Keleth at FunnyJunk

Keleth

Rank #20335 on Comments

Offline

Send mail to Keleth Block Keleth Invite Keleth to be your friend

Last status update:	-

Gender:	male
Date Signed Up:	8/13/2010
Last Login:	8/26/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:	#20335
Highest Content Rank:	#21766
Highest Comment Rank:	#4164
Content Thumbs:	20 total, 29 , 9
Comment Thumbs:	2494 total, 3445 , 951
Content Level Progress:	40.67% (24/59) Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress:	68.99% (69/100) Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:	0
Content Views:	1560
Total Comments Made:	1033
FJ Points:	2649

What people say about Keleth

Pictures

Views: 1488
16 5 Total: +11
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 08/07/12

Infomercials

user favorites

latest user's comments

#39 - actually several prestigious doctors have stated that from vie… [+] (1 reply) 08/26/2016 on The Hillary Clinton Test 0

#73 - anon (08/26/2016) [-]

several or that One dude that sucks trumps dick?

his evidence is a couple videos and he doesn't think she is very sick, but possible some arthritis. its all speculation regardless

#1135 - **Keleth used "*roll picture*"** **Keleth rolled image ** 08/26/2016 on Roll for ugliest girl +2

#52 - it does not say right to own weapons of mass destruction. the… [+] (1 reply) 03/17/2016 on Liberals be like... +6

#134 - kalaark (03/17/2016) [-]

The founding fathers made the ammendment with the current technology of weapons in mind. Right to bear arms ws never about "standard guns". Their standard guns were muskets. They designed it to keep up with the current technology, for the purpose of defended oneself against the government, both foreign and domestic.

Anything that cripples a civilian use of a weapon on par with common military would be against the consitution. No, I'm not suggesting we should be able to own nuclear warheads. It's a right to bear arms, personal weapons. Figured I'd point that out before someone brings it up.

#48 - Sweden is practically the rape capitol of the first world. gu… [+] (3 replies) 03/17/2016 on Liberals be like... +1

#88 - Ruspanic (03/17/2016) [-]

Sweden is nowhere near the rape capital of the world, or even of Europe. The main reason their rape rates seem to be so high is because they have very liberal definitions of "rape" compared to everyone else, and because their method of tracking rape statistics is different from most other countries.

#56 - deutschblut (03/17/2016) [-]

But then you have American Feminism in the extreme.

Walk by a woman and give her a friendly smile.

She pulls her gun out and shoots you 6 times, hitting you twice.

You spend the next 25 years in prison for "attempted rape".

In a wheelchair.

#57 - masanori (03/17/2016) [-]

Yeah but that's only in the minds of tumblr SJWs, not real life. They also hate funs, so you'd never get shot by one.

#45 - the unlawful search and seizure. try again [+] (4 replies) 03/17/2016 on Liberals be like... -2

#81 - anon (03/17/2016) [-]

Bring a gun to an airport and then yell that at them when they try to take it away from you.

#137 - battledude (03/17/2016) [-]

yes every gun free zone is completely surrounded by guards with metal detectors that you have to pass through to get in

#152 - anon (03/17/2016) [-]

Of course not. Hence the modifier "if".

#94 - anon (03/17/2016) [-]

you can, you just have to declare it. Not sure how you would go about that though.

#21 - at advance auto as well step 1: steal big tube of thr… [+] (2 replies) 01/29/2016 on Customer service dream +13

#105 - nexdemise (01/29/2016) [-]

I had people do that at CVS I worked at. I never gave a shit, summer job family forced me into. Same thing about outright stealing. Few items (usually expensive shit, like razors, DMX, and make up had security tags on them). So even if someone did grab and run we didn't chase them and we really didn't have the manpower to enforce anything (it was usually just a cashier and a manager).

#22 - skelebones (01/29/2016) [-]

better than threadlocker.
that goddamn 60 dollar bottle of blue devil head sealer.

#21 - for science reasons where is this porn located? [+] (1 reply) 10/15/2015 on Bombs Away is at it again 0

#23 - ideletedmyotherone (10/15/2015) [-]

PornHub has some of them, you should be able to find something there.

#13 - googled ockham's razor. wikipedia hurt me. what in the hell … [+] (11 replies) 01/05/2015 on Tumblr Trigger comp +2

#86 - aherorising (01/05/2015) [-]

The simplest solution is often the most credible one.
By its own logic, this simplest solution would be for her to not be an angel, because the probability and likelihood is so infinitely small, one can probably safely assume that she is not an angelkin.

#53 - fiveblackmen (01/05/2015) [-]

The theory with the fewest assumptions should be considered correct until it or another theory, originally with more assumptions, is proven. The problem with this fucktard using it is that its theory is all assumption with no actual fact behind so, even if it is the least complex, it doesn't really fit with Occam's razor.

#18 - irishlawyer (01/05/2015) [-]

Generally, and I may be wrong here , it says that the simplest, least complex explanation that makes the least amount of assumptions is able to be assumed as the real explanation to unexplained phenomenon.

Tl;dr, that Tumblr angel cunt doesn't know what she's talking about

#162 - zchrls (01/05/2015) [-]

So in this case, the single assumption that these people are mentally handicapped and/or delusional is obviously the best explanation, as opposed to the slew of ridiculous assumptions involved in purporting that someone in a fucking reincarnated angel.

#125 - bennybbutton (01/05/2015) [-]

Even though philosophy is not my jam, is she not theoretically right? If we consider both her points they are both ideas of their own, and if they are the easiest possible explanations then it has gone through Okham's razor.

That does not mean that the ideas are not full of shit though.

#196 - irishlawyer (01/06/2015) [-]

Easiest explanation is that the wings and the thoughts of an otherworldly individual are just delusions of the mind, as well as the fact that angels exist, which is also an assumption.

#151 - schnitzelwagen (01/05/2015) [-]

Easiest explanation would be that non-existing wings are nothing but imagination.

#61 - DrDanny (01/05/2015) [-]

I too, watched that episode of scrubs.

Scrubs is the shit.

#195 - irishlawyer (01/06/2015) [-]

I don't watch scrubs
I know this because I strive to be a well-rounded individual in my areas of knowledge.

Basically, approximate knowledge of many things

#25 - Bacabed has deleted their comment.

#15 - royoten (01/05/2015) [-]

It basically means that When presented with a lot of theories, the simplest one is (probably) correct.