Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:9/10/2009
Last Login:6/07/2014
Location:South Side of the Sky
Content Thumbs: 1717 total,  1968 ,  251
Comment Thumbs: 426 total,  570 ,  144
Content Level Progress: 15% (15/100)
Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 118 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 142 Comments: Faptastic → Level 143 Comments: Faptastic
Content Views:44312
Times Content Favorited:147 times
Total Comments Made:184
FJ Points:1339
Favorite Tags: a (2) | fucking (2) | Reading (2) | stop (2) | These (2)
O hai pepoles. Howzit hangang?

latest user's comments

#105 - Picture 02/21/2013 on Hot hot hot! 0
#66 - That's actually not true at all. Where on earth do th…  [+] (2 replies) 02/20/2013 on lets play cave game -2
User avatar
#76 - coolfuzzy (02/20/2013) [-]
Except it totally fucking was the development code name
#75 - anon (02/20/2013) [-]
Idk it's not like they have the address of the site on the bottom of the picture or anything.
#123 - I keep hearing this argument and it doesn't make any sense to …  [+] (31 replies) 02/10/2013 on Let's ban hammers. +8
#254 - fuckyosixtyminutes (02/10/2013) [-]
So the fact that hammers are useful for other things cancels out the deaths they cause.
#215 - pedobearson (02/10/2013) [-]
Well, guns are fun AND can hunt AND can defend you. Hammers can only build stuff and defend you (Not as well as a gun).
#124 - anon (02/10/2013) [-]
Define "practical purpose."

If hobby is not a "practical purpose" then baseball bats should be banned too. Plenty of people have been killed by baseball bats and their only purpose is hobby.

Also, building things with hammers can be defined as impractical. Structures built by hammers aren't necessary in the most basic definition of survival.
User avatar
#125 - thegrayknights (02/10/2013) [-]
Damn anon, that was a well done argument. You should have signed in so you could have my thumb :(.
User avatar
#131 - bramdk (02/10/2013) [-]
it really wasnt because an assault rifle is still much more deadly then a baseball bat
User avatar
#170 - sexybarracuda (02/10/2013) [-]
Humans are a lot more deadly than an assault rifle...
User avatar
#171 - bramdk (02/10/2013) [-]
a Human cant go run into a place kill nearly everyone inside it and run out withouth some kind of weapon like lets say... an assault rifle maybe
User avatar
#176 - sexybarracuda (02/10/2013) [-]
I do agree with that argument. But consider this...is an assault rifle deadly if it's just sitting on a table literally doing nothing. I hope your answer is no it's not deadly. Now it only becomes deadly in the hands of a deadly person, or a person with deadly intent.
User avatar
#177 - bramdk (02/10/2013) [-]
i agree
how do we make it harder for people to obtain an assault rifle
User avatar
#188 - sexybarracuda (02/10/2013) [-]
Well that's exactly my point. It isn't the 'assault rifle' itself that is bad, it is the person weilding it. The solution doesn't lie in getting rid of the item, it lies in finding a way to recognize those with malintent and to try and either help them with their issues before they escalate into something lethal or to put measures forth to have trained individuals ready to act on a moment's notice (similar to the US Air Marshalls). I am a little bit bias in favor of guns because one of my good friends (similar to you I think) didn't really see the point of firearms, until one night a person broke into their home and seriously injured them. They went a bought an AR-15 as soon as they recovered.
User avatar
#194 - bramdk (02/10/2013) [-]
its not your point im saying that shit wouldnt happen if people didnt get these guns in the first place
the point you are defending is the thing that lets these bad people aquire these rifles and use them
User avatar
#262 - myrtille (02/10/2013) [-]
If somebody really wants to shoot someone, they'll get the firearm illegally.
User avatar
#361 - bramdk (02/10/2013) [-]
the harder it is for them to aquire guns the better
User avatar
#430 - myrtille (02/11/2013) [-]
It's not exactly hard to acquire an illegal firearm.
User avatar
#431 - bramdk (02/11/2013) [-]
harder i said
and id like to see you try to get your hands on an illigal firearm
User avatar
#432 - myrtille (02/11/2013) [-]
I don't want an illegal firearm, but if I did want one, I'm sure I could get it.
User avatar
#433 - bramdk (02/11/2013) [-]
go back to playing with dolls
you arent able to get an illigal firearm
you might think you do but you dont
you see most sellers of these illigal firearms have to watch out for police and stuff
they will not sell to strangers
and you being on funnyjunk and playing xbox dont fall under their normal customer base
User avatar
#434 - myrtille (02/11/2013) [-]
I like your pitiful insults. Since it has gotten to empty accusations, I'll leave you with your delusions that gun laws will keep killers from getting guns. Evenin'.
User avatar
#204 - sexybarracuda (02/10/2013) [-]
We shall see what happens with gun legislation. I have my opinions (good and bad) for firearms, but I'm curious to see if the legislation passes and if it works out in the long run. Past tries point to it not really making a difference, but maybe something will deter the senseless killing of civilians. Who knows...
#145 - anon (02/10/2013) [-]
You're wading into the logical fallacy waters.

If I shoot someone in the middle of a Texan mall how long do you think I have to live. As soon as I pull that trigger I just let hundreds of gun toting lone star staters in a couple mile radius that I want to be shot.

If I take my baseball bat and hide in a parking garage I can kill people quietly and secretly as long as I'm not seen up until people are reported missing and authorities track their last known location. That would probably take a day or two. Do you have an idea how many people i can kill with a bat in a day or two?
User avatar
#173 - bramdk (02/10/2013) [-]
also you are comparing these 2 in difrent situations
overall an assault rifle is still much more deadly then a baseball bat even though you can kill a few people at night
User avatar
#158 - bramdk (02/10/2013) [-]
id like to see you kill 2 people with a baseball bat
because when youve hit the first one the second one is probably punching away and overpowering you
with a gun you could just should them both from a distance
User avatar
#136 - thegrayknights (02/10/2013) [-]
That could be argued. Baseball bats are much easier to obtain, and are less conspicuous than an assault rifle. So could can be used with the same deadly efficiency.
User avatar
#148 - bramdk (02/10/2013) [-]
yes exept for that a baseball bat can only hit a person up close and you will be massively underpowered against a group of people
wheras an assault rifle can kill a person with 1 shot through the head or lots of shots anywhere else
is easy to use against groups
and can kill people from meters away
saying that a baseballbat has the same deadly efficiency as an assault rifle is like saying my cat has the same deadly efficency as a mountain lion just because they are both cat species
#157 - anon (02/10/2013) [-]
That all being said, if I'm a smart person, I'll pick my battlefield to give myself the upper hand. I wouldn't take my bat into a crowded shopping mall because I know its deficiencies.

The point is, if you want to kill lots of people, there are plenty of ways to do it. The longer we focus on guns the longer we disregard the true issue which is social degradation and a lack of adequate mental health detection and treatment.
User avatar
#161 - bramdk (02/10/2013) [-]
so you are saying the problem is mental health
while your country is pretty much giving away guns (i know that isnt true i mean that they are much to easy to obtain)
to people with a low mental capacity
#153 - anon (02/10/2013) [-]
I never said anything about efficiency.

If you want to talk about efficiency I'll just drive a semi full of explosives made with household chemicals into a crowd. A gun would be child's play in comparison.
User avatar
#156 - bramdk (02/10/2013) [-]
... i wasnt replying to you was i?
#163 - anon (02/10/2013) [-]
Oh, you weren't. Sorry, misread that.
#128 - anon (02/10/2013) [-]
Thanks but recognition isn't what's important. Informing people and potentially making society a little smarter is plenty rewarding.
User avatar
#132 - thegrayknights (02/10/2013) [-]
Fair enough, carry on the good fight my friend!
#68 - Since always ^__^ 12/28/2012 on Wake Up +1