x
Click to expand

RugbyKing

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:2/14/2010
Last Login:10/18/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 4358 total,  4952 ,  594
Comment Thumbs: 1367 total,  1732 ,  365
Content Level Progress: 56.99% (57/100)
Level 143 Content: Faptastic → Level 144 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 67% (67/100)
Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:2
Content Views:57276
Times Content Favorited:348 times
Total Comments Made:545
FJ Points:5743
Favorite Tags: i (3) | the (3) | The Tags (2) | to (2)

latest user's comments

#273 - >looks for an excuse to use a meme >Looks like an as… 03/14/2012 on Eggcelent +2
#169 - Have YOU read the bible? God is a terrible being.  [+] (2 new replies) 03/07/2012 on The bible seems legit... -5
User avatar #180 - redwolfradolf (03/07/2012) [-]
are you an athiest?
#179 - schifter (03/07/2012) [-]
oh hey man, you trolling too?
#155 - Leviticus 18:22 1 Timothy 2:12 /thread  [+] (4 new replies) 03/07/2012 on The bible seems legit... -4
User avatar #161 - redwolfradolf (03/07/2012) [-]
Your point is?
User avatar #169 - RugbyKing (03/07/2012) [-]
Have YOU read the bible? God is a terrible being.
User avatar #180 - redwolfradolf (03/07/2012) [-]
are you an athiest?
#179 - schifter (03/07/2012) [-]
oh hey man, you trolling too?
#151 - The arguments are getting old? I think that's another way of s…  [+] (8 new replies) 03/07/2012 on The bible seems legit... -6
User avatar #154 - redwolfradolf (03/07/2012) [-]
Have you read the bible?
Jesus never pulled any punches. he called the pharasses a "Brood of vipers"
We're called to be like him.
But i've already had one religious argumane today and I'm going to bed.
If you really care that much, get back to me tomorrow.
User avatar #263 - RandomAnonGuy (03/07/2012) [-]
He burned a bush for not bearing him fruit when he asked it to. Does that cont as pulling a punch?
User avatar #461 - redwolfradolf (03/07/2012) [-]
do you know what the phrase "Pulling your punches" means?
It means to soften your words (if used figuratively, but it can also be literal).
So when Jesus withered the tree (wasn't a bush, didn't burn it.) it was to make a point to his disciples about being passive.
User avatar #155 - RugbyKing (03/07/2012) [-]
Leviticus 18:22

1 Timothy 2:12

/thread
User avatar #161 - redwolfradolf (03/07/2012) [-]
Your point is?
User avatar #169 - RugbyKing (03/07/2012) [-]
Have YOU read the bible? God is a terrible being.
User avatar #180 - redwolfradolf (03/07/2012) [-]
are you an athiest?
#179 - schifter (03/07/2012) [-]
oh hey man, you trolling too?
#1 - lol 03/02/2012 on Comment WIN 0
#130 - but battletoads is actually a game, what about the one guy who… 03/02/2012 on BATTLETOADS! +4
#51 - :48 ROH! 02/29/2012 on Synchronized Laughing Twins 0
#396 - Thumbed down, dont tell me what to do, ill thumb you if youre … 02/28/2012 on Don't let this get lost in... -6
#31 - Hes like the new Dsend, ****** comics, and all name. Su… 02/25/2012 on Seanessy... 0
#146 - sperm actually doesnt live that long. As soon as it dries up i…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/19/2012 on Always wash ur hands +1
User avatar #155 - faplongfaphard (02/19/2012) [-]
What if it fossilised?
#147 - guiguito (02/19/2012) [-]
can live up to 48 hours on dry and alot more on wet and even dead you can see it
<--- related
#416 - Comment deleted 02/16/2012 on Dis B Title 0
#132 - Comment deleted 02/07/2012 on very special person +1
#126 - Comment deleted  [+] (2 new replies) 02/07/2012 on very special person +1
#129 - vaperon Comment deleted by RugbyKing
#132 - RugbyKing Comment deleted by RugbyKing
#117 - or i guess some people didnt have a childhood, or an snes. 02/03/2012 on Kim Jong Un 0
#98 - MOTHER ******* BOOSTER FROM SUPER MARIO RPG ANYONE? …  [+] (2 new replies) 02/03/2012 on Kim Jong Un +2
#195 - Rascal (02/03/2012) [-]
I loved that game as a kid D:
User avatar #117 - RugbyKing (02/03/2012) [-]
or i guess some people didnt have a childhood, or an snes.
#516 - That's true that we needed it at one point to bring us togethe… 02/03/2012 on Athiests 0
#405 - *about their religion 02/03/2012 on Athiests 0
#404 - Do you not think the world would be a better place without it?…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/03/2012 on Athiests 0
User avatar #436 - fishtacos (02/03/2012) [-]
I honestly don't think that society as we know it would have been created had there been no religion. In the first River Valley Civilizations (Mesopotamia, Egypt, etc.) the cities were built as centers of trade, but then leaders started calling themselves the sons of their gods, everybody believed them, and the following of a leader to take over other tribes, thus there would have been no culture-mixing across large distances, and, as I think that war is the primary reason that technology developed in these civilizations, allowing us humans to adapt to nature and spread over the world. Therefore, if religion didn't exist, our technological advancement would be slowed substantially, if not altogether stopped. So, though without religion we would not have that reason to hate each other as well as our other, modern-world problems, but we also wouldn't have the comforts that we have come to take for granted over the years, nor would we have a 50 year life expectancy rate, much less the 90-year average life expectancy that we have today. However, if a magical wave swept across the world turning everybody in the world either into athiests or a single religion, life would be better. But, that's not going to happen, so we have to deal with the extremists and tolerate others who don't share the same beliefs as we do.
User avatar #516 - RugbyKing (02/03/2012) [-]
That's true that we needed it at one point to bring us together, it was the driving force behind a lot of things, but we do not need it now. Atheism has only erupted over the past 100 years and is growing at a steady rate, as soon as people begin to realize that what they are doing is an act of fiction, it will probably be gone in the next 200 years. All it takes is some education and some critical, logical, thinking.
User avatar #405 - RugbyKing (02/03/2012) [-]
*about their religion
#140 - toenail clipping ed for FSM, but here's why religion shouldnt…  [+] (5 new replies) 02/03/2012 on Athiests +1
User avatar #177 - fishtacos (02/03/2012) [-]
I commented on that post, and I pointed out that those are all examples of religious extremism and that most religious people are actually nice people who don't shove their beliefs down other people's throats. Those events and comments were horrible, I do not deny that, but if all, or even a quarter, of religious people were extremists, then I'd agree. But the truth is that the vast majority people who have religion have their religion because it makes them happy, not because they believe that every other religion is evil.
User avatar #404 - RugbyKing (02/03/2012) [-]
Do you not think the world would be a better place without it? That's all I'm saying. Pragmatically although there's no way to prove it, more than likely everyone is wrong.
User avatar #436 - fishtacos (02/03/2012) [-]
I honestly don't think that society as we know it would have been created had there been no religion. In the first River Valley Civilizations (Mesopotamia, Egypt, etc.) the cities were built as centers of trade, but then leaders started calling themselves the sons of their gods, everybody believed them, and the following of a leader to take over other tribes, thus there would have been no culture-mixing across large distances, and, as I think that war is the primary reason that technology developed in these civilizations, allowing us humans to adapt to nature and spread over the world. Therefore, if religion didn't exist, our technological advancement would be slowed substantially, if not altogether stopped. So, though without religion we would not have that reason to hate each other as well as our other, modern-world problems, but we also wouldn't have the comforts that we have come to take for granted over the years, nor would we have a 50 year life expectancy rate, much less the 90-year average life expectancy that we have today. However, if a magical wave swept across the world turning everybody in the world either into athiests or a single religion, life would be better. But, that's not going to happen, so we have to deal with the extremists and tolerate others who don't share the same beliefs as we do.
User avatar #516 - RugbyKing (02/03/2012) [-]
That's true that we needed it at one point to bring us together, it was the driving force behind a lot of things, but we do not need it now. Atheism has only erupted over the past 100 years and is growing at a steady rate, as soon as people begin to realize that what they are doing is an act of fiction, it will probably be gone in the next 200 years. All it takes is some education and some critical, logical, thinking.
User avatar #405 - RugbyKing (02/03/2012) [-]
*about their religion
#138 - Read the god delusion by richard dawkins, if you get through i…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/03/2012 on Athiests -1
User avatar #139 - PinkToxic (02/03/2012) [-]
What are you even talking about. You, YET AGAIN, someone who didn't read ANYTHING I wrote.

You twats need to stop being so fucking butthurt. I didn't call ANYONE ELSE wrong for what they believe.

Now read what I wrote properly or fuck off. Simple.
#9 - REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPOST 01/28/2012 on Im Color Blind +7
#510 - this guy is annoying. 01/21/2012 on MegaUploads Dangerous... 0
#3765 - Alright, enjoy your time in heaven, I'm sure out of the thousa…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/18/2012 on Religion (notice description) 0
#3785 - nudist (01/18/2012) [-]
I'm sure I have too. God bless, I hope one day you become a believer.

"You of little faith, why are you so afraid?"



#3640 - bible.cc/leviticus/18-22.htm You honestly think t…  [+] (3 new replies) 01/18/2012 on Religion (notice description) 0
#3745 - nudist (01/18/2012) [-]
15 people? All those different versions of the Bible are based off the same translation. They all didn't find different Hebrew scripts.

And the mistranslation bit wasn't even the focus of my post. What I meant was "I could list it as mistranslation, but here's my real reasons for not going against gay rights". And then went on to the later half of my post. I don't care if you think its hypocritical. I don't need your approval to be a follower of Christ.
User avatar #3765 - RugbyKing (01/18/2012) [-]
Alright, enjoy your time in heaven, I'm sure out of the thousands of religions, you mustve picked the right one.

"We are all atheists about most of the Gods humanity has ever believed in, I just go one god further" -Richard Dawkins


#3785 - nudist (01/18/2012) [-]
I'm sure I have too. God bless, I hope one day you become a believer.

"You of little faith, why are you so afraid?"



#3588 - I know this sounds stupid, but that means you believe in the b…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/18/2012 on Religion (notice description) 0
#3604 - nudist (01/18/2012) [-]
Yes, and I know what passage you're trying to get at. I've thought it over for a long time. Parts of the Bible, especially the Old Testament, could be mistranslated or misinterpreted, etc. But I guess it comes down to the fact that I know I can't tell other people what to do. I see that gays love each other and I can't see the wrong in that.

In the end I just put my faith in God and his forgiveness. Judgement is not for me, it's for Him. I have absolutely no issue with gays, and I feel they deserve the right to love each other just like us straight people do. If I'm wrong then I pray that God will forgive me for my transgression. But the oppression of gays just doesn't sit right with me.
User avatar #3640 - RugbyKing (01/18/2012) [-]
bible.cc/leviticus/18-22.htm

You honestly think that 15 people got "lost in translation"? They all say the same thing. It's hard to find an excuse to interpret it differently other than "God does not approve of homosexuals". And if you love and follow God, I think it's a bit hypocritical that you do too.

#3745 - nudist (01/18/2012) [-]
15 people? All those different versions of the Bible are based off the same translation. They all didn't find different Hebrew scripts.

And the mistranslation bit wasn't even the focus of my post. What I meant was "I could list it as mistranslation, but here's my real reasons for not going against gay rights". And then went on to the later half of my post. I don't care if you think its hypocritical. I don't need your approval to be a follower of Christ.
User avatar #3765 - RugbyKing (01/18/2012) [-]
Alright, enjoy your time in heaven, I'm sure out of the thousands of religions, you mustve picked the right one.

"We are all atheists about most of the Gods humanity has ever believed in, I just go one god further" -Richard Dawkins


#3785 - nudist (01/18/2012) [-]
I'm sure I have too. God bless, I hope one day you become a believer.

"You of little faith, why are you so afraid?"



What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - copy (01/13/2012) [-]
I stand up for my beliefs and I get pinkies down. This is why we can't have intelligent discussions.
User avatar #4 to #3 - RugbyKing (01/13/2012) [-]
and i shot them down violently, because they were flawed severely. Here ill break it down for you:
P=premise C=Conclusion.

Your thought process:
P1: Good things happen to those who believe in God
P2: This man believes in God
C: Good things will happen to this man.

Now, you see, I used a counter example of children starving in Africa, which defeats your second premise. Something like 30k children die a day from starvation, using basic probability we can say that without a doubt, at least one of them believe in the same god you do, yet they are subject to a cruel malicious reality. Please don't respond with "oh there's **** waiting for them in heaven" Because we aren't talking about that, we're talking about what happened to the man with the golden voice. In this exact example, your theory doesn't work.


User avatar #5 to #4 - copy (01/13/2012) [-]
But what you didn't calculate are the many variables in which you must not have knowledge of. For if you had knowledge of these variables, then your answer would be different. For example, people who are Christians, normally have a harder life than people who don't believe in God. Evidence is of this conversation right now, and if not, then look at Egypt and Lybia, and even China, who mass murder people who claim to be Christians. Not to mention that you're logic is based on pure opinion which you have so deeply thought for so long that you now accept it as fact. Also, the children in africa, statistically wise, are either of the muslim faith, or of a natural faith found in the tribes. So they wouldn't know of God.

User avatar #6 to #5 - RugbyKing (01/14/2012) [-]
you fail to define these variables, you arent even attacking my premises, jesus what are you even saying is wrong of what im saying? christians having a hard life has nothing to do with what you said. Please tell me exactly where i am wrong here and dont dance around it. your argument isnt even an argument, it's just attempting to educate.
User avatar #7 to #6 - copy (01/14/2012) [-]
Variable. Christians are persecuted by other of different faiths.
Now if I may, use your theory of a=b=c, I'll show you your flaw.
You say that the way I am thinking is as simple as that, yet you didn't throw in the variable.
Now if we throw in this variable, then we have taken out your first sequence, in which, makes the other null and void, for there is no base in your argument. God blesses everyone on earth, not just Christians. Christians are the only ones who thank God for the blessings, in doing so, are singled out for it. By just believing in God, it does not state that your life will be filled with wonders and presents. It actually says that your life will be 10X harder to live. So in saying that, my point is, that God blessed that man with the voice, and in turn, he thanked God by giving him the glory for it. It's simple logic.

#8 to #7 - RugbyKing (01/14/2012) [-]
You are being so unbelievably vague it's hard to tell what you are even saying. take for instance:

"You say that the way I am thinking is as simple as that, yet you didn't throw in the variable. Now if we throw in this variable, then we have taken out your first sequence..."

What is "The variable" You clearly state above there are many variables, but now there is only one? You keep jumping around. Tell me exactly what you're talking about. Use simple language, it makes life a lot easier, you sound like the post-modernism bible. I'm not trying to be insulting, but there is definitely an easier way to say what you're saying without me having to break down every word, and i dont have to find 20 different interpretations.

As for your second part, god chooses to single out this man but not starving african children? Wait, what? this is seems very wrong, not something a kind, caring, god would do. And your fact that you say they are muslims is totally irrelevant, im saying in at least one of the millions of children who have died this way MUST have been a christian like you. Why do they die? Why dont they get the golden help of god? I choose to attribute this mans success to youtube and human beings, not an invisible man.

Pic related.




User avatar #10 to #8 - copy (01/14/2012) [-]
Oh, and if you want to, I can break out pictures also.
User avatar #9 to #8 - copy (01/14/2012) [-]
You're not looking at it the way I'm looking at it. I did say there are many variables, but I did not say that that is the only variable. That is just an example of a variable. I am making it as clear as possible, if you can't understand this logic then open your mind to newer things instead of closing it in.

Now to the starving children in Africa, why do you believe that God doesn't bless them? They are alive, aren't they? But the reason they are in the situation they are in is because of man, because of sin.
 Friends (0)