x
Click to expand

Orangepeel

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:10/23/2010
Last Login:3/22/2015
Location:New Zealand
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#821
Comment Ranking:#29888
Highest Content Rank:#752
Highest Comment Rank:#1080
Content Thumbs: 14301 total,  16307 ,  2006
Comment Thumbs: 4105 total,  5270 ,  1165
Content Level Progress: 23.4% (234/1000)
Level 213 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 68.99% (69/100)
Level 240 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 241 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:6
Content Views:488630
Times Content Favorited:879 times
Total Comments Made:1052
FJ Points:17889

latest user's comments

#3872 - The KKK was a racist and violent organization that leaned stau…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/11/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +3
#3881 - repostsrepost (07/11/2012) [-]
The KKK was founded by the Democratic Party. FDR's first appointee to the Supreme Court was a card carrying Klan member by the name of Hugo Black. In contrast the National Rifle Association, now deemed as a right wing group, was America's first civil rights organization. It tried to stop Democratic lawmakers from imposing gun control aimed at stopping blacks from buying legal guns.
#3871 - Please, point out all the genocidal famines which Capitalism h…  [+] (22 new replies) 07/11/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +3
User avatar #3913 - szymonf (07/11/2012) [-]
genocide is the systematic murder of a single ethnic group

america may not have done this, however they have murdered thousands of civilians in south east asia, terror bombed japanease and german cities, killed 40k civilians in Iraq and overthrew central american governments that ended up murdering thousands of their population
User avatar #3924 - Orangepeel (07/12/2012) [-]
And? The USSR killed huge numbers of Poles when it invaded Poland, used German POW's as slave labour, started the Winter War, but also murdered huge numbers of their own citizens (a communist trait, practically), unmatched by Capitalist powers.

genocide is the systematic murder of a single ethnic group

IE millions of Slavs in Russia.

User avatar #3991 - szymonf (07/12/2012) [-]
yes i am well aware of the mass graves at Katyn and other areas. My parents made sure it was burned into my brain. And I know about the holodomor I wrote an essay about it back in May...

We both know what my argument to the USSR will be so i will just leave it at that
User avatar #4053 - Orangepeel (07/13/2012) [-]
Of course you'd have to be aware. Hell, in Poland it's a crime to deny both the Holocaust and the crimes committed by the USSR.

The USSR is proof Communism doesn't work. Initially when Lenin took power he handed all capital over to the workers. But when the civil war broke out he reverted back to the capitalist structure (manager ----> Workers ------> Wages) because production had dropped tremendously, but had everything still state owned. Communism has been tried, and it hasn't worked. Worker ownership deteriorates to state capitalism.
User avatar #4083 - szymonf (07/13/2012) [-]
the USSR is proof that communism had not been tried

a communist revolution is supposed to occur in an industrialized nation, like england at the time.
Russia was the farthest thing from being industrialized. It was still feudal. The communist leaders attempted to create an industrial revolution after the proletarian revolution
User avatar #4131 - Orangepeel (07/14/2012) [-]
Well so far, I haven't seen the workers in any industrialized nation "seize control of the means of production", so if you say it hasn't been tried, it probably never will.
User avatar #4960 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
nigga what do you call the paris commune?
#4961 - anonymous (07/24/2012) [-]
Over. Finished. Done. Also, SMALL SCALE.

Communism is a regressive ideology that seeks to transform society back to the stone age, where we were untraveled and lived in uncommunicative castes.
User avatar #4963 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
>clearly hasn't read marx

Not even going to bother
#4974 - anonymous (07/24/2012) [-]
Having to reply here because I've run out of space...

Yes, but that doesn't mean it becomes an exclusivity.

Why not? The majority of the people don't want Product X. It uses too many resources (which are limited) to produce and doesn't satisfy enough people. Unless of course, the stuck a price on it which can pay for production and replenish the resources (but that's capitalism).

So how exactly will you satisfy the small handful of consumers if the majority of the people don't want product X?
User avatar #4975 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
I'm really sleepy and I'm having a hard time gathering my thoughts. I will reply to you sometime... just send me a private message or something.

kudos.
#4976 - anonymous (07/24/2012) [-]
Alright then.
#4964 - anonymous (07/24/2012) [-]
Actually, it's precisely because I WAS a marxist that I can come to this conclusion that it's one of the most backwards, REACTIONARY ideologies man can believe in.

So, where's the "worker's revolution" now? Why hasn't happened on such a global scale?

You're not going to bother because you clearly CAN'T.
User avatar #4965 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Because we've (we as in everyone) taken it upon ourselves to distract ourselves with trivial matters such as race, sex, etc.

Mass media/propaganda didn't exactly fuel the revolution. McCarthy didn't help, either.
#4966 - anonymous (07/24/2012) [-]
Or maybe it's because no one really wants the entire production of goods managed by uneducated rednecks and the working class?
User avatar #4967 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Or maybe it's because those who currently hold political power don't want to get off the marry-go-round?
#4968 - anonymous (07/24/2012) [-]
those who political power don't want to get off the marry-go-round?

Rubbish. Even Lenin abandoned worker self-management in favour of War communism, then state capitalism.

Pic very related.

Question: How are bakeries and retailers meant to operate under Communism? Clearly, in the end they can't be state-owned if the state is to disappear now isn't it?
User avatar #4969 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Yeah, good for Lenin, he was a fucktard.

Decisions will be made using direct democracy. If something is needed it is produced. It's really not that hard to grasp.
#4970 - anonymous (07/24/2012) [-]
Lenin, he was a fucktard.
He certainly was. Something we can both agree on.

If something is needed it is produced. It's really not that hard to grasp.

You've oversimplified it. Under capitalism, if I wanted a DVD that they don't produce anymore, technically I can still get it if I order it and can pay for it. That way, the workers who produce it still get paid even if just to satisfy one consumer. What if in your stateless society only one or two consumers want a particular film produced, are they to miss out, or will they be forced to get it from a Capitalist country where consumer satisfaction is higher?
User avatar #4971 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Well, you can always bootleg DVD's and then burn them onto blank ones. D.I.Y ethics play a big role in marxist ideology.

Just to clarify I hate the fuck out of stalinists, trotskyists, maoists, leninists, and many of the others. I'm more fond of the Situationist International.
#4972 - anonymous (07/24/2012) [-]
Well, you can always bootleg DVD's and then burn them onto blank ones.

>SIGH

Fine then. If only a small handful of consumers want product X but the producers don't make it anymore. If the high price set is payable, then the producers will make a profit and the consumers will be satisfied. Under communism, you have no prices, it's only "democratic". So what happens to the people who want product X then? Apparently, since they're a minority, then have no say in production and will need to go to a capitalist country to have their voices heard.

D.I.Y ethics play a big role in marxist ideology.
Like I said before, that's a very backwards standpoint. I didn't build the house I'm in, I didn't build the computer I'm using. Under Communism, the workers should own what they make, right?
User avatar #4973 - arisaka (07/24/2012) [-]
Yes, but that doesn't mean it becomes an exclusivity.
#3835 - Good point, very good point. 07/11/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +1
#3832 - I meant regarding replies rather than posts. The anons who spa…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/11/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +1
User avatar #3834 - airguitar (07/11/2012) [-]
Yea but there are still SOME, and not every single person has an account. I have found that people only get thumbed down if they have a radical view and then don't provide any evidence or argument.

Plus, we need to thumb down fascist soldier's comments...
User avatar #3835 - Orangepeel (07/11/2012) [-]
Good point, very good point.
#3830 - You can hide all anonymous comments, though.  [+] (4 new replies) 07/11/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +1
User avatar #3831 - airguitar (07/11/2012) [-]
Like you just said though, sometimes you contribute to conversations as an anon. SOMETIMES anons say intellectually stimulating things also, so I don't want to block them out.
User avatar #3832 - Orangepeel (07/11/2012) [-]
I meant regarding replies rather than posts. The anons who spam rubbish tend to do so with comments, rather than replies.
User avatar #3834 - airguitar (07/11/2012) [-]
Yea but there are still SOME, and not every single person has an account. I have found that people only get thumbed down if they have a radical view and then don't provide any evidence or argument.

Plus, we need to thumb down fascist soldier's comments...
User avatar #3835 - Orangepeel (07/11/2012) [-]
Good point, very good point.
#166 - >TFW I'm in New Zealand and I actually do have class in July... 07/11/2012 on Burn. 0
#3814 - <---- Pro-life libertarian here.  [+] (1 new reply) 07/11/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +2
User avatar #3815 - latinotornado (07/11/2012) [-]
eh close enough lol
#3812 - I agree. I normally switch to anon whenever I get into a debat… 07/11/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +2
#275 - Haha I ******* saved the .jpg one. THAT one actually ma… 07/10/2012 on Jewelry in the night +1
#273 - Already done :D But **** I'd be so mad if that happened…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/10/2012 on Jewelry in the night +1
#274 - dalemc (07/10/2012) [-]
I know i went on it mate, i'm still laughing at it, its fucking awesome man.
#275 - Orangepeel (07/10/2012) [-]
Haha I fuckin' saved the .jpg one. THAT one actually made me lol
#271 - I will post it then!  [+] (4 new replies) 07/10/2012 on Jewelry in the night +1
#272 - dalemc (07/10/2012) [-]
Awesome man, quick though, someone might steal it dude! I posted a cat touching a watermellon in a comment day later someone posts it and has 4000 thumbs, i was raging xD.
#273 - Orangepeel (07/10/2012) [-]
Already done :D But fuck I'd be so mad if that happened to me ae.
#274 - dalemc (07/10/2012) [-]
I know i went on it mate, i'm still laughing at it, its fucking awesome man.
#275 - Orangepeel (07/10/2012) [-]
Haha I fuckin' saved the .jpg one. THAT one actually made me lol
#270 - Picture 07/10/2012 on Jewelry in the night +2
#266 - Picture  [+] (8 new replies) 07/10/2012 on Jewelry in the night 0
User avatar #269 - dalemc (07/10/2012) [-]
Still fucking laughing man xD bet if you uploaded that you'd get front page aw thats so funny.
User avatar #271 - Orangepeel (07/10/2012) [-]
I will post it then!
#272 - dalemc (07/10/2012) [-]
Awesome man, quick though, someone might steal it dude! I posted a cat touching a watermellon in a comment day later someone posts it and has 4000 thumbs, i was raging xD.
#273 - Orangepeel (07/10/2012) [-]
Already done :D But fuck I'd be so mad if that happened to me ae.
#274 - dalemc (07/10/2012) [-]
I know i went on it mate, i'm still laughing at it, its fucking awesome man.
#275 - Orangepeel (07/10/2012) [-]
Haha I fuckin' saved the .jpg one. THAT one actually made me lol
#268 - dalemc (07/10/2012) [-]
#270 - Orangepeel (07/10/2012) [-]
#245 - I read this as "Jewry in the night" :)  [+] (3 new replies) 07/10/2012 on Jewelry in the night +4
#253 - stretchedvagina (07/10/2012) [-]
I read it as "Strangers in the Night"
#247 - anonymous (07/10/2012) [-]
not me.
User avatar #290 - tauh (07/11/2012) [-]
¡Qué inyustisia!
#3765 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 07/10/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +5
User avatar #3771 - reaganomix (07/10/2012) [-]
I love you
#3763 - Picture 07/10/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +1
#956 - This is one of my favourite Penn Jillette quotes. 07/09/2012 on Science and religion +5
#3686 - That's a good point, but libertarianism is characterized by it… 07/09/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
#3678 - Libertarians are not socially liberal. Social liberal includes…  [+] (4 new replies) 07/09/2012 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar #3679 - EventHorizon (07/09/2012) [-]
Socially liberal is far more accurate than socially conservative. The extremes of liberalism are so moderate compared to the thresholds of conservatism.
#3683 - anonymous (07/09/2012) [-]
I see where you're coming from, but I still disagree. A liberal may claim to support gay marriage whereas a libertarian would just want the government out of marriage altogether.
User avatar #3684 - EventHorizon (07/09/2012) [-]
True enough, I'd certainly agree with you there. The problem is though that you can't really use the term "libertarian" to describe "libertarians". It's like explaining what red looks like to someone by saying "well it looks red, but it certainly isn't blue or green".
User avatar #3686 - Orangepeel (07/09/2012) [-]
That's a good point, but libertarianism is characterized by its support of limited government. Neither Social Conservatism or Social Liberalism supports limited government. To describe libertarianism to someone who only knows about liberalism and conservatism it's not accurate to say "economically conservative, socially liberal" because there are too many areas where libertarianism comes into conflict with both, particularly social liberalism.

For example, a libertarian might disagree with economic conservative in areas such as protectionism, central banking, military spending and corporate welfare.
A libertarian would disagree with a social liberal in areas such as centralization (Liberarians oppose a large federal goverment), marriage, guns, free speech, etc.

tl;dr "economic conservative, social liberal" is an over-simplification. Liberarianism should be classified as an entirely different ideology rather than a mixture of several IMO.
#81 - It even used "you're" correctly... 07/09/2012 on YAY +2
#3635 - Picture  [+] (16 new replies) 07/09/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +6
User avatar #3642 - szymonf (07/09/2012) [-]
well there is a major difference
#3646 - anonymous (07/09/2012) [-]
The US has no right to interfere with the affairs of another nation that don't threaten US security.

User avatar #3649 - szymonf (07/09/2012) [-]
i hated kony 2012 and i believe that the wars in afghanistan and iraq were both illegal

I also agree with you statemtn

I also dont believe that the US should interfere in the congo

However there is a major difference between the two
#3698 - acaciastrain (07/09/2012) [-]
So let me guess. You believe that Obama is doing better than Bush in this area. Am I right?
User avatar #3706 - szymonf (07/10/2012) [-]
in what area?
#3708 - acaciastrain (07/10/2012) [-]
War in the Middle East.
User avatar #3710 - szymonf (07/10/2012) [-]
welllllllllllllllllllllllllll
i disagree with what obama has done
and i view the us involvement in iraq as a total failure mainly because of obama

but i hate bush
primarily for starting two illegal wars

so i believe both are equally terrible
#3712 - acaciastrain (07/10/2012) [-]
Ok well at least you're consistent. I'm so sick of the idiots who think Bush was a monster but will praise all Obama does even though he's just as bad. I think the wars were necessary but there is obviously a better way we could have went about it. I also believe that ultimately these wars have helped America.
User avatar #3715 - szymonf (07/10/2012) [-]
except fascistsoldier
he is not allowed to have an opinion
User avatar #3714 - szymonf (07/10/2012) [-]
mehhh...
destroyed what ever good image america had
racked up massive debt with china
but everyone is entitled to their opinions and that is my opinion
#3716 - acaciastrain (07/10/2012) [-]
Told terrorists if you fuck with us we will find you and put a bullet in your head. Took down a number of dictators. Now America is virtually untouchable.
#3651 - anonymous (07/09/2012) [-]
How? The US claimed to "Liberate" Iraq from Hussein the same way the Kony scam calls for US "liberation" from Joseph Kony.

Oh yeah, both Uganda and Iraq have oil.

Where's the major difference?
User avatar #3666 - szymonf (07/09/2012) [-]
you also forgot that the us invaded for "WMD's"
I know central africa has oil, one of the reasons as to why i am against us involvement

and they were not planning on liberating uganda since kony isnt the leader of the nation
#3667 - anonymous (07/09/2012) [-]
But US involvement in say, Libya, had nothing to do with WMDs, same with involvement in Kuwait. Even the claim for Afghanistan threatening US security was unconvincing.

To be fair the US wasn't planning on invading Uganda in the first place, the Kony campaign and all its sheep were just telling the US to.
User avatar #3743 - szymonf (07/10/2012) [-]
the US (under Obama) had sent military advisor's to Uganda where they continue to train the Ugandan army.
An army that has committed as many, if not more atrocities as Joseph Kony.
Most of them in the name of Western Capitalism
#3762 - anonymous (07/10/2012) [-]
the US (under Obama) had sent military advisor's to Uganda where they continue to train the Ugandan army.
That's not what the military is for. Helping the Ugandan government is a job for the UN, not American National Defence.

Most of them in the name of Western Capitalism
The atrocities committed in the name of Capitalism are dwarfed by the genocide committed in the name of socialism.
#3531 - No, according to Marx the state is only necessary for the tran…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/08/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +1
User avatar #3585 - arisaka (07/09/2012) [-]
I applaud you.
#3763 - Orangepeel (07/10/2012) [-]
#3530 - That's called the "Consensus model", but it was drop…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/08/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +1
User avatar #3587 - arisaka (07/09/2012) [-]
Just bootleg 'em.
#3532 - feelythefeel (07/08/2012) [-]
Well, you've got me beat. Thanks for making me think.
#3525 - And isn't the goal of communism a classless STATELESS society?…  [+] (6 new replies) 07/08/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +1
User avatar #3527 - feelythefeel (07/08/2012) [-]
I think that's Anarchist Communism, seen here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_communism
User avatar #3586 - arisaka (07/09/2012) [-]
You are a fruit.
#3593 - feelythefeel (07/09/2012) [-]
User avatar #3531 - Orangepeel (07/08/2012) [-]
No, according to Marx the state is only necessary for the transition of Capitalism to socialism. Pure communism is "A classless, stateless society where the means of production are communally owned". Pure Communism abolishes the State, hence the USSR and other "communist" states were not really communist, they were just socialist.
User avatar #3585 - arisaka (07/09/2012) [-]
I applaud you.
#3763 - Orangepeel (07/10/2012) [-]
#3524 - My question was how does the government determine demand? Unde…  [+] (4 new replies) 07/08/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +1
User avatar #3526 - feelythefeel (07/08/2012) [-]
Depends on how the resources are dispersed.

For example, there may be some sort of form that a family/living group would fill out that would decide what the family/living group would want, with a minimum and maximum value based on nutritional value and other aspects of importance. The more people that, say, request oranges, the stronger the initiative for producing oranges.

This is just an example, though.
User avatar #3530 - Orangepeel (07/08/2012) [-]
That's called the "Consensus model", but it was dropped by Khrushchev when he took office because it wasn't working.

So what if I want 10 000 copies of a particular DVD, but there's only enough resources give everyone one copy? Under capitalism, I can get that 10000 copies so long as I can pay for it, and that money spent will in turn increase production of said product and lower prices for everyone. But under Communism, will I still be free to choose what I want?
User avatar #3587 - arisaka (07/09/2012) [-]
Just bootleg 'em.
#3532 - feelythefeel (07/08/2012) [-]
Well, you've got me beat. Thanks for making me think.

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #44 - robobloxx (11/10/2013) [-]
Oh **** ****** what are you doing
User avatar #45 to #44 - Orangepeel (11/20/2013) [-]
Do I know you?
User avatar #46 to #45 - robobloxx (11/21/2013) [-]
You kept thumbing up something called blueberry boy or something and I wanted to know why.
User avatar #47 to #46 - Orangepeel (11/22/2013) [-]
I don't recall... when would this have been?
#38 - petal (07/27/2012) [-]
You're an idiot. Please go educate yourself.
You're an idiot. Please go educate yourself.
User avatar #39 to #38 - Orangepeel (07/27/2012) [-]
That's quite an accusation you're making. You don't come across as very intelligent... are you a liberal, by any chance?
User avatar #40 to #39 - petal (07/27/2012) [-]
I'm not labeled.
User avatar #41 to #40 - Orangepeel (08/02/2012) [-]
Well you've labeled yourself as an idiot, clearly, seeing as how you've gone and made statements without explaining or even backing them up.
User avatar #42 to #41 - petal (08/02/2012) [-]
Right.
User avatar #43 to #42 - Orangepeel (08/02/2012) [-]
You're an idiot.
#37 - anonymous (07/15/2012) [-]
u racist bro???
#34 - techketzer (07/08/2012) [-]
You are awesome.   
And you should feel awesome.
You are awesome.
And you should feel awesome.
#35 to #34 - Orangepeel (07/08/2012) [-]
Just doing my part in the war against leftards.
User avatar #33 - satyrn (02/16/2012) [-]
I
User avatar #31 - satyrn (02/16/2012) [-]
AM
User avatar #30 - satyrn (02/16/2012) [-]
IN
User avatar #29 - satyrn (02/16/2012) [-]
YOUR
User avatar #28 - satyrn (02/16/2012) [-]
PROFILE

User avatar #32 to #28 - Orangepeel (02/16/2012) [-]
What about it????
User avatar #26 - satyrn (02/15/2012) [-]
You look like an Ari to me...
User avatar #27 to #26 - Orangepeel (02/16/2012) [-]
Well done ;)
User avatar #21 - FoonyJoonk (01/04/2011) [-]
Seriously dude,your a douchebag,you can ****** burn in hell
#25 to #21 - ahhnothankyou (05/23/2011) [-]
ahh no thank you, none of that on here please.
User avatar #24 to #21 - Orangepeel (01/13/2011) [-]
Hahaha, I didn't think so.
#23 to #21 - Orangepeel (01/04/2011) [-]
Also, allow me to correct your grammar:

"Seriously dude, you're a douchebag. You can ******* burn in Hell."

There we go.
User avatar #22 to #21 - Orangepeel (01/04/2011) [-]
O RLY? May I as why? Or do you need to go back under a bridge?
#20 - cockadoodie (01/02/2011) [-]
talk to me!!!
User avatar #16 - cRookie (12/29/2010) [-]
"C'mon let's get this to the front page!"

And I'm the thumbwhore :) Nice one!
User avatar #17 to #16 - Orangepeel (12/29/2010) [-]
What can I say? Encouraging people to thumb your content is different from spamming pages with retoasts...
User avatar #18 to #17 - cRookie (12/29/2010) [-]
What was the retoast? I did the Christmas Time comic from scratch and I didn't get the idea from anywhere. Clearly you don't know what you're talking about and I won't continue this anymore under the given circumstances.
User avatar #19 to #18 - Orangepeel (12/29/2010) [-]
Most of your 'OC' is just well known ideas.
I know exactly what you are referring to, and I'd just like to point out your hypocrisy of even thinking you can slam me for supposedly 'thumb - whoring' when you yourself lose thumbs due to petty adverts.
Were you trolling or something? You DO realize you lose a tremendous amount of thumbs when you spam adverts for crap content...
User avatar #8 - luxrizzle (12/04/2010) [-]
I'm pretty sure we have had this talk before Mr J.
You're the Nazi, I am your little Turkish helper.
User avatar #9 to #8 - Orangepeel (12/04/2010) [-]
That's better :3
User avatar #10 to #9 - luxrizzle (12/04/2010) [-]
DAMN STRAIGHT
User avatar #11 to #10 - Orangepeel (12/04/2010) [-]
Our Theocracy is advancing.
User avatar #12 to #11 - luxrizzle (12/04/2010) [-]
Is it really? How many new recruits do we have?
Am I still leader of the military and also foreign affairs?
User avatar #13 to #12 - Orangepeel (12/04/2010) [-]
You are, and we're on TEH move for MOAR recruits.
User avatar #14 to #13 - luxrizzle (12/04/2010) [-]
are you being serial?
thats awesome.
User avatar #15 to #14 - Orangepeel (12/04/2010) [-]
FAH kyeh!
User avatar #6 - luxrizzle (12/04/2010) [-]
dont forget what I told you to ponder jewboy.
#7 to #6 - Orangepeel (12/04/2010) [-]
Don't you dare mix me with Jews, you ******* Nazi.
By the way, 'jewboy' is two words.
#1 - earthquake **User deleted account** (10/26/2010) [-]
you're a great person i wish you the best in life, live it to the full just know everyone loves you :) have a nice day
User avatar #2 to #1 - Orangepeel (10/26/2010) [-]
I LOVE YOU.
#3 to #2 - earthquake **User deleted account** (10/26/2010) [-]
i love you too <3 :D
User avatar #4 to #3 - Orangepeel (10/26/2010) [-]
Hahaha ;)
Well... this is a little... spontaneous?
#5 to #4 - earthquake **User deleted account** (10/26/2010) [-]
haha :p
 Friends (0)