Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:11/01/2010
Last Login:10/23/2016
Location:Climbin through your windows
Content Thumbs: 3519 total,  3894 ,  375
Comment Thumbs: 909 total,  1081 ,  172
Content Level Progress: 15% (15/100)
Level 135 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 136 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 189 Comments: Anon Annihilator → Level 190 Comments: Anon Annihilator
Content Views:10965
Times Content Favorited:321 times
Total Comments Made:321
FJ Points:4512
Favorite Tags: You (4) | a (3) | rolodude (3) | the (3) | and (2) | comic (2) | fail (2) | fuck (2) | game (2) | paris (2)

  • Views: 39793
    Thumbs Up 2101 Thumbs Down 149 Total: +1952
    Comments: 385
    Favorites: 100
    Uploaded: 12/25/10
    Merry Christmas. Merry Christmas.
  • Views: 21760
    Thumbs Up 654 Thumbs Down 87 Total: +567
    Comments: 294
    Favorites: 158
    Uploaded: 12/18/10
    Just do it. Just do it.
  • Views: 7739
    Thumbs Up 141 Thumbs Down 6 Total: +135
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 10
    Uploaded: 11/22/10
    Reflective armour Reflective armour
  • Views: 7077
    Thumbs Up 112 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +109
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 4
    Uploaded: 11/20/10
    Evil Overlord Tips. Evil Overlord Tips.
  • Views: 5386
    Thumbs Up 72 Thumbs Down 7 Total: +65
    Comments: 28
    Favorites: 10
    Uploaded: 11/19/10
    True, true. True, true.
  • Views: 2453
    Thumbs Up 37 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +33
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 4
    Uploaded: 11/19/10
    Laughing makes you racist. Laughing makes you racist.

latest user's comments

#219 - Right, but after that allotted time you still have to let them…  [+] (1 reply) 04/23/2016 on Guns 0
#220 - lostabyss (04/23/2016) [-]
but thats not correct. its 25 TO LIFE. if someone is not responsible enough to re enter society, if you cant trust them NOT to go out and murder someone, then yes you can hold them for the rest of their life. thats what it means.
#169 - " then why the hell did you let them out of prison?"…  [+] (3 replies) 04/22/2016 on Guns 0
#205 - lostabyss (04/22/2016) [-]
you sure as hell can. the committed a violent felony, ei rape, murder, etc. stop giving paroles out like they were free candies. stop dropping gun charges for easy convictions. NY has some of the lowest gun crime prosecutions (but the most laws) because DAs plea out the harsh gun crime felonies to guarantee plea deals.

example: bill shoots and kills someone. well bill, you are risking going away for 25 to like + a mandatory 15 years for shooting them...BUT if you take this deal and avoid a trial you can just get the 25 years. with parole out in like 15 or less with "good behavior"
User avatar
#219 - RoloDude (04/23/2016) [-]
Right, but after that allotted time you still have to let them out after 25 years, or whatever, and then by your "unpopular opinion" they are allowed a gun, and could repeat the crime and everyone would be yelling "why did you let them out of prison?"
#220 - lostabyss (04/23/2016) [-]
but thats not correct. its 25 TO LIFE. if someone is not responsible enough to re enter society, if you cant trust them NOT to go out and murder someone, then yes you can hold them for the rest of their life. thats what it means.
#6 - No, she paid for it herself, then went back and asked the mana…  [+] (12 replies) 12/05/2015 on McDick's +10
#14 - fabledlobster (12/06/2015) [-]
**fabledlobster used "*roll picture*"**
**fabledlobster rolled image**why didnt the firefighter pay her back instead of getting her fired?
User avatar
#8 - xdiabolicx (12/06/2015) [-]
Okay but you still don't do that and expect the company to pay for it. I'm guessing there was a verbal fight about it and the manager got fed up and fired her. The other guy was right, if you want to do something charitable do it out of your own accord or don't do it at all. Or at least ask if its okay before going through with it. People need to think a little before they act.
User avatar
#13 - greyhoundfd (12/06/2015) [-]
>Firefighters do brave thing
>Woman decides to help them
>Asks company to help her
>Fired and people talk about it

This is very straightforward. She payed for their meals, asked if the company would cover it, and they said no. Firefighters went back, advocated on her behalf independently of whether she still expected help, and the company fired her. She didn't make a stink about it, she wasn't harassing her manager, she was canned because firefighters told McD to start being a little charitable.

Can we once, just once, assume that, when there is absolutely no evidence that someone is lying or omitting the truth, that they actually aren't, instead of leaping to the conclusion that anyone who says anything that isn't hardline conservative businesses-are-great, guns-and-glory rhetoric is making it up for personal gain?
#16 - ByeliVolk (12/06/2015) [-]
no where does the guy even mention about her lying at all. What basically happens is that the firefighters went and complained to the manager about how shitty it was of him not to give the chick compensation for an act that is considered to be of charitable means even though she did it out her own free will without consultation of the manager about compensation. So she brought in customer complaints about something she did of her own about getting money back that she freely spent based on her own good will and then weaseling it back and having the company pay for it out of their own pocket after the decision had been made. She should have asked the manager first and if the answer was no then it would have elimanted the thought of compensation.
User avatar
#18 - iqequalzero (12/06/2015) [-]
And nowhere does it mention this being about weaseling it back. I other people cant read between the lines, why do you get to do it?
#21 - ByeliVolk (12/20/2015) [-]
Because when you have had the same situation happen to you that went along the same lines you can draw what may have happened behind the scenes. Taking comments only at face value from one source causes a skewed look at the situation. Now am I saying this is what exactly happened? No. All I am getting at is that there was a possibility of what may have been.
User avatar
#22 - iqequalzero (12/20/2015) [-]
Your own experience really has zero bearing on what happened. "This is how it happened for me" is just that, your personal story.
#23 - ByeliVolk (12/20/2015) [-]
So discredit the opinion of the person is saying because in similar circumstances with near exact things happening has no ability to comment on the situation using any personal experiences because that might not have been how it happened. What you are getting at is that using any form of reasonable deduction from past experiences is wrong because that is not this exact situation you have been in before.
You do understand how stupid that sounds right? A majority of understanding of something is basically comes from personal experiences.
User avatar
#24 - iqequalzero (12/20/2015) [-]
You are just thinking thats what I mean, when really all im saying is, just because something similar happened to you does not give you any more insight into what actually happened.
#25 - ByeliVolk (12/20/2015) [-]
wait wait wait so what you are telling me right or wrong on situation using logic and understanding the stems from past experiences that why she got fired and what may have lead to that firing and why is because I have more insight into what happened. You think I have more insight into the situation than anyone else. Nowhere did I state this is what actually happened but my opinion on what happened. If you are looking for an excuse to feel offended then you are an idiot. What I said from my first comment was what may have happened or not all was opinion or possible. Then you go in and grumpily say "Why is your opinion more important hmph" which it isn't. I used my own personal experiences to formulate an opinion but I forgot having your own opinion is actually illegal and we must all mindlessly have the same unanimous opinion.

The fact I have to defend my own personal opinion is both idiotic and saddening.
User avatar
#26 - iqequalzero (12/20/2015) [-]
"What basically happens..."

Thats your lead in to your original comment. Basically you went "ok let me break this down for you, heres how it went". I then said you really couldnt know that.

And the only on here who is offended is apparently you, given how much of your replies have been dedicated to belittling my intelligence.
User avatar
#7 - Einsty (12/06/2015) [-]
well fuck