Upload
Login or register

Endofzeeworld

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:1/15/2010
Last Login:5/31/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#932
Highest Content Rank:#5597
Highest Comment Rank:#915
Content Thumbs: 59 total,  92 ,  33
Comment Thumbs: 10854 total,  13770 ,  2916
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/5)
Level 1 Content: New Here → Level 2 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 86% (86/100)
Level 295 Comments: Post Master → Level 296 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:1
Content Views:6456
Times Content Favorited:4 times
Total Comments Made:4412
FJ Points:9651

  • Views: 2220
    Thumbs Up 21 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +19
    Comments: 25
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 11/24/15
    Desc Desc
  • Views: 874
    Thumbs Up 21 Thumbs Down 7 Total: +14
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 04/06/11
    Not funny. Not funny.
  • Views: 1850
    Thumbs Up 14 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +10
    Comments: 13
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 05/18/14
    GM Rules GM Rules
  • Views: 1187
    Thumbs Up 13 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +10
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 12/16/11
    Next level badass Next level badass

latest user's comments

#44 - Vikings, tv show on history channel 05/29/2016 on Service +3
#136 - Oh. Well then I think we're done here. I thought you were argu… 05/28/2016 on Holy shit I live in The... 0
#134 - Again, Russia having a "Weaker Economy" is a VAST un… 05/28/2016 on Holy shit I live in The... 0
#132 - Clearly I can't convince you of the importance of Economic str… 05/28/2016 on Holy shit I live in The... 0
#129 - Which would then bring those countries into the war, stacking …  [+] (7 new replies) 05/28/2016 on Holy shit I live in The... 0
User avatar
#135 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I'm not saying that Russia would win the war, I'm just saying that any war would be indecisive, and the the EU wouldn't "easily shit-stomp the Russians", while Russia wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Europe, the EU wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Russia either, that's damn near impossible. There'd be no winning on any side.
User avatar
#136 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Oh. Well then I think we're done here. I thought you were arguing for a Russian victory.

There are many variables in war. To say that Europe would shit-storm them was a bit of Hyperbole. If I was a betting man, I would bet on Europe, but you are correct in that it is a far from sure thing.
User avatar
#133 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
While Russia does have a weaker economy, their military equipment is cheaper overall, while an F-22 would cost around $150 million USD, a Russian fighter jet of similar quality would cost only around $50 million USD. And while economy is important, it isn't decisive, look at what happened in Vietnam, and the Soviet-Afghanistan.
User avatar
#134 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Again, Russia having a "Weaker Economy" is a VAST understatement. A russian jet may cost a third of what a western one does, but the EU's economy is nine times the size.

The reason the US lost in Vietnam is because we weren't willing to continue to escalate the engagement (correctly, IMO). But if the US wanted to win the war enough, they could have. I can't speak to Soviet-Afghanistan, but that was a very complicated situation in any case.
User avatar
#131 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Plus, I don't see countries like Nigeria and Saudi Arabia being much of a problem for Russia.
User avatar
#130 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I think the war would start off with the invasion of Europe, due to Russia's larger army at the beginning of the war, and while they're there they can just cut the oil pipelines, I don't see how a nation could play that as an attack on them. Plus, most of the imports are from the middle east, Russia could just go through the Balkans and cut them.
User avatar
#132 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Clearly I can't convince you of the importance of Economic strength, but I'll just leave you with this.
Russia has a GDP of about 2.1 Trillion.
The EU has a GDP of 18.5 Trillion.
That is the measure of the economic disparity. That is the measure of Europe's ability to produce. Cut it by 28%, you still have 13 Trillion. Cut it by 50%, you still have 9 Trillion. Cut it by 75%, and the EU's economy is still more than TWICE the size of Russia's. They would fall to pieces.
#127 - You're the one who brought up the US. I was just arguing again…  [+] (9 new replies) 05/28/2016 on Holy shit I live in The... 0
User avatar
#128 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Numbers isn't everything, Russia has more tanks, tank destroyers, artillery pieces, multiple rocket launch systems, attack aircraft and attack helicopters than the EU. I still don't see who would supply the EU's oil considering Russia could forcefully cut off the oil from any countries in the Middle East or Africa.
User avatar
#129 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Which would then bring those countries into the war, stacking the numbers even more into the EU's favor. And you're just assuming that Russia could cut off those supply lines with no say from the EU. It would be a fight, not something Russia could just do.
User avatar
#135 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I'm not saying that Russia would win the war, I'm just saying that any war would be indecisive, and the the EU wouldn't "easily shit-stomp the Russians", while Russia wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Europe, the EU wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Russia either, that's damn near impossible. There'd be no winning on any side.
User avatar
#136 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Oh. Well then I think we're done here. I thought you were arguing for a Russian victory.

There are many variables in war. To say that Europe would shit-storm them was a bit of Hyperbole. If I was a betting man, I would bet on Europe, but you are correct in that it is a far from sure thing.
User avatar
#133 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
While Russia does have a weaker economy, their military equipment is cheaper overall, while an F-22 would cost around $150 million USD, a Russian fighter jet of similar quality would cost only around $50 million USD. And while economy is important, it isn't decisive, look at what happened in Vietnam, and the Soviet-Afghanistan.
User avatar
#134 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Again, Russia having a "Weaker Economy" is a VAST understatement. A russian jet may cost a third of what a western one does, but the EU's economy is nine times the size.

The reason the US lost in Vietnam is because we weren't willing to continue to escalate the engagement (correctly, IMO). But if the US wanted to win the war enough, they could have. I can't speak to Soviet-Afghanistan, but that was a very complicated situation in any case.
User avatar
#131 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Plus, I don't see countries like Nigeria and Saudi Arabia being much of a problem for Russia.
User avatar
#130 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I think the war would start off with the invasion of Europe, due to Russia's larger army at the beginning of the war, and while they're there they can just cut the oil pipelines, I don't see how a nation could play that as an attack on them. Plus, most of the imports are from the middle east, Russia could just go through the Balkans and cut them.
User avatar
#132 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Clearly I can't convince you of the importance of Economic strength, but I'll just leave you with this.
Russia has a GDP of about 2.1 Trillion.
The EU has a GDP of 18.5 Trillion.
That is the measure of the economic disparity. That is the measure of Europe's ability to produce. Cut it by 28%, you still have 13 Trillion. Cut it by 50%, you still have 9 Trillion. Cut it by 75%, and the EU's economy is still more than TWICE the size of Russia's. They would fall to pieces.
#125 - 1. Should the Russians sink a US ship bringing oil to Europe, …  [+] (11 new replies) 05/28/2016 on Holy shit I live in The... 0
User avatar
#126 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
The US isn't even self-sufficient in oil production, so I don't see them importing oil to anyone anytime soon.
User avatar
#127 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
You're the one who brought up the US. I was just arguing against that point.

I guess my main point here is that Oil is not everything in winning a war. Its important, but not the sole factor. Russia's economy is tiny compared to the rest of Europe. Beyond reserve military personnel there is also manpower reserves, and Europe has that in spades as well.
User avatar
#128 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Numbers isn't everything, Russia has more tanks, tank destroyers, artillery pieces, multiple rocket launch systems, attack aircraft and attack helicopters than the EU. I still don't see who would supply the EU's oil considering Russia could forcefully cut off the oil from any countries in the Middle East or Africa.
User avatar
#129 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Which would then bring those countries into the war, stacking the numbers even more into the EU's favor. And you're just assuming that Russia could cut off those supply lines with no say from the EU. It would be a fight, not something Russia could just do.
User avatar
#135 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I'm not saying that Russia would win the war, I'm just saying that any war would be indecisive, and the the EU wouldn't "easily shit-stomp the Russians", while Russia wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Europe, the EU wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Russia either, that's damn near impossible. There'd be no winning on any side.
User avatar
#136 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Oh. Well then I think we're done here. I thought you were arguing for a Russian victory.

There are many variables in war. To say that Europe would shit-storm them was a bit of Hyperbole. If I was a betting man, I would bet on Europe, but you are correct in that it is a far from sure thing.
User avatar
#133 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
While Russia does have a weaker economy, their military equipment is cheaper overall, while an F-22 would cost around $150 million USD, a Russian fighter jet of similar quality would cost only around $50 million USD. And while economy is important, it isn't decisive, look at what happened in Vietnam, and the Soviet-Afghanistan.
User avatar
#134 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Again, Russia having a "Weaker Economy" is a VAST understatement. A russian jet may cost a third of what a western one does, but the EU's economy is nine times the size.

The reason the US lost in Vietnam is because we weren't willing to continue to escalate the engagement (correctly, IMO). But if the US wanted to win the war enough, they could have. I can't speak to Soviet-Afghanistan, but that was a very complicated situation in any case.
User avatar
#131 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Plus, I don't see countries like Nigeria and Saudi Arabia being much of a problem for Russia.
User avatar
#130 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I think the war would start off with the invasion of Europe, due to Russia's larger army at the beginning of the war, and while they're there they can just cut the oil pipelines, I don't see how a nation could play that as an attack on them. Plus, most of the imports are from the middle east, Russia could just go through the Balkans and cut them.
User avatar
#132 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Clearly I can't convince you of the importance of Economic strength, but I'll just leave you with this.
Russia has a GDP of about 2.1 Trillion.
The EU has a GDP of 18.5 Trillion.
That is the measure of the economic disparity. That is the measure of Europe's ability to produce. Cut it by 28%, you still have 13 Trillion. Cut it by 50%, you still have 9 Trillion. Cut it by 75%, and the EU's economy is still more than TWICE the size of Russia's. They would fall to pieces.
#123 - I disagree with your science here on a few points 1. Altho…  [+] (13 new replies) 05/28/2016 on Holy shit I live in The... 0
User avatar
#124 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
1: From which partners? The US, hard to see that happening considering Russia could just sink any ships coming to EU waters.
2: I'm pretty sure no imports from Russia would hurt the EU significantly, oil is very important for an economy. Plus, the Russia gets medicine and agricultural products from the EU. And Russia can rely on China for more imports.
3: I didn't reduce it for personnel, that would be stupid.
4: You'd need oil to power factories, and you'd need factories to produce more ammunition, weapons, tanks, aircraft etc. And the EU couldn't win in a prolonged engagement, again, they'd run out of oil.
User avatar
#125 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
1. Should the Russians sink a US ship bringing oil to Europe, US enters the war. Scenario over.
2."EU exports to Russia are dominated by machinery and transport equipment, chemicals, medecines and agricultural products" All important for winning a war.
3. Just checking.
4. Combustible fuels, which includes Oil and Coal, make up about 50% of energy generation in Europe. I dont know what fraction of that is Oil (presumably a small amount of Oil based factories could be converted to Coal factories), but again, a reduction of 28%, while sizable, is not game-breaking
User avatar
#126 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
The US isn't even self-sufficient in oil production, so I don't see them importing oil to anyone anytime soon.
User avatar
#127 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
You're the one who brought up the US. I was just arguing against that point.

I guess my main point here is that Oil is not everything in winning a war. Its important, but not the sole factor. Russia's economy is tiny compared to the rest of Europe. Beyond reserve military personnel there is also manpower reserves, and Europe has that in spades as well.
User avatar
#128 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Numbers isn't everything, Russia has more tanks, tank destroyers, artillery pieces, multiple rocket launch systems, attack aircraft and attack helicopters than the EU. I still don't see who would supply the EU's oil considering Russia could forcefully cut off the oil from any countries in the Middle East or Africa.
User avatar
#129 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Which would then bring those countries into the war, stacking the numbers even more into the EU's favor. And you're just assuming that Russia could cut off those supply lines with no say from the EU. It would be a fight, not something Russia could just do.
User avatar
#135 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I'm not saying that Russia would win the war, I'm just saying that any war would be indecisive, and the the EU wouldn't "easily shit-stomp the Russians", while Russia wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Europe, the EU wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Russia either, that's damn near impossible. There'd be no winning on any side.
User avatar
#136 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Oh. Well then I think we're done here. I thought you were arguing for a Russian victory.

There are many variables in war. To say that Europe would shit-storm them was a bit of Hyperbole. If I was a betting man, I would bet on Europe, but you are correct in that it is a far from sure thing.
User avatar
#133 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
While Russia does have a weaker economy, their military equipment is cheaper overall, while an F-22 would cost around $150 million USD, a Russian fighter jet of similar quality would cost only around $50 million USD. And while economy is important, it isn't decisive, look at what happened in Vietnam, and the Soviet-Afghanistan.
User avatar
#134 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Again, Russia having a "Weaker Economy" is a VAST understatement. A russian jet may cost a third of what a western one does, but the EU's economy is nine times the size.

The reason the US lost in Vietnam is because we weren't willing to continue to escalate the engagement (correctly, IMO). But if the US wanted to win the war enough, they could have. I can't speak to Soviet-Afghanistan, but that was a very complicated situation in any case.
User avatar
#131 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Plus, I don't see countries like Nigeria and Saudi Arabia being much of a problem for Russia.
User avatar
#130 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I think the war would start off with the invasion of Europe, due to Russia's larger army at the beginning of the war, and while they're there they can just cut the oil pipelines, I don't see how a nation could play that as an attack on them. Plus, most of the imports are from the middle east, Russia could just go through the Balkans and cut them.
User avatar
#132 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Clearly I can't convince you of the importance of Economic strength, but I'll just leave you with this.
Russia has a GDP of about 2.1 Trillion.
The EU has a GDP of 18.5 Trillion.
That is the measure of the economic disparity. That is the measure of Europe's ability to produce. Cut it by 28%, you still have 13 Trillion. Cut it by 50%, you still have 9 Trillion. Cut it by 75%, and the EU's economy is still more than TWICE the size of Russia's. They would fall to pieces.
#118 - But Oil is still not the only factor in war. The EU has over 5…  [+] (18 new replies) 05/28/2016 on Holy shit I live in The... 0
User avatar
#121 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Also, considering which countries make up the EU's oil importers, Russia could cut off the imports by force.
User avatar
#122 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Most of them, not all, but most.
#120 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
While the EU has a larger population, Russia has more reserve personnel, and even with oil imports, most EU countries wouldn't be able to have all their military equipment active at once, even if they are, an absence of Russian imports would severely effect their ability to. Now since I am autistic, I made an excel chart that shows numbers between Russia and the EU, I subtracted 28% from all EU numbers, and it considerably tipped the favor to Russia.
Source on numbers: www.globalfirepower.com/
#119 - videogamehippey has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#123 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
I disagree with your science here on a few points
1. Although Russia makes up 28% of Oil Imports to the EU, that is simply how the market exists in its current forms. There is nothing stopping the EU from importing more oil from its other partners at a higher price.
2. Russia's economy also is based largely on imports/exports with the EU. The EU's economy would still be strong without Russia. The reverse, however, is largely unlikely.
3. I can't tell if you did this here, but 28% oil reduction should have no effect on personnel.
4. Again, although Russia has a larger standing army, the industrial and economic superiority of the EU tips the scales far into their favor in a prolonged engagement.
User avatar
#124 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
1: From which partners? The US, hard to see that happening considering Russia could just sink any ships coming to EU waters.
2: I'm pretty sure no imports from Russia would hurt the EU significantly, oil is very important for an economy. Plus, the Russia gets medicine and agricultural products from the EU. And Russia can rely on China for more imports.
3: I didn't reduce it for personnel, that would be stupid.
4: You'd need oil to power factories, and you'd need factories to produce more ammunition, weapons, tanks, aircraft etc. And the EU couldn't win in a prolonged engagement, again, they'd run out of oil.
User avatar
#125 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
1. Should the Russians sink a US ship bringing oil to Europe, US enters the war. Scenario over.
2."EU exports to Russia are dominated by machinery and transport equipment, chemicals, medecines and agricultural products" All important for winning a war.
3. Just checking.
4. Combustible fuels, which includes Oil and Coal, make up about 50% of energy generation in Europe. I dont know what fraction of that is Oil (presumably a small amount of Oil based factories could be converted to Coal factories), but again, a reduction of 28%, while sizable, is not game-breaking
User avatar
#126 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
The US isn't even self-sufficient in oil production, so I don't see them importing oil to anyone anytime soon.
User avatar
#127 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
You're the one who brought up the US. I was just arguing against that point.

I guess my main point here is that Oil is not everything in winning a war. Its important, but not the sole factor. Russia's economy is tiny compared to the rest of Europe. Beyond reserve military personnel there is also manpower reserves, and Europe has that in spades as well.
User avatar
#128 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Numbers isn't everything, Russia has more tanks, tank destroyers, artillery pieces, multiple rocket launch systems, attack aircraft and attack helicopters than the EU. I still don't see who would supply the EU's oil considering Russia could forcefully cut off the oil from any countries in the Middle East or Africa.
User avatar
#129 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Which would then bring those countries into the war, stacking the numbers even more into the EU's favor. And you're just assuming that Russia could cut off those supply lines with no say from the EU. It would be a fight, not something Russia could just do.
User avatar
#135 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I'm not saying that Russia would win the war, I'm just saying that any war would be indecisive, and the the EU wouldn't "easily shit-stomp the Russians", while Russia wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Europe, the EU wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Russia either, that's damn near impossible. There'd be no winning on any side.
User avatar
#136 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Oh. Well then I think we're done here. I thought you were arguing for a Russian victory.

There are many variables in war. To say that Europe would shit-storm them was a bit of Hyperbole. If I was a betting man, I would bet on Europe, but you are correct in that it is a far from sure thing.
User avatar
#133 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
While Russia does have a weaker economy, their military equipment is cheaper overall, while an F-22 would cost around $150 million USD, a Russian fighter jet of similar quality would cost only around $50 million USD. And while economy is important, it isn't decisive, look at what happened in Vietnam, and the Soviet-Afghanistan.
User avatar
#134 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Again, Russia having a "Weaker Economy" is a VAST understatement. A russian jet may cost a third of what a western one does, but the EU's economy is nine times the size.

The reason the US lost in Vietnam is because we weren't willing to continue to escalate the engagement (correctly, IMO). But if the US wanted to win the war enough, they could have. I can't speak to Soviet-Afghanistan, but that was a very complicated situation in any case.
User avatar
#131 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Plus, I don't see countries like Nigeria and Saudi Arabia being much of a problem for Russia.
User avatar
#130 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I think the war would start off with the invasion of Europe, due to Russia's larger army at the beginning of the war, and while they're there they can just cut the oil pipelines, I don't see how a nation could play that as an attack on them. Plus, most of the imports are from the middle east, Russia could just go through the Balkans and cut them.
User avatar
#132 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Clearly I can't convince you of the importance of Economic strength, but I'll just leave you with this.
Russia has a GDP of about 2.1 Trillion.
The EU has a GDP of 18.5 Trillion.
That is the measure of the economic disparity. That is the measure of Europe's ability to produce. Cut it by 28%, you still have 13 Trillion. Cut it by 50%, you still have 9 Trillion. Cut it by 75%, and the EU's economy is still more than TWICE the size of Russia's. They would fall to pieces.
#116 - And I still think you overestimate exactly how powerful Russia…  [+] (20 new replies) 05/28/2016 on Holy shit I live in The... 0
User avatar
#117 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
While their GDP is considerably less than the EU, they still have an oil monopoly in Europe, which would tip things in their favor in case of a war.
#118 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
But Oil is still not the only factor in war. The EU has over 500 million inhabitants, while Russia only has 150 million. Population matters intensely in times of war. In addition, while Russia does make up 28% of EU Oil imports, which is a large amount, it is not all. It is not even a third. The EU war machine with 28% less oil could still easily shitstomp the Russians.
User avatar
#121 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Also, considering which countries make up the EU's oil importers, Russia could cut off the imports by force.
User avatar
#122 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Most of them, not all, but most.
#120 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
While the EU has a larger population, Russia has more reserve personnel, and even with oil imports, most EU countries wouldn't be able to have all their military equipment active at once, even if they are, an absence of Russian imports would severely effect their ability to. Now since I am autistic, I made an excel chart that shows numbers between Russia and the EU, I subtracted 28% from all EU numbers, and it considerably tipped the favor to Russia.
Source on numbers: www.globalfirepower.com/
#119 - videogamehippey has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#123 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
I disagree with your science here on a few points
1. Although Russia makes up 28% of Oil Imports to the EU, that is simply how the market exists in its current forms. There is nothing stopping the EU from importing more oil from its other partners at a higher price.
2. Russia's economy also is based largely on imports/exports with the EU. The EU's economy would still be strong without Russia. The reverse, however, is largely unlikely.
3. I can't tell if you did this here, but 28% oil reduction should have no effect on personnel.
4. Again, although Russia has a larger standing army, the industrial and economic superiority of the EU tips the scales far into their favor in a prolonged engagement.
User avatar
#124 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
1: From which partners? The US, hard to see that happening considering Russia could just sink any ships coming to EU waters.
2: I'm pretty sure no imports from Russia would hurt the EU significantly, oil is very important for an economy. Plus, the Russia gets medicine and agricultural products from the EU. And Russia can rely on China for more imports.
3: I didn't reduce it for personnel, that would be stupid.
4: You'd need oil to power factories, and you'd need factories to produce more ammunition, weapons, tanks, aircraft etc. And the EU couldn't win in a prolonged engagement, again, they'd run out of oil.
User avatar
#125 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
1. Should the Russians sink a US ship bringing oil to Europe, US enters the war. Scenario over.
2."EU exports to Russia are dominated by machinery and transport equipment, chemicals, medecines and agricultural products" All important for winning a war.
3. Just checking.
4. Combustible fuels, which includes Oil and Coal, make up about 50% of energy generation in Europe. I dont know what fraction of that is Oil (presumably a small amount of Oil based factories could be converted to Coal factories), but again, a reduction of 28%, while sizable, is not game-breaking
User avatar
#126 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
The US isn't even self-sufficient in oil production, so I don't see them importing oil to anyone anytime soon.
User avatar
#127 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
You're the one who brought up the US. I was just arguing against that point.

I guess my main point here is that Oil is not everything in winning a war. Its important, but not the sole factor. Russia's economy is tiny compared to the rest of Europe. Beyond reserve military personnel there is also manpower reserves, and Europe has that in spades as well.
User avatar
#128 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Numbers isn't everything, Russia has more tanks, tank destroyers, artillery pieces, multiple rocket launch systems, attack aircraft and attack helicopters than the EU. I still don't see who would supply the EU's oil considering Russia could forcefully cut off the oil from any countries in the Middle East or Africa.
User avatar
#129 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Which would then bring those countries into the war, stacking the numbers even more into the EU's favor. And you're just assuming that Russia could cut off those supply lines with no say from the EU. It would be a fight, not something Russia could just do.
User avatar
#135 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I'm not saying that Russia would win the war, I'm just saying that any war would be indecisive, and the the EU wouldn't "easily shit-stomp the Russians", while Russia wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Europe, the EU wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Russia either, that's damn near impossible. There'd be no winning on any side.
User avatar
#136 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Oh. Well then I think we're done here. I thought you were arguing for a Russian victory.

There are many variables in war. To say that Europe would shit-storm them was a bit of Hyperbole. If I was a betting man, I would bet on Europe, but you are correct in that it is a far from sure thing.
User avatar
#133 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
While Russia does have a weaker economy, their military equipment is cheaper overall, while an F-22 would cost around $150 million USD, a Russian fighter jet of similar quality would cost only around $50 million USD. And while economy is important, it isn't decisive, look at what happened in Vietnam, and the Soviet-Afghanistan.
User avatar
#134 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Again, Russia having a "Weaker Economy" is a VAST understatement. A russian jet may cost a third of what a western one does, but the EU's economy is nine times the size.

The reason the US lost in Vietnam is because we weren't willing to continue to escalate the engagement (correctly, IMO). But if the US wanted to win the war enough, they could have. I can't speak to Soviet-Afghanistan, but that was a very complicated situation in any case.
User avatar
#131 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Plus, I don't see countries like Nigeria and Saudi Arabia being much of a problem for Russia.
User avatar
#130 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I think the war would start off with the invasion of Europe, due to Russia's larger army at the beginning of the war, and while they're there they can just cut the oil pipelines, I don't see how a nation could play that as an attack on them. Plus, most of the imports are from the middle east, Russia could just go through the Balkans and cut them.
User avatar
#132 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Clearly I can't convince you of the importance of Economic strength, but I'll just leave you with this.
Russia has a GDP of about 2.1 Trillion.
The EU has a GDP of 18.5 Trillion.
That is the measure of the economic disparity. That is the measure of Europe's ability to produce. Cut it by 28%, you still have 13 Trillion. Cut it by 50%, you still have 9 Trillion. Cut it by 75%, and the EU's economy is still more than TWICE the size of Russia's. They would fall to pieces.
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (20)
Anonymous comments allowed.
20 comments displayed.
#21 - misskayla (03/24/2015) [-]
#19 - buscemieveryday (03/21/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
#20 to #19 - Endofzeeworld ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
YESSSSSSSSSSSs
#17 - datgrass (06/25/2014) [-]
my mother is a filthy nasty whore
my mother is a filthy nasty whore
#15 - evilhomer (06/20/2014) [-]
#16 to #15 - Endofzeeworld ONLINE (06/21/2014) [-]
YUSSSSSSSSSS
#13 - tronbot (11/14/2013) [-]
Thanks for the constructive criticism!
#14 to #13 - Endofzeeworld ONLINE (11/15/2013) [-]
No problem, my friend! I believe what you are doing is a necessary and integral part of any website. It helps keep equilibrium.
#6 - zomba **User deleted account**
has deleted their comment [-]
#7 to #6 - Endofzeeworld ONLINE (07/01/2012) [-]
oh em gee its zomba :3
#8 to #7 - zomba **User deleted account**
has deleted their comment [-]
#9 to #8 - Endofzeeworld ONLINE (07/01/2012) [-]
Yeah kinda. Y U NO POST ANYMORE?!?!?
#10 to #9 - zomba **User deleted account**
has deleted their comment [-]
#11 to #10 - Endofzeeworld ONLINE (07/01/2012) [-]
Thats a damn good point, son. A damn good point. I been here since yellow, and it seems to me that this site just gets younger and younger. Or maybe its us getting older?
#12 to #11 - zomba **User deleted account**
has deleted their comment [-]
#3 - dragel (02/08/2012) [-]
I apologize if my replys to you seem like I'm being a bastard.

#4 to #3 - Endofzeeworld ONLINE (02/08/2012) [-]
No no no no, you are actually one of the less dickish people who I have ever argued with on the website. You seem cool, even if our opinions differ on some subjects.
#5 to #4 - dragel (02/08/2012) [-]
I'm glad you think that.

I don't wish for my first impression to be a bad one.
#1 - freedomfromlife **User deleted account**
has deleted their comment [-]
#2 to #1 - Endofzeeworld ONLINE (10/23/2010) [-]
Thanks, Ill make sure to use it!