the odds of an unfavorable event happening are extremely low and should reserve the right to say "Yeah, the worst is highly unlikely to happen, but I'm not willing to risk it anyway.". Especially if it comes in the 'foot in the door' form.
|#46 - What possible excuse could exist for "depends"? [+] (1 new reply)||08/13/2014 on Gave me a chuckle||+21|
|#54 - >pic Meanwhile Israel has nuclear armaments capab… [+] (12 new replies)||08/01/2014 on Threats right off the bat||-1|
#103 - anonymoose (08/01/2014) [-]
They're attacking people in a county that was made against their will in their own land and forced them out of their own homes. Palestine was 100% okay with having Jews having a controlled migration into their land, but the zionists were not okay with this and wanted partition (and admitted with the intent to build up a force and take the rest of the land).
They have no right to that land other than "but people were mean to jews in the past". That's no excuse to rob land and kill children.
#106 - anonymoose (08/01/2014) [-]
The Palestinians were for controlled migration of jews into their land. They got forced occupation. I live in Northern Ireland and have seen first hand what forced occupation can do to a country. I see the scars of it most days of my life. I still have to change my name in certain areas because it's a known "irish" name.
Forced occupation will always lead to violence.
#108 - usarmyexplain (08/01/2014) [-]
The violence started before they were even a country. Northern Ireland is different, I can respect the IRA, because they fought an aggressive and determined campaign to free their people. I cannot respect Hamas or or the PLO because they fight for an unattainable objective and use civilians as shields.
#110 - anonymoose (08/01/2014) [-]
IDF use humans as shield. You have no problem with them. I showed you pictures, as much pictures as you'd find of Hamas using human shields. Tying children to their armoured vehicles, like that would even make a sliver of difference when it comes to defending the vehicle. Scum.
#112 - usarmyexplain (08/01/2014) [-]
I saw two pictures of somebody being detained and one of somebody sitting on the windshield of a vehicle unrestrained.
The ones with the man tied and blindfolded, the IDF soldier is standing over him in a protective posture, covering him between the wall and his own body. The IDF soldier appears to be maintaining an aggressive stance toward any possible threats in the area. You can even see in the second picture that he is moving his detainee down towards the ground, a safer position than sitting upright, as he moves himself to the side and partially in front of the detained man.
The kid sitting on the vehicle does not appear to be bound or restrained, and would not be an effective human shield since he is blocking the drivers's view. The vehicle does not appear to be moving, as you can see the open door of another vehicle and a dismounted IDF soldier in the foreground.
I fail to see anything provocative in those images.
#114 - usarmyexplain (08/02/2014) [-]
A lot of militaires make it SOP to blindfold prisoners in an asymetric envryonment. An un-blindfolded prisoner would be able to call out locations, numbers, status of the people arresting him like who is wounded , if they are looking for everyone else, when they separate or move, ect. Basically a prisoner, while at your mercy, can really fuck you up if you do not handle him properly. It seems cruel, but it's the best option in most cases, additionally, when you detain somebody in a fluid situation like that, you are responsible for their safety. To me, somebody who had been in that situation before, the IDF soldier.
I've never even seen that picture before, I was referring to this one, you can see the kids on the building. In later photographs, child side bodies show up wearing the same cloths as those two kids.
#113 - anonymoose (08/02/2014) [-]
If the second person was being protected by the IDF, why isn't he behind them, why is he blindfolded?
<- Also, the main picture of Hamas using a human shield, they're clearly not in open combat and it DOES actually look like the person is simply being forced away from somewhere.
|#9 - Pussy.||07/31/2014 on they forgot 2 key ingredients||0|
|#11 - Except your friends dont wanna spend time in a half empty club…||07/28/2014 on New funny shirt message of...||0|
|#24 - ITT: post yf when you see newfags hopelessly trying to reeduca… [+] (5 new replies)||07/25/2014 on (untitled)||+8|
|#13 - By the highest price you'd be willing to pay for someone to st…||07/25/2014 on The value of a tree||+3|