| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Channels |
| User Rankings |
Sethorein
| Rank #430 on Comments  Level 319 Comments: Wizard Online  Send mail to Sethorein Block Sethorein Invite Sethorein to be your friend flag avatar |
|
- Text/Links 16
- Pictures 18
- YouTube 10
- Animated Gifs 2
- Favorites 83
- Friends2 new155
- Comments405 new19675
- Channels 8
- All 19973
- Views: 27089
449 
94
Total: +355
Comments: 93
Favorites: 45
Uploaded: 12/26/11
(MC) The Doll - Views: 12704
202 29
Total: +173
Comments: 25
Favorites: 20
Uploaded: 12/26/11
The Waitress - Views: 9887
140 12
Total: +128
Comments: 58
Favorites: 28
Uploaded: 12/27/11
Sleep Paralysis - Views: 6105
125 7
Total: +118
Comments: 38
Favorites: 17
Uploaded: 12/27/11
(MC) I'm Not Afraid of the Dark - Views: 9169
126 13
Total: +113
Comments: 24
Favorites: 11
Uploaded: 12/26/11
Mommy Dearest - Views: 4721
58 5
Total: +53
Comments: 28
Favorites: 1
Uploaded: 07/30/12
A Proposition
- Views: 5372
123 85
Total: +38
Comments: 25
Favorites: 5
Uploaded: 03/09/12
Most Recent Luna Sketch - Views: 2892
44 7
Total: +37
Comments: 7
Favorites: 8
Uploaded: 06/29/12
Just Glorious /b/... - Views: 1880
61 32
Total: +29
Comments: 38
Favorites: 1
Uploaded: 03/02/12
Bored, why not sketch? - Views: 6138
31 8
Total: +23
Comments: 0
Favorites: 10
Uploaded: 02/11/10
Pedolympics? - Views: 1417
52 30
Total: +22
Comments: 21
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 03/04/12
Pinky Pie Welcoming a Red Shirt... - Views: 5160
24 2
Total: +22
Comments: 0
Favorites: 2
Uploaded: 02/12/10
Does this ever Happen to you?
- Views: 3369
84 35
Total: +49
Comments: 22
Favorites: 16
Uploaded: 03/05/12
You'll be in my heart PMV - Views: 3920
72 24
Total: +48
Comments: 22
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 04/08/12
Polish Ponies xD - Views: 2225
17 3
Total: +14
Comments: 23
Favorites: 3
Uploaded: 01/08/12
(MC) A Morbid Lullabye - Views: 1105
19 6
Total: +13
Comments: 3
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 02/27/12
ADMIN AT THE OSCARS - Views: 1211
14 3
Total: +11
Comments: 2
Favorites: 3
Uploaded: 07/30/12
An Orgasm for your Ears - Views: 753
7 0
Total: +7
Comments: 5
Favorites: 2
Uploaded: 01/25/12
Meanwhile in Russia...
- Views: 4606
50 13
Total: +37
Comments: 13
Favorites: 4
Uploaded: 02/06/12
Doggy Doing What Now? - Views: 659
7 3
Total: +4
Comments: 3
Favorites: 1
Uploaded: 05/17/11
WOMD
Show:
Sort by:
Order:
user favorites
Daddy-sama
A Whole Two Days
Well that changes...
Wavy Seals.
need some help?
Cute
sir bearington
Buttjobs
Cake
Are you feeling...latest user's comments
user's channels
user's friends
Show:
Sort by:
Order:
items
Total unique items point value: 555 / Total items point value: 2235
- x3
- x1
- x2
- x3
- x5
- x17
- x17
- x3
- x15
- x1
#428
-
wiredguy (03/03/2014) [-] okay, no really
for one, I'm sorry.
like I said, I'm not feeling great, and I snapped.
but secondly, and totally seriously.
in what way can I be out of line, if I don't even do anything? take no action whatsoever?
could you still think I was out of line then? Because that's what's going to happen, nothing. I just wanted to rant...
for one, I'm sorry.
like I said, I'm not feeling great, and I snapped.
but secondly, and totally seriously.
in what way can I be out of line, if I don't even do anything? take no action whatsoever?
could you still think I was out of line then? Because that's what's going to happen, nothing. I just wanted to rant...
#430 to #428
-
Sethorein ONLINE (03/03/2014) [-] you asked if you were out of line with your view on the matter. Perhaps I used poor phrasing. Your issue was a non-issue. What he did is a perfectly normal occurence. It shouldn't have bothered you. Note: it didn't bother anyone else.
By that same token you're still allowed to have whatever emotions you do have. I was only warning you against taking any action based on them because to the public, you're the one who was reading too much into the situation and letting it get to you. Like I said a bunch of times. **** happens, that's life. Either you learn to accept that people are flawed or you'll go mad searching for someone who won't disappoint you.
By that same token you're still allowed to have whatever emotions you do have. I was only warning you against taking any action based on them because to the public, you're the one who was reading too much into the situation and letting it get to you. Like I said a bunch of times. **** happens, that's life. Either you learn to accept that people are flawed or you'll go mad searching for someone who won't disappoint you.
#432 to #430
-
wiredguy (03/03/2014) [-] it is normal, but so is execution by stoning in many countries, *shrug*
that doesn't make it okay
and they weren't bothered because they don't have feelings for him.
he promised me, to my face. twice, once before and once after she called him. You're saying that promises mean nothing? no, in the very least, you make a promise to ensure that someone has a reason to be mad when you break it.
I won't be mad, though. I can't. I just melt when I see him.
**** does happen, but we can be pissed at people who directly cause **** .
but whatever, alright.
I hope you have a good night, mate.
that doesn't make it okay
and they weren't bothered because they don't have feelings for him.
he promised me, to my face. twice, once before and once after she called him. You're saying that promises mean nothing? no, in the very least, you make a promise to ensure that someone has a reason to be mad when you break it.
I won't be mad, though. I can't. I just melt when I see him.
**** does happen, but we can be pissed at people who directly cause **** .
but whatever, alright.
I hope you have a good night, mate.
#434 to #432
-
Sethorein ONLINE (03/03/2014) [-] Can't go equating stoning to breaking a promise there bud. It's like comparing apples to oranges. I'm talking about Western Countries with Western ideals
Promises indicate intention. He definitely intended not to **** up. He still ****** up though. The thing is, it's not that big a **** up. You happen to have feelings for him which is why you care so deeply, but like you said, to your friends who don't this was a non-issue.
Drink tea. Clear your head. Consider tonight as if nothing happened.
Promises indicate intention. He definitely intended not to **** up. He still ****** up though. The thing is, it's not that big a **** up. You happen to have feelings for him which is why you care so deeply, but like you said, to your friends who don't this was a non-issue.
Drink tea. Clear your head. Consider tonight as if nothing happened.
#436 to #434
-
wiredguy (03/03/2014) [-] okay, you don't like hyperbole.
adultery, cheating. happens all the time, happened to multiple friends of mine. that makes it normal, mathematically.
but, definitely not a nice thing to do.
not when they're a lie.
I think that at some level below the surface, he definitely knew he wouldn't see me again that day.
But I can see more where you're coming from here, and you're right, it is my fault entirely, I just shouldn't care... but then that just makes me feel guilty on top of everything else, which isn't great.
again, all of this makes no difference to how I treat him, at all. I'm an objective person.
Coffee, actually. but you're right, thanks.
you've handled me well, hah. I feel like a stroppy child again.
see you around, man.
adultery, cheating. happens all the time, happened to multiple friends of mine. that makes it normal, mathematically.
but, definitely not a nice thing to do.
not when they're a lie.
I think that at some level below the surface, he definitely knew he wouldn't see me again that day.
But I can see more where you're coming from here, and you're right, it is my fault entirely, I just shouldn't care... but then that just makes me feel guilty on top of everything else, which isn't great.
again, all of this makes no difference to how I treat him, at all. I'm an objective person.
Coffee, actually. but you're right, thanks.
you've handled me well, hah. I feel like a stroppy child again.
see you around, man.
#420 to #419
-
Sethorein ONLINE (02/23/2014) [-] I was an avid advocate for being less faggy. Back in the day when the channel spammed like 60 - 80 posts a day which got floated to 60 - 100 thumbs flooding the 2nd page of top content with pony content... I liked the show and community but god damn if it didn't bug me when I'd see "lovesmylittlepony" posting 30 mylittlebrony pictures per day.
Those were fun days. Heh.
Those were fun days. Heh.
#409
-
revengeforfreeze (01/19/2014) [-] Don't think .. less of me for that ********* please :|
I at least tried, even though (according to them) I didn't do very good.. I don't really care that much.. it's the internet
I respect you though and value your opinion
I at least tried, even though (according to them) I didn't do very good.. I don't really care that much.. it's the internet
I respect you though and value your opinion
#408
-
Sethorein ONLINE (01/14/2014) [-] Name: Fhalynn Waveharp aka Reckless Waveharp
Occupation: Infiltrator
Born of mother: ********* Glimmergaunt
Born of father: Kreveak Waveharp
Born of a rogue and ranger Fhalynn found little joy in books and sewing as a child. She would make a habit of trying to sneak behind her father on his jobs, earning her the nickname "Reckless Waveharp". As she got older she apprenticed under her father's band and learned the ways of an infiltrator. Getting in and getting out without anyone the wiser became her trade. Her relationship with her mother may not have been quite as strong as with her father, though it was still strong. Her mother would come and go, disappearing for months on one of her great hunts. When her mother was absent for a particularly long time, you could find Fhalynn spending a great deal of time at the shrines dedicated to the forest guardian, her mother's deity.
...I think that's good for now... might expand on that later...
Occupation: Infiltrator
Born of mother: ********* Glimmergaunt
Born of father: Kreveak Waveharp
Born of a rogue and ranger Fhalynn found little joy in books and sewing as a child. She would make a habit of trying to sneak behind her father on his jobs, earning her the nickname "Reckless Waveharp". As she got older she apprenticed under her father's band and learned the ways of an infiltrator. Getting in and getting out without anyone the wiser became her trade. Her relationship with her mother may not have been quite as strong as with her father, though it was still strong. Her mother would come and go, disappearing for months on one of her great hunts. When her mother was absent for a particularly long time, you could find Fhalynn spending a great deal of time at the shrines dedicated to the forest guardian, her mother's deity.
...I think that's good for now... might expand on that later...
#387
-
mangioluingi ONLINE (01/03/2014) [-] I didn't like being over there... it was all cluttered...
#258
-
reliquishedpooper (10/26/2013) [-] Yo, you're a colossal ****** .
What's your response, to cry ad hominem?
Of course.
It's easy to do, and this time it's correct. Not like last time where you used it in place of "name calling" to try to just cry because the opponent was calling you names. Can't take name calling? This is the internet, the rules of formal engagement are slacked unless in some debate-specific location, so unless it's alone or comprising of over half of what's being said, then it's really meaningless to resort to pointing out the opponent's use of it.
Now personally, I'm tired of seeing smugfags like kanade just throw around fallacies that aren't there and then try to dismiss arguments as irrelevent, especially since mentioned smugfags are stupid as balls-on-tits and make more fallacies than they proclaim.
Now, I can tell that you want to be at the religion board for a while, and I'm tired of seeing it go to non-lulzy cancer where smugfags parade and stroke their own **** and believe it. Let's do both of us a favor. Let's make you better than kanade, 8, and maybe even clev3rguy. Don't mention any names.
So, sit your bitchtits the **** down, cause we're going to non-ironically learn some logical fallacies, how to use them, and how to spot them, ***** .
What's your response, to cry ad hominem?
Of course.
It's easy to do, and this time it's correct. Not like last time where you used it in place of "name calling" to try to just cry because the opponent was calling you names. Can't take name calling? This is the internet, the rules of formal engagement are slacked unless in some debate-specific location, so unless it's alone or comprising of over half of what's being said, then it's really meaningless to resort to pointing out the opponent's use of it.
Now personally, I'm tired of seeing smugfags like kanade just throw around fallacies that aren't there and then try to dismiss arguments as irrelevent, especially since mentioned smugfags are stupid as balls-on-tits and make more fallacies than they proclaim.
Now, I can tell that you want to be at the religion board for a while, and I'm tired of seeing it go to non-lulzy cancer where smugfags parade and stroke their own **** and believe it. Let's do both of us a favor. Let's make you better than kanade, 8, and maybe even clev3rguy. Don't mention any names.
So, sit your bitchtits the **** down, cause we're going to non-ironically learn some logical fallacies, how to use them, and how to spot them, ***** .
#260 to #259
-
reliquishedpooper (10/26/2013) [-] That's right. The last time I taught someone on this site something, I taught *************** how to proxy. He taught lulzforsandyhook, who talked with trapper an other proxyfags at the time, and then the religion board had -45 thumbs for days.
Lesson number 1. Ad hominem is baby's first logical fallacy. It's easy to identify effectively and use.
Ad hominem is different than Name Calling, the fallacy that I used but was incorrectly identified. The Ad Hominem fallacy is used to discredit an opponent's position through a characteristic rather than his or her own argument.
Take, for example, if you glance at www.funnyjunk.com/religion/44102#44102 you'll notice Kanade's attack on teo's political party rather than his ideas. While this example uses an atheist-on-theist example of fallacy... get used to it and don't be buttmad. Kanade is an atheist, and is stupid as **** , so he's a prime example of stupid **** not to say.
However, there are times when ad hominem is appropriate to use (not primarily), as when the opponent's stance offers them no real authority in the topic. Always try to avoid logical fallacies in formal settings, but the fact remains that certain positions, such as a virgin 13 year old boy trying to relate to childbirth, hinder the presenter's argument by default. This is extremely rare.
Lesson number 1. Ad hominem is baby's first logical fallacy. It's easy to identify effectively and use.
Ad hominem is different than Name Calling, the fallacy that I used but was incorrectly identified. The Ad Hominem fallacy is used to discredit an opponent's position through a characteristic rather than his or her own argument.
Take, for example, if you glance at www.funnyjunk.com/religion/44102#44102 you'll notice Kanade's attack on teo's political party rather than his ideas. While this example uses an atheist-on-theist example of fallacy... get used to it and don't be buttmad. Kanade is an atheist, and is stupid as **** , so he's a prime example of stupid **** not to say.
However, there are times when ad hominem is appropriate to use (not primarily), as when the opponent's stance offers them no real authority in the topic. Always try to avoid logical fallacies in formal settings, but the fact remains that certain positions, such as a virgin 13 year old boy trying to relate to childbirth, hinder the presenter's argument by default. This is extremely rare.
#262 to #261
-
rebornpooper (10/26/2013) [-] Note about fallacy by fallacy:
I really don't think I have to explain what it is, but it's dismissing an opponent's argument as crap because it contains a fallacy. Memorizing a long list of fallacies can help, and it makes referencing them and utilizing/identifying them easier and quicker, but actually pulling up a list of common fallacies on Wikipedia helps to. The fallacy-by-fallacy game is less about knowing what is a fallacy and what could be a fallacy if you aren't an encyclopedia. This is the Information Age. Nobody will give a **** unless you're in an irl setting if you look up a list on google and align the opponent's logic up with something there to identify a fallacy. If you really are an atheist, then skepticism should be something that you've been introduced to at least once. Don't just be skeptic of the opponent's argument, be skeptic of the opponent's flow of logic in the argument.
Ironically, the fallacy-by-fallacy method is a mediocre one to play on this site because the current metagame of people are too deluded in their own ******** to recognize where their logic is broken just by giving them a fancy Latin term. Sometimes you have to explain why what they're saying is full of **** . This may not make the opponent shut the **** up as long as pride is on the line, but it does make the argument better on the readers.
Speaking of arguing, how about this bitchin' chart made by a programmer, huh? Before reviewing a response in quality, you may want to consider how effective the nature of it is in countering your argument. This doesn't guarantee a victory in debating (and in flame wars, the opponent will almost always be too stupid to know when he or she has lost and continue on five or so posts after all of the lulz and worth-while discussion are gone), as if the rebuttal is still incorrect then it still sucks, but it gives you a pretty good idea of where to start placing bragging rights and talking-down-to in response to the opponent.
I really don't think I have to explain what it is, but it's dismissing an opponent's argument as crap because it contains a fallacy. Memorizing a long list of fallacies can help, and it makes referencing them and utilizing/identifying them easier and quicker, but actually pulling up a list of common fallacies on Wikipedia helps to. The fallacy-by-fallacy game is less about knowing what is a fallacy and what could be a fallacy if you aren't an encyclopedia. This is the Information Age. Nobody will give a **** unless you're in an irl setting if you look up a list on google and align the opponent's logic up with something there to identify a fallacy. If you really are an atheist, then skepticism should be something that you've been introduced to at least once. Don't just be skeptic of the opponent's argument, be skeptic of the opponent's flow of logic in the argument.
Ironically, the fallacy-by-fallacy method is a mediocre one to play on this site because the current metagame of people are too deluded in their own ******** to recognize where their logic is broken just by giving them a fancy Latin term. Sometimes you have to explain why what they're saying is full of **** . This may not make the opponent shut the **** up as long as pride is on the line, but it does make the argument better on the readers.
Speaking of arguing, how about this bitchin' chart made by a programmer, huh? Before reviewing a response in quality, you may want to consider how effective the nature of it is in countering your argument. This doesn't guarantee a victory in debating (and in flame wars, the opponent will almost always be too stupid to know when he or she has lost and continue on five or so posts after all of the lulz and worth-while discussion are gone), as if the rebuttal is still incorrect then it still sucks, but it gives you a pretty good idea of where to start placing bragging rights and talking-down-to in response to the opponent.
#237 to #236
-
Sethorein ONLINE (10/23/2013) [-] I'm living with 5 of my friends... I'm friends with 3 girls in neuro... 4 folks in research... pretty much everyone on my fencing team so add 15 to that... my friends from last year add another 10... some friends I made earlier on in cognition lecture... that's another 4...
41 friends I guess
41 friends I guess
#246 to #243
-
Sethorein ONLINE (10/23/2013) [-] I just googled it... is it the stupid ******* zimbardo experiment? That was a garbage experiment and anyone who derives their understanding of human morality from it is really really doing themselves a disservice.
The experimenter was a participant in the bloody experiment for goodness sake...
The experimenter was a participant in the bloody experiment for goodness sake...
#248 to #247
-
Sethorein ONLINE (10/23/2013) [-] It's not your fault... I only learned it was stupid in 2nd year uni. It's one of those perpetuated myths like the idea of the 3 different kinds of learners. There's nobody on this planet who is solely kinesthetic, visual, or auditory in their learning... it's just a hoax to sell books... like that stupid "you only use 10% of your brain" junk... guh... These are the things that make me cringe.
#245 to #244
-
revengeforfreeze (10/23/2013) [-] I guess you could say that. It's about how people turn evil.
You could say it's something like this: Authority of person X and dehumanization of person Y = Person X = Evil
If you catch my drift
Watch Phillip Zombardo videos about it, he also has something cool about the psychology of time orientation.
You could say it's something like this: Authority of person X and dehumanization of person Y = Person X = Evil
If you catch my drift
Watch Phillip Zombardo videos about it, he also has something cool about the psychology of time orientation.
#223 to #222
-
Sethorein ONLINE (10/21/2013) [-] Something like that. It talks about the wave/particle nature of the electron. Part of that wave-like nature is that observation dictates where the electron will occupy space at a specific moment. However, in reality it occupies all of its possible moments all of the time.
#226 to #225
-
revengeforfreeze (10/21/2013) [-] Yeah I was interested in psychology too for a while, tried diagnosing whom of my mates were psycho/socio when they were kids.
I also spend some time interested in archetypes and the collective unconscious, do you know anything about that?
I also spend some time interested in archetypes and the collective unconscious, do you know anything about that?
