Rank #1677 on CommentsLevel 307 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
OfflineSend mail to Endofzeeworld Block Endofzeeworld Invite Endofzeeworld to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||1/15/2010|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#5597|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#793|
|Content Thumbs:||59 total, 92 , 33|
|Comment Thumbs:||12135 total, 15235 , 3100|
|Content Level Progress:|| 0% (0/5) |
Level 1 Content: New Here → Level 2 Content: New Here
|Comment Level Progress:|| 7% (7/100) |
Level 307 Comments: Lord Of Laughs → Level 308 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
|Times Content Favorited:||4 times|
|Total Comments Made:||4617|
latest user's comments
|#4 - Cats love to attack birds. [+] (3 new replies)||07/24/2016 on cat loses his shjt||+46|
|#13 - PolySci is fine. As long as it is followed up by a la…||07/24/2016 on Political Science though||+5|
|#6 - She has a semi-successful youtube channel now.||07/24/2016 on She loved you and you...||+8|
|#27 - You think so? Even though Turkey has had five coups in the pas… [+] (1 new reply)||07/16/2016 on Wonders of Islam||0|
#28 - hueman (07/16/2016) [-]
Well, the military was stronger and more centralized back then
Today, it seems weakened and split politically, with only a minor faction in the military attempting it
Judging by the actions taken by the soldiers, it looks like they were going for speed and blitz tactics to take and briefly hold key locations, as if awaiting reinforcements
Previous coups were done at higher levels, with direct removal of the leader by the military
Erdogan wasn't even in the capital at the time of the coup, so it looks like the military elements were counting on international action to help remove him from power
Just my two cents, though, I could be wrong
|#59 - Picture||07/16/2016 on Random shit on my phone 89||0|
|#25 - IF ROADSOW ISNT THICC THEN SHE ISNT ROADSOW. GTFO.||07/09/2016 on Tumblr isn't so bad after all||0|
|#187 - #feelthejohnson [+] (2 new replies)||07/02/2016 on sides||+2|
|#20 - >laboratory scientists >compared to sociology majors… [+] (32 new replies)||06/17/2016 on Ethos||+36|
#154 - jewbob (06/18/2016) [-]
I can't think of anything good that's come out of sociology. Garbage tier modern philosophy? Women's Studies? Psychoanalysis? Have they made a new major form of government or something? Brought us more scumbag lawyers? A widespread economic system? I'm curious what you can come up with that can bring it close to STEM fields because I'm drawing a total blank.
#164 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
I agree that sociology itself is total shit. But I wouldn't stack all liberal arts in the same pile.
I think that studying things like philosophy, literature, history, politics and economics is very important as the ideas and knowledge that circulates within a society (and humanity itself in the bottom line) have a very significant effect on the welfare of the people.
I do agree that sociology does not bring much to that circulation, however.
#176 - jewbob (06/18/2016) [-]
Philosophy, literature, politics, history, and economics are the soul of nations and cultures, I don't have an argument against that nor would I want to have one. It's just sad to me that in the past fifty years all of it has been corrupted by new age bullshit, I'll always advocate learning liberal arts on your own outside of a school so you don't drink other people's Kool-Aid. It shouldn't be useless but it is because people have made it useless.
#40 - AlexPaincakes (06/18/2016) [-]
I dont get your argument..
Scientist and engineers are ALWAYS innovating. It's their job, to innovate new technologies or techniques. Hell thousands of innovations were made just to send people to the moon, innovations we all still use today. If you truly believe science and engineering don't have a meaningful impact on your life you are insanely naive.
#43 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
"It's their job, to innovate new technologies or techniques"
What the fuck are you on about? The guy who programs my microwave isn't a fucking innovator. The guy who makes a website for a few hundred dollars for a company that dresses dogs in cute little suits isn't a fucking innovator. The civil engineer who builds a bridge is working within the confines of the creative mind of the architect, since he himself was too uncreative to go for something that actually has merit. He's not a fucking innovator.
Edison, Tesla, even the nigger who invented peanut butter, are innovators.
#51 - AlexPaincakes (06/18/2016) [-]
How are you going to sit there and say "Hurr Durr microwaves are important so neither is anyone else"
You seriously think that's the extent of science? What about medical research? What about artificial limbs? What about potential rescue robots? What about the thousands of implications with graphene? What about the advancement of germ theory? What about the fact that you have electricity? What about the fact you have plumbing in your house? What about the fact that your food is grown all over the country and is kept at very specific temperatures so that it doesn't spoil before it reaches your fat fucking mouth? What about antibiotics or vaccines? What about water purification? I could keep going on and on and on forever.
You really think that none of this shit is important? This is all scientist and engineers making this shit, but no you're saying that sociology is more important..
#56 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
"Hurr Durr microwaves are important so neither is anyone else"
You must be actually retarded... I have no clue as to what you are trying to say here. When did I ever...? What...?
Your second paragraph is whining about how some people in science innovate so I should also respect dipshits who sniff horse jizz in test tubes. A few people have innovated (artificial limbs, electricity, steam engine, sewage, etc.); most people do work like I can kind of guess you do: probably programming microwaves and calling yourself an innovator for finding a more eloquent or concise way to phrase something in code.
Look, reality is harsh, and I know that. But nature is fascist. No one gives a shit about the guy who makes transistors, while everyone gives a shit about Alan Turing for designing the first binary computing device. He was a logician, by the by--not an autismus, uncreative and uninnovative engineer.
"This is all scientists and engineers making this shit"
No. It's innovators. Stop fucking conflating the two.
#71 - AlexPaincakes (06/18/2016) [-]
How do you not know what a scientist or engineer does? How do you sit there and boil all scientist and engineers to what biologist do? You seriously only go on about animal jizz and it is concerning There is WAAAAAy more to science that just your narrow biased tunnel vision allows.
There isn't just a title of innovator. One person doesn't do all the work and BAM we got a new invention. It's the combined efforts of multiple scientist and engineers that make it possible. Even the "innovators" you spoke of didn't solely create the invention they are known for. They used previous work from other scientist and engineers. You even mention Nikola Tesla earlier and he himself is an engineer. Engineers build shit and scientist research shit they build off of each other.
#81 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
I gave you one example, and what do I get? "Oh, my god you're boiling all science and engineering into biology lol. But yeah, some guy innovated something so all scientists are innovators."
The guy from counter-signal memes could make memes with your comments for fuck's sake--you literally prove yourself hypocritical in the space of two replies.
Again, I respect innovators; I don't give a shit about dipshits who program microwaves. That's my whole point.
You can keep saying "No, but maybe the guy who designed that website for people who like to trade jizz online brought something new to the table, and hey, man, who knows, maybe some kind of Tesla will use his innovations in the future--am I right?" but it won't change the facts that no one gives a shit about 99% of scientists and engineers.
#93 - AlexPaincakes (06/18/2016) [-]
"Biologists jerk off pigs, taste their sperm, look at it through a microscope, and then tweet about it in their "peer reviewed" articles."
"... so I should also respect dipshits who sniff horse jizz in test tubes"
Hmmm werid that's two comments about jizz..
I never said ALL scientist were innovators. How are you making these assumptions? My point is that you are undermining science on a device that science and engineering conceived, and it is hypocritical of you. You seem to think that jizz is the only thing scientist are studying. You do realize that sociologist are considered scientist as well as pretty much any field that has to do with research. But no you for some reason think that only biologist are scientist. How are you so stupid?
#122 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
You missed another reference I had made to jizz which was "No, but maybe the guy who designed that website for people who like to trade jizz online brought something new to the table, and hey, man, who knows, maybe some kind of Tesla will use his innovations in the future--am I right?"
Come on, man.
I'm disappointed in your lack of diligence.
#140 - goddamnitwork (06/18/2016) [-]
**goddamnitwork used "*roll picture*"**
**goddamnitwork rolled image**lol. I think an important point to add is that for the innovations/inventions to have the effect that they do, they need people to do less historical work that may not be extremely innovative but are needed for the product or thing to work. Like designing a website or building a bridge so many can benefit from it.
#39 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
When did I say that, you fucking inbred?
I said "society is more important than any science or engineering combined". I respect anyone who helps the human race.
Sociologists provide us with useful information. Writers and musicians give me dank ass entertainment. Many great innovators have produced amazing technologies that make life easier for everyone...
Biologists jerk off pigs, taste their sperm, look at it through a microscope, and then tweet about it in their "peer reviewed" articles.
#45 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
Yeah, that makes more sense.
Because only a daft cunt could say something so stupid. What the fuck does that have to do with my first comment anyway? I said "functioning society".
If you had at least wanted to be relevant you could have said "it's not like sociologists make society functioning" or something to that effect. But not, you said "sociologists don't create society".
How exactly is that even addressing my first comment's point? Explain.
#48 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
I was implying that they contributed to a well-functioning society.
If someone said "Physicists are cool because physics are important in life" would you jump on them and yell "physicists don't design physics, dipshit!!!" or would you potentially be ready to make the effort of understanding that they technically meant "it's important for us to know physics"?
It's important for us to know data on society. It helps us know what problems to address. A functioning society is a hundred times more important than science or engineering.
|#29 - Picture [+] (3 new replies)||06/17/2016 on ship||+6|
|#224 - Who is*||06/17/2016 on lolicon||0|