Rank #15075 on CommentsLevel 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
OfflineSend mail to IFuckinLoveHendrix Block IFuckinLoveHendrix Invite IFuckinLoveHendrix to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||1/20/2010|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#3569|
|Comment Thumbs:||4045 total, 4446 , 401|
|Content Level Progress:|| 6.77% (4/59) |
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
|Comment Level Progress:|| 2% (2/100) |
Level 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 237 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
|Total Comments Made:||820|
latest user's comments
|#24 - evilhomer put bread on my profile once..... To this d…||07/18/2016 on bred||0|
|#48 - Comment deleted||07/15/2016 on rabbit||0|
|#178 - Oh yeah........ Rage Faces and Oatmeal drama. This we…||07/12/2016 on is this still relevant?||0|
|#6 - You took too long, Now your candy's gone......... … [+] (2 new replies)||06/28/2016 on Hi sugar ;)||+11|
|#91 - ******************** used "*roll 1, 01-99*"** *************…||06/28/2016 on Feels thread||+1|
|#400 - Washington actually has very relaxed gun laws comparatively to… [+] (1 new reply)||04/15/2016 on Trump's Guns||+1|
|#235 - Goddamn I should have reread that before I hit post||04/14/2016 on Trump's Guns||0|
|#234 - We are talking about two different things here. You … [+] (11 new replies)||04/14/2016 on Trump's Guns||+17|
#259 - anon (04/14/2016) [-]
What part of "In order to form a well regulated militia" do you not understand? We have a well regulated militia...its called the national guard.
#302 - anon (04/14/2016) [-]
How about the "In order to form" part -- which is not actually there.
The syntax of the amendment puts forth the idea of a well regulated militia as an example of a justification for the amendment, not as a provision of the amendment itself.
If it said "Transportation to one's place of work, being critical to the maintenance of a healthy economy, the right to own and drive a car shall not be infringed.", would you claim that driving to work is the only allowed use of a car or that anybody who lives less than a certain distance from work should be barred from owning one? The first bit is justification. The second part is the actual legally binding provision. And I'd like to point out that that provision has the strongest wording of any clause in the Constitution.
|#68 - lol||03/30/2016 on Unpopular||+2|
|#15 - *multidimensional mentioned you in a comment* Obligat…||03/23/2016 on New Erma comic.||+2|