Upload
Login or register

Orangepeel

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:10/23/2010
Location:New Zealand
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#445
Comment Ranking:#11011
Highest Content Rank:#445
Highest Comment Rank:#1080
Content Thumbs: 18047 total,  20239 ,  2192
Comment Thumbs: 4310 total,  5491 ,  1181
Content Level Progress: 2.9% (29/1000)
Level 216 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 217 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 3% (3/100)
Level 242 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 243 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:7
Content Views:647854
Times Content Favorited:1032 times
Total Comments Made:1079
FJ Points:20818
Favorite Tags: GAMEofthrones (2)

latest user's comments

#4877 - Don't say boys, because it implies that there are no women inv… 07/22/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +3
#1590 - Comment deleted 07/22/2012 on KILL IT BEFORE IT LAYS EGGS!!! +1
#4725 - Funny how some of the worst shootouts happen in areas with str… 07/21/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +6
#172 - Picture 07/19/2012 on A WIZARD -1
#133 - I think you mean "Syndrome of a Down". 07/18/2012 on youtube +2
#273 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 07/16/2012 on Fabulous 0
#335 - anon (07/16/2012) [-]
#292 - supermudkipz has deleted their comment.
#266 - Liberal Logic.  [+] (1 new reply) 07/16/2012 on Fabulous +2
#275 - pokershark has deleted their comment.
#450 - Picture 07/15/2012 on Dubstep +6
#90 - ME GUSTA 07/15/2012 on really tho +2
#10 - A pilot! Don't be racist! 07/15/2012 on Niggers. 0
#262 - Picture 07/15/2012 on Oh Jew -1
#4131 - Well so far, I haven't seen the workers in any industrialized …  [+] (16 new replies) 07/14/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar
#4960 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
nigga what do you call the paris commune?
#4961 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Over. Finished. Done. Also, SMALL SCALE.

Communism is a regressive ideology that seeks to transform society back to the stone age, where we were untraveled and lived in uncommunicative castes.
User avatar
#4963 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
>clearly hasn't read marx

Not even going to bother
#4974 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Having to reply here because I've run out of space...

Yes, but that doesn't mean it becomes an exclusivity.

Why not? The majority of the people don't want Product X. It uses too many resources (which are limited) to produce and doesn't satisfy enough people. Unless of course, the stuck a price on it which can pay for production and replenish the resources (but that's capitalism).

So how exactly will you satisfy the small handful of consumers if the majority of the people don't want product X?
User avatar
#4975 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
I'm really sleepy and I'm having a hard time gathering my thoughts. I will reply to you sometime... just send me a private message or something.

kudos.
#4976 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Alright then.
#4964 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Actually, it's precisely because I WAS a marxist that I can come to this conclusion that it's one of the most backwards, REACTIONARY ideologies man can believe in.

So, where's the "worker's revolution" now? Why hasn't happened on such a global scale?

You're not going to bother because you clearly CAN'T.
User avatar
#4965 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Because we've (we as in everyone) taken it upon ourselves to distract ourselves with trivial matters such as race, sex, etc.

Mass media/propaganda didn't exactly fuel the revolution. McCarthy didn't help, either.
#4966 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Or maybe it's because no one really wants the entire production of goods managed by uneducated rednecks and the working class?
User avatar
#4967 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Or maybe it's because those who currently hold political power don't want to get off the marry-go-round?
#4968 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
those who political power don't want to get off the marry-go-round?

Rubbish. Even Lenin abandoned worker self-management in favour of War communism, then state capitalism.

Pic very related.

Question: How are bakeries and retailers meant to operate under Communism? Clearly, in the end they can't be state-owned if the state is to disappear now isn't it?
User avatar
#4969 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Yeah, good for Lenin, he was a fucktard.

Decisions will be made using direct democracy. If something is needed it is produced. It's really not that hard to grasp.
#4970 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Lenin, he was a fucktard.
He certainly was. Something we can both agree on.

If something is needed it is produced. It's really not that hard to grasp.

You've oversimplified it. Under capitalism, if I wanted a DVD that they don't produce anymore, technically I can still get it if I order it and can pay for it. That way, the workers who produce it still get paid even if just to satisfy one consumer. What if in your stateless society only one or two consumers want a particular film produced, are they to miss out, or will they be forced to get it from a Capitalist country where consumer satisfaction is higher?
User avatar
#4971 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Well, you can always bootleg DVD's and then burn them onto blank ones. D.I.Y ethics play a big role in marxist ideology.

Just to clarify I hate the fuck out of stalinists, trotskyists, maoists, leninists, and many of the others. I'm more fond of the Situationist International.
#4972 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Well, you can always bootleg DVD's and then burn them onto blank ones.

>SIGH

Fine then. If only a small handful of consumers want product X but the producers don't make it anymore. If the high price set is payable, then the producers will make a profit and the consumers will be satisfied. Under communism, you have no prices, it's only "democratic". So what happens to the people who want product X then? Apparently, since they're a minority, then have no say in production and will need to go to a capitalist country to have their voices heard.

D.I.Y ethics play a big role in marxist ideology.
Like I said before, that's a very backwards standpoint. I didn't build the house I'm in, I didn't build the computer I'm using. Under Communism, the workers should own what they make, right?
User avatar
#4973 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Yes, but that doesn't mean it becomes an exclusivity.
#30209 - First time I ever came on FJ it was yellow and Purple... and v… 07/13/2012 on Social Board 0
#30202 - Same here. It makes me feel so much better about myself, both … 07/13/2012 on Social Board +1
#30196 - Good choice. What are your reasons?  [+] (2 new replies) 07/13/2012 on Social Board +1
User avatar
#30198 - szymonf (07/13/2012) [-]
ethical/health benefits
User avatar
#30202 - Orangepeel (07/13/2012) [-]
Same here. It makes me feel so much better about myself, both physically and morally.
#30193 - Hey, I am. Exactly four years now.  [+] (4 new replies) 07/13/2012 on Social Board +1
User avatar
#30194 - szymonf (07/13/2012) [-]
cool. i have been for about 18 months
User avatar
#30196 - Orangepeel (07/13/2012) [-]
Good choice. What are your reasons?
User avatar
#30198 - szymonf (07/13/2012) [-]
ethical/health benefits
User avatar
#30202 - Orangepeel (07/13/2012) [-]
Same here. It makes me feel so much better about myself, both physically and morally.
#4053 - Of course you'd have to be aware. Hell, in Poland it's a crime…  [+] (18 new replies) 07/13/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar
#4083 - szymonf (07/13/2012) [-]
the USSR is proof that communism had not been tried

a communist revolution is supposed to occur in an industrialized nation, like england at the time.
Russia was the farthest thing from being industrialized. It was still feudal. The communist leaders attempted to create an industrial revolution after the proletarian revolution
User avatar
#4131 - Orangepeel (07/14/2012) [-]
Well so far, I haven't seen the workers in any industrialized nation "seize control of the means of production", so if you say it hasn't been tried, it probably never will.
User avatar
#4960 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
nigga what do you call the paris commune?
#4961 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Over. Finished. Done. Also, SMALL SCALE.

Communism is a regressive ideology that seeks to transform society back to the stone age, where we were untraveled and lived in uncommunicative castes.
User avatar
#4963 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
>clearly hasn't read marx

Not even going to bother
#4974 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Having to reply here because I've run out of space...

Yes, but that doesn't mean it becomes an exclusivity.

Why not? The majority of the people don't want Product X. It uses too many resources (which are limited) to produce and doesn't satisfy enough people. Unless of course, the stuck a price on it which can pay for production and replenish the resources (but that's capitalism).

So how exactly will you satisfy the small handful of consumers if the majority of the people don't want product X?
User avatar
#4975 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
I'm really sleepy and I'm having a hard time gathering my thoughts. I will reply to you sometime... just send me a private message or something.

kudos.
#4976 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Alright then.
#4964 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Actually, it's precisely because I WAS a marxist that I can come to this conclusion that it's one of the most backwards, REACTIONARY ideologies man can believe in.

So, where's the "worker's revolution" now? Why hasn't happened on such a global scale?

You're not going to bother because you clearly CAN'T.
User avatar
#4965 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Because we've (we as in everyone) taken it upon ourselves to distract ourselves with trivial matters such as race, sex, etc.

Mass media/propaganda didn't exactly fuel the revolution. McCarthy didn't help, either.
#4966 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Or maybe it's because no one really wants the entire production of goods managed by uneducated rednecks and the working class?
User avatar
#4967 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Or maybe it's because those who currently hold political power don't want to get off the marry-go-round?
#4968 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
those who political power don't want to get off the marry-go-round?

Rubbish. Even Lenin abandoned worker self-management in favour of War communism, then state capitalism.

Pic very related.

Question: How are bakeries and retailers meant to operate under Communism? Clearly, in the end they can't be state-owned if the state is to disappear now isn't it?
User avatar
#4969 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Yeah, good for Lenin, he was a fucktard.

Decisions will be made using direct democracy. If something is needed it is produced. It's really not that hard to grasp.
#4970 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Lenin, he was a fucktard.
He certainly was. Something we can both agree on.

If something is needed it is produced. It's really not that hard to grasp.

You've oversimplified it. Under capitalism, if I wanted a DVD that they don't produce anymore, technically I can still get it if I order it and can pay for it. That way, the workers who produce it still get paid even if just to satisfy one consumer. What if in your stateless society only one or two consumers want a particular film produced, are they to miss out, or will they be forced to get it from a Capitalist country where consumer satisfaction is higher?
User avatar
#4971 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Well, you can always bootleg DVD's and then burn them onto blank ones. D.I.Y ethics play a big role in marxist ideology.

Just to clarify I hate the fuck out of stalinists, trotskyists, maoists, leninists, and many of the others. I'm more fond of the Situationist International.
#4972 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Well, you can always bootleg DVD's and then burn them onto blank ones.

>SIGH

Fine then. If only a small handful of consumers want product X but the producers don't make it anymore. If the high price set is payable, then the producers will make a profit and the consumers will be satisfied. Under communism, you have no prices, it's only "democratic". So what happens to the people who want product X then? Apparently, since they're a minority, then have no say in production and will need to go to a capitalist country to have their voices heard.

D.I.Y ethics play a big role in marxist ideology.
Like I said before, that's a very backwards standpoint. I didn't build the house I'm in, I didn't build the computer I'm using. Under Communism, the workers should own what they make, right?
User avatar
#4973 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Yes, but that doesn't mean it becomes an exclusivity.
#487 - Throws*  [+] (2 new replies) 07/12/2012 on Simple, but accurate +13
#520 - sippay (07/12/2012) [-]
MFW I shove lack of belief in (something with no proof) down peoples throats?
#531 - anon (07/12/2012) [-]
Actually, any acceptance of a statement, conclusion or truth is a belief :. Atheists wave their beliefs about like fundamentalists.
#29638 - 17 / M / New Zealand & Hong Kong. Not really sur… 07/12/2012 on Social Board +1
#3924 - And? The USSR killed huge numbers of Poles when it invaded Pol…  [+] (20 new replies) 07/12/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +1
User avatar
#3991 - szymonf (07/12/2012) [-]
yes i am well aware of the mass graves at Katyn and other areas. My parents made sure it was burned into my brain. And I know about the holodomor I wrote an essay about it back in May...

We both know what my argument to the USSR will be so i will just leave it at that
User avatar
#4053 - Orangepeel (07/13/2012) [-]
Of course you'd have to be aware. Hell, in Poland it's a crime to deny both the Holocaust and the crimes committed by the USSR.

The USSR is proof Communism doesn't work. Initially when Lenin took power he handed all capital over to the workers. But when the civil war broke out he reverted back to the capitalist structure (manager ----> Workers ------> Wages) because production had dropped tremendously, but had everything still state owned. Communism has been tried, and it hasn't worked. Worker ownership deteriorates to state capitalism.
User avatar
#4083 - szymonf (07/13/2012) [-]
the USSR is proof that communism had not been tried

a communist revolution is supposed to occur in an industrialized nation, like england at the time.
Russia was the farthest thing from being industrialized. It was still feudal. The communist leaders attempted to create an industrial revolution after the proletarian revolution
User avatar
#4131 - Orangepeel (07/14/2012) [-]
Well so far, I haven't seen the workers in any industrialized nation "seize control of the means of production", so if you say it hasn't been tried, it probably never will.
User avatar
#4960 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
nigga what do you call the paris commune?
#4961 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Over. Finished. Done. Also, SMALL SCALE.

Communism is a regressive ideology that seeks to transform society back to the stone age, where we were untraveled and lived in uncommunicative castes.
User avatar
#4963 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
>clearly hasn't read marx

Not even going to bother
#4974 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Having to reply here because I've run out of space...

Yes, but that doesn't mean it becomes an exclusivity.

Why not? The majority of the people don't want Product X. It uses too many resources (which are limited) to produce and doesn't satisfy enough people. Unless of course, the stuck a price on it which can pay for production and replenish the resources (but that's capitalism).

So how exactly will you satisfy the small handful of consumers if the majority of the people don't want product X?
User avatar
#4975 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
I'm really sleepy and I'm having a hard time gathering my thoughts. I will reply to you sometime... just send me a private message or something.

kudos.
#4976 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Alright then.
#4964 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Actually, it's precisely because I WAS a marxist that I can come to this conclusion that it's one of the most backwards, REACTIONARY ideologies man can believe in.

So, where's the "worker's revolution" now? Why hasn't happened on such a global scale?

You're not going to bother because you clearly CAN'T.
User avatar
#4965 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Because we've (we as in everyone) taken it upon ourselves to distract ourselves with trivial matters such as race, sex, etc.

Mass media/propaganda didn't exactly fuel the revolution. McCarthy didn't help, either.
#4966 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Or maybe it's because no one really wants the entire production of goods managed by uneducated rednecks and the working class?
User avatar
#4967 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Or maybe it's because those who currently hold political power don't want to get off the marry-go-round?
#4968 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
those who political power don't want to get off the marry-go-round?

Rubbish. Even Lenin abandoned worker self-management in favour of War communism, then state capitalism.

Pic very related.

Question: How are bakeries and retailers meant to operate under Communism? Clearly, in the end they can't be state-owned if the state is to disappear now isn't it?
User avatar
#4969 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Yeah, good for Lenin, he was a fucktard.

Decisions will be made using direct democracy. If something is needed it is produced. It's really not that hard to grasp.
#4970 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Lenin, he was a fucktard.
He certainly was. Something we can both agree on.

If something is needed it is produced. It's really not that hard to grasp.

You've oversimplified it. Under capitalism, if I wanted a DVD that they don't produce anymore, technically I can still get it if I order it and can pay for it. That way, the workers who produce it still get paid even if just to satisfy one consumer. What if in your stateless society only one or two consumers want a particular film produced, are they to miss out, or will they be forced to get it from a Capitalist country where consumer satisfaction is higher?
User avatar
#4971 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Well, you can always bootleg DVD's and then burn them onto blank ones. D.I.Y ethics play a big role in marxist ideology.

Just to clarify I hate the fuck out of stalinists, trotskyists, maoists, leninists, and many of the others. I'm more fond of the Situationist International.
#4972 - anon (07/24/2012) [-]
Well, you can always bootleg DVD's and then burn them onto blank ones.

>SIGH

Fine then. If only a small handful of consumers want product X but the producers don't make it anymore. If the high price set is payable, then the producers will make a profit and the consumers will be satisfied. Under communism, you have no prices, it's only "democratic". So what happens to the people who want product X then? Apparently, since they're a minority, then have no say in production and will need to go to a capitalist country to have their voices heard.

D.I.Y ethics play a big role in marxist ideology.
Like I said before, that's a very backwards standpoint. I didn't build the house I'm in, I didn't build the computer I'm using. Under Communism, the workers should own what they make, right?
User avatar
#4973 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Yes, but that doesn't mean it becomes an exclusivity.
#3895 - I know exactly what you mean. But then again it's probably bec… 07/11/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
#3892 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 07/11/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar
#3893 - unncommon (07/11/2012) [-]
Holy shit this is a slow moving board...I can't believe that my post is still the latest...
User avatar
#3895 - Orangepeel (07/11/2012) [-]
I know exactly what you mean. But then again it's probably because it's got nowhere near the amount of people /pol/ has.
#3 - Hey sdgrave. You didn't need to delete your earlier comment. 07/11/2012 on Paradise -1
#3877 - Sure, the workers didn't own the means of production, but the … 07/11/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
#3875 - It's arguable, yes, but the mercantilist system and colonialis… 07/11/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (47)
[ 47 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
22 comments displayed.
#44 - robobloxx (11/10/2013) [-]
Oh **** ****** what are you doing
#45 to #44 - Orangepeel (11/20/2013) [-]
Do I know you?
#46 to #45 - robobloxx (11/21/2013) [-]
You kept thumbing up something called blueberry boy or something and I wanted to know why.
#47 to #46 - Orangepeel (11/22/2013) [-]
I don't recall... when would this have been?
#38 - petal (07/27/2012) [-]
You're an idiot. Please go educate yourself.
You're an idiot. Please go educate yourself.
#39 to #38 - Orangepeel (07/27/2012) [-]
That's quite an accusation you're making. You don't come across as very intelligent... are you a liberal, by any chance?
#40 to #39 - petal (07/27/2012) [-]
I'm not labeled.
#41 to #40 - Orangepeel (08/02/2012) [-]
Well you've labeled yourself as an idiot, clearly, seeing as how you've gone and made statements without explaining or even backing them up.
#42 to #41 - petal (08/02/2012) [-]
Right.
#43 to #42 - Orangepeel (08/02/2012) [-]
You're an idiot.
#37 - anon (07/15/2012) [-]
u racist bro???
#34 - techketzer (07/08/2012) [-]
You are awesome.   
And you should feel awesome.
You are awesome.
And you should feel awesome.
#35 to #34 - Orangepeel (07/08/2012) [-]
Just doing my part in the war against leftards.
#36 to #35 - techketzer (07/08/2012) [-]
#33 - satyrn (02/16/2012) [-]
I
#31 - satyrn (02/16/2012) [-]
AM
#30 - satyrn (02/16/2012) [-]
IN
#29 - satyrn (02/16/2012) [-]
YOUR
#28 - satyrn (02/16/2012) [-]
PROFILE

#32 to #28 - Orangepeel (02/16/2012) [-]
What about it????
#26 - satyrn (02/15/2012) [-]
You look like an Ari to me...
#27 to #26 - Orangepeel (02/16/2012) [-]
Well done ;)
[ 47 comments ]
Leave a comment