Login or register


Last status update:
Date Signed Up:1/30/2010
Last Login:7/23/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#4623
Highest Content Rank:#2223
Highest Comment Rank:#77
Content Thumbs: 3444 total,  3603 ,  159
Comment Thumbs: 76233 total,  81135 ,  4902
Content Level Progress: 43% (43/100)
Level 134 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 135 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 89.1% (891/1000)
Level 369 Comments: FJ Noble → Level 370 Comments: Immortal
Content Views:17208
Times Content Favorited:218 times
Total Comments Made:10525
FJ Points:43720

latest user's comments

#33 - "...another sentence exists, another series of words, whi… 02/05/2016 on Edgy 0
#44 - They can give a real answer, they can cite the portions of the… 02/04/2016 on Best way to shut up a... 0
#10 - Didn't Mel Blanc voice those characters?  [+] (1 new reply) 02/04/2016 on joe alaskey +9
#11 - trimdosthesecond (02/04/2016) [-]
I thought so too. Turns out he took over when Mel died.
#131 - How about just put a porta-john every couple of blocks?  [+] (1 new reply) 02/03/2016 on DESIGNATED PISSING STREETS +1
#150 - omarsjihad (02/03/2016) [-]
because niggers would vandalize them

#86 - Comment deleted 02/02/2016 on GreenTeaNeko 0
#118 - It's a government conspiracy to force November birthdays. 02/02/2016 on waste his time 2016 0
#11 - Not a feminist. Free Inhabitant, it's different thing. A movem…  [+] (36 new replies) 02/02/2016 on Feminist gets arrested +610
#270 - crazycommando (02/02/2016) [-]
>listening to her talk....for fuck sake

#251 - anon (02/02/2016) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**i get why they would do something like that. i find it horrifing how a selcet few can have completle controll over the lives of so many, but this girl is just an idiot
User avatar
#243 - semiprogravy (02/02/2016) [-]
soooooo theyre libertarians?
User avatar
#250 - oaky (02/02/2016) [-]
I am a libertarian and this is stupid
User avatar
#253 - semiprogravy (02/02/2016) [-]
it was a joke albeit not a particularly funny one
User avatar
#182 - hexadecimated (02/02/2016) [-]
Nah, she's a femmy.
User avatar
#164 - stinkbugfrick (02/02/2016) [-]
They're just as stupid as the feminists, believing in made up horse shit. She's so fucking annoying all I want to do is back her head against the car, have some hobo rape her, then cut her stomach open and hang her up by her own intestines as an example for those cunts.
#258 - quilathe (02/02/2016) [-]
User avatar
#225 - deathweaver (02/02/2016) [-]
Wishing death on people you don't agree with doesn't make you better than those SJW/Feminists we all shit on.
#213 - thegazz (02/02/2016) [-]
#195 - longduckdong (02/02/2016) [-]
easy there tiger
#161 - alboorack (02/02/2016) [-]
like Eric Cartman?
User avatar
#139 - thedungeonmaster (02/02/2016) [-]
I haven't looked into this and it's probably a dumb question, but do they actually have any shred of right to do this? Like is free inhabitant an actual thing or is it just a bunch of (most likely) legally retarded people who think it's a thing? I only ask because I would lose my mind if I ever heard of this girl suing the cop and winning.
#203 - anon (02/02/2016) [-]
As far as I know, it references the Articles of Confederation, which is the no-longer-applicable precursor to the Constitution. She may as well be saying that under the laws imposed by George III apply to her; it's the same time period and very equally not relevant to the US.
#155 - ellojello (02/02/2016) [-]
No, my comment >#150 has the full text of the section of the Articles of Confederation that she is referencing. All it did was let Free Inhabitants (i.e. not slaves) travel between states unimpeded. It made the States into the first Union which behaved more like the EU does today rather than the USA we know now. The USA we know now was established by a new Constitution in 1789 which completely superseded the AoC, so she is referencing something that isn't even in place now anyway.
#143 - anon (02/02/2016) [-]
No. 100% No, I don't remember why precisely but the gist of it is that waaaaaaay back with the constitution or something, there where something called "Free inhabitants" who could travel between the states and trade freely without being part of any single state, however the something something has since made parts (or all of the consitution) completely irrelevant (legally speaking)
#129 - LarsGoes (02/02/2016) [-]
The "you are raping me" part has some aspects of that..
User avatar
#135 - deadlyfoez (02/02/2016) [-]
Yeah, the aspects of being my fetish. Too bad she likely never showers.
#107 - anon (02/02/2016) [-]
so a modern day hippie?
#180 - anon (02/02/2016) [-]
Just Right Wing.
#68 - fragman (02/02/2016) [-]
> not a feminist
> "this is rape! THIS IS RAPE!" *banshee cry*

seems legit
User avatar
#62 - peanutpwner (02/02/2016) [-]
potato potato
#43 - anon (02/02/2016) [-]
problem with this is......laws protecting them is also not applied. So technically you can rob or injure a free inhabitant and the police have no obligation to help them. works both ways
#219 - macgiollauidhir (02/02/2016) [-]
You really shit the bed there, Anon.
User avatar
#49 - paddypancake (02/02/2016) [-]
That's not how it works, though. Believing a legal status exists which makes you be exempt from all laws doesn't make you be exempt from all laws just as much as believing yourself to be exempt from all laws doesn't negate your rights.
#154 - anon (02/02/2016) [-]
Not dissimilar to the concept of "Outlaws"
#86 - anon (02/02/2016) [-]
Nigga what
#104 - iseeyoufapping (02/02/2016) [-]
Thinking that laws don't apply to you doesn't change jack shit; it doesn't change how you can act or be treated.
User avatar
#64 - sirinsanity (02/02/2016) [-]
Oh shit, I just noticed I put new twice.
User avatar
#38 - luciafoxx (02/02/2016) [-]
so she was using a law that died about 11 years after the U.S. was founded?
User avatar
#121 - thedugster (02/02/2016) [-]
not to mention that she completely misinterpreted the actual statements in that article
User avatar
#63 - vladhellsing (02/02/2016) [-]
User avatar
#42 - lilnuggetbob (02/02/2016) [-]
#51 - brianslarson (02/02/2016) [-]
**brianslarson used "*roll picture*"**
**brianslarson rolled image**Now that's just advanced stupid
User avatar
#15 - trollmobile (02/02/2016) [-]
oh man, you have the same profile picture as some massive retard i used to know
thought you were him
#4 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 02/02/2016 on Hacker +4
#10 - icanhasaccount (02/02/2016) [-]
i was absolutely sure this was going to be posted here. good on you
#25 - I have to say I've never been called out on any of those stupi…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/21/2016 on This should cheer you up +10
User avatar
#60 - SemiAnon (01/22/2016) [-]
I've never experienced any of the things we all constantly bitch about in real life.

User avatar
#28 - theugandanhero (01/21/2016) [-]
Starting arguments for the sake of arguing

Like, no one cares about the Kardashian family anymore. But if you go onto Facebook, they'll be in the "trending" window at least 4-5 times a week, so that they can tell people something "controversial" is happening when it really isn't.
#13 - Looks like them Duke boys are in a heap o' trouble. 01/20/2016 on Carrier Testing Catapult... +18