Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a 6% commission on everything you buy.

Lambda    

Rank #520 on Comments
Lambda Avatar Level 356 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Offline
Send mail to Lambda Block Lambda Invite Lambda to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:1/30/2010
Last Login:8/20/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#520
Highest Content Rank:#2223
Highest Comment Rank:#77
Content Thumbs: 3440 total,  3598 ,  158
Comment Thumbs: 58227 total,  62389 ,  4162
Content Level Progress: 38% (38/100)
Level 134 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 135 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 68% (680/1000)
Level 356 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 357 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:8
Content Views:16102
Times Content Favorited:219 times
Total Comments Made:8698
FJ Points:30537

latest user's comments

#7 - "perfectly or not at all" is not exactly correct. …  [+] (5 new replies) 08/08/2014 on HDMI +5
User avatar #59 - skypatrol (08/08/2014) [-]
As cables get longer, due to minor resistance in the wiring used, things can get distorted.

It's usually about ~300 feet.
User avatar #10 - createdjustnow (08/08/2014) [-]
this was based on 4 foot hdmi, they did not test or show results using anything larger
User avatar #12 - kabuthefox (08/08/2014) [-]
the testing was based on 4 meters (roughly 13 feet)

still significantly less than 50 but u get the point
User avatar #13 - createdjustnow (08/08/2014) [-]
thank you, i was wondering why people would buy a 4 ft cord
User avatar #15 - kabuthefox (08/08/2014) [-]
i was as well, ik they sell em but the usage is so limited.

im thinking there was a mistake somewhere in there, since they say 4 feet at some points and 4 meters at other points
#14 - You know, I really believe that the majority of these unrealis… 08/08/2014 on Remember, it's men holding... +9
#17 - It was created by an artist whose intention was to create an u…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/08/2014 on still waiting +5
User avatar #26 - kosicandavid (08/08/2014) [-]
What is unexplainable on this? Two young nazi women (from which one have probably ended up in some horrible crash or something) are having fun with bottles of milk..
#32 - No matter how you do it, inhaling smoke is ALWAYS bad for you.…  [+] (7 new replies) 08/08/2014 on Logic +38
#124 - splyt (08/08/2014) [-]
dude if i had 20 joints a day that'd be the opposite of a problem
#76 - acksl (08/08/2014) [-]
Or become a tourist attraction Jamaican Tour Guide
User avatar #40 - justignoreme (08/08/2014) [-]
you forgot to factor in stoners hold in the smoke about 3-10 times longer. anyhow, whenever i smoke stogies, seems like it prevents me from coughing up flem. when i smoke weed/wax, seems like i almost always cough up flem the breath after the hit. not promoting stogies at all though, you don't feel anything from them after building up a nicotine tolerance (builds up fast,) yet most people will continue smoking, denying that they are addicted till they actually are.
User avatar #126 - Lambda (08/08/2014) [-]
There's actually no reason to hold in the smoke at all-- All the THC is absorbed in the first second or two, beyond that you're just getting tar.
But really, it's much much healthier to vaporize.
User avatar #129 - justignoreme (08/08/2014) [-]
this is coming from a huge stoner: the longer i hold it in the higher i get, every time. usually about 5 seconds. vaporize: more of a body high, then the head high i desire; funny how you get a different high by changing the way you smoke it.
User avatar #130 - Lambda (08/08/2014) [-]
The high is also different depending on the temperature at which you vaporize.
Personally, I think that just burning it gives the best high. But I hate the smell and taste of smoke, always have, so I usually vaporize.
I've never found that I get any higher from holding smoke in, personally.
#393 - Give them tiny amounts of LSD without their knowledge. Slowly … 08/08/2014 on What is a cool Psychology... 0
#19 - I would guess they did this as part of a viral marketing thing… 08/08/2014 on Love on Coke +1
#97 - One time I heard my roommate speaking Latin in his sleep. I qu… 08/08/2014 on Sleeptalk stories +1
#12 - Very short extension cords.  [+] (1 new reply) 08/08/2014 on WHY IS THIS SO SATISFYING 0
User avatar #13 - technique (08/09/2014) [-]
touche
#10 - That's terrifying. 08/07/2014 on FASTER GOD DAMMIT 0
#27 - Picture  [+] (4 new replies) 08/07/2014 on Do iiiiiiiiiiiit +32
User avatar #48 - tigasingy (08/07/2014) [-]
that airplanes looks shy

like guys can i speed with you too
#87 - jonball (08/07/2014) [-]
silly you, you spelled airplanes. HAH!
You clearly see that there is only 1 airplane there.
User avatar #49 - tigasingy (08/07/2014) [-]
Looks like im retarded

airplane HELICOPTER
#53 - theshade (08/07/2014) [-]
#16 - Yep. 08/07/2014 on Washing A Piglet 0
#9 - hello internet I would like one data please 08/07/2014 on wow that's many data +2
#3 - This show needed another season at least. 08/07/2014 on You're waiting for a ship +1
#5 - has science gone too far? 08/07/2014 on Photoshop +3
#16 - There are birds like this where I live. They usually hang out … 08/07/2014 on birds 0
#3 - Shane, stop writing on the whiteboard pretending to be management.  [+] (1 new reply) 08/06/2014 on I think Shane is a pretty... +27
User avatar #4 - xdiabolicx (08/07/2014) [-]
Shane has really pretty handwriting.
#3 - Some of them make sense-- Four women in an apartment could be …  [+] (1 new reply) 08/06/2014 on Mmmmuricah +3
#5 - anonymous (08/06/2014) [-]
I think the moose one is a moose-hunting regulation, since they can't easily regulate activities in an aircraft and flying makes it too easy or something.
#4 - He's got the London look.  [+] (2 new replies) 08/06/2014 on Same brother +104
User avatar #19 - turbodoosh (08/07/2014) [-]
*Gotham
User avatar #9 - danster (08/07/2014) [-]
When does lambda cubed come out?
#14 - Next time I find a signed-in facebook I'm going to do this. 08/06/2014 on Top kek m8 10/10 would go... 0
#18 - Good thing only one was ever built. And it blew up. 08/06/2014 on Random Interesting Facts... +5
#10 - Most nukes are not the Tsar bomb. The vast majority of them ha…  [+] (13 new replies) 08/06/2014 on Random Interesting Facts... +4
#83 - anonymous (08/07/2014) [-]
>Not important enough to nuke
>Survive nuclear holocaust
>???
>Profit
User avatar #12 - pfccross (08/06/2014) [-]
all nukes may not be tsar bombs, but 5 tsar bombs would probably wipe the us clean of life...
User avatar #18 - Lambda (08/06/2014) [-]
Good thing only one was ever built. And it blew up.
User avatar #13 - pfccross (08/06/2014) [-]
actually that too is probably an exaduration. it would take alot more than 5. but theres probably easily enough to wipe the us
User avatar #16 - sursum (08/06/2014) [-]
Fortunately the US does not constitute the entirety of humanity.
User avatar #17 - pfccross (08/06/2014) [-]
no, but it constitutes the strongest military and if you can take the us the fuck out then you can probably take the rest of the world the fuck out. Like if the US with all of its anti missile defenses cant keep itself safe then noone else is going to survive a nuclear onslaught.
User avatar #167 - sursum (08/07/2014) [-]
The idea was that there would be only enough nukes left to take out the US, what else is going to be left for the rest of the world?
User avatar #15 - pfccross (08/06/2014) [-]
probably closer to 15-20 with well calculated windspeeds for fallout.
User avatar #19 - davidteninch (08/06/2014) [-]
Over 2,000 nuclear weapons have been detonated today. So far we're all pretty fine. And I think the US spending is so high for two reasons. 1.) the US is a big country. 2.) No one is dumb enough to start a nuclear war, so the US needs some defense besides nukes.
User avatar #23 - valyn (08/06/2014) [-]
it's not even just that. A lot of the US' defense spending is actually a form of Keynesian economic aid. We keep buying military hardware to keep those factories open and the people in them employed. If anything, its a pretty smart way of doing things- instead of propping up businesses with grants or spending money on welfare for those workers when they lose their jobs, we spend about the same amount to just keep the companies busy, and instead of the government having nothing to show for it, they get tanks/planes/what have you for their trouble. Keynesian economics is always better than straight up handouts
#181 - anonymous (08/07/2014) [-]
Except for when you have a war based economy it kind of forces you to be at war at pretty much all times.
User avatar #256 - valyn (08/07/2014) [-]
no, it forces you to be producing war materiel at all times. That just means somebody, somewhere, needs to be fighting. There's more than enough people out therre who hate each other and buy our tanks
User avatar #20 - davidteninch (08/06/2014) [-]
Also, source for all the nukes: A Time-Lapse Map of Every Nuclear Explosion Since 1945 - by  Isao Hashimoto
#7 - It's a common misconception-- There aren't nearly enough nucle…  [+] (15 new replies) 08/06/2014 on Random Interesting Facts... +13
User avatar #8 - pfccross (08/06/2014) [-]
are there not thousands of nukes in possession by the us and russia alone? And I dont know if you have seen on a map what kind of destruction could be done by a single Tsar bomb, but it wouldnt take much to wipe out humanity. Not just with the explosions but with the radiation as well.
User avatar #10 - Lambda (08/06/2014) [-]
Most nukes are not the Tsar bomb. The vast majority of them have much, much smaller yields. Plus, there are much fewer nuclear warheads in existence today than there were at the height of the Cold War. There's a lot of land on earth and nuclear weapons have a comparatively small destructive capacity. An all-out nuclear war would be devastating, of course, but the species would survive. Priority targets would be major cities and military installations, and even those, only in a few countries. Those in other areas would survive.
#83 - anonymous (08/07/2014) [-]
>Not important enough to nuke
>Survive nuclear holocaust
>???
>Profit
User avatar #12 - pfccross (08/06/2014) [-]
all nukes may not be tsar bombs, but 5 tsar bombs would probably wipe the us clean of life...
User avatar #18 - Lambda (08/06/2014) [-]
Good thing only one was ever built. And it blew up.
User avatar #13 - pfccross (08/06/2014) [-]
actually that too is probably an exaduration. it would take alot more than 5. but theres probably easily enough to wipe the us
User avatar #16 - sursum (08/06/2014) [-]
Fortunately the US does not constitute the entirety of humanity.
User avatar #17 - pfccross (08/06/2014) [-]
no, but it constitutes the strongest military and if you can take the us the fuck out then you can probably take the rest of the world the fuck out. Like if the US with all of its anti missile defenses cant keep itself safe then noone else is going to survive a nuclear onslaught.
User avatar #167 - sursum (08/07/2014) [-]
The idea was that there would be only enough nukes left to take out the US, what else is going to be left for the rest of the world?
User avatar #15 - pfccross (08/06/2014) [-]
probably closer to 15-20 with well calculated windspeeds for fallout.
User avatar #19 - davidteninch (08/06/2014) [-]
Over 2,000 nuclear weapons have been detonated today. So far we're all pretty fine. And I think the US spending is so high for two reasons. 1.) the US is a big country. 2.) No one is dumb enough to start a nuclear war, so the US needs some defense besides nukes.
User avatar #23 - valyn (08/06/2014) [-]
it's not even just that. A lot of the US' defense spending is actually a form of Keynesian economic aid. We keep buying military hardware to keep those factories open and the people in them employed. If anything, its a pretty smart way of doing things- instead of propping up businesses with grants or spending money on welfare for those workers when they lose their jobs, we spend about the same amount to just keep the companies busy, and instead of the government having nothing to show for it, they get tanks/planes/what have you for their trouble. Keynesian economics is always better than straight up handouts
#181 - anonymous (08/07/2014) [-]
Except for when you have a war based economy it kind of forces you to be at war at pretty much all times.
User avatar #256 - valyn (08/07/2014) [-]
no, it forces you to be producing war materiel at all times. That just means somebody, somewhere, needs to be fighting. There's more than enough people out therre who hate each other and buy our tanks
User avatar #20 - davidteninch (08/06/2014) [-]
Also, source for all the nukes: A Time-Lapse Map of Every Nuclear Explosion Since 1945 - by  Isao Hashimoto
#80 - That's what she said. 08/06/2014 on Hardcore 0
#33 - Don't get use to it, most things don't make any sense at all. 08/06/2014 on engineering at its finest 0
#31 - I believe it was depicting the competing company.  [+] (2 new replies) 08/06/2014 on engineering at its finest 0
User avatar #32 - Kairyuka (08/06/2014) [-]
Ooh that would make sense!
User avatar #33 - Lambda (08/06/2014) [-]
Don't get use to it, most things don't make any sense at all.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2822 / Total items point value: 3272

Comments(65):

[ 65 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #64 - tjsoup (03/07/2014) [-]
hey
User avatar #65 to #64 - Lambda (03/07/2014) [-]
Hello.
User avatar #66 to #65 - tjsoup (03/07/2014) [-]
interested in the board?
User avatar #67 to #66 - Lambda (03/07/2014) [-]
Yep.
User avatar #69 to #68 - Lambda (03/07/2014) [-]
Thanks.
#63 - duelknight ONLINE (12/13/2013) [-]
What you need is a 11 lambda
User avatar #58 - xinzley (11/03/2013) [-]
hey
User avatar #59 to #58 - Lambda (11/03/2013) [-]
Hello.
I actually quit caring about items. Not sure I want to spend so many FJ points on one.
User avatar #60 to #59 - xinzley (11/03/2013) [-]
PLS
User avatar #62 to #60 - Lambda (11/03/2013) [-]
....you're alright.
User avatar #53 - cycloneclone ONLINE (04/11/2013) [-]
Dat usemame.
User avatar #48 - jingleforth (02/09/2013) [-]
funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4419891/What+if+this+happened/14#14
The worst part. I fap to **** like that...all the time. I usually go to places like gurochan for my porn.
User avatar #49 to #48 - Lambda (02/09/2013) [-]
Why?
User avatar #50 to #49 - Lambda (02/09/2013) [-]
Wait, the whole site is just drawn porn? Not as bad as the real thing, I guess.
User avatar #52 to #50 - jingleforth (02/09/2013) [-]
Oh yeah, and some of the things there I fap to don't exist in reality. So, yep. I fap to real stuff sometimes like you know.. ****
User avatar #51 to #50 - jingleforth (02/09/2013) [-]
Yeah, it's just a thing. Don't go into that area man. Next thing you know you're fapping to the most weird **** ever.
#47 - kokanium **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #46 to #45 - Lambda (12/11/2012) [-]
Hmm, maybe I'm wrong. I'm not sure.
#43 - luxray (11/22/2012) [-]
This image has expired
User avatar #42 - bdevils (10/31/2012) [-]
I'm not gonna lie, I added you because I'm a part of Lambda Chi Alpha
#40 - alZii has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #41 to #40 - Lambda (10/05/2012) [-]
You have TONS of items. What do you need all these for?
#38 - lolerbot (10/02/2012) [-]
valve shall never release episode 3
User avatar #39 to #38 - Lambda (10/02/2012) [-]
No, no no no. Don't say that. We can't give up hope. One day Valve will learn how to count to three.
User avatar #30 - toxicdisorder (09/05/2012) [-]
I added you for your name and profile picture. i love you
#31 to #30 - Lambda (09/06/2012) [-]
Thanks, I'm flattered.
User avatar #32 to #31 - toxicdisorder (09/06/2012) [-]
Are you a half-life fan? or did you just use the name because of the lambda itself?
User avatar #33 to #32 - Lambda (09/06/2012) [-]
I am both a half-life fan and a fan of the letter lambda.
User avatar #34 to #33 - toxicdisorder (09/06/2012) [-]
You sir, are ******* awesome. it's only on here that I find people with similar interests as me, but sadly I don't know much about the lambda itself, all I know is that it's used in math, and I think it's from the Greek (I don't really know for sure).
User avatar #35 to #34 - Lambda (09/06/2012) [-]
It's a greek letter, the scientific symbol for wavelength, and the designation of a secret lab devoted to teleportation research.
#27 - sumakabob **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #24 - allcontent (05/27/2012) [-]
sorry to ask, but why is your name blue? may have missed a PM or something
User avatar #25 to #29 - Lambda (05/27/2012) [-]
Oldfags get blue usernames. If you signed up (I think) before February 2010, you get blue.
User avatar #26 to #30 - allcontent (05/27/2012) [-]
dammit... i knew i should have signed up earlier...

used to browse the site all the time when it was green.
User avatar #21 - redwolfradolf (04/02/2012) [-]
Wicked username man.
Half-life fan?
User avatar #22 to #26 - Lambda (04/02/2012) [-]
Yesh. It's just too bad valve can't count to three. >:(
User avatar #37 to #22 - spaceturtlecadet (09/20/2012) [-]
Months late, but level 3 sentry gun?
I love your name BTW
User avatar #23 to #27 - redwolfradolf (04/02/2012) [-]
I know right?
HL3 would be the best gam ever....
But instead, we get hats....
#19 - geraldbostock (03/12/2012) [-]
Why are you named after a Greek letter?
User avatar #20 to #24 - Lambda (03/13/2012) [-]
It is my favorite Greek letter, and also the symbol of my favorite game.
#16 - namx (01/17/2012) [-]
ohh, yesss! I just tried voting again now literally minutes ago, and I can vote again!   
   
you should check to see if you can, as well! I took the courtesy of pinkieing up our previous conversation ahaha.
ohh, yesss! I just tried voting again now literally minutes ago, and I can vote again!

you should check to see if you can, as well! I took the courtesy of pinkieing up our previous conversation ahaha.
User avatar #17 to #21 - Lambda (01/17/2012) [-]
WOOHOO! I never realized how important voting rights were to me until they were taken away on funnyjunk...
#18 to #22 - namx (01/19/2012) [-]
True that.
True that.
#15 - misterducklumps (11/21/2011) [-]
Heλλo there.
[ 65 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)