Upload
Login or register

Luni

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 27
Date Signed Up:10/22/2010
Last Login:8/31/2012
Stats
Content Thumbs: 831 total,  1032 ,  201
Comment Thumbs: 341 total,  676 ,  335
Content Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 83 Content: Srs Business → Level 84 Content: Srs Business
Comment Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 134 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 135 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:0
Content Views:45348
Times Content Favorited:64 times
Total Comments Made:252
FJ Points:1164
Favorite Tags: Google (2) | Racist (2)

latest user's comments

#58 - Nuclear power, is actually 1. Safe if protected and maintai…  [+] (11 replies) 06/02/2011 on world news +7
#101 - karlossacramento (06/02/2011) [-]
3. is wrong... it is actually the only reason why it isn't already used everywhere
User avatar
#110 - Just Another Guy (06/02/2011) [-]
I heard they found some random mountain (possibly in China) where America is gonna dump all the nuclear waste they produce. 3 is definitely not correct :)
#79 - fregi (06/02/2011) [-]
2.: dude, i live in norway, and there are still reindeer and shit dying up here from contaminated food after chernobyl...
User avatar
#66 - mjcninjapanda (06/02/2011) [-]
I half agree with you. Nuclear power may very well be the power of the future(even if Germany claim to be shutting all theres down by 2022). But meltdowns even if they are unlikely will happen eventually and it's not just down to incompetence. also it's not easy to dispose of at ALL, it takes hundreds of years for the waste to be broken down and right now they are having major problems with storage.And as far as Chernobyl goes, what the Chernobyl babies who are born (and continue to be) disfigured with short lifespan. The area is now a ghost town that's no one is sick....no one lives there.
User avatar
#73 - Jewssassin (06/02/2011) [-]
As I understand it, even if there is a melt down in most modern plants (like the plants the French have, which are the best I believe) it would do barely anything because of all the safety precautions. Chernobyl had like NO protection around the core and wasnt there just no meltdown at Three Mile Island, just almost had one but it was but promptly stopped?
User avatar
#76 - mjcninjapanda (06/02/2011) [-]
Well i'm not talking about how likely it is but if it does happen it can be devastating depending on it's were abouts. For example, i live in Ireland and if there was a meltdown at the Sellifield nuclear plant(which is in Wales) I would have to move no question due to the prevailing winds. Granted there safety precautions but nature can cause them. And if the sea level rises it could very well happen.
#65 - nowayimgonasayyes (06/02/2011) [-]
Not completely true, to maintain a stable fission reaction you need to keep the temperature of the fuel within a certain temperature barrier, if this is to high, or too low, the reaction will not occur. In turn, to do so, you need to wast a lot of power. Also, enriching Uranium is a difficult process that takes a long time and energy. Then, to dispose of the radioactive isotopes that are left over after the fission reaction occurs it is necessary to dig deep under ground to berry the radioactive wast, and this damages the ecology greatly... Finally any small malfunctions will result in a another Chernobyl or what happened in Japan. Thus, the question arises, to go nuclear or to continue using fossil fuel as the world's main energy supply?
#80 - anon (06/02/2011) [-]
small malfunctions? are you crazy, when a nuclear powerplant is damaged in anyway or shut down, control rods are dropped into the radioactive source. a machine holds them up so when the power goes out they are immediately dropped so even if the machine itself breaks it will work. Chenoble was the equivalent of using dynamite to cook your food instead of a fire. The reason these babies are supposedly being butated due to the radiation is because russia sees no problem in selling them irradiated water. I know I'll get thumbed down for being anonamous but i just finished 2 years of study of nuclear power. the explosions in japan were not nuclear explosions, they were explosions at a nuclear plant, difference. Know your shit. Bitch.
#105 - nowayimgonasayyes (06/02/2011) [-]
First off, I am Russian so i know what happened in Chernobyl. Second, what i said was that any malfunctions, even the smallest one will have catastrophic consequences. Learn to read. Third off, you seem to know that control rods exist, but you don't seem to know what they are used for. During a fission reaction atoms of Uranium are hit with neutrons. One neutrons which collides with a single atom of Uranium will knock three other neutrons from that atom and send them colliding into other atoms.This is called a chain reaction. Control rods are made from silicium or silicon. They have a property which allows the to absorb stray neutrons. When a non-nuclear explosion occurs the ability to control the reaction in this way is lost.
User avatar
#63 - SexHarassmentPanda (06/02/2011) [-]
"easy to dispose of"?
that is nuclear powers main flaw actually, what to do with the waste?
I am 100% with you that it is the safest and cleanest energy source, but when something out of human control happens, it is the most dangerous
Fukushima was excellently maintained, but when they had an earthquake which damaged it, they barely avoided a massive disaster when the radiation started leaking
User avatar
#61 - brony (06/02/2011) [-]
boobs
#77 - Picture 04/08/2011 on Something Goofy 0
#92 - If captain picard were a baked good he'd be captain Piecard  [+] (3 replies) 03/18/2011 on Sextrek +4
User avatar
#96 - touriopalfreyman (03/18/2011) [-]
if captain picard was as stupid as shit he would be captain retard
User avatar
#100 - RamboTrucker (03/18/2011) [-]
if captain picard took viagra he would be captain hard
User avatar
#134 - Luni (03/18/2011) [-]
I captain picard loved to party he'd be captain Partyard
#83 - If Captain Picard were really dumb he would be Captain Tard.  [+] (5 replies) 03/18/2011 on Sextrek 0
#88 - lambres has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#92 - Luni (03/18/2011) [-]
If captain picard were a baked good he'd be captain Piecard
User avatar
#96 - touriopalfreyman (03/18/2011) [-]
if captain picard was as stupid as shit he would be captain retard
User avatar
#100 - RamboTrucker (03/18/2011) [-]
if captain picard took viagra he would be captain hard
User avatar
#134 - Luni (03/18/2011) [-]
I captain picard loved to party he'd be captain Partyard
#283 - Bong=Ancient artifact?! BITCHES IT'S A LAMP!  [+] (2 replies) 03/16/2011 on Oblivious Parents +16
User avatar
#294 - magicgiraffe (03/16/2011) [-]
Flower vase. Yesssss.
User avatar
#309 - iTzZac (03/16/2011) [-]
If the bong acted as a flower vase:

See flower in bong

'Must be a science experiment'