Login or register
Login or register
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Have the FunnyJunk newsletter e-mailed to you
Rank #10935 on Comments
Level 171 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Send mail to PVTANON
Invite PVTANON to be your friend
Last status update:
Date Signed Up:
Highest Comment Rank:
Content Level Progress:
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress:
Level 171 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 172 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Total Comments Made:
What people say about PVTANON
Flags of our autists
Great New Horror...
anon on women...
latest user's comments
- were talking about using your words here not actually doing it…
- because saying your going to scalp 100 Nazis is totally using …
>saying. so yes that is exactly that
Ah yes I am certain that this dumbass woman had a knife with her and planned to grab some Nazis by their hair, ritualistically and very bloodily cutting off their scalp, showing off the war trophy to the amazed antifa onlookers. I'm also very certain that this hippiepuncher had seen this specific facebook post and punched her in reaction to it because he disagreed and not because he is a literal retard degenerate too imbecilic to engage in proper discourse.
were talking about using your words here not actually doing it the point is she said it and her intention was to do ill will towards a random human being based on nothing more than he doesn't believe what i believe reeeeeeee
what #41 said. She was loading M80's into a fucking bottle, and throwing it. You're an idiot.
This is a few seconds before the knockout Punch, notice she still has her hat and her weapon (Broken glass bottle) which she drops until she gets up and attacks again getting knocked out.
You're comfortable with punching a disarmed woman in a defensive posture square in the face though?
I can't think of many ideologies where that would be acceptable. Islam maybe?
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
Disarmed woman? Are you fucking blind?
Have you seen the follow up picture/Vid?
Ok let me give you a timeline.
First this picture, she's using a bottle and firecrackers etc.
Blue Shirt pushes her and she loses her hat and bottle
She GETS BACK UP to keep fighting (You can see it in the vid)
Blue shirt finally gives her a good punch and she gets knocked out.
Now some backstory, to prove that she is not innocent, she wrote ahead of time on Social Media that she was going out to get 100 Nazi Scalps
I love inglorious Bastards, but I'm pretty sure she didn't mean it as a loving reference to the film and more as in she was going to attack "Nazis"
So not a "Disarmed woman in a defensive posture" though you should rephrase that to "Punching a disarmed person in a defensive posture" it seems like you're prioritising that it's a chick, haven't you heard? SJWs and Feminism achieved equality!
This isn't a movie. Knocking someone out is a good way to accidentally kill them.
I don't see any evidence of her fighting. She's knees bent and feet planted as the guy runs at her. It's an obviously defensive stance.
I don't know why you think it's OK to punch someone when it's not for self-defense, especially someone weaker than you, e.g. a small woman.
Not OK in my book. Not OK in most books.
She's throwing Firecrackers in bottles, and possibly intended to hit them with the bottle. Do you honestly wait until after you've been burnt or cut up badly until you fight back?
You can see at the end of the vid that she didn't get hit hard enough to have anything other than fall over. She's back up so evidently she wasn't hit hard.
I think we have different ideas of self defence. What is Self Defense to you? Because to me on the Vid I see them as they're fighting, the fights ongoing, it doesn't start the second the camera is on them it started before. AT THAT POINT, Despite getting pushed and losing her shit (as we see in the picture) she's gotten back up and moved back in to fight AGAIN. She had the chance to leave or stop and went back in, how clearer can this be? Of course she's got a "Defensive posture" because she can see him throwing a punch, let me remind you again, SHE GOT UP, AND WENT BACK TO FIGHT HIM AGAIN before that. In a fight you don't just let a punch hit you, you try to block or avoid it, ergo the defensive posture.
Seriously It's starting to feel like I'm gonna have to explain basic combat here
So go ahead, define your idea of self defence to me. Because what I see from the guy is alright to be self defence when he punches her. Because whatever first happened with the bottle and the firecrackers she was throwing, maybe she didn't swing at him or try to hit him at all and he just pushed her to stop her throwing shit at people. But after being disarmed and pushed away, when given the chance to stop or leave, she came back to attack Blue shirt again.
Have I repeated it enough? She came at Blue shirt again after he pushed her away. You get that? She was pushed away, disarmed, and we see her on video closing the distance towards him. Makes sense? She got pushed away and came back at him. You got it?
If you've got a complaint on fights not being fair for "a small woman" there is no excuse or redeeming feature when it's the aggressor. The Defender can respond with appropriate or equal force, that she's smaller and a woman doesn't protect her anymore. Think that's bad? The Feminists think so too, but they also think she should be treated equally. So what's equality then? Should all men be treated like women? All Women treated like Men? Should everyone just react equally to a woman/man as they would to a man/woman? If that was a man or a woman being the aggressor, both are equal opportunity targets to a punch.
> She got pushed away and came back at him. You got it?
In the video you linked, she's standing in one place when he runs up and punches her. So no?
> If you've got a complaint on fights not being fair for "a small woman" there is no excuse or redeeming feature when it's the aggressor.
No one said anything about a "fair fight". You're supposed to avoid fighting altogether when possible (both legally and morally). The reason you don't aggressively attack an unarmed person who is obviously weaker (a woman, a child, a disabled person, ect.) is because there's no reasonable expectation that they can overpower you given the chance. Therefore, there's no reason to act first.
Did your parents teach you that it's OK to hit a woman as long as she's a feminist? I can't tell if I should feel bad for you or your parents.
Have you actually watched the video?
She moves in from the left (That's not just the camera moving towards her, you can see her walking up). She tries to attack a couple of guys to her left, but they fall to the floor fighting. She then turns back to her original direction, takes another step forward toward BlueShirt, Mind you this whole time she has a Fists raised/ready to punch. And if you slow down the video, you actually see her reaching out to push Blue Shirt.
Forget what you said earlier, I slowed it down (By holding spacebar it shows the video as frame by frame) and that's not defensive posture, that's an attempt to attack/push.
IN ADDITION, Due to the picture we KNOW she had a weapon and hat earlier. That she doesn't have now. SO WE KNOW she was disarmed and continued to attack.
As if I didn't fucking repeat it enough already
So your "You're supposed to avoid fighting altogether when possible (both legally and morally). The reason you don't aggressively attack an unarmed person who is obviously weaker (a woman, a child, a disabled person, ect.) is because there's no reasonable expectation that they can overpower you given the chance. Therefore, there's no reason to act first." STILL has NO BASIS because she is the one who is attacking.
For reasons that really don't want to repeat again.
Jesus christ this has literally come down to us looking at the video Frame By Frame and at every point of this, you're wrong. Can you not admit that she's an Anti-Fa asshole who came to the Free Speech Rally with hostile intentions in mind? That she's the aggressor? That She's in the wrong?
Or are you too much of a Shill White Knight. Seriously, "Did your parents teach you that it's OK to hit a woman as long as she's a feminist? I can't tell if I should feel bad for you or your parents." That was one of the very basic arguments the Feminist movement campaigned against. And now you're devolving into attempts to shame or insult me/my parentage.
Well, I've come to terms that either you're too much of a shill, white knight, or that you are a troll. My only regret is how much effort I put in ridiculing your arguments.
Like, maybe 20 minutes total. It felt a bit cathartic actually
So either fuck off, or stop repeating yourself (With the "it's wrong to hit a woman because of X") or at least stop making claims that can easily be debunked
simply by watching the video.
Or who knows? Maybe you'll acknowledge that your first opinion was wrong and that she really is the one at fault here? I don't know if CREW and CTR allow tactical retreats though.
I'll leave you with the remind that your nation is a Loss Edit
No point in arguing anything else about this if you don't know the rest of the context or background information needed to establish facts:
Being in this chaotic environment it's reasonable to assume danger in the people dressed unlike yourself (whether you're antifa seeing everybody else dressed unlike you, or whether you're somebody who is dressed unlike antifa and seeing antifa). Its reasonable to assume you can be attacked by anybody, really.
So that's one thing. Second, you are allowed to act to guarantee your safety and not go overboard when you're being attacked. The same to protect other people, ensuring their safety from attackers or people who most definitely will attack or hurt others.
To put yourself in
and justify yourself or justify him, you'd need to know whether this guy had sound reason to believe she was a threat to his safety or other people's safety.
But it could go either way. She could have seen
as a threat and may have been trying to defend
Now you see the importance of knowing intentions.
She's apparently got more background information than the light blue shirt guy has. It sheds light on her probable intentions. It is not in her favor, but thats for courts and people on FJ who want to argue, not for the guy in the video (only if he knew nothing about her; and I assume he didn't, but again we refer to the environment which provides him almost the same justification).
He may have seen her as a threat previously, if he recognized her as the same bottle wielding individual clearly posing as a potential threat (and who he clearly interacted with previously). He tried to subdue her once. Then attempted a second time to subdue her. Maybe he assessed that she was still a threat if he recognized her, and saw that she had neither fled nor indicated defensiveness.
The moment before he punches, there is no indication of cowering defensiveness or surrender on her part, either of which would have voided any justification of the guy's punch.
So he's got something going for his justification. I don't think he went overboard. As far as I know, seeing from the 1 video and 1 picture, he never went overboard. People are overreacting. He pushed her once, and that was only enough to stop her from doing anything with the bottle (presumably). Decked her once, as far as I know, and he didn't go beyond that.
As for her? She could've seen him running up to her, posing as a threat, and had been ready to defend her own self. She's justified in defending herself, but she's not the one on trial here.
Side note -
You probably ought to look your hero up. His name is Nathan Damingo.
At no point in the video does she make a fist.
Her feet are not moving during the confrontation (look at the hips).
No one's even touched on the idiot in the Bible sweatshirt in the background kicking someone already knelt on the ground.
Weak-minded people see what they want to see I guess. Makes me sad.
It's cute that you think either side came for a "free speech rally" as opposed to just fighting, but I'm not sure why you think I'm defending her actions. Guy in the video obviously crossed the line is all; it's troubling to see people praising him.
You start shit, you get hit. If you die, maybe you will serve as an example for future generation that you should not behave like a prick.
has deleted their comment.
- Also decades of experience and you still cant read i said you …
Life is a warzone
- wow you are a sad old man yelling at people on the internet d…
Life is a warzone
- i like how you were shown facts but you resort to im older tha…
Life is a warzone
has deleted their comment.
You keep shitting on this website, but your account is a level 331, you're ranked #169. You've posted a total of nearly 16,000 comments in the year and a half you've been here.
Basically, you explained the ghetto word for word and then got pissed off when he asked if you lived there, angrily told him not to make assumptions, then made the assumption that he's 15 years old and called him a dumb fuck for no reason, exclaiming that he will never do and see what you have.
Your FJ profile says you're a historian and a philosopher. Are you sure you aren't just a comedian?
And I'm just waiting for the "I was only joking" reply. What you say shows what kind of a person you are, and if you would throw all of that away just to say a bunch of stupid bullshit and get a reaction out of people, that makes you even more of a jackass.
Also decades of experience and you still cant read i said you were shown fact not you were showing facts
wow you are a sad old man yelling at people on the internet do you cry yourself to sleep everynight
- **PVTANON roll picture searched Shill **
- ｃｏｍｍｉｅ ｓｃｕｍ
Start Up The Rotors
The Short But Beautiful...
- not a big surprise
Better dead than red
- the game is called RIFT
Show Comments (0)