Rank #19510 on CommentsLevel 224 Comments: Mind Blower
OfflineSend mail to Keleth Block Keleth Invite Keleth to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||8/13/2010|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#21766|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#4164|
|Content Thumbs:||20 total, 29 , 9|
|Comment Thumbs:||2495 total, 3445 , 950|
|Content Level Progress:|| 40.67% (24/59) |
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
|Comment Level Progress:|| 70% (70/100) |
Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower
|Total Comments Made:||1033|
- Views: 1488Infomercials
16 5 Total: +11
latest user's comments
|#39 - actually several prestigious doctors have stated that from vie… [+] (1 new reply)||13 hours ago on The Hillary Clinton Test||+1|
#73 - anon (10 hours ago) [-]
several or that One dude that sucks trumps dick?
his evidence is a couple videos and he doesn't think she is very sick, but possible some arthritis. its all speculation regardless
|#1135 - **Keleth used "*roll picture*"** **Keleth rolled image **||13 hours ago on Roll for ugliest girl||+2|
|#52 - it does not say right to own weapons of mass destruction. the… [+] (1 new reply)||03/17/2016 on Liberals be like...||+6|
#134 - kalaark (03/17/2016) [-]
The founding fathers made the ammendment with the current technology of weapons in mind. Right to bear arms ws never about "standard guns". Their standard guns were muskets. They designed it to keep up with the current technology, for the purpose of defended oneself against the government, both foreign and domestic.
Anything that cripples a civilian use of a weapon on par with common military would be against the consitution. No, I'm not suggesting we should be able to own nuclear warheads. It's a right to bear arms, personal weapons. Figured I'd point that out before someone brings it up.
|#48 - Sweden is practically the rape capitol of the first world. gu… [+] (3 new replies)||03/17/2016 on Liberals be like...||+1|
#88 - Ruspanic (03/17/2016) [-]
Sweden is nowhere near the rape capital of the world, or even of Europe. The main reason their rape rates seem to be so high is because they have very liberal definitions of "rape" compared to everyone else, and because their method of tracking rape statistics is different from most other countries.
|#45 - the unlawful search and seizure. try again [+] (4 new replies)||03/17/2016 on Liberals be like...||-2|
#81 - anon (03/17/2016) [-]
Bring a gun to an airport and then yell that at them when they try to take it away from you.
#152 - anon (03/17/2016) [-]
Of course not. Hence the modifier "if".
#94 - anon (03/17/2016) [-]
you can, you just have to declare it. Not sure how you would go about that though.
|#21 - at advance auto as well step 1: steal big tube of thr… [+] (2 new replies)||01/29/2016 on Customer service dream||+13|
#105 - nexdemise (01/29/2016) [-]
I had people do that at CVS I worked at. I never gave a shit, summer job family forced me into. Same thing about outright stealing. Few items (usually expensive shit, like razors, DMX, and make up had security tags on them). So even if someone did grab and run we didn't chase them and we really didn't have the manpower to enforce anything (it was usually just a cashier and a manager).
|#21 - for science reasons where is this porn located? [+] (1 new reply)||10/15/2015 on Bombs Away is at it again||0|
|#13 - googled ockham's razor. wikipedia hurt me. what in the hell … [+] (11 new replies)||01/05/2015 on Tumblr Trigger comp||+2|
#53 - fiveblackmen (01/05/2015) [-]
The theory with the fewest assumptions should be considered correct until it or another theory, originally with more assumptions, is proven. The problem with this fucktard using it is that its theory is all assumption with no actual fact behind so, even if it is the least complex, it doesn't really fit with Occam's razor.
#18 - irishlawyer (01/05/2015) [-]
Generally, and I may be wrong here , it says that the simplest, least complex explanation that makes the least amount of assumptions is able to be assumed as the real explanation to unexplained phenomenon.
Tl;dr, that Tumblr angel cunt doesn't know what she's talking about
#125 - bennybbutton (01/05/2015) [-]
Even though philosophy is not my jam, is she not theoretically right? If we consider both her points they are both ideas of their own, and if they are the easiest possible explanations then it has gone through Okham's razor.
That does not mean that the ideas are not full of shit though.
|#23 - **Keleth used "*roll picture*"** **Keleth rolled image ** … [+] (1 new reply)||12/25/2014 on I don't think Scott wants a...||+34|
|#54 - Comment deleted||12/22/2014 on United School of America||0|