x

Lambda

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:1/30/2010
Last Login:9/04/2015
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#768
Highest Content Rank:#2223
Highest Comment Rank:#77
Content Thumbs: 3444 total,  3603 ,  159
Comment Thumbs: 71436 total,  76195 ,  4759
Content Level Progress: 43% (43/100)
Level 134 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 135 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 35.6% (356/1000)
Level 366 Comments: FJ Noble → Level 367 Comments: FJ Noble
Subscribers:9
Content Views:16606
Times Content Favorited:219 times
Total Comments Made:10191
FJ Points:40219

latest user's comments

#23 - Well, I guess he won the argument. 06/26/2015 on I didn't need this 0
#64 - I see. Yeah, you're absolutely right. Earth can sustain quite …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/25/2015 on buckle up kids... 0
#66 - kanedam (06/25/2015) [-]
#62 - We can, but there's a lot preventing us from doing so.  [+] (3 new replies) 06/25/2015 on buckle up kids... 0
#63 - kanedam (06/25/2015) [-]
i just wanted to point it out since i read so often about how many people earth can sustain and its always some kind of made up number that has nothing to do with real ressources.
like in this post "wilson blablabla earth can only sustain 10billion people in matters of food..." and that is simply wrong.

it doesnt matter if we dont share it, or if we dont produce it, if we starve or kill each other and so on... earth could sustain more people. and its a big difference if someone states "with our behaviour right now we cant feed more than x peopl" and "the earth cant feed more than x people"
User avatar #64 - Lambda (06/25/2015) [-]
I see. Yeah, you're absolutely right. Earth can sustain quite a bit more people.
#66 - kanedam (06/25/2015) [-]
#60 - There's a lot more than technology involved. We have the abili…  [+] (5 new replies) 06/25/2015 on buckle up kids... 0
#61 - kanedam (06/25/2015) [-]
your point may be valid, but has nothing to do with my argument.

i simply stated that when it comes to food earth can easily support more than 10billion people. thats all.
User avatar #62 - Lambda (06/25/2015) [-]
We can, but there's a lot preventing us from doing so.
#63 - kanedam (06/25/2015) [-]
i just wanted to point it out since i read so often about how many people earth can sustain and its always some kind of made up number that has nothing to do with real ressources.
like in this post "wilson blablabla earth can only sustain 10billion people in matters of food..." and that is simply wrong.

it doesnt matter if we dont share it, or if we dont produce it, if we starve or kill each other and so on... earth could sustain more people. and its a big difference if someone states "with our behaviour right now we cant feed more than x peopl" and "the earth cant feed more than x people"
User avatar #64 - Lambda (06/25/2015) [-]
I see. Yeah, you're absolutely right. Earth can sustain quite a bit more people.
#66 - kanedam (06/25/2015) [-]
#58 - Because 100% efficiency is never possible. When you're dealing…  [+] (11 new replies) 06/25/2015 on buckle up kids... 0
#59 - kanedam (06/25/2015) [-]
it could easily feed 10billion people even if we take into account that not all can be distributed.
but you also have to consider that there is still a damn big area and possibilities for production are not used yet, so we could most likely easily produce for 20-25billions people, just with the technology and methods we have nowadays.
#72 - xsap (06/25/2015) [-]
" we could most likely easily produce for 20-25billions people"

you fucking crazy? we only have 7.5 billion now and its already considered over populated, more 3 billion people go hungry every day thats why there is a thing called "world hunger"

idk if you read the post but oil is running out slowly, earth doesn't have infinite resources. we don't have any alt fuel as of now other than electricity and bio-fuel and there are problem with both, electricity without oil is much harder to produce. if we replace everything that runs on oil with nuclear energy its gonna fuck the earth up the ass much harder than fossil fuel.

the other being bio-fuel is extracted from algae, beans, corn and other vegetables. when you have a overpopulated planet of over 10 billion people who are starving you really can't afford to waste crops on creating unofficant fuel.

also... fosile fuel is the backbone of modern civilization. a lot of country's especially developing country's who are hungry now can't afford to make the switch from fossil fuel to any other energy. when oil runs out the world economy will crash and there will be a great depression like never before. even first world country's will struggle to make the switch.

another thing to keep in mind. when oil is near running out. country's are not gonna sit back and accept it, every country will try to take as much as they can and stock pile.
which means WW3 (resource wars), chinas pretty much runs on oil with all the factory's they have, so they'll be the first to get in and USA the 2nd and slowly every country will want control of the oil.

at this point, oil is scarce, so USA most likely will cut most of the oil for the public and use it for military purposes

tl:dr, shits going down brah

oh and P.S. to the point i made about developing country's being unable to make the switch, well when oil runs out pretty much most of foreign aid that goes to 3rd world contrary like Africa will be cut since they transport all the food and stuff by big point that eat up a lot of oil. and i read a thing article done by UN a while ago that said over 63% of Africa will starve to death without the aid of the UN.
#73 - kanedam (06/25/2015) [-]
now i didnt read all of it tbh because your first statement already missed the point.

that people starve doesnt mean not enough food is produced. as i stated earlier the amount of food we produce worldwide could easily feed 13 billion people. today. its just that a lot of the food is being thrown awa, not used properly or simply wasted/willfully getting not sold so prices stay on a good level for the western countries.

about the other thing: did i at any point argue about the oil issue? no. i just felt it being wrong to state the earth cant produce food for 10billion people when it now already does for 13billion people and a lot of possible land isnt even being used for food.
User avatar #76 - xsap (06/25/2015) [-]
you said we can sustain 23 billion people. even with oil that's bullshit because ven if we do make food for 13 billion it doesn't mean all 13 billion will get it, and if you read you'll know that in the future we're not gonna just have 1 problem of over population, the oil is problem is still gonna be there.

with your logic we can flap our hands and go into space if gravity wasn't a thing, but gravity is problem like it or not.

and like i said, if you read, u'll know that without oil we cant produce as much food as we do now.
#77 - kanedam (06/25/2015) [-]
ok... so you read my comments further below.
it doesnt matter if we dont share it, or if we dont produce it, if we starve or kill each other and so on... earth could sustain more people. and its a big difference if someone states "with our behaviour right now we cant feed more than x peopl" and "the earth cant feed more than x people"

that was point. and nothing you talk about has to do with it either. because earth could still sustain more than 10billion people. simple as that, no matter if we have oil or not. (would you imply is that our economy and our agricultural fields wouldnt work as good as they do because oil would be missing, crippling a lot of economic fields. you are right about that, but even that still doesnt mean that EARTH couldnt sustain more than 10 billion people. if you stop with that attitude and start discussing this rationally we can keep at that topic, but i'm not in the mood to argue with some angry person who doesnt abide rules of politeness in an objective discussion)
User avatar #60 - Lambda (06/25/2015) [-]
There's a lot more than technology involved. We have the ability to fix almost all the problems we have with the world, really. But there's society, there's money, there's politics. All of these come into play and serve to drive our efficiency down.

The problem with it all is that although we are a global society, we don't yet know HOW to be a global society. We're beginners blundering our way through it. It will take a lot of time before humanity figures this out. Until then, we can expect inefficiency and even stupidity. As long as we make it through the next century or two without all killing each other, we'll figure it all out. We'll have to.
#61 - kanedam (06/25/2015) [-]
your point may be valid, but has nothing to do with my argument.

i simply stated that when it comes to food earth can easily support more than 10billion people. thats all.
User avatar #62 - Lambda (06/25/2015) [-]
We can, but there's a lot preventing us from doing so.
#63 - kanedam (06/25/2015) [-]
i just wanted to point it out since i read so often about how many people earth can sustain and its always some kind of made up number that has nothing to do with real ressources.
like in this post "wilson blablabla earth can only sustain 10billion people in matters of food..." and that is simply wrong.

it doesnt matter if we dont share it, or if we dont produce it, if we starve or kill each other and so on... earth could sustain more people. and its a big difference if someone states "with our behaviour right now we cant feed more than x peopl" and "the earth cant feed more than x people"
User avatar #64 - Lambda (06/25/2015) [-]
I see. Yeah, you're absolutely right. Earth can sustain quite a bit more people.
#66 - kanedam (06/25/2015) [-]
#130 - It really depends on the gun, and it can also be modified to b… 06/25/2015 on Definitely not a soldiers... 0
#5 - Reminds me of elementary school. My school banned them for som…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/24/2015 on Today I remembered Mighty... +2
#9 - wilburthedestroy (06/24/2015) [-]
Mine to because I kid got it in the eye and he fell of the monkey bars. He dislocated his arm when he fell
#8 - It responds to acceleration. Under acceleration, the water gat…  [+] (8 new replies) 06/24/2015 on Water trapped in double... 0
#10 - anon (06/24/2015) [-]
negative acceleration.
User avatar #12 - superpats (06/24/2015) [-]
there's no such thing as negative acceleration. Acceleration is a change in velocity and/or direction. Whether the velocity increases or decreases is irrelevant in the definition.
#20 - anon (06/24/2015) [-]
>Acceleration is a change in velocity and/or direction
True enough. Let's work with that. To express that statement, we'll use acceleration a = dv/dt to express the rate of change of the velocity of an object moving in the x (arbitrary) direction with respect to time. Note that v (and thus, a) is a vector.

Suppose v1 is velocity at time t1 and v2 is velocity at time t2. Further impose that v2 is smaller than v1. Calculating acceleration would imply we use a = (v2 - v1)/(t2 - t1), in which case our numerator would give us a negative and our denominator a positive, making our crudely calculated a vector negative, which only means our object is slowing down in the x direction.

I don't mean to sound snobby but I wouldn't mind being proven wrong.
User avatar #26 - afaik (06/24/2015) [-]
Lets skip all the complex details and go down to the basic use of a vector.

Draw a 10 meter long line.
Then find where the 5 m point is and call it "point A".
Then find where the 8 m point is and call it "point B".

In order to carry something from point A to point B, you need to walk a length of 3 m in the direction of the line from A to B.
In order to carry something from point B to point A, you need to walk a length of 3 m in the opposite direction of the line from A to B.

Now, the 2nd case doesn't mean that you walk a distance of -3m, does it? Vectors only have a direction and a magniutde. Refer to the 1st and 2nd paragraph of >>#19 otherwise.
#15 - anon (06/24/2015) [-]
I know you're trying super hard to be smart, but you're just wrong

a ball thrown in the positive z direction will experience negative acceleration due to gravity bring it down in the negative z direction
User avatar #17 - afaik (06/24/2015) [-]
1: "I know you're trying super hard to be smart, but you're just wrong" is a douce thing to say. You're the one acting like the smartass.

2: "gravity" doesnt go in the opposite of the Z axis because Z is vertical.

3: Vectors can't have negative values.
#18 - anon (06/24/2015) [-]
You make a very good argu-
Vectors can't have negative values.
Oh haha you really had me going there
Good stuff, man
#19 - afaik (06/24/2015) [-]
Indeed. Go ahead and give me an example of a negative value vector though. Gravity is a positive vector. Velocity is a positive vector. Increase and decrease of velocity are positive vectors. Changes in temperature can be represented with a positive vector in a single-dimension space.

Vectors show properties; not relationships. A car can have a relative velocity of -5 m/s relative to another car, but it doesn't change the fact that it's moving at 5 m/s away from the first car, which is what you would show with a vector.

But hey, I accept witty remarks as counter-arguments, so this:
"Oh haha you really had me going there
Good stuff, man"

This is indeed a valid argument that shows me exactly where I'm wrong and proves you right. I guess I'm simply the silly one here for not being able to see any relevant information, but thats a whole different matter.
#53 - It's not racist, it's an assignment of tasks based on ability.… 06/24/2015 on I love pikmin +4
#34 - Oh jesus **** . 06/24/2015 on ramen +1
#19 - A gravity bong? I'd believe it.  [+] (13 new replies) 06/24/2015 on anon wants a special meal +5
User avatar #20 - darktoucan (06/24/2015) [-]
well it makes sense if the kid is a retard to begin with. so i suppose ya
User avatar #21 - mirukawa (06/24/2015) [-]
nah ur fuckin stupid
User avatar #26 - darktoucan (06/24/2015) [-]
excuse me there white name. show some respect to your elders.
User avatar #31 - mirukawa (06/24/2015) [-]
>2010
new account breh
I've been perma'd many, many times
User avatar #37 - darktoucan (06/24/2015) [-]
then you deserve your weak white title
User avatar #38 - mirukawa (06/24/2015) [-]
a few were bullshit
User avatar #42 - darktoucan (06/24/2015) [-]
is this one bullshit? i only ask because your picture is of a pretty girl.
User avatar #43 - mirukawa (06/24/2015) [-]
I don't think you know what I meant by bullshit.
I meant the bans.
User avatar #44 - darktoucan (06/24/2015) [-]
oh i thought you meant your accounts where just for bullshiting. anyways why did you get banned? i never had that problem.
User avatar #45 - mirukawa (06/24/2015) [-]
Pissing Admin off, mostly.
User avatar #46 - darktoucan (06/24/2015) [-]
jeez he is a pretty laidback guy you must have posted porn outside of nsfw or something risky like that.
User avatar #47 - mirukawa (06/24/2015) [-]
nah, I just called him a faggot and shit
he used to be pissy
User avatar #48 - darktoucan (06/24/2015) [-]
i dont remember him being a little baby about being called names. now you will get banned if you refuse to call him a buttpirate cock wanker
#31 - The bible does say that all the plants are here for humans to …  [+] (4 new replies) 06/24/2015 on Yahoo Answers Comp +13
User avatar #37 - demandsgayversion (06/24/2015) [-]
Technically, you could use a plant to commit murder
User avatar #39 - CherryYumDiddly (06/24/2015) [-]
but we covered this, murder is a sin. it was kind of one of the big rules dude. There's like ten of those big rules, and I'm pretty sure not murdering is one of them.
User avatar #40 - demandsgayversion (06/24/2015) [-]
Yeah, I'm agreeing with you. Book say plants good, book say murder bad, but can do murder with plant so not al plant use good.
User avatar #42 - CherryYumDiddly (06/24/2015) [-]
basically what people understood back then
plant is good
person good
use plant make person dead
people sad
people mad
me hurt
no make person dead
no make people sad
people not sad
people not mad
me not hurt
people happy
no more people make people dead
all people happy, always
Dude, someone should totes write this shit down and tell everyone else our findings.
#44 - This is why, when holding somebody at gunpoint, it is importan… 06/23/2015 on Everything is Under Control 0
#45 - I wonder if the teacher would have ordered the student back in… 06/23/2015 on School fire 0
#7 - This has got to be my favorite animated show on TV today. 06/22/2015 on trying to flirt +1
#33 - Who?  [+] (1 new reply) 06/20/2015 on The joke never ends 0
User avatar #41 - Sunset (06/20/2015) [-]
caitlyn jenner
#100 - Half the people think the bible has all the answers, and the o… 06/20/2015 on Confession bear 0
#25 - This particular machine is made from a modified printer, that'… 06/20/2015 on The most useless machine ever 0
#65 - That's one type. Another is when the outer part of the iris is… 06/19/2015 on Luna Lovegood 0
#3 - And here I am, I don't even own clean socks. 06/19/2015 on and they say we dont listen 0
#12 - This cat sees more than you could possibly know. 06/19/2015 on Such a pretty cat +1
#6 - This has all the hallmarks of freshman year Intro to Programming.  [+] (1 new reply) 06/19/2015 on dank programming +1
#7 - anon (06/19/2015) [-]
The thing that solidified it was the phrase "I LOVE PROGRAMMING"
#33 - Dat heterochromia though.  [+] (2 new replies) 06/19/2015 on Luna Lovegood 0
User avatar #42 - theugandanhero (06/19/2015) [-]
Heterochromia? Isn't that the thing where you have two different colored eyes?
I'm not really seeing it in this picture.
User avatar #65 - Lambda (06/19/2015) [-]
That's one type. Another is when the outer part of the iris is a different color than the inner part. The latter is more common.
#39 - Picture 06/19/2015 on *Heavy breathing* +9
#11 - Yeah, I've watched quite a few on that very same website. 06/18/2015 on I Need This Magic 0

items

Total unique items point value: 8854 / Total items point value: 9640

Comments(66):

[ 66 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#71 - murrlogic ONLINE (08/21/2015) [-]
User avatar #64 - tjsoup (03/07/2014) [-]
hey
User avatar #65 to #64 - Lambda (03/07/2014) [-]
Hello.
User avatar #66 to #65 - tjsoup (03/07/2014) [-]
interested in the board?
User avatar #67 to #66 - Lambda (03/07/2014) [-]
Yep.
User avatar #69 to #68 - Lambda (03/07/2014) [-]
Thanks.
#63 - duelknight (12/13/2013) [-]
What you need is a 11 lambda
User avatar #58 - xinzley (11/03/2013) [-]
hey
User avatar #59 to #58 - Lambda (11/03/2013) [-]
Hello.
I actually quit caring about items. Not sure I want to spend so many FJ points on one.
User avatar #60 to #59 - xinzley (11/03/2013) [-]
PLS
User avatar #62 to #60 - Lambda (11/03/2013) [-]
....you're alright.
User avatar #53 - cycloneclone (04/11/2013) [-]
Dat usemame.
User avatar #48 - jingleforth (02/09/2013) [-]
funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4419891/What+if+this+happened/14#14
The worst part. I fap to **** like that...all the time. I usually go to places like gurochan for my porn.
User avatar #49 to #48 - Lambda (02/09/2013) [-]
Why?
User avatar #50 to #49 - Lambda (02/09/2013) [-]
Wait, the whole site is just drawn porn? Not as bad as the real thing, I guess.
User avatar #52 to #50 - jingleforth (02/09/2013) [-]
Oh yeah, and some of the things there I fap to don't exist in reality. So, yep. I fap to real stuff sometimes like you know.. ****
User avatar #51 to #50 - jingleforth (02/09/2013) [-]
Yeah, it's just a thing. Don't go into that area man. Next thing you know you're fapping to the most weird **** ever.
#47 - kokanium **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #46 to #45 - Lambda (12/11/2012) [-]
Hmm, maybe I'm wrong. I'm not sure.
#43 - luxray (11/22/2012) [-]
This image has expired
User avatar #42 - bdevils (10/31/2012) [-]
I'm not gonna lie, I added you because I'm a part of Lambda Chi Alpha
#40 - alZii has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #41 to #40 - Lambda (10/05/2012) [-]
You have TONS of items. What do you need all these for?
#38 - lolerbot (10/02/2012) [-]
valve shall never release episode 3
User avatar #39 to #38 - Lambda (10/02/2012) [-]
No, no no no. Don't say that. We can't give up hope. One day Valve will learn how to count to three.
User avatar #30 - toxicdisorder (09/05/2012) [-]
I added you for your name and profile picture. i love you
#31 to #30 - Lambda (09/06/2012) [-]
Thanks, I'm flattered.
User avatar #32 to #31 - toxicdisorder (09/06/2012) [-]
Are you a half-life fan? or did you just use the name because of the lambda itself?
User avatar #33 to #32 - Lambda (09/06/2012) [-]
I am both a half-life fan and a fan of the letter lambda.
User avatar #34 to #33 - toxicdisorder (09/06/2012) [-]
You sir, are ******* awesome. it's only on here that I find people with similar interests as me, but sadly I don't know much about the lambda itself, all I know is that it's used in math, and I think it's from the Greek (I don't really know for sure).
User avatar #35 to #34 - Lambda (09/06/2012) [-]
It's a greek letter, the scientific symbol for wavelength, and the designation of a secret lab devoted to teleportation research.
#27 - sumakabob **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #24 - allcontent (05/27/2012) [-]
sorry to ask, but why is your name blue? may have missed a PM or something
User avatar #25 to #29 - Lambda (05/27/2012) [-]
Oldfags get blue usernames. If you signed up (I think) before February 2010, you get blue.
User avatar #26 to #30 - allcontent (05/27/2012) [-]
dammit... i knew i should have signed up earlier...

used to browse the site all the time when it was green.
User avatar #21 - redwolfradolf (04/02/2012) [-]
Wicked username man.
Half-life fan?
User avatar #22 to #26 - Lambda (04/02/2012) [-]
Yesh. It's just too bad valve can't count to three. >:(
User avatar #37 to #22 - spaceturtlecadet (09/20/2012) [-]
Months late, but level 3 sentry gun?
I love your name BTW
User avatar #23 to #27 - redwolfradolf (04/02/2012) [-]
I know right?
HL3 would be the best gam ever....
But instead, we get hats....
#19 - geraldbostock (03/12/2012) [-]
Why are you named after a Greek letter?
User avatar #20 to #24 - Lambda (03/13/2012) [-]
It is my favorite Greek letter, and also the symbol of my favorite game.
#16 - namx (01/17/2012) [-]
ohh, yesss! I just tried voting again now literally minutes ago, and I can vote again!   
   
you should check to see if you can, as well! I took the courtesy of pinkieing up our previous conversation ahaha.
ohh, yesss! I just tried voting again now literally minutes ago, and I can vote again!

you should check to see if you can, as well! I took the courtesy of pinkieing up our previous conversation ahaha.
User avatar #17 to #21 - Lambda (01/17/2012) [-]
WOOHOO! I never realized how important voting rights were to me until they were taken away on funnyjunk...
#18 to #22 - namx (01/19/2012) [-]
True that.
True that.
[ 66 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)