Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:8/14/2010
Last Login:6/10/2016
Content Thumbs: 15 total,  18 ,  3
Comment Thumbs: 2655 total,  2873 ,  218
Content Level Progress: 32.2% (19/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 2% (2/100)
Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower
Content Views:365
Total Comments Made:564
FJ Points:1902

latest user's comments

#56 - Grammatically, I think it could work either way: &qu…  [+] (3 replies) 01/03/2016 on Spicy +1
#57 - vegasstoner (01/03/2016) [-]

you showed me. well played good sir.
User avatar
#58 - simonhatesfj (01/22/2016) [-]
nice video
it would be a shame if something were to happen to it
#59 - vegasstoner (01/22/2016) [-]
#19 - Gatsby doesn't have a fear of swimming pools, he just di…  [+] (3 replies) 08/26/2015 on Coincidence? I think not! +5
#23 - blindpone has deleted their comment.
#24 - anon (08/26/2015) [-]
wtf did you read? he died in his pool
#25 - blindpone has deleted their comment.
#23 - This is a bit unfair and misleading. "Feminist art" …  [+] (5 replies) 08/13/2015 on Absolutely Disgusting +1
#41 - anon (08/13/2015) [-]
This is an example of the modern art genre.
The cunt using her cunt as a gravity-fed paintbrush isn't "modern art", it's shock schlock ripped straight out of the 70's, when it was used by angry, talentless hacks who thought they had a message to tell the world, and is now being used for that exact same purpose today, except the angry, talentless hacks of the 2010s have to literally make up their oppressors and struggles so they can have something to rebel against and churn out these kinds of artistic setbacks.
#24 - desudesudesudes (08/13/2015) [-]
This piece of art was created in 1930 I believe but was encompassed in the greater scope of the "surrealism" art movement of the 1920's. As we all knew feminism was at its highest point in 1920 when women received the right to vote and the years after. This is a well known masterpiece that was created in a time when feminism was thriving.

What the OP is, is a privileged, elitist feminism that is either to lazy or not talented enough to capture the attention of the public without the aide of "Look at this disgusting crazy thing I can do, it is powerful right?"
User avatar
#31 - donatelo (08/13/2015) [-]
you make a good point. but i think the content is stil misleading but for other reasons...i mean, it is only one piece of feminist art. whats more, there is no concrete "femenist art" in the way that surrealism is. Since its ambiguous we can consider Frida Khalo's (a well known femenist) art as fem art, a far better artist and example than the content.
User avatar
#33 - desudesudesudes (08/13/2015) [-]
yea the content is more just for the lulz and I know feminist writings are far more substantial than the OP, but I wanted to make the point that this brand of feminist art is more reaction porn than anything artistic and that justifying it with how art is today is just enabling it.
User avatar
#36 - donatelo (08/13/2015) [-]
thats true, very true actually. I remember a recent "art" exhibition where a guy nailed his balls to the ground..its more exhibition or protest. The content has two very different styles.
#24 - I'm a bit suspicious of the Diogenes one. There's yet another …  [+] (1 reply) 08/05/2015 on Random Interesting Facts... +19
User avatar
#40 - ohemgeezus (08/06/2015) [-]
Alexander liked him, mostly because he didn't give a fuck. In response to what he said in our comment, Alexander turned and said, "if I were not Alexander, then I should wish to be Diogenes." To which Diogenes replied with, "If I were not Diogenes, then I should wish to be Diogenes". He also fucked with Plato