Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Age: 22
Date Signed Up:2/18/2010
Location:United States of America
Comment Ranking:#327
Highest Content Rank:#6104
Highest Comment Rank:#316
Content Thumbs: 90 total,  120 ,  30
Comment Thumbs: 37979 total,  44668 ,  6689
Content Level Progress: 80% (4/5)
Level 5 Content: New Here → Level 6 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 40.69% (407/1000)
Level 333 Comments: Practically Famous → Level 334 Comments: Practically Famous
Content Views:6513
Times Content Favorited:3 times
Total Comments Made:10882
FJ Points:20619

  • Views: 5961
    Thumbs Up 84 Thumbs Down 10 Total: +74
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 11/25/14
    Sexy Twins Sexy Twins
  • Views: 1727
    Thumbs Up 19 Thumbs Down 11 Total: +8
    Comments: 7
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 12/11/10
    Troll Math Troll Math

latest user's comments

#306 - why don't you ever do it then  [+] (1 reply) 6 hours ago on My Candidate is Better than... -1
#312 - skelebones (2 hours ago) [-]
Because like anon said youre just a shill. Youd invite your jidf buddies to the party and shit all over the debate like uncivilized monkey niggers.
tell me im wrong.
#14 - The point is that if you tell an entire population of people t…  [+] (5 replies) 12 hours ago on Gasatl Budidiar Foplav +3
#23 - anon (10 hours ago) [-]
So you're saying that literally the entire population of muslims are terrorists.
I know leftists are dumb but holy shit dude
User avatar
#61 - scorcho (5 hours ago) [-]
where did he say that?
even a 5 year old could get the point better than you.
User avatar
#55 - Ruspanic (5 hours ago) [-]
No that's not what I'm saying, and I don't see what this has to do with "leftists".
Why do people like you believe that Muslims are anti-West? Because you see statements and actions made by various Muslims against the West, and consequently believe that all of them are like that. And as a result you're far more likely to support military action or even violence against Muslims, as well as other measures such as banning Muslims.
The same exact thing applies the other way around. If Western politicians, Western media and Western individuals attack Muslims, invade Muslim countries, push for anti-Muslim policies etc, they're going to cause some resentment and make people think that maybe the anti-Western fighters have it right. The terrorist group Al-Shabaab literally used clips from a Donald Trump speech in one of its recruitment videos.
Many terrorists are not radical because they were raised with extremely draconian religious beliefs to begin with. They become radicalized, often because they come to believe that their people or their religion is under threat and they have to defend it. The Iraq War has done wonders for terrorist groups' recruitment capabilities.
#36 - anon (9 hours ago) [-]
Everyone will fight back when you push them for long enough. Christians and jews has been doing it to muslims for the last 100 years. Considering the amount of backlash they've got muslims really are peaceful. Or more likely, can't really fight back. And there comes "terrorism" in play.
User avatar
#22 - WutsAtroll (11 hours ago) [-]
nobody (except racists) are against the people, they're against the shitty ideas that they hold
#208 - I'm going to take one last shot, but I don't think I'm going t…  [+] (1 reply) 13 hours ago on The world should love Trump 0
User avatar
#209 - thegamepixel (12 hours ago) [-]
In general it seems you take a moment where Trump is being vague and try to over-specify it to show a lie. Trump speaks very plainly and assumptions get us nowhere.

1. No, he said he was not in favor of Libya, which could be interpreted your way or interpreted as he was not in favor of the way Libya was done and never spoke on if he was in favor of the way it was done. I don't know why every time he clarifies you call it an excuse. The difference is that Trump explains his clarification, whilst Hillary simply changes stances like on gay marriage and the TPP and border control...

2. Again, he could have not wrote it or wrote it afterwards. But if you want to call this a lie, that's fine.

3. You can prove a negative. For example, if you claimed I was a child molester and raped a child at X date and time, I could prove I didn't by showing street cam footage that I was not there. If, for example, you could prove Cruz was somewhere else or the man pictured spoke out that it was him, then you could prove the negative. However, with your current evidence you cannot prove the negative and there is evidence to support my claim, meaning that it's possibly true, not definitely false. This is not a court and it is not false until proven true. There are levels of plausibility.

4. Well it didn't include what he was responding to, which is context.

6. Sure, I concede this point.

7. Sorry, I was multi-tasking at the time. I think you can assume what I meant to say. Even the left-wing fact-checking sites quote it, so I would say it plausibly exists as a legitimate quote.

8. You're right, it wasn't said in the debate. I re-listened to the quote and while he is referencing the debate beforehand it is not clear if he is in the 90% sentence, which is my mistake. Yes, it's a technicality, but it's important not to put words into people's mouths when examining the statements' validity.
It doesn't matter who Trump was referring to, there could be rich people in the crowd. It's not important. What's important is the number and before Sanders said what you quoted, he had considered 90%. Also, your video intentionally takes out the part where Hank Green shows Sanders actually puts 10mil+ taxes at 77%.

10. In a world where he didn't clearly hear the question and meant that he knew nothing about David Duke in regards to the question.

11. Okay, so we've resolved this one.

13. We want to help the world but we can't do that if we can't pay for it. This is now an ideological argument and not one based on the validity of Trump's statement, but I'm happy to have that discussion if you'd like.

14. Technically correct is the best kind of correct.

Overall, I've said you were right in him lying a couple of times and even if we could the rest of these unresolved ones, I wouldn't characterize that as "Trump answers only to himself. If he really cared about the American people he wouldn't lie to them every 5 minutes." I am glad that you brought this video to my attention rather than the politifact articles, or the reposted list of lies I've debunked a few times now, so thank you for that.
[ 10874 Total ]