Upload
Login or register

PVTDickStryker

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:8/15/2010
Last Login:5/26/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#5725
Highest Content Rank:#730
Highest Comment Rank:#264
Content Thumbs: 4266 total,  5231 ,  965
Comment Thumbs: 25086 total,  30078 ,  4992
Content Level Progress: 58% (58/100)
Level 140 Content: Faptastic → Level 141 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 86.7% (867/1000)
Level 320 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 321 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:6
Content Views:374602
Times Content Favorited:351 times
Total Comments Made:9456
FJ Points:24599
Favorite Tags: Vindictus (2)

latest user's comments

#125 - Weeaboo waifufags, thats what. 04/27/2016 on Anubis 0
#26 - Picture 04/22/2016 on eyasz 0
#78 - Choosing not to censor them isnt the same as just standing the…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/22/2016 on pettition to get social... +1
User avatar
#110 - msypsylon (04/22/2016) [-]
There's already classes that teach race or gender studies in a completely objective manner. They're called anatomy and psychology. No university would loose anything of value if they completely removed gender studies and all the sjw crap. Because that's all it is. It's not an important subject that had been tainted by the SJWs. It's a pile of shit created by them. Sure, you can take gender studies and try to make an actual class out of it, but in the end you would have to change everything, from the teachers to the curriculum. It would be no different from removing it and creating a new one. So at the end of the day you're still "restricting their ideals".

And I think you're very naive with that freedom of speech thing. I'm not saying we should ban idiots from saying stupid things, I'm saying they shouldn't be encouraged, by giving them fucking classes to teach. Anyways, you will never convince an idiot that's deeply immersed in his ideology that he's wrong. How many arguments on the internet have you seen where no one changes their mind? Look at us for instance. I'd like to think that we're both somewhat rational and intelligent, our views aren't even that different and yet we argue and there's a low chance of either of us changing their mind. Now think about a sad, dumb fuck who fell into a stupid but life-controlling ideology. I don't care what it is, SJW, /pol/shit, some weird religion, it's irrelevant. Their ideology basically dictates the way they see life. They base most of what they do, think and feel on it. How do you imagine you can convince someone their ideology, the one that rules their lives is not true? And when you have a harmful ideology, well, it's best to cut it off before it spreads. By censorship. I hate to bring up this example, but would you censor Hitler before he spread his ideology if you could I realize this is an extreme example and not comparable to the sjw thing, don't get pissy about that, I'm just trying to make the point clear. ? Again, I'd love for things to be easy, for everybody to say whatever they want and nothing bad to happen, but that's just not possible. There are things much more important than the freedom of speech of some cunts.

And no, trying to silence shitty ideologies is not the same as someone saying it should be considered rape to disagree with a women. The latter is silencing any argument on the basis of "I don't like it" for an idiotic reason. The former is silencing a dumb ideology because it has bad consequences.

Again, don't get me wrong. Anyone should have the right to say whatever they want. But you should not be allowed to spread an ideology that influences many people in a negative way. And you should definitely not be given the tools to do that by fucking universities.
#60 - By not emulating them would be a good start.  [+] (3 new replies) 04/21/2016 on pettition to get social... +1
User avatar
#71 - msypsylon (04/21/2016) [-]
But that's not doing anything. That's just standing there and accepting what they do.

Now see, the issue here is that you're not really restricting ideals by not allowing indoctrination classes in college. You're removing a class that should not be there in the first place. No matter how you call them, these classes are filled with propaganda and hate speech. What they teach is not based on fact, students are not encouraged be open minded and argue about it, they are supposed to just accept what they're told. This kind of classes go against everything universities are supposed to stand for, they're harmful and encourage bad behavior.

No one is telling them not to talk about their shitty ideas, they can bitch and moan on their social medias all they want. But there is no reason to turn a place that's supposed to open your mind and make you grow intellectually into a space for them to spew their propaganda.

No, the right thing to do is to remove that shitty class from colleges , although a petition won't do anything about it . Ideals, no matter how shitty they are will spread if they appeal to peoples feelings and desires and if they're advertised enough. The easiest way to stop them, maybe the only one in the short term is censorship. This is not about freedom of speech, it's about combating harmful ideas. You're not doing anything with your "example by (in)action", they will take your lack of reaction as weakness and they'll keep attacking. You're an idealistic fool if you think letting shitty ideals spread is better than censoring them. you fucking cuck
User avatar
#78 - PVTDickStryker (04/22/2016) [-]
Choosing not to censor them isnt the same as just standing there and letting them do as they please you ninny. You say that these classes force an ideology and train of thought onto people, that they indoctrinate. Well then the best course of action is to push for these classes to be taught properly. For race or gender studies to be given to students in a completely objective manner wherein theyd be able to reach their own, educated conclusion when a subjective matter arises, no?

Oh but of course not. Shut it all down, ban anything and everything if SJWs have it in a headlock, right? You cant fucking say you fight against censorship when instead of reforming studies to become proper, youd rather just censor them. Well, you can I guess, if you enjoy being a massive hypocrite.

On a similar note, freedom of speech is a two way street. As retarded, jaded, and downright backwards as someone's views are, they have the right to express them, just as you have the right to analyze each and every ass-backwards point they make, then drive it into the dirt with intelligent, well-thought-out rebuttals. And thats the proper response in a society that values freedom of speech,as at least that way, those that aren't lost causes can see whatever errors theyre making from rebuttals. Trying to stop them from voicing their view, as shit as it may be, is no different from them saying it should be considered rape to disagree with women or some shit. You're just trying to beat them to the censorship and validating the notion that theyre being "oppressed."

Love the buzzword by the way. Yup, im a total cuck if id prefer to keep struggling against them than pulling a complete 180 in my views to shut them up, right?
User avatar
#110 - msypsylon (04/22/2016) [-]
There's already classes that teach race or gender studies in a completely objective manner. They're called anatomy and psychology. No university would loose anything of value if they completely removed gender studies and all the sjw crap. Because that's all it is. It's not an important subject that had been tainted by the SJWs. It's a pile of shit created by them. Sure, you can take gender studies and try to make an actual class out of it, but in the end you would have to change everything, from the teachers to the curriculum. It would be no different from removing it and creating a new one. So at the end of the day you're still "restricting their ideals".

And I think you're very naive with that freedom of speech thing. I'm not saying we should ban idiots from saying stupid things, I'm saying they shouldn't be encouraged, by giving them fucking classes to teach. Anyways, you will never convince an idiot that's deeply immersed in his ideology that he's wrong. How many arguments on the internet have you seen where no one changes their mind? Look at us for instance. I'd like to think that we're both somewhat rational and intelligent, our views aren't even that different and yet we argue and there's a low chance of either of us changing their mind. Now think about a sad, dumb fuck who fell into a stupid but life-controlling ideology. I don't care what it is, SJW, /pol/shit, some weird religion, it's irrelevant. Their ideology basically dictates the way they see life. They base most of what they do, think and feel on it. How do you imagine you can convince someone their ideology, the one that rules their lives is not true? And when you have a harmful ideology, well, it's best to cut it off before it spreads. By censorship. I hate to bring up this example, but would you censor Hitler before he spread his ideology if you could I realize this is an extreme example and not comparable to the sjw thing, don't get pissy about that, I'm just trying to make the point clear. ? Again, I'd love for things to be easy, for everybody to say whatever they want and nothing bad to happen, but that's just not possible. There are things much more important than the freedom of speech of some cunts.

And no, trying to silence shitty ideologies is not the same as someone saying it should be considered rape to disagree with a women. The latter is silencing any argument on the basis of "I don't like it" for an idiotic reason. The former is silencing a dumb ideology because it has bad consequences.

Again, don't get me wrong. Anyone should have the right to say whatever they want. But you should not be allowed to spread an ideology that influences many people in a negative way. And you should definitely not be given the tools to do that by fucking universities.
#36 - Classes are offered, the majors are chosen. This is like a for…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/21/2016 on pettition to get social... +4
User avatar
#123 - ishallsmiteyou (04/22/2016) [-]
Protests are held. People are forced into programs or face being kicked out of their classes. Left wing ideologies are very clearly in control of the universities of the United States.
#19 - So you want to stop the restriction of ideals..... By restrict…  [+] (9 new replies) 04/21/2016 on pettition to get social... +7
User avatar
#53 - msypsylon (04/21/2016) [-]
How else would you do it?
User avatar
#60 - PVTDickStryker (04/21/2016) [-]
By not emulating them would be a good start.
User avatar
#71 - msypsylon (04/21/2016) [-]
But that's not doing anything. That's just standing there and accepting what they do.

Now see, the issue here is that you're not really restricting ideals by not allowing indoctrination classes in college. You're removing a class that should not be there in the first place. No matter how you call them, these classes are filled with propaganda and hate speech. What they teach is not based on fact, students are not encouraged be open minded and argue about it, they are supposed to just accept what they're told. This kind of classes go against everything universities are supposed to stand for, they're harmful and encourage bad behavior.

No one is telling them not to talk about their shitty ideas, they can bitch and moan on their social medias all they want. But there is no reason to turn a place that's supposed to open your mind and make you grow intellectually into a space for them to spew their propaganda.

No, the right thing to do is to remove that shitty class from colleges , although a petition won't do anything about it . Ideals, no matter how shitty they are will spread if they appeal to peoples feelings and desires and if they're advertised enough. The easiest way to stop them, maybe the only one in the short term is censorship. This is not about freedom of speech, it's about combating harmful ideas. You're not doing anything with your "example by (in)action", they will take your lack of reaction as weakness and they'll keep attacking. You're an idealistic fool if you think letting shitty ideals spread is better than censoring them. you fucking cuck
User avatar
#78 - PVTDickStryker (04/22/2016) [-]
Choosing not to censor them isnt the same as just standing there and letting them do as they please you ninny. You say that these classes force an ideology and train of thought onto people, that they indoctrinate. Well then the best course of action is to push for these classes to be taught properly. For race or gender studies to be given to students in a completely objective manner wherein theyd be able to reach their own, educated conclusion when a subjective matter arises, no?

Oh but of course not. Shut it all down, ban anything and everything if SJWs have it in a headlock, right? You cant fucking say you fight against censorship when instead of reforming studies to become proper, youd rather just censor them. Well, you can I guess, if you enjoy being a massive hypocrite.

On a similar note, freedom of speech is a two way street. As retarded, jaded, and downright backwards as someone's views are, they have the right to express them, just as you have the right to analyze each and every ass-backwards point they make, then drive it into the dirt with intelligent, well-thought-out rebuttals. And thats the proper response in a society that values freedom of speech,as at least that way, those that aren't lost causes can see whatever errors theyre making from rebuttals. Trying to stop them from voicing their view, as shit as it may be, is no different from them saying it should be considered rape to disagree with women or some shit. You're just trying to beat them to the censorship and validating the notion that theyre being "oppressed."

Love the buzzword by the way. Yup, im a total cuck if id prefer to keep struggling against them than pulling a complete 180 in my views to shut them up, right?
User avatar
#110 - msypsylon (04/22/2016) [-]
There's already classes that teach race or gender studies in a completely objective manner. They're called anatomy and psychology. No university would loose anything of value if they completely removed gender studies and all the sjw crap. Because that's all it is. It's not an important subject that had been tainted by the SJWs. It's a pile of shit created by them. Sure, you can take gender studies and try to make an actual class out of it, but in the end you would have to change everything, from the teachers to the curriculum. It would be no different from removing it and creating a new one. So at the end of the day you're still "restricting their ideals".

And I think you're very naive with that freedom of speech thing. I'm not saying we should ban idiots from saying stupid things, I'm saying they shouldn't be encouraged, by giving them fucking classes to teach. Anyways, you will never convince an idiot that's deeply immersed in his ideology that he's wrong. How many arguments on the internet have you seen where no one changes their mind? Look at us for instance. I'd like to think that we're both somewhat rational and intelligent, our views aren't even that different and yet we argue and there's a low chance of either of us changing their mind. Now think about a sad, dumb fuck who fell into a stupid but life-controlling ideology. I don't care what it is, SJW, /pol/shit, some weird religion, it's irrelevant. Their ideology basically dictates the way they see life. They base most of what they do, think and feel on it. How do you imagine you can convince someone their ideology, the one that rules their lives is not true? And when you have a harmful ideology, well, it's best to cut it off before it spreads. By censorship. I hate to bring up this example, but would you censor Hitler before he spread his ideology if you could I realize this is an extreme example and not comparable to the sjw thing, don't get pissy about that, I'm just trying to make the point clear. ? Again, I'd love for things to be easy, for everybody to say whatever they want and nothing bad to happen, but that's just not possible. There are things much more important than the freedom of speech of some cunts.

And no, trying to silence shitty ideologies is not the same as someone saying it should be considered rape to disagree with a women. The latter is silencing any argument on the basis of "I don't like it" for an idiotic reason. The former is silencing a dumb ideology because it has bad consequences.

Again, don't get me wrong. Anyone should have the right to say whatever they want. But you should not be allowed to spread an ideology that influences many people in a negative way. And you should definitely not be given the tools to do that by fucking universities.
#37 - anon (04/21/2016) [-]
Well, restricting the big whole SJW idea group would allow more ideas to be free from those fucks. So its the lesser of two evils or someshit.
User avatar
#24 - ishallsmiteyou (04/21/2016) [-]
It's not restricting ideals, it's restricting the ability to impose those ideals on others.
User avatar
#36 - PVTDickStryker (04/21/2016) [-]
Classes are offered, the majors are chosen. This is like a form of book-burning youre proposing.
User avatar
#123 - ishallsmiteyou (04/22/2016) [-]
Protests are held. People are forced into programs or face being kicked out of their classes. Left wing ideologies are very clearly in control of the universities of the United States.
#33 - The episode where Bill Nye was on and everyone except the audi…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/21/2016 on butt stuff +4
User avatar
#37 - kennyh (04/21/2016) [-]
I'll put my name to that statement.
#124 - He didnt deserve to die, but saying **** like that earning som… 04/21/2016 on Harrow schoolboy died from... +3
#112 - Funny thing is Armored Core usually gets **** on for reasons D… 04/21/2016 on Dark Souls 0
#55 - Youre playing a dangerous game here. I expect so…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/21/2016 on (ART) Reaction Img Comp +5
User avatar
#70 - soule (04/21/2016) [-]
If he wants to drown in a sea of red thumbs that's his business.
#96 - Jesus Christ the cancer in these comps 04/20/2016 on Lamia Monstergirls Comp. -2
#61 - Killing off Terry McGinnis sounds like a very silly decision to make. 04/19/2016 on Random Facts 0
#129 - Its more like telling someone whos drowning to take their head… 04/19/2016 on Facebook fatlogic ... drown... +1
#60 - Would you prefer pride in just one body part with shame on the… 04/18/2016 on Fat boobs are more... 0
#46 - My argument here was that, since the times change in the setti… 04/18/2016 on /pol/ predicts the new... 0
#22 - Huh, well that makes perfect sense. Thanks for the info. 04/18/2016 on /pol/ predicts the new... 0
#20 - Huh, but doesnt that bring modernity into question? The films'…  [+] (4 new replies) 04/18/2016 on /pol/ predicts the new... +1
User avatar
#30 - artyomthebadass (04/18/2016) [-]
So by the norm of modernity for movies sake we should all of a sudden change a white skinned character to a black man all thanks to the PC bullshit?
User avatar
#46 - PVTDickStryker (04/18/2016) [-]
My argument here was that, since the times change in the settings, all the James Bonds throughout the films couldnt possibly have been the same person in the canon, so hes either an immortal or the name James Bond was like a callsign handed down to agents, just like how there have been multiple actors playing him over the years. This means that it wouldnt really be a big deal if someone of a different race played the role.

But this was just a misconception of mine since I havent seen most of the movies. sgtmajjohnson already cleared up that up for me. So...... Yeah.
User avatar
#21 - sgtmajjohnson (04/18/2016) [-]
I'm assuming that's the good old-fashioned comic logic present in almost all long-running series: Batman's been 30 since his inception, but a lot of the stories that have occurred over those decades are still canon. The characters on the Simpsons (actually most cartoons) are still roughly the same age after decades and references to multiple presidential my well endowed daddyistrations. etc. etc.
Only exception I really know of is John Constantine, who's constantly aged since his inception.
You got a pretty sweet name yourself.
User avatar
#22 - PVTDickStryker (04/18/2016) [-]
Huh, well that makes perfect sense. Thanks for the info.

#13 - Hasnt James Bond been more of a handle name throughout the ser…  [+] (6 new replies) 04/17/2016 on /pol/ predicts the new... 0
User avatar
#17 - sgtmajjohnson (04/17/2016) [-]
Nope, that's a fan theory that has proven less then compelling. For one, Tracy Bond (his deceased wife) is later referenced by 3 different Bonds. Also, James Bond's parents are explicitly established as being named Bond in Skyfall. Similarly, he was very clearly one man in Ian Fleming's books.
User avatar
#20 - PVTDickStryker (04/18/2016) [-]
Huh, but doesnt that bring modernity into question? The films' settings have followed the times that they've been released in, yet Bond is always a middle-aged man in his physical prime.


Haven't seen the films yet. Planning to binge them all as well as the Bruce Lee and Zatoichi films, so sorry for my vapid ignorance. Love your name btw.
User avatar
#30 - artyomthebadass (04/18/2016) [-]
So by the norm of modernity for movies sake we should all of a sudden change a white skinned character to a black man all thanks to the PC bullshit?
User avatar
#46 - PVTDickStryker (04/18/2016) [-]
My argument here was that, since the times change in the settings, all the James Bonds throughout the films couldnt possibly have been the same person in the canon, so hes either an immortal or the name James Bond was like a callsign handed down to agents, just like how there have been multiple actors playing him over the years. This means that it wouldnt really be a big deal if someone of a different race played the role.

But this was just a misconception of mine since I havent seen most of the movies. sgtmajjohnson already cleared up that up for me. So...... Yeah.
User avatar
#21 - sgtmajjohnson (04/18/2016) [-]
I'm assuming that's the good old-fashioned comic logic present in almost all long-running series: Batman's been 30 since his inception, but a lot of the stories that have occurred over those decades are still canon. The characters on the Simpsons (actually most cartoons) are still roughly the same age after decades and references to multiple presidential my well endowed daddyistrations. etc. etc.
Only exception I really know of is John Constantine, who's constantly aged since his inception.
You got a pretty sweet name yourself.
User avatar
#22 - PVTDickStryker (04/18/2016) [-]
Huh, well that makes perfect sense. Thanks for the info.

#56 - Well, stiffness and seizing _are_ signs of tetanus. 04/17/2016 on COINCIDENCE?! 0
#11 - Gary Stu strikes again. 04/17/2016 on batgod +18
#103 - Shame that, among the hispanic comnunity with family that have… 04/17/2016 on Rekt 0
#97 - I always gave the prequels a break because they were what intr… 04/15/2016 on Glum George Lucas +1
#66 - So you **** on the 3D fallouts for complaints you have with 4?… 04/15/2016 on 1026 0
#25 - A part of Miami had a bit of a nuclear mishap with the drinking water. 04/14/2016 on 1041 0
#41 - I love how people **** on obviously superior features for bein…  [+] (2 new replies) 04/14/2016 on 1026 -8
#44 - anon (04/14/2016) [-]
You mean like chat options that are severely limited, no skill checks, watered down RPG elements, and generally half-assed settlement building?

The whole "you don't like change" argument is so fucking bullshit, if a game ends up snubbing a HUGE amount of RPG elements when it was an RPG, people aren't in the wrong to be pissed. I guess we should all love the new Syndicate that's now an action FPS because any change is okay, right?
User avatar
#66 - PVTDickStryker (04/15/2016) [-]
So you shit on the 3D fallouts for complaints you have with 4? Thats real nice. Guess Morrowind Oblivion and Skyrim suck ass because of ESO's shit business practices, huh?
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (56)
[ 56 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
36 comments displayed.
#54 - konradkurze (09/08/2014) [-]
found the stryker
#55 to #54 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (09/08/2014) [-]
#52 - misanthrizzle (07/27/2014) [-]
#53 to #52 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (07/28/2014) [-]
Why are his forearms sucha different color than his face?
#51 - adding (10/09/2013) [-]
are you there
please accept. i really want it.
#47 - adding (10/09/2013) [-]
how about the one for coal? please. i don't want angelic badges.
#48 to #47 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (10/09/2013) [-]
Sorry, im sortof hoarding.
#50 to #48 - adding (10/09/2013) [-]
D':
please. it's just one coal.
#49 to #48 - adding (10/09/2013) [-]
one coal takes literally 4 seconds to get
it's one capcha
it took me a minute to get those badges. im still slow.
please dude. it's one coal. i'm giving you 10+ of an items for the most common item in the game.
pleeease
#39 - adding (10/09/2013) [-]
why did you decline ):
#40 to #39 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (10/09/2013) [-]
I......dont know.
#41 to #40 - adding (10/09/2013) [-]
i really need that recipe,
pleease accept.
#42 to #41 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (10/09/2013) [-]
What if....I need it?
#43 to #42 - adding (10/09/2013) [-]
you don't play items thoug..):
I wanna make an angelic hat. that's my favourite item.
#44 to #43 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (10/09/2013) [-]
If I didnt play items, why would I have it?
#45 to #44 - adding (10/09/2013) [-]
just pleas can i buy it
i'm overpaying for it anyways..
#46 to #45 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (10/09/2013) [-]
Sorry.
#36 - anbieter ONLINE (09/10/2013) [-]
you are a hero and you will never be forgotten (for the next 20 hours or so).
#33 - nickypiebang (09/10/2013) [-]
sweet profile pic
#34 to #33 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (09/10/2013) [-]
Lost a bet
#38 to #34 - nickypiebang (09/10/2013) [-]
iknowisaw
#28 - buttholee (09/10/2013) [-]
I salute you sir, for your bravery...
#29 to #28 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (09/10/2013) [-]
Thank you, kind sir
#30 to #29 - buttholee (09/10/2013) [-]
I did the same thing... luckily tho, I got this...

I now pass the torch to you, good sir
#32 to #30 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (09/10/2013) [-]
A legacy.....stained in white.
#31 to #30 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (09/10/2013) [-]
Please, let me pass in peace, invite as many friends as you can to browse my **** uploads. I wish to leave a legacy.
#37 to #31 - buttholee (09/10/2013) [-]
I shall...
#25 - amissingmouse (07/16/2013) [-]
Hellur.
How are you?
#26 to #25 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (07/16/2013) [-]
Good, good, and yourself?
#27 to #26 - amissingmouse (07/17/2013) [-]
I'm okay.
#20 - kylermannn (04/25/2011) [-]
well i think the my little pony thing is ******* gay too. All its proving is that fj is full of 12 yr olds. Tried to thumb them comments back as best as i could lawl
#21 to #20 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (04/25/2011) [-]
Sorry man, did it for the lulz, I actually dont mind lovers, least they dont rant as much as haters....
#22 to #21 - kylermannn (04/25/2011) [-]
GAAAAAH

fine i will take my hate elsewhere lawl
#23 to #22 - PVTDickStryker ONLINE (04/25/2011) [-]
Though im saying i dont mind lovers i do agree with you in the sense that this site is full of 12 year olds, the rest are pedophiles.
#24 to #23 - kylermannn (04/25/2011) [-]
haha, gotcha brotato
[ 56 comments ]
Leave a comment