Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Haruhi    

Rank #11259 on Subscribers
Haruhi Avatar Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to Haruhi Block Haruhi Invite Haruhi to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: female
Date Signed Up:11/29/2010
Last Login:11/20/2014
Location:Israel
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#11465
Highest Content Rank:#3262
Highest Comment Rank:#4142
Content Thumbs: 1379 total,  1588 ,  209
Comment Thumbs: 1738 total,  3173 ,  1435
Content Level Progress: 79% (79/100)
Level 113 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 114 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 99% (99/100)
Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:6
Content Views:24635
Times Content Favorited:86 times
Total Comments Made:1349
FJ Points:3223
Favorite Tags: PIKACHU (3) | Pokemon (3) | Ash (2) | batman (2) | Haruhi (2) | lol (2) | OC (2) | rage (2) | repost (2) | troll (2)

latest user's comments

#67 - There is no such thing as a palestinian. mfw red thumbs  [+] (12 new replies) 11/16/2013 on The Jews did both +1
#74 - Bloodgartham (11/16/2013) [-]
Yea.. there kind of is. Which is why there are so many problems revolving around it. Even in the UN files, it says a sudden emigration of nearly 300.000 PALESTINIANS (using that name, yes) occurred right after the state of Israel was set up.
User avatar #96 - Haruhi (11/16/2013) [-]
The reason why there are so many 'problem's is because the arabs are well aware of the fact that they cannot destroy israel using force. They've tried. Three times. So, knowing that a military solution will not work, they created the palestinians. These ARABS, not PALESTINIANS, ARABS, are being used by the arab nations and terrorist organizations to achieve the same goal. Destroy the state of Israel and commit mass genocide against the Jews.
#116 - Bloodgartham (11/16/2013) [-]
Yea... you seem sane enough. Documents from the 1945-48 showing the UN and the west carving up an area and actually use the term Palestinians is definitely and arab invention.

On the other hand: Let's say the Palestinians don't exist, which they do, what gives the people of Israel and the map makers of the time the right to take the home country of someone else?

Oh, and I won't waste more time, given you seem like a fanatic using the term "commit mass genocide against the Jews".
User avatar #119 - Haruhi (11/16/2013) [-]
Well that is EXACTLY what they're trying to do. Commit mass genocide against the jewish people. I'm not a fanatic. Go look at speeches that were made my egyptian, syian, and lebanese leaders 40 years ago. They were talking about killing all the jews. Not just the ones in israel, all of them.
#69 - orkanoidz (11/16/2013) [-]
Considering the Israelis kicked there asses, you're actually right.
#80 - munyman (11/16/2013) [-]
I feel guilty, but this is the funniest shit I have seen in months.
User avatar #73 - Haruhi (11/16/2013) [-]
No. There is no such thing as a palestinian nationality. These people called palestinians all are actually jordanian, egyptian, and syrian people. Roughly 200k arabs stayed to live in Israel and become Israeli citizens.
#117 - Bloodgartham (11/16/2013) [-]
Doesn't matter if YOU accept the term Palestinian or not, the state of Israel took someones land, homes and rights away, only so others could get their "guilty conscious" of their backs.
User avatar #120 - Haruhi (11/16/2013) [-]
let me make this very clear to you. Israel offered ANY arab who lived there full citizenship and the same rights as any jew, and the majority of them denied that offer because they were told by other nations that the jews would soon be eliminated
User avatar #121 - orkanoidz (11/16/2013) [-]
Boom, knowledge. Now our world fights for the rights of a "people" who made their choice and chose wrong. Our world is filled with idiots.
User avatar #125 - Haruhi (11/17/2013) [-]
They chose genocide over peace. They are now cogs in a machine of hatred and death. These palestinians do not want peace. It has been made very clear to Israel that they never want peace.
User avatar #118 - Haruhi (11/16/2013) [-]
I don't understand what you mean by someone else's land. The majority of the population was Jews. The few people who did live there were offered full rights and citizenship. 200,000 accepted that, while the rest were either egyptians, syrians, jordanians, OR indigenous who allowed those nations to convince them not to take citizenship.
#15 - I'm aware how extremely old this meme is and I was going to po…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/15/2013 on New Meme -1
#16 - AnusViolator (11/15/2013) [-]
I was making another joke about you fucking pleb.
#13 - Someone should save this post and come back at least 6 months …  [+] (5 new replies) 11/15/2013 on New Meme +8
#97 - stricklandpropane (11/15/2013) [-]
If god says so
#14 - AnusViolator (11/15/2013) [-]
Someone already has, atleast 15 times.
User avatar #18 - TwiztidNinja (11/15/2013) [-]
The most impressive version was when that 1 /b/ tard went on the archives just to do that to someone he talked to a year prior.
User avatar #15 - Haruhi (11/15/2013) [-]
I'm aware how extremely old this meme is and I was going to post a hateful comment saying how fucking stupid it was but I didn't want to get red thumbs.
#16 - AnusViolator (11/15/2013) [-]
I was making another joke about you fucking pleb.
#82 - As a Jewish person that decision's already been easily made for me. 11/14/2013 on Mother of the Year 0
#30 - I'm circumcised and I feel everything the same way as uncircum…  [+] (7 new replies) 11/14/2013 on Mother of the Year +1
User avatar #49 - giraffodil (11/14/2013) [-]
Sometimes I get uncomfortable thinking about how one day if I ever have a son I have to decide if he'll be circumcised or uncircumcised.
User avatar #92 - garin (11/14/2013) [-]
Or you could let him decide for himself when he is older?
User avatar #82 - Haruhi (11/14/2013) [-]
As a Jewish person that decision's already been easily made for me.
User avatar #35 - rhc (11/14/2013) [-]
well i don't have to use lube when I jack off. so there.
#38 - Womens Study Major (11/14/2013) [-]
I'm circumcised but neither do I
User avatar #32 - ilcecchino (11/14/2013) [-]
I'm circumcised and i feel like it's better. honestly not extra skin to get in the way
#31 - captnpl (11/14/2013) [-]
How do you know?
#39 - **** yourself I've been a user of this site far l…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/04/2013 on Please don't ban me. -2
User avatar #40 - pointypixel (11/04/2013) [-]
want a fucking medal? 'cause frankly i don't give a shit that you've wasted more time browsing this site than i have.
#30 - Posts like this that get 300 thumbs make me want to just leave…  [+] (4 new replies) 11/04/2013 on Please don't ban me. -3
#38 - pointypixel (11/04/2013) [-]
it's funny because it pertains to the relatable bullshit that browsers of the site known as Funnyjunk have come to know over the past month. the whole 'yu gon git banned if you show shirtless men, cleavage, mildly sexual/offensive content blahblah'.

it's apart of the sites culture now, and if you don't like it, find some other site to waste your fucking time on.
User avatar #39 - Haruhi (11/04/2013) [-]
Fuck yourself I've been a user of this site far longer than you.
User avatar #40 - pointypixel (11/04/2013) [-]
want a fucking medal? 'cause frankly i don't give a shit that you've wasted more time browsing this site than i have.
#37 - cickolasnage (11/04/2013) [-]
Yo man thats not cool i just posted it because I thought it was funny and maybe it would be to some others, if you don't like it just skip.
#10 - Oh god that took me a good few minutes and then I was laughing so hard 10/31/2013 on Hodor's Secret 0
#494 - I am aware. I try to keep kosher, but sometimes I eat pig and … 10/31/2013 on Nope 0
#87 - > Jewish Would press  [+] (2 new replies) 10/30/2013 on Nope 0
User avatar #102 - konradkurze (10/30/2013) [-]
there are jews who eat pig meat......
only the orthodox give a shit to not eat
User avatar #494 - Haruhi (10/31/2013) [-]
I am aware. I try to keep kosher, but sometimes I eat pig and squid and other non kosher foods
#2 - I would have either returned the money back to the seller, or …  [+] (12 new replies) 10/29/2013 on It's the little things +10
User avatar #55 - Sicsin (10/30/2013) [-]
I second that.
User avatar #5 - fuzzysixx (10/30/2013) [-]
I would if it was a small third party, but probably not if it was from their warehouse.
#3 - Womens Study Major (10/30/2013) [-]
because youre a fuckin faggot
User avatar #62 - riderdouble (10/30/2013) [-]
Did you just call god a faggot?
User avatar #61 - wrocky (10/30/2013) [-]
says the one who didn't log in before he commented
User avatar #20 - rhiaanor (10/30/2013) [-]
WELL THEN! I knew Funnyjunk supported pirating, but wasn't aware it supported straight theft!
User avatar #49 - iridium (10/30/2013) [-]
It's not straight theft, but I don't see why people are thumbing down someone for being honest and thumbing up someone for being an asshole.
User avatar #50 - rhiaanor (10/30/2013) [-]
well it's not stabbing and guy and taking his shoes, but it's taking a real product made with real money that actually cause someone to lose money, rather than simply taking away a gain of money.
User avatar #80 - logicstrike (10/30/2013) [-]
no you where already refunded the money because of the unacceptable delivery time, your not legally obliged to return it (though it is the polite thing to do)
If however you get it and say it wasn't delivered to get a refund that is fraud
User avatar #71 - mondominiman (10/30/2013) [-]
No what you had to do is stab the guy and take his mints
#16 - Womens Study Major (10/30/2013) [-]
Yes, because not being a total shit makes you a faggot.
#12 - gayboard (10/30/2013) [-]
#25 - Picture 10/24/2013 on Australia 0
#223 - Immortality + noise canceling earbuds = are you even kidding m… 10/16/2013 on I see no downside here +2
#33 - furthermore, the reasons for going to war were not the fact th… 10/16/2013 on A very powerful photo 0
#32 - You must understand that this population you are referring to … 10/16/2013 on A very powerful photo 0
#30 - Firstly, nobody was kicked out. Everyone who lived in what bec…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/16/2013 on A very powerful photo 0
User avatar #31 - Ruspanic (10/16/2013) [-]
Look at it from their perspective.
They were living in that region for generations under various rulers. In the early 20th century, the Ottomans were replaced by the British. The population was mostly Arab in ethnicity and culture, but as subjects of an empire they had no control over their own immigration policies, and so the British allowed Jews to flood into Palestine by the thousands. At first the Arabs were okay with it because the Jews brought business and advances in science, agriculture, medicine and technology, but as the Jewish population grew much faster than the Arab population (largely due to continued immigration, which was further boosted by refugees of the Holocaust), eventually this led to tensions and some violence between the groups. Understandably, the Arabs felt their homeland was being taken over by foreigners.

In 1948, the Jews made up about 1/3 of the population of Palestine, compared to less than 1/10 just three decades earlier. And then the British legitimized the Jewish presence by offering them half the territory of Palestine for an independent state (a disproportionately large amount for their population). Of course the Arabs rejected that deal, from their perspective they just lost half their land to a bunch of foreigners. And a large majority of the Arabs in what became Israel left their homes, for a variety of reasons including forcible expulsion by the Israelis.

So yes, the Arabs had a legitimate claim to the land based on the fact that they lived there. If they had been self-governing instead of subject to rule by a foreign power, this would certainly not have been allowed to happen.
Now, of course, it's far too late to undo the State of Israel, but at the very least the Palestinians deserve to have the West Bank and Gaza Strip for themselves, once they can set up a functioning government.
User avatar #33 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
furthermore, the reasons for going to war were not the fact that this land had new ownership. It was solely because they were Jews. The Arab states who declared war time and again were not trying to liberate palestine. They were attempting to commit mass genocide.
User avatar #32 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
You must understand that this population you are referring to is/was extremely small. the cities of modern Israel didn't exist until the jews built them. The vast majority of people claiming to be palestinians are jordanians.
#28 - They have no claim to land  [+] (5 new replies) 10/15/2013 on A very powerful photo 0
User avatar #29 - Ruspanic (10/15/2013) [-]
Yes they do. They inhabited the region before the mass Jewish immigration in the first part of the 20th century, up until being kicked out once the State of Israel was formed. It's all well and good for the Zionists to seek a homeland for their people, but they had no right to do it in a place that was already inhabited by others.
User avatar #30 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
Firstly, nobody was kicked out. Everyone who lived in what became Israel was offered citizenship. They denied citizenship and took exile because all the arab leaders said to them, "hey, don't worry, we're gonna kill all the jews and destroy Israel so you guys don't take anything from them and dont worry we'll have them out in a few months." In 1967 when Israel captured the west bank, which previously was OCCUPIED by Jordan, Jordan abandoned ALL of it's citizens who lived in that region. They did not allow them to return to their own country. Thus, they were named Palestinians, and their plight for their land began.
User avatar #31 - Ruspanic (10/16/2013) [-]
Look at it from their perspective.
They were living in that region for generations under various rulers. In the early 20th century, the Ottomans were replaced by the British. The population was mostly Arab in ethnicity and culture, but as subjects of an empire they had no control over their own immigration policies, and so the British allowed Jews to flood into Palestine by the thousands. At first the Arabs were okay with it because the Jews brought business and advances in science, agriculture, medicine and technology, but as the Jewish population grew much faster than the Arab population (largely due to continued immigration, which was further boosted by refugees of the Holocaust), eventually this led to tensions and some violence between the groups. Understandably, the Arabs felt their homeland was being taken over by foreigners.

In 1948, the Jews made up about 1/3 of the population of Palestine, compared to less than 1/10 just three decades earlier. And then the British legitimized the Jewish presence by offering them half the territory of Palestine for an independent state (a disproportionately large amount for their population). Of course the Arabs rejected that deal, from their perspective they just lost half their land to a bunch of foreigners. And a large majority of the Arabs in what became Israel left their homes, for a variety of reasons including forcible expulsion by the Israelis.

So yes, the Arabs had a legitimate claim to the land based on the fact that they lived there. If they had been self-governing instead of subject to rule by a foreign power, this would certainly not have been allowed to happen.
Now, of course, it's far too late to undo the State of Israel, but at the very least the Palestinians deserve to have the West Bank and Gaza Strip for themselves, once they can set up a functioning government.
User avatar #33 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
furthermore, the reasons for going to war were not the fact that this land had new ownership. It was solely because they were Jews. The Arab states who declared war time and again were not trying to liberate palestine. They were attempting to commit mass genocide.
User avatar #32 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
You must understand that this population you are referring to is/was extremely small. the cities of modern Israel didn't exist until the jews built them. The vast majority of people claiming to be palestinians are jordanians.
#26 - Prior to 1967 there were no people claiming to be palestinians…  [+] (7 new replies) 10/15/2013 on A very powerful photo 0
User avatar #27 - Ruspanic (10/15/2013) [-]
Can't the same thing be said of the Israelis? Before the formation of the State of Israel in 1948, the Jews living in British Palestine were not Israelis.

Anyway, who cares what they call themselves? You're talking about ethnic identity, but that's irrelevant. The people exist, whatever you call them.
User avatar #28 - Haruhi (10/15/2013) [-]
They have no claim to land
User avatar #29 - Ruspanic (10/15/2013) [-]
Yes they do. They inhabited the region before the mass Jewish immigration in the first part of the 20th century, up until being kicked out once the State of Israel was formed. It's all well and good for the Zionists to seek a homeland for their people, but they had no right to do it in a place that was already inhabited by others.
User avatar #30 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
Firstly, nobody was kicked out. Everyone who lived in what became Israel was offered citizenship. They denied citizenship and took exile because all the arab leaders said to them, "hey, don't worry, we're gonna kill all the jews and destroy Israel so you guys don't take anything from them and dont worry we'll have them out in a few months." In 1967 when Israel captured the west bank, which previously was OCCUPIED by Jordan, Jordan abandoned ALL of it's citizens who lived in that region. They did not allow them to return to their own country. Thus, they were named Palestinians, and their plight for their land began.
User avatar #31 - Ruspanic (10/16/2013) [-]
Look at it from their perspective.
They were living in that region for generations under various rulers. In the early 20th century, the Ottomans were replaced by the British. The population was mostly Arab in ethnicity and culture, but as subjects of an empire they had no control over their own immigration policies, and so the British allowed Jews to flood into Palestine by the thousands. At first the Arabs were okay with it because the Jews brought business and advances in science, agriculture, medicine and technology, but as the Jewish population grew much faster than the Arab population (largely due to continued immigration, which was further boosted by refugees of the Holocaust), eventually this led to tensions and some violence between the groups. Understandably, the Arabs felt their homeland was being taken over by foreigners.

In 1948, the Jews made up about 1/3 of the population of Palestine, compared to less than 1/10 just three decades earlier. And then the British legitimized the Jewish presence by offering them half the territory of Palestine for an independent state (a disproportionately large amount for their population). Of course the Arabs rejected that deal, from their perspective they just lost half their land to a bunch of foreigners. And a large majority of the Arabs in what became Israel left their homes, for a variety of reasons including forcible expulsion by the Israelis.

So yes, the Arabs had a legitimate claim to the land based on the fact that they lived there. If they had been self-governing instead of subject to rule by a foreign power, this would certainly not have been allowed to happen.
Now, of course, it's far too late to undo the State of Israel, but at the very least the Palestinians deserve to have the West Bank and Gaza Strip for themselves, once they can set up a functioning government.
User avatar #33 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
furthermore, the reasons for going to war were not the fact that this land had new ownership. It was solely because they were Jews. The Arab states who declared war time and again were not trying to liberate palestine. They were attempting to commit mass genocide.
User avatar #32 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
You must understand that this population you are referring to is/was extremely small. the cities of modern Israel didn't exist until the jews built them. The vast majority of people claiming to be palestinians are jordanians.
#24 - Palestine isn't a place.  [+] (9 new replies) 10/15/2013 on A very powerful photo 0
User avatar #25 - Ruspanic (10/15/2013) [-]
Yes it is. It's Gaza and the West Bank, a.k.a the Palestinian Territories. Before the creation of Israel, the area called "Palestine" also included what is now the State of Israel.
User avatar #26 - Haruhi (10/15/2013) [-]
Prior to 1967 there were no people claiming to be palestinians. Do you even history?
User avatar #27 - Ruspanic (10/15/2013) [-]
Can't the same thing be said of the Israelis? Before the formation of the State of Israel in 1948, the Jews living in British Palestine were not Israelis.

Anyway, who cares what they call themselves? You're talking about ethnic identity, but that's irrelevant. The people exist, whatever you call them.
User avatar #28 - Haruhi (10/15/2013) [-]
They have no claim to land
User avatar #29 - Ruspanic (10/15/2013) [-]
Yes they do. They inhabited the region before the mass Jewish immigration in the first part of the 20th century, up until being kicked out once the State of Israel was formed. It's all well and good for the Zionists to seek a homeland for their people, but they had no right to do it in a place that was already inhabited by others.
User avatar #30 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
Firstly, nobody was kicked out. Everyone who lived in what became Israel was offered citizenship. They denied citizenship and took exile because all the arab leaders said to them, "hey, don't worry, we're gonna kill all the jews and destroy Israel so you guys don't take anything from them and dont worry we'll have them out in a few months." In 1967 when Israel captured the west bank, which previously was OCCUPIED by Jordan, Jordan abandoned ALL of it's citizens who lived in that region. They did not allow them to return to their own country. Thus, they were named Palestinians, and their plight for their land began.
User avatar #31 - Ruspanic (10/16/2013) [-]
Look at it from their perspective.
They were living in that region for generations under various rulers. In the early 20th century, the Ottomans were replaced by the British. The population was mostly Arab in ethnicity and culture, but as subjects of an empire they had no control over their own immigration policies, and so the British allowed Jews to flood into Palestine by the thousands. At first the Arabs were okay with it because the Jews brought business and advances in science, agriculture, medicine and technology, but as the Jewish population grew much faster than the Arab population (largely due to continued immigration, which was further boosted by refugees of the Holocaust), eventually this led to tensions and some violence between the groups. Understandably, the Arabs felt their homeland was being taken over by foreigners.

In 1948, the Jews made up about 1/3 of the population of Palestine, compared to less than 1/10 just three decades earlier. And then the British legitimized the Jewish presence by offering them half the territory of Palestine for an independent state (a disproportionately large amount for their population). Of course the Arabs rejected that deal, from their perspective they just lost half their land to a bunch of foreigners. And a large majority of the Arabs in what became Israel left their homes, for a variety of reasons including forcible expulsion by the Israelis.

So yes, the Arabs had a legitimate claim to the land based on the fact that they lived there. If they had been self-governing instead of subject to rule by a foreign power, this would certainly not have been allowed to happen.
Now, of course, it's far too late to undo the State of Israel, but at the very least the Palestinians deserve to have the West Bank and Gaza Strip for themselves, once they can set up a functioning government.
User avatar #33 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
furthermore, the reasons for going to war were not the fact that this land had new ownership. It was solely because they were Jews. The Arab states who declared war time and again were not trying to liberate palestine. They were attempting to commit mass genocide.
User avatar #32 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
You must understand that this population you are referring to is/was extremely small. the cities of modern Israel didn't exist until the jews built them. The vast majority of people claiming to be palestinians are jordanians.
#19 - Palestinians don't exist. Truth hurts, doesn't it.  [+] (11 new replies) 10/15/2013 on A very powerful photo -2
User avatar #22 - Ruspanic (10/15/2013) [-]
Nope, you're just a faggot.
A Palestinian is an Arab resident of Palestine.
User avatar #24 - Haruhi (10/15/2013) [-]
Palestine isn't a place.
User avatar #25 - Ruspanic (10/15/2013) [-]
Yes it is. It's Gaza and the West Bank, a.k.a the Palestinian Territories. Before the creation of Israel, the area called "Palestine" also included what is now the State of Israel.
User avatar #26 - Haruhi (10/15/2013) [-]
Prior to 1967 there were no people claiming to be palestinians. Do you even history?
User avatar #27 - Ruspanic (10/15/2013) [-]
Can't the same thing be said of the Israelis? Before the formation of the State of Israel in 1948, the Jews living in British Palestine were not Israelis.

Anyway, who cares what they call themselves? You're talking about ethnic identity, but that's irrelevant. The people exist, whatever you call them.
User avatar #28 - Haruhi (10/15/2013) [-]
They have no claim to land
User avatar #29 - Ruspanic (10/15/2013) [-]
Yes they do. They inhabited the region before the mass Jewish immigration in the first part of the 20th century, up until being kicked out once the State of Israel was formed. It's all well and good for the Zionists to seek a homeland for their people, but they had no right to do it in a place that was already inhabited by others.
User avatar #30 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
Firstly, nobody was kicked out. Everyone who lived in what became Israel was offered citizenship. They denied citizenship and took exile because all the arab leaders said to them, "hey, don't worry, we're gonna kill all the jews and destroy Israel so you guys don't take anything from them and dont worry we'll have them out in a few months." In 1967 when Israel captured the west bank, which previously was OCCUPIED by Jordan, Jordan abandoned ALL of it's citizens who lived in that region. They did not allow them to return to their own country. Thus, they were named Palestinians, and their plight for their land began.
User avatar #31 - Ruspanic (10/16/2013) [-]
Look at it from their perspective.
They were living in that region for generations under various rulers. In the early 20th century, the Ottomans were replaced by the British. The population was mostly Arab in ethnicity and culture, but as subjects of an empire they had no control over their own immigration policies, and so the British allowed Jews to flood into Palestine by the thousands. At first the Arabs were okay with it because the Jews brought business and advances in science, agriculture, medicine and technology, but as the Jewish population grew much faster than the Arab population (largely due to continued immigration, which was further boosted by refugees of the Holocaust), eventually this led to tensions and some violence between the groups. Understandably, the Arabs felt their homeland was being taken over by foreigners.

In 1948, the Jews made up about 1/3 of the population of Palestine, compared to less than 1/10 just three decades earlier. And then the British legitimized the Jewish presence by offering them half the territory of Palestine for an independent state (a disproportionately large amount for their population). Of course the Arabs rejected that deal, from their perspective they just lost half their land to a bunch of foreigners. And a large majority of the Arabs in what became Israel left their homes, for a variety of reasons including forcible expulsion by the Israelis.

So yes, the Arabs had a legitimate claim to the land based on the fact that they lived there. If they had been self-governing instead of subject to rule by a foreign power, this would certainly not have been allowed to happen.
Now, of course, it's far too late to undo the State of Israel, but at the very least the Palestinians deserve to have the West Bank and Gaza Strip for themselves, once they can set up a functioning government.
User avatar #33 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
furthermore, the reasons for going to war were not the fact that this land had new ownership. It was solely because they were Jews. The Arab states who declared war time and again were not trying to liberate palestine. They were attempting to commit mass genocide.
User avatar #32 - Haruhi (10/16/2013) [-]
You must understand that this population you are referring to is/was extremely small. the cities of modern Israel didn't exist until the jews built them. The vast majority of people claiming to be palestinians are jordanians.
#151 - Don't ever date a women with a kid. You will end up paying out…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/09/2013 on I can not find a fault in... +1
#156 - evanomicfour (10/09/2013) [-]


Absolutely correct ser.
#95 - >mfw you think the leaders are meant to be historically accurate.  [+] (1 new reply) 10/09/2013 on What to expect from Gandhi... 0
#96 - schneidend (10/09/2013) [-]
MFW you have no face.
#89 - The AI get progressively less passive the higher the dificulty.  [+] (3 new replies) 10/09/2013 on What to expect from Gandhi... 0
User avatar #94 - schneidend (10/09/2013) [-]
You'd think Ghandi would always go for a religious or cultural victory.
User avatar #95 - Haruhi (10/09/2013) [-]
>mfw you think the leaders are meant to be historically accurate.
#96 - schneidend (10/09/2013) [-]
MFW you have no face.
#87 - yes  [+] (5 new replies) 10/09/2013 on What to expect from Gandhi... 0
User avatar #88 - schneidend (10/09/2013) [-]
...Why does a higher difficulty make Ghandi, of all people, go apeshit?
User avatar #89 - Haruhi (10/09/2013) [-]
The AI get progressively less passive the higher the dificulty.
User avatar #94 - schneidend (10/09/2013) [-]
You'd think Ghandi would always go for a religious or cultural victory.
User avatar #95 - Haruhi (10/09/2013) [-]
>mfw you think the leaders are meant to be historically accurate.
#96 - schneidend (10/09/2013) [-]
MFW you have no face.
#89 - Wouldn't there still be a bullet in the chamber  [+] (1 new reply) 10/08/2013 on Disarm an AK 0
#90 - Womens Study Major (10/08/2013) [-]
The second kick took the bullet out of the chamber.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 478 / Total items point value: 1688

Comments(39):

Haruhi has disabled anonymous comments.
 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
#53 - dillistone (09/09/2014) [-]
suck a dick
User avatar #51 - soundofwinter (06/19/2014) [-]
**** you
User avatar #52 to #51 - Haruhi (06/19/2014) [-]
ok
#49 - revengeforfreeze (03/18/2014) [-]
Do you like Pokemon?
User avatar #50 to #49 - Haruhi (03/19/2014) [-]
I haven't played anything released past emerald
#47 - iamaniceperson (02/26/2014) [-]
Yer not the Haruhi I tough you were. get outta my face
User avatar #48 to #47 - Haruhi (03/05/2014) [-]
**** yourself
User avatar #46 - andranadu ONLINE (01/27/2014) [-]
You're jewish?

Hug me brutha!
User avatar #31 - finni (03/17/2013) [-]
Who's the chick in your profile picture?
User avatar #43 to #31 - revengeforfreeze (01/21/2014) [-]
Haruhi Suzumiya
#27 - megafan **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#25 - maggotsix (01/06/2012) [-]
Sawp! :D
User avatar #26 to #26 - Haruhi (02/22/2012) [-]
hai
#13 - MarshManOriginal (09/09/2011) [-]
Same as #10.
User avatar #12 - azusa (08/02/2011) [-]
Nice username! :D
#11 - yuitripfag **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#10 - Vanbr (07/05/2011) [-]
I am a random person you have never met before but i saw your name and couldnt help but come here to post this worthless comment
#8 - MatthewsGauss (05/14/2011) [-]
finally a chance to use this
finally a chance to use this
User avatar #28 to #8 - acaivy (01/24/2013) [-]
To use what?
#7 - thatnerdyguy (04/01/2011) [-]
Hello there.
#6 - sircool (03/22/2011) [-]
i would never think some one would make an account of this anime
User avatar #4 - DoucheKiller (01/05/2011) [-]
wargharrrble!
#1 - TinyHeadHouse **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#2 to #1 - Haruhi (11/30/2010) [-]
Join me
#3 to #2 - TinyHeadHouse **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
 
 Friends (0)