Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

RandomAnonGuy    

Rank #21367 on Subscribers
RandomAnonGuy Avatar Level 252 Comments: Contaminated Win
Offline
Send mail to RandomAnonGuy Block RandomAnonGuy Invite RandomAnonGuy to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:3/14/2010
Last Login:5/31/2014
Location:Australia
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 2 total,  9 ,  11
Comment Thumbs: 5250 total,  7547 ,  2297
Content Level Progress: 3.38% (2/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 20% (20/100)
Level 252 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 253 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:3
Content Views:898
Total Comments Made:4278
FJ Points:5444

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

latest user's comments

#27 - Yes it is. When designing characters for a story, as you do in…  [+] (6 new replies) 02/02/2014 on whiye power !! 0
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall (02/02/2014) [-]
Well, what if the majority of the people who read it are white?
User avatar #38 - harryboom (02/02/2014) [-]
then you could expand into secondary demographic with very little effort
User avatar #59 - captainfuckitall (02/02/2014) [-]
And then you get harassed for having 'token minorities'.
User avatar #60 - harryboom (02/02/2014) [-]
well you do have a token minority, that's the whole point. but you're going to get more new customers than you would lose for having a token minority
User avatar #62 - captainfuckitall (02/02/2014) [-]
I doubt that. I would never sit down and watch a program just because a white person is in it, but I can imagine certainly being offended if they put one if just to pander to me. And that's just counting a person of their own race, you have no idea how SJW or what-not would react.
User avatar #63 - harryboom (02/02/2014) [-]
but people are more likely to watch things if there is someone they can relate to in it. it's shown time and time again by marketing and psychology. when DC introduced simon baz as green lantern that comic had a massive boost in sales. people in marketing don't fuck around when it comes to money they focus test this shit more than politicians
#16 - Haha what? Pirates were vicious and greedy. They were rapists,…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/02/2014 on Pirates and gangsters. +1
#21 - restfullwicked (02/02/2014) [-]
did you know that european governments had pirate crews in their navy? they werent called murderers then. more to the point, to the spanish Francis Drake was one of the most bloodthirsty pirates that has ever lived, but he was a nobelman in the british court, and by all accounts was actually a good man. Pirates that work for a government are called corsairs, the difference being that they only raid ships that their country is at war with. its all a matter of perspective.
#32 - marikthegunslinger (02/02/2014) [-]
And I don't see any government, no matter how corrupt, hiring a bunch of stupid, egotistical gangsters for any reason.
#9 - It's currently 4:30 pm I haven't slept for two days. M… 02/02/2014 on all of us 0
#95 - The most intelligent being on the planet would surely be able … 02/02/2014 on Choose. 0
#78 - Potential happiness of one person against potential misery of two.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/02/2014 on Some generic title 0
User avatar #80 - mylazy (02/02/2014) [-]
Like I have said at least three times in this thread. Neither of us are going to change the others opinion. This has been a total waste of time. And it is the potential happiness of three against the potential misery of two. I have also said newborns are pretty likely to be adopted. Yes the process is lengthy, but it does get done. And I was more talking about the potential to have desire and conscious thought in this case, since you were talking about how apathetic the undeveloped baby is. Every time you sleep you no longer care about what is going on around you until the point that you wake up. Should we take the choice as to whether you will wake up away. Whenever people are at the end of their life, it is always, if possible decided what to do with them based off of what people think the person would want, even if it the person isn't likely to wake up again and cannot care any longer. You still decide based off of what they might want. Why take that away from a baby because it doesn't care yet?
#76 - Man, if you love a kid even a little bit never put it up for a…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/02/2014 on Some generic title 0
User avatar #77 - mylazy (02/02/2014) [-]
And we are back to potential.
User avatar #78 - RandomAnonGuy (02/02/2014) [-]
Potential happiness of one person against potential misery of two.
User avatar #80 - mylazy (02/02/2014) [-]
Like I have said at least three times in this thread. Neither of us are going to change the others opinion. This has been a total waste of time. And it is the potential happiness of three against the potential misery of two. I have also said newborns are pretty likely to be adopted. Yes the process is lengthy, but it does get done. And I was more talking about the potential to have desire and conscious thought in this case, since you were talking about how apathetic the undeveloped baby is. Every time you sleep you no longer care about what is going on around you until the point that you wake up. Should we take the choice as to whether you will wake up away. Whenever people are at the end of their life, it is always, if possible decided what to do with them based off of what people think the person would want, even if it the person isn't likely to wake up again and cannot care any longer. You still decide based off of what they might want. Why take that away from a baby because it doesn't care yet?
#73 - I didn't do any proper debate stuff in school or anything, I d…  [+] (5 new replies) 02/02/2014 on Some generic title 0
User avatar #75 - mylazy (02/02/2014) [-]
The problem isn't the weight of the potential, with me. We can argue that all day, and it won't matter. My problem is that the potential is taken away. If given a choice right now, would you prefer to die or live a life with a chance of reaching happiness. Doesn't have to be a great chance. Just a chance. You are making that decision for a human being that is unable to at this point. People always tend to ignore the adoption route too, which is a pretty easy thing to do with newborns, so I have heard. Then the want of the mother to the child has little to do with its quality of life. Their aren't very many good arguments against adoption over abortion that don't involve a mother who is at risk for having the child, which is something I believe we have covered in this little conversation. The only other situation is rape, and I am 50/50 as to whether abortion after rape should be allowed. I'll make that decision eventually.
User avatar #76 - RandomAnonGuy (02/02/2014) [-]
Man, if you love a kid even a little bit never put it up for adoption. The system is so convoluted, congested and broken as it is. You can't just go up and adopt a kid anytime you want, it's a lengthy process. Which'd be good for the kids if there weren't so many of them.
And I'd like a chance, but a fetus wouldn't like anything. It literally does not care. There is no creature more apathetic than an undeveloped baby.
User avatar #77 - mylazy (02/02/2014) [-]
And we are back to potential.
User avatar #78 - RandomAnonGuy (02/02/2014) [-]
Potential happiness of one person against potential misery of two.
User avatar #80 - mylazy (02/02/2014) [-]
Like I have said at least three times in this thread. Neither of us are going to change the others opinion. This has been a total waste of time. And it is the potential happiness of three against the potential misery of two. I have also said newborns are pretty likely to be adopted. Yes the process is lengthy, but it does get done. And I was more talking about the potential to have desire and conscious thought in this case, since you were talking about how apathetic the undeveloped baby is. Every time you sleep you no longer care about what is going on around you until the point that you wake up. Should we take the choice as to whether you will wake up away. Whenever people are at the end of their life, it is always, if possible decided what to do with them based off of what people think the person would want, even if it the person isn't likely to wake up again and cannot care any longer. You still decide based off of what they might want. Why take that away from a baby because it doesn't care yet?
#72 - That wall of text can be pretty much ignored if you take into … 02/02/2014 on Some generic title 0
#73 - Title. 02/02/2014 on applies to funnyjunk too 0
#66 - But there's more to be taken into account than just that. If a…  [+] (8 new replies) 02/02/2014 on Some generic title 0
User avatar #69 - mylazy (02/02/2014) [-]
Like I said, I have taken part in more than one of these debates. In real life too, with research and everything. In almost every one of them, I have been forced to be the one for abortion, despite the fact that I disagree with it. We didn't really have many in the classes that were for abortion, and those people were never the people I faced, so naturally, they thought I would be best able to handle a viewpoint that I disagree with. In fact, I am pretty sure I have a saved page full of research statistics talking about what you just said. I have even won a few of those debates, so you know I wasn't slacking on my arguments. I still disagree with the points though. That same potential to have a bad life is also the potential to have a good life, and you are taking that chance away.
User avatar #71 - mylazy (02/02/2014) [-]
To be a bit more specific, when I say "saved page" i mean more like about 10 pages.
User avatar #73 - RandomAnonGuy (02/02/2014) [-]
I didn't do any proper debate stuff in school or anything, I don't really like the structure of formal debate. I much rather a conversational style of things. That said, I've looked up a bunch of stuff before and the potenetial isn't the same. A wanted child with financially stable parents is significantly more likely to have a happy early life than an unwanted child.
User avatar #75 - mylazy (02/02/2014) [-]
The problem isn't the weight of the potential, with me. We can argue that all day, and it won't matter. My problem is that the potential is taken away. If given a choice right now, would you prefer to die or live a life with a chance of reaching happiness. Doesn't have to be a great chance. Just a chance. You are making that decision for a human being that is unable to at this point. People always tend to ignore the adoption route too, which is a pretty easy thing to do with newborns, so I have heard. Then the want of the mother to the child has little to do with its quality of life. Their aren't very many good arguments against adoption over abortion that don't involve a mother who is at risk for having the child, which is something I believe we have covered in this little conversation. The only other situation is rape, and I am 50/50 as to whether abortion after rape should be allowed. I'll make that decision eventually.
User avatar #76 - RandomAnonGuy (02/02/2014) [-]
Man, if you love a kid even a little bit never put it up for adoption. The system is so convoluted, congested and broken as it is. You can't just go up and adopt a kid anytime you want, it's a lengthy process. Which'd be good for the kids if there weren't so many of them.
And I'd like a chance, but a fetus wouldn't like anything. It literally does not care. There is no creature more apathetic than an undeveloped baby.
User avatar #77 - mylazy (02/02/2014) [-]
And we are back to potential.
User avatar #78 - RandomAnonGuy (02/02/2014) [-]
Potential happiness of one person against potential misery of two.
User avatar #80 - mylazy (02/02/2014) [-]
Like I have said at least three times in this thread. Neither of us are going to change the others opinion. This has been a total waste of time. And it is the potential happiness of three against the potential misery of two. I have also said newborns are pretty likely to be adopted. Yes the process is lengthy, but it does get done. And I was more talking about the potential to have desire and conscious thought in this case, since you were talking about how apathetic the undeveloped baby is. Every time you sleep you no longer care about what is going on around you until the point that you wake up. Should we take the choice as to whether you will wake up away. Whenever people are at the end of their life, it is always, if possible decided what to do with them based off of what people think the person would want, even if it the person isn't likely to wake up again and cannot care any longer. You still decide based off of what they might want. Why take that away from a baby because it doesn't care yet?
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1300

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #25 - lolollo (10/09/2012) [-]
That'd be right, if it weren't for the fact that my heart is made of pure adamantium. That shit's the only thing that won't grow back. Too expensive.
User avatar #26 to #25 - RandomAnonGuy (10/10/2012) [-]
...HOW DOES IT BEAT?
User avatar #27 to #26 - lolollo (10/10/2012) [-]
Easy, my kidneys are made of PURE ADRENALIN!
User avatar #28 to #27 - RandomAnonGuy (10/10/2012) [-]
Oh yeah, silly me, how could I forget.
Wait, wasn't your blood pure adrenaline?
Dalek-explain.gif
User avatar #29 to #28 - lolollo (10/10/2012) [-]
THEY ARE BOTH ONE IN THE SAME!!!

I AM ON EDGE...ALWAYS!!!
User avatar #30 to #29 - RandomAnonGuy (10/10/2012) [-]
Good thing you're not the hulk. You'd be extra invincible with your already superhuman abilities, plus you'd never be not green.
The world would fall before your might in but a day
User avatar #31 to #30 - lolollo (10/10/2012) [-]
Yes, but the universe did give me one weakness.

I still don't know how to talk to girls.

It's sad...

...luckily...there's still rape.
User avatar #32 to #31 - RandomAnonGuy (10/10/2012) [-]
Eh, I can talk to a few girls. Unfortunately, I am cursed to only be able to have short relationships.
To the point where it's amusing to my friends.
User avatar #33 to #32 - lolollo (10/10/2012) [-]
I'm kinda the same way. I'll let my friends in on who I'm interested, and they'll keep with it long after I've closed the book on them. Eventually, I stopped letting them in on my interests.
User avatar #34 to #33 - RandomAnonGuy (10/10/2012) [-]
There's a group of my friends that think me and this girl want to bone, and have thought that for like, a year now. God knows what put it in their heads.
User avatar #35 to #34 - lolollo (10/10/2012) [-]
It could just be a joke...or are they going out of their ways to set shit up for you?
User avatar #36 to #35 - RandomAnonGuy (10/10/2012) [-]
The second one. That said, one of them is either joking or really wants me to have a girlfriend. Ask her out! She likes you! I don't think you're over your ex, have you considered trying again?
User avatar #37 to #36 - lolollo (10/10/2012) [-]
Yeeeaaaaaahhhhh I still have no idea why people think it's necessary for them to meddle...
User avatar #22 - YugiDork (07/11/2011) [-]
You seem like a cool person to be around.
User avatar #23 to #22 - RandomAnonGuy (11/07/2011) [-]
Why thank you, YugiWhalePENIS
#18 - anonymous (04/29/2011) [-]
I Liek you!
User avatar #19 to #18 - RandomAnonGuy (04/29/2011) [-]
Thaaaannk youuuuu :3
User avatar #17 to #16 - RandomAnonGuy (04/08/2011) [-]
*takes*
MINE
#20 to #17 - delrio (04/29/2011) [-]
have this too!!!!
User avatar #21 to #20 - RandomAnonGuy (04/29/2011) [-]
>.>
<.<
*takes*
MINE
User avatar #3 - eklyvaldur (02/09/2011) [-]
Feminism is about protecting men from sexism too.
User avatar #4 to #3 - RandomAnonGuy (02/09/2011) [-]
I havent seen much of that in feminists.
Other than you, since you seem to be wishing for balanced scales, and i admire you for that.
I dont think it would be fair though, if in 20 years we were equal in every way but a women could win any argument by saying "Just because im a girl!"... or something along those lines
User avatar #5 to #4 - eklyvaldur (02/09/2011) [-]
Something like that is completely wrong. (winning based only on gender/sex)

Sadly, feminism becomes twisted and obscured by people who havn't taken the time to really learn what it is. Some women have been truly victimized by some men though, and I can see why they would lean toward something radical out of retaliation.

User avatar #6 to #5 - RandomAnonGuy (02/09/2011) [-]
Look at black people.
They might not be entirely equal, mainly due to arseholes who think they are better than everyone else, but if you tell them to stop being so loud on the train your racist. Whos to say that wont happen again? Its not like every "Feminist" will be as complacent as you are, happy with equality.
User avatar #7 to #6 - eklyvaldur (02/09/2011) [-]
Actually, due to the way school funding works, and the fact that our political system is broken, black people are still incredibly disadvantaged.

Sure, our system says they can rise and do anything, but that's only after the system finds ways to keep them down.

Minority schools are underfunded. Standardized tests are literally designed to be easier for upperclass white kids to take, and designed to have minorities fail, causing their schools to lose even more money.

There are always going to be a few people in every group that acts like an ass. But it's important to remember they are often acting this way because of years of oppression that have just fucked up their lives. It's hard for them to not want to lash out with all they go throu
User avatar #8 to #7 - RandomAnonGuy (02/10/2011) [-]
So the schools funded by charities that only black people can attend are bullshit?
User avatar #9 to #8 - eklyvaldur (02/10/2011) [-]
Those would be incredibly few in number. We have to try to remember the big pictures. Most black kids, and hispanic kids, go to underfunded inner-city schools. Some of these schools can't even afford to get rid of their pest problems and the kids see roaches and mice in their rooms. Buildings aren't up to code and are dangerous for these kids to even be in. Class sizes are ridiculous, their high schools don't offer any AP courses. They get stuck taking sewing classes because oh, there's a factory in town that will need them once they leave school.
User avatar #11 to #9 - RandomAnonGuy (02/10/2011) [-]
I got work to do, but i would like to continue this debate. Keep in mind that i like you, none of this is in anger, and i will get back to you sooner or later.
User avatar #13 to #11 - eklyvaldur (02/10/2011) [-]
I have classes today, so it could be a while before I reply again. I appreciate that we can discuss this calmly and without anger. That happens so rarely on the internet.
User avatar #10 to #9 - RandomAnonGuy (02/10/2011) [-]
Thats not the big picture, thats the worst parts of society. There are just as many white kids in broken homes and the slums as black kids, or at least there is here in aussie. And theres a lot more "Black colleges" than "White colleges"
User avatar #12 to #10 - eklyvaldur (02/10/2011) [-]
I admit, my knowledge concerning this is restricted to what goes on in the USA. Here, there are definitely not just as many white kids goiing to these poor schools. In the schools I am referring to, out of a class of 35, maybe 3-5 of those kids will be white.

I went to schools like this in middle school and high school. (When in grade school, my parents were still together and I was in 'better' schools in better parts of town) Grades 7-12, I there were normally only -3 other white kids in my classes. The rest were black, hispanic, and Hmong.

When we were getting ready for 8th grade graduation, one of the teachers told us to be sure we enjoyed it, because it was the only graduation most of us would ever get.
User avatar #14 to #12 - eklyvaldur (02/10/2011) [-]
sorry, just an edit here. That was supposed to say 1-3
User avatar #15 to #14 - RandomAnonGuy (03/20/2011) [-]
I've completely lost the train of thought I had going here so long ago...
but I attended pretty decent schools and at least 60% of the people in each class were Asian, and no more than 10 out of the 35 in any class were actually Australian by blood.
User avatar #1 - supersparta (07/24/2010) [-]
You are such a fag.
User avatar #2 to #1 - RandomAnonGuy (07/24/2010) [-]
What have i done? i trolled a little here and agreed with a troll there, but i also had a couple of wins.
 Friends (0)