Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

LazierThanThou

Rank #31 on Subscribers
LazierThanThou Avatar Level 310 Content: Wizard
Offline
Send mail to LazierThanThou Block LazierThanThou Invite LazierThanThou to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 29
Video Games Played: League of Legends, L.A. Noire, GTA IV
Interests: Porn, sexuality, politics, philosophy
Date Signed Up:12/18/2009
Location:Somewhere where I dont know where I am
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 118419 total,  126483 ,  8064
Comment Thumbs: 4171 total,  4590 ,  419
Content Level Progress: 25.12% (1256/5000)
Level 310 Content: Wizard → Level 311 Content: Wizard
Comment Level Progress: 38% (38/100)
Level 234 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 235 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:1363
Content Views:36021246
Times Content Favorited:2382 times
Total Comments Made:1169
FJ Points:40451
Withdrawn and introverted. Infectiously perverted.

latest user's comments

#277 - I'm pretty sure they're banking on deterrence. This is a thin…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/31/2014 on JUSTICE IS SERVED +2
User avatar #294 - Onemanretardpack (08/31/2014) [-]
Yes, but people his age have actually killed someone and got less jail time
#61 - I accept your diversity, but it's just not for me. I like the… 08/31/2014 on What a Twist 0
#59 - No, because of the stat increases based on how you level. …  [+] (2 new replies) 08/30/2014 on What a Twist +1
#60 - mrarm (08/30/2014) [-]
Thumb for useful math link, but I'll put it down to a difference in taste. I like doing ALL THE PLANNING beforehand and then following that path to being blatantly overpowered.

The early game in Oblivion is brutal though.
User avatar #61 - LazierThanThou (08/31/2014) [-]
I accept your diversity, but it's just not for me. I like the freedom of sneaking through one dungeon, then rushing through with a two hander ripping everything to pieces in the next. Oblivion doesn't cater to that, unless I want to severely gimp my character.
#98 - I thought you were supposed to be pretending to be some uber feminazi.  [+] (1 new reply) 08/29/2014 on taco +3
User avatar #198 - spceinvdr (08/29/2014) [-]
she/he recently commented on the webm of tyrone on how we should "lynch that nigger". The jig is up
#47 - I absolutely detest the leveling system in Oblivion. Even if …  [+] (4 new replies) 08/29/2014 on What a Twist 0
#58 - mrarm (08/30/2014) [-]
Because you have to sleep to level?
User avatar #59 - LazierThanThou (08/30/2014) [-]
No, because of the stat increases based on how you level.

I forget all the specific details because it made me really angry when I first learned about it, but you basically have to level very carefully and get just the right skill ups in order to get the right stats. If you deviate too much, you lose stats and aren't able to get them back. Once you level up, they're gone forever.

It burns me up, because I had a game that I'd put like 40 hours into, but I ran into a wall where I just couldn't compete with enemies. My gear was horrible, but I couldn't get new gear because I couldn't stand up to enemies. My stats were horrible, because I like to level different things a little here, a little there, and that's absolutely no conducive to good leveling in Oblivion.

I'm not going to play a game that actively seeks to discourage me from having fun.

Here's more info on the leveling system:

www.uesp.net/wiki/Oblivion:Creating_an_Awesome_Character#Leveling_Up
#60 - mrarm (08/30/2014) [-]
Thumb for useful math link, but I'll put it down to a difference in taste. I like doing ALL THE PLANNING beforehand and then following that path to being blatantly overpowered.

The early game in Oblivion is brutal though.
User avatar #61 - LazierThanThou (08/31/2014) [-]
I accept your diversity, but it's just not for me. I like the freedom of sneaking through one dungeon, then rushing through with a two hander ripping everything to pieces in the next. Oblivion doesn't cater to that, unless I want to severely gimp my character.
#46 - You get experience based upon the value of the item you create…  [+] (3 new replies) 08/29/2014 on What a Twist 0
User avatar #62 - iamrealfancy (09/01/2014) [-]
What spell is that? the one that transmutes the metal?
User avatar #64 - iamrealfancy (09/01/2014) [-]
Sweeeeeet.
#239 - There's this concept in western societies called "mens re… 08/29/2014 on /int/ reacts to a tragedy 0
#156 - Everybody else doesn't trust adults to make adult decisions. …  [+] (31 new replies) 08/28/2014 on /int/ reacts to a tragedy 0
User avatar #160 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Everybody else realizes that being an adult doesn´t make you intelligent.
Everybody else realizes that adults can go crazy.
Everybody else realizes that adults are often even more idiotic than children.
Everybody else realizes that, other than children, adults can be evil.

That has nothing to do with Freedom - there is no such thing as freedom in a world filled with as many people as we have on earth. If you want to be free, go life in the jungle or dessert, all alone - when people meet, there are rules and when there are rules there is no freedom.

Giving everybody guns is NOT freedom. It´s idiocy. Pure and utter idiocy.

As was your last sentence.

Who´s the faint of heart? Who´s the coward? Those who dare go out of their house unarmed? Or those who need to have a weapon next to their bed to even sleep?
#207 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
#206 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
User avatar #208 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
You people are so incredible dense, it´s unbelievable. Seriously, I can´t take any argument with gun-nuts serious because they simply seem to refuse to think as soon as it´s about guns.
User avatar #210 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Also instead of pulling any logic or reasoning, or even fact you just whine about how dumb we are when presenting with facts that prove guns in America make it safer to live.
User avatar #209 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Also just a question, which do you think kills more people, rifles or handguns?
User avatar #212 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Weapons.

I´m not talking against assault rifles. I´m talking about every kind of shooting weapon that can´t be used for anything but - shooting. It´s okay to own one or two if you´re a hunter, trained several years and are working to keep the enviromental and natural balance up - or a policemen, defending the publicity yet another interesting point - look up how many bullets german policemen have fired in the whole year of 2013 - and then think about why those numbers happened. if not you don´t need a weapon.
User avatar #214 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Also one of your previous statments

"And telling me that a system in which a girl of 9 years is allowed to handle a deadly weapon while a grown-up of 20 years isn´t allowed to drink or go to a concert is in any way reasonable - well, in that case you´re simply wrong. It´s completely retarted."

Is wrong if you look at facts and statistics
User avatar #216 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Fact: Giving 9 year olds a gun is pure and utter idiocy.

point.
#219 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Also giving an untrained 9 year old a fully automatic SMG is a bad idea, and they should not have done that.
User avatar #222 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Please, enlighten me - why should a nine year old feel the need to be able to handle ANY weapon at all? 9 year olds should play gameboy and hit each other with sticks, not handle deadly arsenal.
User avatar #223 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
What part of "Also giving an untrained 9 year old a fully automatic SMG is a bad idea, and they should not have done that." Does not make sense to you? I was agreeing with your statement that giving an untrained 9 year old a automatic firearm is a bad idea.
Also you "Need" a firearm as much as you "Need" Free speech, or a Car, or a Home, in fact it would just be easy to tie us all up and feed us protein milkshakes through our noses, that is all we need!
User avatar #224 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
I just wanted to put a point that you stressed "untrained" and "automatic"- no matter if trained or not and no matter if the weapon is automatic or not - it´s not a good idea.

And no, that´s idiotic.
Free Speech brings tolerance, brings ideas, brings progress.
A Car brings you home, brings you far away, brings you everywhere.
A home gives you warmth, safety, a place to go to.

A gun? Hm, yeah - a gun brings you bullets. That´s it. It doesn´t even bring you safety if everybody has one.
User avatar #228 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Double Correction

Free Speech brings hatred, ignorance, and general intolerace.
A Car brings you death, getaways from crime, and helps in crime (more than a gun in some cases).
A home gives you danger, a place for dangerous creatures to hide, and crimials.
A gun gives you protection, security, and knowledge that no one will be able to infringe those previous rights.
User avatar #226 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Correction

Free Speech brings tolerance, brings ideas, brings progress.
A Car brings you home, brings you far away, brings you everywhere.
A home gives you warmth, safety, a place to go to.
A gun gives you protection, security, and knowledge that no one will be able to infringe those previous rights.
#213 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Showing that facts have no effect on your argument i have stopped pulling them up, but it seems you just don't want people to own guns because they don't need them, this is a very poor and dumb argument, and it really depends on what you mean by "Need"

There are many more cases of self-defense with firearms than there are normal homicides, if you don't want the majority of people to die from crimes, than you NEED private ownership of firearms, but if you don't mind small crime rates jumping a lot with self defense cases going down, then you don't need guns.
User avatar #215 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
See, I don´t even READ your facts - because they are all non-withstanding vs. the bigger fact that guns are a potencial risk factor with no reasonable benefit because the only benefit they give is protection against people with smaller guns - which isn´t needed if those people don´t have guns. That´s my whole point. If you don´t need something, it doesn´t have any benefits and it puts others in danger it´s idiotic to have it.

Just look at every other country - if there are less weapons there´s less crime. That´s simple fucking logic. Of cause the crime would first skyrocket - until the criminals who did NOT give away there arms have been discovered and disarmed. Because it´s way easier for the police to identiy a criminal if only the few radical criminals are armed. It´ll take money and casualities, but on the long run it´s the only way to go and to become a more civilized place.

Btw, that´s it from my side - I don´t want to spend my time with people who seem to stop thinking as soon as this problem is talked about, no matter how intelligent they might be normally.
User avatar #220 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Andrew Klavan: Shut Up.

This represents your argument in a 4 minute video, i kept it short as i know you haev a very short attention-span.
#217 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
"See, I don´t even READ your facts"

SEE I DIDNT EVEN READ YOUR STATMENT BUT I AM RIGHT BECAUSE I AM
- ljxjlos

Really man? I just retorted your statement about that, but because YOU are the thick one who refuses to listen to any facts, logic and reasoning, you are , in a sense, a 3 year old who is saying "If i cant see you, you're not there!" Exept replace "You" with facts, and we got you.

Also you are calling me dumb and idiotic when you refuse to look, or read any of my facts? Do you even know what arguing is??

Also almost all of firearms used in crimes are illegal, and if found by the police, would have been confiscated.
User avatar #221 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Okay, I might have sounded like an idiot with this - but it´s true, nontheless.

See, I´ve had this discussion dozens of times. And i´ve readen all those fucking facts at least half a dozen of times.

It didn´t even take me reading them a second time to realize that they end up with "guns are less dangerous than you think"

BUT: They are NOT harmless. They are dangerous weapons. That´s one fact that overcomes all others in this discussion. It´s like saying (I´m overplaying now) : Hitler built the Autobahn and there was work for everyone. He was less dangerous than you think.

People need to think on long run and on lung run, over a path of casualities and money, there will be less gun crime if there are less guns. Illegal gunholders will be found because they can´t hide between millions of legal gunholders, black markets will fall and so will illegal weapon trading paths.

But because it will take money noone wants to go this path.

Really, it is that fucking simple: Less guns = less crime. Believe what you want, this is how it is and this is how it works nearly everywhere.
User avatar #225 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

Less guns = less gun crime

This is true,
however, more people will die though small crimes, such as robbery, muggins, ECT, but it depends on if you want to appeal to the majority, or the minority,
and this always is a hard choice, but i decide the majority of people deserve to protect themselves over the minority that get killed because of accidents, or possibly criminal actions.
User avatar #227 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Obviously Godwins Law has a point? Why shouldn´t it? Hitler Jokes are fun.

Then, I wonder, why it works in Germany for example? Believe it or not, we have up to no guns and still there are not many deaths in small crimes. Weird, huh?
User avatar #236 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
*Reply limit at your last comment*

I took the reply bait, and i don't expect you to reply to this comment.

"I could have looked for sources, stats, etc, etc - but why? I don´t care enough"
If you refused to look up facts and statistics, that means you either do not really care about the problem, or you know you are just wrong.

"and there´s always a counterstat saying the exact opposite"
If you did find a counterstat, most of the are VERY biased, and will refused, like you, and logic or reason, and give very misleading fact without cites, while i gave you the raw data, with cites, and translated it for you.

"Always. I´m german, I won´t change anything in the US, so why should I care enough to take hours looking up stuff."
IT took me about 10 total minutes to get all the info i gathered, most of it was just typing, there is this magical tool called "Google"
Find it here: www.google.com

"It´s simply logic thinking that I did and that was more than enough. Every normal person understands it. The only legit point you had was the cultural diversity. That´s about it. "
And that more guns (in America) leads to reduced crime, homicides, and general small crimes, or youknow, the whole argument? But the fact that you refused to even read it, means that you don't understand it.

"And this is easily the worst clichée about us germans. That´s what our people degenerated to. We were a country of poets and artists one, free-thinkers. Now we´re degraded to wörkwörkwörk - and that´s just sad. So please, do me a favor and don´t remind me of it, okay?"
This is the first valid point you have made this entire argument, and i have nothing to retort this, having been an American, and never been to german, and have thus not had enough experience to state anything (With full confidence that its true) about German culture.


#233 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Germany is 6% black.

America is 14% black.

If we deported all Blacks, our gun crime would reduce over 80%, and overall crime by around 70%

Of course this is terrible, intolerant, and impractical, and hard to put into work, just like your idea to ban all firearms for civilians.

User avatar #230 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
"Hitler Jokes are fun. "

Yus but u dunt need dem hurtful jokes assut jokes, ban dem pls.

User avatar #231 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
They don´t harm, tho - that´s the difference.

Also, yet again, this is it for me, I´m getting tired of this.
User avatar #234 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Your argument is nothing but ignorace:
I bring up a penty amout of facts and statistic, with cites, you bring up only 3, but no cites, although i knew they were true.
You used very flawed lodgic, and presented it as truth
You refuse to realize 2 things might be different
You refused to look at any of my facts, logic, or reasoning, just to attempt to make a point.

If little to no work makes you tired, i feel very sad, i all ways though of the Germans ans hard working, and logical people, luckily you proved me wrong, so how about you look at this page, and thing before you speak, as you obviously do not.

yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

Have a good day, and don't get an aneurysm looking at more than 15 words on one page.
User avatar #235 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Dude,...I said stop it.

I could have looked for sources, stats, etc, etc - but why? I don´t care enough - and there´s always a counterstat saying the exact opposite. Always. I´m german, I won´t change anything in the US, so why should I care enough to take hours looking up stuff.
It´s simply logic thinking that I did and that was more than enough. Every normal person understands it. The only legit point you had was the cultural diversity. That´s about it.

And this is easily the worst clichée about us germans. That´s what our people degenerated to. We were a country of poets and artists one, free-thinkers. Now we´re degraded to wörkwörkwörk - and that´s just sad. So please, do me a favor and don´t remind me of it, okay?
User avatar #232 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
But muh cuson keled demself so de b ded b cause u told dat humfull joke.
User avatar #229 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
You even heard of this little thing call cultural difference?

Detroit has very strict gun laws, and has the highest gun crime in America.

If you went to Africa and banned very fattys foods, it would not effect the obesity rates, does that mean banning very fatty foods has no effect on obesity?
No.
#154 - From what I can tell, there is no legal age restriction on whe…  [+] (33 new replies) 08/28/2014 on /int/ reacts to a tragedy 0
User avatar #155 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
"incredible bad judgement"

Yeah, obviously - it´s incredible bad judgement to give children lethal weapons.
As well as giving every-fucking-body the possibility to own a gun.

Everyone else understands this, only the US are to dense what this is concerned.
User avatar #156 - LazierThanThou (08/28/2014) [-]
Everybody else doesn't trust adults to make adult decisions.

Freedom is scary and freedom is volatile. It's not for the faint of heart or cowards.
User avatar #160 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Everybody else realizes that being an adult doesn´t make you intelligent.
Everybody else realizes that adults can go crazy.
Everybody else realizes that adults are often even more idiotic than children.
Everybody else realizes that, other than children, adults can be evil.

That has nothing to do with Freedom - there is no such thing as freedom in a world filled with as many people as we have on earth. If you want to be free, go life in the jungle or dessert, all alone - when people meet, there are rules and when there are rules there is no freedom.

Giving everybody guns is NOT freedom. It´s idiocy. Pure and utter idiocy.

As was your last sentence.

Who´s the faint of heart? Who´s the coward? Those who dare go out of their house unarmed? Or those who need to have a weapon next to their bed to even sleep?
#207 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
#206 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
User avatar #208 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
You people are so incredible dense, it´s unbelievable. Seriously, I can´t take any argument with gun-nuts serious because they simply seem to refuse to think as soon as it´s about guns.
User avatar #210 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Also instead of pulling any logic or reasoning, or even fact you just whine about how dumb we are when presenting with facts that prove guns in America make it safer to live.
User avatar #209 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Also just a question, which do you think kills more people, rifles or handguns?
User avatar #212 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Weapons.

I´m not talking against assault rifles. I´m talking about every kind of shooting weapon that can´t be used for anything but - shooting. It´s okay to own one or two if you´re a hunter, trained several years and are working to keep the enviromental and natural balance up - or a policemen, defending the publicity yet another interesting point - look up how many bullets german policemen have fired in the whole year of 2013 - and then think about why those numbers happened. if not you don´t need a weapon.
User avatar #214 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Also one of your previous statments

"And telling me that a system in which a girl of 9 years is allowed to handle a deadly weapon while a grown-up of 20 years isn´t allowed to drink or go to a concert is in any way reasonable - well, in that case you´re simply wrong. It´s completely retarted."

Is wrong if you look at facts and statistics
User avatar #216 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Fact: Giving 9 year olds a gun is pure and utter idiocy.

point.
#219 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Also giving an untrained 9 year old a fully automatic SMG is a bad idea, and they should not have done that.
User avatar #222 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Please, enlighten me - why should a nine year old feel the need to be able to handle ANY weapon at all? 9 year olds should play gameboy and hit each other with sticks, not handle deadly arsenal.
User avatar #223 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
What part of "Also giving an untrained 9 year old a fully automatic SMG is a bad idea, and they should not have done that." Does not make sense to you? I was agreeing with your statement that giving an untrained 9 year old a automatic firearm is a bad idea.
Also you "Need" a firearm as much as you "Need" Free speech, or a Car, or a Home, in fact it would just be easy to tie us all up and feed us protein milkshakes through our noses, that is all we need!
User avatar #224 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
I just wanted to put a point that you stressed "untrained" and "automatic"- no matter if trained or not and no matter if the weapon is automatic or not - it´s not a good idea.

And no, that´s idiotic.
Free Speech brings tolerance, brings ideas, brings progress.
A Car brings you home, brings you far away, brings you everywhere.
A home gives you warmth, safety, a place to go to.

A gun? Hm, yeah - a gun brings you bullets. That´s it. It doesn´t even bring you safety if everybody has one.
User avatar #228 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Double Correction

Free Speech brings hatred, ignorance, and general intolerace.
A Car brings you death, getaways from crime, and helps in crime (more than a gun in some cases).
A home gives you danger, a place for dangerous creatures to hide, and crimials.
A gun gives you protection, security, and knowledge that no one will be able to infringe those previous rights.
User avatar #226 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Correction

Free Speech brings tolerance, brings ideas, brings progress.
A Car brings you home, brings you far away, brings you everywhere.
A home gives you warmth, safety, a place to go to.
A gun gives you protection, security, and knowledge that no one will be able to infringe those previous rights.
#213 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Showing that facts have no effect on your argument i have stopped pulling them up, but it seems you just don't want people to own guns because they don't need them, this is a very poor and dumb argument, and it really depends on what you mean by "Need"

There are many more cases of self-defense with firearms than there are normal homicides, if you don't want the majority of people to die from crimes, than you NEED private ownership of firearms, but if you don't mind small crime rates jumping a lot with self defense cases going down, then you don't need guns.
User avatar #215 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
See, I don´t even READ your facts - because they are all non-withstanding vs. the bigger fact that guns are a potencial risk factor with no reasonable benefit because the only benefit they give is protection against people with smaller guns - which isn´t needed if those people don´t have guns. That´s my whole point. If you don´t need something, it doesn´t have any benefits and it puts others in danger it´s idiotic to have it.

Just look at every other country - if there are less weapons there´s less crime. That´s simple fucking logic. Of cause the crime would first skyrocket - until the criminals who did NOT give away there arms have been discovered and disarmed. Because it´s way easier for the police to identiy a criminal if only the few radical criminals are armed. It´ll take money and casualities, but on the long run it´s the only way to go and to become a more civilized place.

Btw, that´s it from my side - I don´t want to spend my time with people who seem to stop thinking as soon as this problem is talked about, no matter how intelligent they might be normally.
User avatar #220 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Andrew Klavan: Shut Up.

This represents your argument in a 4 minute video, i kept it short as i know you haev a very short attention-span.
#217 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
"See, I don´t even READ your facts"

SEE I DIDNT EVEN READ YOUR STATMENT BUT I AM RIGHT BECAUSE I AM
- ljxjlos

Really man? I just retorted your statement about that, but because YOU are the thick one who refuses to listen to any facts, logic and reasoning, you are , in a sense, a 3 year old who is saying "If i cant see you, you're not there!" Exept replace "You" with facts, and we got you.

Also you are calling me dumb and idiotic when you refuse to look, or read any of my facts? Do you even know what arguing is??

Also almost all of firearms used in crimes are illegal, and if found by the police, would have been confiscated.
User avatar #221 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Okay, I might have sounded like an idiot with this - but it´s true, nontheless.

See, I´ve had this discussion dozens of times. And i´ve readen all those fucking facts at least half a dozen of times.

It didn´t even take me reading them a second time to realize that they end up with "guns are less dangerous than you think"

BUT: They are NOT harmless. They are dangerous weapons. That´s one fact that overcomes all others in this discussion. It´s like saying (I´m overplaying now) : Hitler built the Autobahn and there was work for everyone. He was less dangerous than you think.

People need to think on long run and on lung run, over a path of casualities and money, there will be less gun crime if there are less guns. Illegal gunholders will be found because they can´t hide between millions of legal gunholders, black markets will fall and so will illegal weapon trading paths.

But because it will take money noone wants to go this path.

Really, it is that fucking simple: Less guns = less crime. Believe what you want, this is how it is and this is how it works nearly everywhere.
User avatar #225 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

Less guns = less gun crime

This is true,
however, more people will die though small crimes, such as robbery, muggins, ECT, but it depends on if you want to appeal to the majority, or the minority,
and this always is a hard choice, but i decide the majority of people deserve to protect themselves over the minority that get killed because of accidents, or possibly criminal actions.
User avatar #227 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Obviously Godwins Law has a point? Why shouldn´t it? Hitler Jokes are fun.

Then, I wonder, why it works in Germany for example? Believe it or not, we have up to no guns and still there are not many deaths in small crimes. Weird, huh?
User avatar #236 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
*Reply limit at your last comment*

I took the reply bait, and i don't expect you to reply to this comment.

"I could have looked for sources, stats, etc, etc - but why? I don´t care enough"
If you refused to look up facts and statistics, that means you either do not really care about the problem, or you know you are just wrong.

"and there´s always a counterstat saying the exact opposite"
If you did find a counterstat, most of the are VERY biased, and will refused, like you, and logic or reason, and give very misleading fact without cites, while i gave you the raw data, with cites, and translated it for you.

"Always. I´m german, I won´t change anything in the US, so why should I care enough to take hours looking up stuff."
IT took me about 10 total minutes to get all the info i gathered, most of it was just typing, there is this magical tool called "Google"
Find it here: www.google.com

"It´s simply logic thinking that I did and that was more than enough. Every normal person understands it. The only legit point you had was the cultural diversity. That´s about it. "
And that more guns (in America) leads to reduced crime, homicides, and general small crimes, or youknow, the whole argument? But the fact that you refused to even read it, means that you don't understand it.

"And this is easily the worst clichée about us germans. That´s what our people degenerated to. We were a country of poets and artists one, free-thinkers. Now we´re degraded to wörkwörkwörk - and that´s just sad. So please, do me a favor and don´t remind me of it, okay?"
This is the first valid point you have made this entire argument, and i have nothing to retort this, having been an American, and never been to german, and have thus not had enough experience to state anything (With full confidence that its true) about German culture.


#233 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Germany is 6% black.

America is 14% black.

If we deported all Blacks, our gun crime would reduce over 80%, and overall crime by around 70%

Of course this is terrible, intolerant, and impractical, and hard to put into work, just like your idea to ban all firearms for civilians.

User avatar #230 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
"Hitler Jokes are fun. "

Yus but u dunt need dem hurtful jokes assut jokes, ban dem pls.

User avatar #231 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
They don´t harm, tho - that´s the difference.

Also, yet again, this is it for me, I´m getting tired of this.
User avatar #234 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
Your argument is nothing but ignorace:
I bring up a penty amout of facts and statistic, with cites, you bring up only 3, but no cites, although i knew they were true.
You used very flawed lodgic, and presented it as truth
You refuse to realize 2 things might be different
You refused to look at any of my facts, logic, or reasoning, just to attempt to make a point.

If little to no work makes you tired, i feel very sad, i all ways though of the Germans ans hard working, and logical people, luckily you proved me wrong, so how about you look at this page, and thing before you speak, as you obviously do not.

yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

Have a good day, and don't get an aneurysm looking at more than 15 words on one page.
User avatar #235 - ljxjlos (08/28/2014) [-]
Dude,...I said stop it.

I could have looked for sources, stats, etc, etc - but why? I don´t care enough - and there´s always a counterstat saying the exact opposite. Always. I´m german, I won´t change anything in the US, so why should I care enough to take hours looking up stuff.
It´s simply logic thinking that I did and that was more than enough. Every normal person understands it. The only legit point you had was the cultural diversity. That´s about it.

And this is easily the worst clichée about us germans. That´s what our people degenerated to. We were a country of poets and artists one, free-thinkers. Now we´re degraded to wörkwörkwörk - and that´s just sad. So please, do me a favor and don´t remind me of it, okay?
User avatar #232 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
But muh cuson keled demself so de b ded b cause u told dat humfull joke.
User avatar #229 - lilnuggetbob (08/28/2014) [-]
You even heard of this little thing call cultural difference?

Detroit has very strict gun laws, and has the highest gun crime in America.

If you went to Africa and banned very fattys foods, it would not effect the obesity rates, does that mean banning very fatty foods has no effect on obesity?
No.
#145 - I agree that gun control is the primary problem in this story.…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/28/2014 on /int/ reacts to a tragedy 0
#158 - anonymous (08/28/2014) [-]
The instructor should not have given an uzi to a 9 year old.

Why the fuck does a CIVILIAN even need an Uzi? I'm fine with you carrying around a handgun for self defense, but you don't need a fucking uzi...
#143 - 9 years old Accident These are importa…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/28/2014 on /int/ reacts to a tragedy 0
User avatar #168 - roflstorm (08/28/2014) [-]
No charges laid

Licensed and legal

Some important factors i found
User avatar #239 - LazierThanThou (08/29/2014) [-]
There's this concept in western societies called "mens rea." It's latin for "guilty mind" and is one of the founding principals upon which our justice system is built. Without a guilty mind, without mens rea, you really can't be convicted of a crime. It doesn't mean you can't be guilty of committing a crime, it just means that your culpability is either lessened or completely washed away.

An example of this is when a person is mentally retarded and doesn't have the capacity to understand what they did. Or, perhaps, they're hallucinating or drunk or on other illicit substances that would cause them to lack control over their own actions. Including, but also not limited to, age.

There was no intention behind the death of this man. That alone doesn't really mean much, because that's what "negligent homicide" or "reckless endangerment" are for, but it is a mitigating factor. However, when you're talking about a child here, specifically a child that doesn't have the legal responsibly to look out for other people. Adults do, children do not. Right or wrong, the child didn't really have a choice in all this. It wasn't her fault.

Your desire for criminal prosecution is understandable, but it's wholly ignorant of the law.
#26 - That's okay. America has launched a war on plants and has f… 08/28/2014 on Pest problems +3
#96 - Right, but why can't you masturbate to her? 08/28/2014 on The Ken Levine Effect +1
#20 - It's called "twincest" and it's already a thing. 08/28/2014 on geneology is tough 0
#32 - ...do they not? I mean, I have my favorites, sure, bu… 08/28/2014 on Perspective +2
#220 - Then I agree. I especially think that "no knock" wa… 08/28/2014 on Where is the media outrage +1
#46 - If you're so terrified of a person that you don't think you ca…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/27/2014 on Isn't a feminist world such... 0
User avatar #48 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Which is why the post would help. So they don't find out.
#44 - I don't know how I can possibly say it any clearer. …  [+] (3 new replies) 08/27/2014 on Isn't a feminist world such... 0
User avatar #45 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Clearly you don't understand how some abuse works. The victim can feel completely unable to get out. To a rational person, it may seem obvious, just pack your things in the night and go. But to some victims, the fear and control is so strong that they feel like the abuser can find them anywhere. Cheating on that partner, may be a way out. Even if it's not, it's fulfilling a need that the victim isn't getting. With an abusive relationship (at least one as extreme as the situation we are talking) the sex is more like rape, or could just be flat out rape. Are you saying that the victim should ignore their needs for the sake of the abuser?
User avatar #46 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
If you're so terrified of a person that you don't think you can leave them for fear that they'll hurt you, what do you think the chances are that they'll be willing to cheat?

Your argument is bad and ridiculous and you clearly don't understand universal principals.
User avatar #48 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Which is why the post would help. So they don't find out.
#41 - That's a great argument. Instead of focusing on philosophy an…  [+] (5 new replies) 08/27/2014 on Isn't a feminist world such... 0
User avatar #42 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
I refuse to believe anyone could believe in such a general statement, especially since they were presented with a clear situation that was clearly gray. I can't believe that someone would think that a victim of abuse should have any kind of respect for an abusive relationship. I can't believe that someone would say that a victim of abuse should stifle there own happiness, needs, and hope of escape for the benefit of the relationship with thier abuser. Maybe I'm just being optimistic in assuming that you know I'm right. I suppose it's possible you're just a retard.
User avatar #44 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
I don't know how I can possibly say it any clearer.

GET OUT OF THE RELATIONSHIP!

Why is that so difficult for you to understand? At the point where you're talking about abuse, you're no longer talking about the morality of cheating, you're talking about a situation that needs to be resolved before getting into another relationship, even if it's a purely sexual one. Fucking someone other than your significant whatever is not going to help that. At all. Not even a little.

But even in this ridiculously stupid, empty situation you're suggesting, I stand by my position. Cheating is universally wrong.
User avatar #45 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Clearly you don't understand how some abuse works. The victim can feel completely unable to get out. To a rational person, it may seem obvious, just pack your things in the night and go. But to some victims, the fear and control is so strong that they feel like the abuser can find them anywhere. Cheating on that partner, may be a way out. Even if it's not, it's fulfilling a need that the victim isn't getting. With an abusive relationship (at least one as extreme as the situation we are talking) the sex is more like rape, or could just be flat out rape. Are you saying that the victim should ignore their needs for the sake of the abuser?
User avatar #46 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
If you're so terrified of a person that you don't think you can leave them for fear that they'll hurt you, what do you think the chances are that they'll be willing to cheat?

Your argument is bad and ridiculous and you clearly don't understand universal principals.
User avatar #48 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Which is why the post would help. So they don't find out.
#39 - #1. That doesn't make cheating acceptable. You can be friend…  [+] (8 new replies) 08/27/2014 on Isn't a feminist world such... 0
User avatar #40 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
I'm not gonna sit here and argue when you know I'm right. I'm guessing someone cheated on you and you're a little sore.
#47 - newprinny (08/27/2014) [-]
Look, even if you were right (which you are clearly not), calling someone retarded and trying to end a debate by saying "you know I'm right" automatically discredits every other word that comes out of your mouth, dood. There is never an excuse to willingly and knowingly cheat on your partner, even in your "gray area," because if you're in an abusive relationship, you go to the police, not go looking around for new dick.
User avatar #41 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
That's a great argument. Instead of focusing on philosophy and universals and truth, just say "you know I'm right" as though that you can prove that or that it actually matters.

You're just a sore little bitch because you don't have any arguments because cheating is universally wrong.
User avatar #42 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
I refuse to believe anyone could believe in such a general statement, especially since they were presented with a clear situation that was clearly gray. I can't believe that someone would think that a victim of abuse should have any kind of respect for an abusive relationship. I can't believe that someone would say that a victim of abuse should stifle there own happiness, needs, and hope of escape for the benefit of the relationship with thier abuser. Maybe I'm just being optimistic in assuming that you know I'm right. I suppose it's possible you're just a retard.
User avatar #44 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
I don't know how I can possibly say it any clearer.

GET OUT OF THE RELATIONSHIP!

Why is that so difficult for you to understand? At the point where you're talking about abuse, you're no longer talking about the morality of cheating, you're talking about a situation that needs to be resolved before getting into another relationship, even if it's a purely sexual one. Fucking someone other than your significant whatever is not going to help that. At all. Not even a little.

But even in this ridiculously stupid, empty situation you're suggesting, I stand by my position. Cheating is universally wrong.
User avatar #45 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Clearly you don't understand how some abuse works. The victim can feel completely unable to get out. To a rational person, it may seem obvious, just pack your things in the night and go. But to some victims, the fear and control is so strong that they feel like the abuser can find them anywhere. Cheating on that partner, may be a way out. Even if it's not, it's fulfilling a need that the victim isn't getting. With an abusive relationship (at least one as extreme as the situation we are talking) the sex is more like rape, or could just be flat out rape. Are you saying that the victim should ignore their needs for the sake of the abuser?
User avatar #46 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
If you're so terrified of a person that you don't think you can leave them for fear that they'll hurt you, what do you think the chances are that they'll be willing to cheat?

Your argument is bad and ridiculous and you clearly don't understand universal principals.
User avatar #48 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Which is why the post would help. So they don't find out.
#37 - Yes, even then. If you have an abusive partner who makes you …  [+] (10 new replies) 08/27/2014 on Isn't a feminist world such... 0
User avatar #38 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Do you know what trapped means? "If you ever leave me, I'll kill you." Now imagine the abused partner meets a great person who is interested. That great person asks them out on a date. Maybe cheating would be a way to get out of that abusive relationship. Often, abusers will make the victim cut ties with all their family and friends. At least cheating will make them remember they are human and give them access to someone who can help them.
User avatar #39 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
#1. That doesn't make cheating acceptable. You can be friends with someone without engaging in sexual intercourse, which can make you feel like a human being again and lead to that very same awakening wherein you blah blah blah Lifetime story bullshit.

#2. Are you aware that people can *gasp* go to jail for that kind of behavior? That you can get restraining orders and all manner of help from charities in such situations that will help relocate you so you can stay away from such toxic people? None of them require you fucking someone.
User avatar #40 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
I'm not gonna sit here and argue when you know I'm right. I'm guessing someone cheated on you and you're a little sore.
#47 - newprinny (08/27/2014) [-]
Look, even if you were right (which you are clearly not), calling someone retarded and trying to end a debate by saying "you know I'm right" automatically discredits every other word that comes out of your mouth, dood. There is never an excuse to willingly and knowingly cheat on your partner, even in your "gray area," because if you're in an abusive relationship, you go to the police, not go looking around for new dick.
User avatar #41 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
That's a great argument. Instead of focusing on philosophy and universals and truth, just say "you know I'm right" as though that you can prove that or that it actually matters.

You're just a sore little bitch because you don't have any arguments because cheating is universally wrong.
User avatar #42 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
I refuse to believe anyone could believe in such a general statement, especially since they were presented with a clear situation that was clearly gray. I can't believe that someone would think that a victim of abuse should have any kind of respect for an abusive relationship. I can't believe that someone would say that a victim of abuse should stifle there own happiness, needs, and hope of escape for the benefit of the relationship with thier abuser. Maybe I'm just being optimistic in assuming that you know I'm right. I suppose it's possible you're just a retard.
User avatar #44 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
I don't know how I can possibly say it any clearer.

GET OUT OF THE RELATIONSHIP!

Why is that so difficult for you to understand? At the point where you're talking about abuse, you're no longer talking about the morality of cheating, you're talking about a situation that needs to be resolved before getting into another relationship, even if it's a purely sexual one. Fucking someone other than your significant whatever is not going to help that. At all. Not even a little.

But even in this ridiculously stupid, empty situation you're suggesting, I stand by my position. Cheating is universally wrong.
User avatar #45 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Clearly you don't understand how some abuse works. The victim can feel completely unable to get out. To a rational person, it may seem obvious, just pack your things in the night and go. But to some victims, the fear and control is so strong that they feel like the abuser can find them anywhere. Cheating on that partner, may be a way out. Even if it's not, it's fulfilling a need that the victim isn't getting. With an abusive relationship (at least one as extreme as the situation we are talking) the sex is more like rape, or could just be flat out rape. Are you saying that the victim should ignore their needs for the sake of the abuser?
User avatar #46 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
If you're so terrified of a person that you don't think you can leave them for fear that they'll hurt you, what do you think the chances are that they'll be willing to cheat?

Your argument is bad and ridiculous and you clearly don't understand universal principals.
User avatar #48 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Which is why the post would help. So they don't find out.
#13 - That poor dumb bastard. 08/27/2014 on le friendzone 0
#35 - Cheating is universally wrong.  [+] (12 new replies) 08/27/2014 on Isn't a feminist world such... 0
User avatar #36 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Even in the example I gave? Are you retarded?
#37 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
Yes, even then. If you have an abusive partner who makes you feel trapped, THEN YOU GET THE FUCK OUT OF THE RELATIONSHIP. Not because cheating is immoral, but because that's a parasitic relationship and you're killing yourself by being in it. Cheating on an abusive partner is just going to make them more abusive.
User avatar #38 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Do you know what trapped means? "If you ever leave me, I'll kill you." Now imagine the abused partner meets a great person who is interested. That great person asks them out on a date. Maybe cheating would be a way to get out of that abusive relationship. Often, abusers will make the victim cut ties with all their family and friends. At least cheating will make them remember they are human and give them access to someone who can help them.
User avatar #39 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
#1. That doesn't make cheating acceptable. You can be friends with someone without engaging in sexual intercourse, which can make you feel like a human being again and lead to that very same awakening wherein you blah blah blah Lifetime story bullshit.

#2. Are you aware that people can *gasp* go to jail for that kind of behavior? That you can get restraining orders and all manner of help from charities in such situations that will help relocate you so you can stay away from such toxic people? None of them require you fucking someone.
User avatar #40 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
I'm not gonna sit here and argue when you know I'm right. I'm guessing someone cheated on you and you're a little sore.
#47 - newprinny (08/27/2014) [-]
Look, even if you were right (which you are clearly not), calling someone retarded and trying to end a debate by saying "you know I'm right" automatically discredits every other word that comes out of your mouth, dood. There is never an excuse to willingly and knowingly cheat on your partner, even in your "gray area," because if you're in an abusive relationship, you go to the police, not go looking around for new dick.
User avatar #41 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
That's a great argument. Instead of focusing on philosophy and universals and truth, just say "you know I'm right" as though that you can prove that or that it actually matters.

You're just a sore little bitch because you don't have any arguments because cheating is universally wrong.
User avatar #42 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
I refuse to believe anyone could believe in such a general statement, especially since they were presented with a clear situation that was clearly gray. I can't believe that someone would think that a victim of abuse should have any kind of respect for an abusive relationship. I can't believe that someone would say that a victim of abuse should stifle there own happiness, needs, and hope of escape for the benefit of the relationship with thier abuser. Maybe I'm just being optimistic in assuming that you know I'm right. I suppose it's possible you're just a retard.
User avatar #44 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
I don't know how I can possibly say it any clearer.

GET OUT OF THE RELATIONSHIP!

Why is that so difficult for you to understand? At the point where you're talking about abuse, you're no longer talking about the morality of cheating, you're talking about a situation that needs to be resolved before getting into another relationship, even if it's a purely sexual one. Fucking someone other than your significant whatever is not going to help that. At all. Not even a little.

But even in this ridiculously stupid, empty situation you're suggesting, I stand by my position. Cheating is universally wrong.
User avatar #45 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Clearly you don't understand how some abuse works. The victim can feel completely unable to get out. To a rational person, it may seem obvious, just pack your things in the night and go. But to some victims, the fear and control is so strong that they feel like the abuser can find them anywhere. Cheating on that partner, may be a way out. Even if it's not, it's fulfilling a need that the victim isn't getting. With an abusive relationship (at least one as extreme as the situation we are talking) the sex is more like rape, or could just be flat out rape. Are you saying that the victim should ignore their needs for the sake of the abuser?
User avatar #46 - LazierThanThou (08/27/2014) [-]
If you're so terrified of a person that you don't think you can leave them for fear that they'll hurt you, what do you think the chances are that they'll be willing to cheat?

Your argument is bad and ridiculous and you clearly don't understand universal principals.
User avatar #48 - emptysuperman (08/27/2014) [-]
Which is why the post would help. So they don't find out.
#34 - I'm curious as to what you mean by "militarization of the…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/27/2014 on Where is the media outrage +2
User avatar #218 - bolas (08/27/2014) [-]
I mean the excessive armor and weaponry, unnecessary surprise raids and military mindset. It's unfortunate that the power dynamic between the police and the community is starting to resemble soldiers in an occupied country.
User avatar #220 - LazierThanThou (08/28/2014) [-]
Then I agree. I especially think that "no knock" warrants are a thing that only endanger lives and this militaristic attitude is the stuff of fascist regimes.
#7 - Says who? 08/27/2014 on get your shit together 0
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0
  • x71

Comments(28):

LazierThanThou has disabled anonymous comments.
 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
#598 - LazierThanThou (07/22/2014) [-]
Well that escalated quickly.
User avatar #599 to #598 - joshlol (07/22/2014) [-]
god damn and I thought I got a lot of those things
User avatar #600 to #599 - LazierThanThou (07/22/2014) [-]
In retrospect, I'm betting it was just a bug or something. I probably didn't earn all of them.

I'm curious, though. How many did you get?
User avatar #601 to #600 - joshlol (07/22/2014) [-]
I only got 2 from **** but I have 39 atm from reposting **** and have probably had close to 50 in total, it seems easier to get them like that than **** though since I don't often see many **** content's with over 150 thumbs unless it's some camwhore
User avatar #602 to #601 - LazierThanThou (07/22/2014) [-]
Yeah, the amount of thumbs you can get in **** seems to have dropped somewhat. I remember a back when you could get 200-300 thumbs pretty easy. Perhaps people just didn't thumb down as much back then, though.

Anyway, I'm off to bed. See ya around.
User avatar #603 to #602 - joshlol (07/22/2014) [-]
bye
User avatar #593 - ubisoft (06/30/2014) [-]
Actually sorry it's.
SS-Obersturmbannführer Lazier.
User avatar #594 to #593 - LazierThanThou (06/30/2014) [-]
That's quite the title. Any particular reason you're giving it to me?
User avatar #595 to #594 - ubisoft (06/30/2014) [-]
No particular reason Fuhrer Lazier you just seem awesome as fak.
User avatar #596 to #595 - LazierThanThou (06/30/2014) [-]
One does ones best.
User avatar #597 to #596 - ubisoft (06/30/2014) [-]
As always Obersturmbannführer, of course.
User avatar #592 - ubisoft (06/30/2014) [-]
Heil UberFruher Lazier
#590 to #589 - LazierThanThou (06/19/2014) [-]
It was everything I dreamed it would be.
User avatar #591 to #590 - soundofwinter (06/19/2014) [-]
This is everything I feared it would be
User avatar #587 - finalrendition (05/27/2014) [-]
HE'S BACK
User avatar #588 to #587 - LazierThanThou (05/28/2014) [-]
Indeed I am.
User avatar #576 - LazierThanThou (05/27/2014) [-]
Fresh start.

Maybe this time I wont get banned.
User avatar #577 to #576 - Sunset (05/27/2014) [-]
HEY!
User avatar #578 to #577 - LazierThanThou (05/27/2014) [-]
Hello.
User avatar #579 to #578 - Sunset (05/27/2014) [-]
how've you been?
User avatar #580 to #579 - LazierThanThou (05/27/2014) [-]
Well enough.

Yourself?
User avatar #581 to #580 - Sunset (05/27/2014) [-]
better. gonna go to college, getting a job soon hopefully
User avatar #582 to #581 - LazierThanThou (05/27/2014) [-]
Congratulations. Sounds like things are going well for you.
User avatar #583 to #582 - Sunset (05/27/2014) [-]
they are! things are probably the best they've ever been for me now
User avatar #584 to #583 - LazierThanThou (05/27/2014) [-]
That's really good to hear.

Hate to be a downer, but I was about to get to bed when you contacted me. I'm really beat, so I'm gonna get to sleep.

I'll talk to you later.
User avatar #585 to #584 - Sunset (05/27/2014) [-]
night man. nice to see you around again
User avatar #586 to #585 - LazierThanThou (05/27/2014) [-]
Same here. Have a good one.
 
 Friends (0)