Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu


Rank #5491 on Comments
no avatar Level 194 Comments: Anon Annihilator
Send mail to Delthan Block Delthan Invite Delthan to be your friend
Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 26
Date Signed Up:7/06/2009
Last Login:10/25/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#5491
Highest Content Rank:#12385
Highest Comment Rank:#5873
Content Thumbs: 1 total,  5 ,  4
Comment Thumbs: 1101 total,  1194 ,  93
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 194 Comments: Anon Annihilator → Level 195 Comments: Anon Annihilator
Content Views:1783
Total Comments Made:88
FJ Points:954

Sort by:

youtube videos

  • Views: 1780
    Thumbs Up 5 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +1
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 03/21/14
    Sleep tight... Sleep tight...

latest user's comments

#3 - What if you were walking along that side of the street to begi…  [+] (23 new replies) 14 hours ago on You're So Close +142
User avatar #26 - RiflemanFunny (6 hours ago) [-]
I can just see programmers fucking jumping over the fence forever.
#28 - applecrash (6 hours ago) [-]
int one = 1
When (one = 1){
(boolBanner = True){
BoolJumpFence = True
User avatar #71 - honkan (2 hours ago) [-]
The fuck's that code supposed to do? It's just assigning values, and using when (which I haven't seen before, is it like if?)., with a single "=" sign, although to be fair I'm sure there are languages that actually only use one to compare values.
#72 - applecrash (2 hours ago) [-]
Use VB for reference. Shit's so wack you wouldn't want to get it yo. Again, why is everyone expecting code that makes sense so late at night. Just adding to the joke man, no need to get so butt-blistered over it.
User avatar #73 - honkan (2 hours ago) [-]
You made that comment 4 hours ago. Either you don't sleep a lot, or you really need to get the fuck to bed, if it was so late at night you couldn't think properly four hours ago.

It was more that I was curious if that actually could do anything, in whatever fucked up language it was. That, and I kinda dislike seeing stuff that just look like code but really isn't.
#74 - applecrash (1 hour ago) [-]
My mornings are normal peoples nights lately, sadly. I feel you, but my only real experience with programming is Visual Basic which kinda lets you just do what I did and Java which has you sacrifice your first born son and then makes only half the booleans' intended functions work, so that could attribute to the fact that i forgot to initialize the boolean first.
User avatar #31 - copperonic (6 hours ago) [-]
>That moment with beginner programs start practicing over the FJ comments
#41 - applecrash (5 hours ago) [-]
Nigga this aint SJWchan and why do you expect good code in 40 seconds?
#27 - applecrash has deleted their comment.
#25 - xxxsonic fanxxx (6 hours ago) [-]
grass is always greener on the other side
#24 - enduranceathlete (7 hours ago) [-]
#48 - cabbagemayhem (4 hours ago) [-]
#54 - enduranceathlete (4 hours ago) [-]
#75 - cabbagemayhem (35 minutes ago) [-]
Sure, and I bet a single horse is stronger than he is, but how smart is he? Strength isn't what put us at the top of the food chain. It was intelligence, and meat is what made it possible to sustain our brain mass. Vegetarianism is known for its nutrient deficiencies and mental disorders. Animals don't have rights equal to humans. We are the stewards of the Earth, and first we will eat, and second we will salvage life itself. Take your imaginary moral standard somewhere you can fool more people.
User avatar #17 - hockeycrazysteve (8 hours ago) [-]
i think you just changed my perspective on life
#55 - enduranceathlete (4 hours ago) [-]
#57 - upyoursnumbnuts (4 hours ago) [-]
If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of tasty meat?
#58 - enduranceathlete (4 hours ago) [-]
why do they feel pain and suffer?

User avatar #63 - captainrattrap (3 hours ago) [-]
Post mroe becuz u r good at posting nah yeah you aren't complete garbage.
#59 - upyoursnumbnuts (4 hours ago) [-]
#60 - enduranceathlete (4 hours ago) [-]
User avatar #62 - zelyx (3 hours ago) [-]

- upyoursnumbnuts
#61 - gedab (3 hours ago) [-]
#12 - Don't know what this is, but it ain't no damn Charizard  [+] (3 new replies) 10/23/2014 on Behold +77
#32 - zetsuboukamina (10/23/2014) [-]
Gen wun maybe?
#22 - upfordownsyndrome (10/23/2014) [-]
#13 - thingexplain (10/23/2014) [-]
It's Cera from Land Before Time
#15 - It's the way he maintains eye contact... it broke me 10/21/2014 on Fuck Yo Pancake, Bitch! +9
#38 - While those statistics may be true, they could very well be a …  [+] (23 new replies) 09/24/2014 on Westboro church +9
User avatar #74 - lebarricuda (09/24/2014) [-]
The statistics like most persuasive statistics are based off of a deliberately skewed perspective. They are certainly not true because they are misleading. They are 'strong', however they are not cogent. It's an invalid argument because it is a fallacious inductive due to statistics.
#113 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/24/2014) [-]
the fallacy fallacy you see a fallacy in the argument and the entire argument must be thrown out.
#123 - grantyboy (09/24/2014) [-]
The fallacy fallacy fallacy where you see the fallacy fallacy and the entire argument must be thrown out.

User avatar #73 - garymotherfingoak (09/24/2014) [-]
You understand that you're talking to a /pol/tist, right?
User avatar #81 - lebarricuda (09/24/2014) [-]
Uh, /pol/ is a cancer but the denizens of 4chons dystopian /pol/ know how to make a logically cogent inductive falsehoods. This isn't from /pol/ it's just bigotry.
User avatar #85 - garymotherfingoak (09/24/2014) [-]
I generally use the term /pol/tist to describe people that ignore every fallacy in existence except for the ones that support a neo-nazi agenda, and call a person a JIDF or shill when someone disagrees with them.
User avatar #92 - lebarricuda (09/24/2014) [-]
Ah, so you are referring to the average reader of /pol/ not the average /pol/ OP?

I honestly think that board is just churning out paranoid schizophrenics.
User avatar #93 - garymotherfingoak (09/24/2014) [-]
moreso the reader, yeah
User avatar #101 - lebarricuda (09/24/2014) [-]
I've recognized you as someone who has argued against me on FJ when I've spread some of the bigoted opinions that I have. Thank you for setting me straight those couple of times. Anyway's carry on your purification of the interwebs.
User avatar #114 - garymotherfingoak (09/24/2014) [-]
I don't recall these encounters, but you're welcome anyways

the only pure interwebs is inpure interwebs
#51 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/24/2014) [-]
"Minority stress" "patriarchy" and other phantoms of the Left are all social constructs created to take the responsibility from those so-called "victim" demographics and the horrific consequences of their own unsustainable behaviors and lifestyles, and project it on the healthy/ier more functional so-called "oppressor" demographics.

Pretty much every major civilization or nation in history has understood that homosexuality is hideously unsustainable with zero or near-zero birthrates and sky-high STD rates. Yet today's society is so sick they insist on not seeing this.

What if I told you that as acceptance of homosexuality has increased, STD and AIDS rates have ~increased~, not decreased, which is exactly what you would expect when homosexuality becomes increasingly culturally and legally sanctioned; and exactly what you would expect if you were a skeptic of the BS the homosexual lobby spouts.
#64 - shadowgandalf (09/24/2014) [-]
Alright, i'll bite---

1. Minority stress, in the case of homosexuals, is not a construct. They are literally persecuted the world over. In Russia, there was a gang that baited gays via dating sites, and would beat them almost to death, steal their belongings and destroy their homes.
In USA, gays can be denied jobs, have their homes thrashed, and be attack by gangs and religious zealots.
I'd think that this would add a considerable ammount of stress to the average person.

2. Patriachy, while not existant in the west today, HAVE existed for millenia. Don't know if you meant in this age, or just overall.

3. They aren't projecting their "lifestyle" onto us hetrosexuals. I don't even understand how you could come to that conclusion... Acceptance =! conversion.

4. By "pretty much every major nation", do you mean a few of the more know? Cause the egyptians, greeks and romans didn't seem to care much.

5. What if i told you, that you could avoid STD spreading, by havingg proper sexual education at a young age? Give them a full course in sex, prevention & protection and STD's at age 12, and keep referencing to it in other subjects now and then. for a year or two.

6. A skeptic have to be skeptical towards all information, not just what he/she disagree with. Unfortunally, both sides use a sad mix of propaganda, facts about human biology, religon(why the fuck is this one even in here?!), and cherry picked statistics.
#170 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/25/2014) [-]
1. Minority stress may exist but not as an excuse for their sky-high STD rates. So you get a beating from a bunch of dudes and that gives you AIDS how / makes your groups AIDS rates shoot thru the roof how?
Also, you ignored what I said about how as acceptance of homosexuality has increased, their outcomes have worsened and STD rates have increased.

2. Patriarchy is not what you think it is: a hetero nuclear family headed by the man. It is a social setup meant to unfairly advantage men at the expense of women. Most alleged patriarchies were trying to protect women in ages before modern states and police forces and safe, non-physical jobs.

3. I didn't say they were projecting the lifestyle itself, numbskull, but the CONSEQUENCES of their lifestyle. The effects which are inherent to their behaviors get attributed to a mythical "spirit of discrimination/oppression".

4. What they forget to mention in your liberal history material is that those nations weren't tolerant of homo[cont]
#171 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/25/2014) [-]
[cont]homosexuality or increased their tolerance of homosexuality until a generation or two before they had a societal collapse and/or were conquered from a neighboring civlization.

5. Yes, yes. The whole disembodied, generic education solution to all ills that takes into account exactly zero data into which lifestyles and sexual activities have dozens of times the STD rates of healthy heteros. Homosexuals are specially targeted for sex ed and still they have sky-high STD rates. In San Francisco, they have classes that teach them how to not kill their partner when engaging in BDSM. But there's only so much shit you can shovel vs the avalanche of shit that is homosexuals' hundreds of sexual partners over their lifetime.

6. Then walk the walk of skepticism. Examine both sides and try to look at from both sides. Look at the data (not just the cherry-picked, manipulated data endlessly parroted in MSM) and make up your mind.
#115 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/24/2014) [-]
>patriarchy exists
>in the television indoctrination era
Check any family sitcom and tell me the mom isn't god herself who can do no wrong and the father isn't a bumbling idiot who can do no right.

#65 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/24/2014) [-]
1. They deserve it for being gay.
2. In this age.
3. Some refuse to blend in like normal people and shove their fagotry in our faces.
4. Notice how they all fell eventually
5. Or just don't tell kids it's ok to be gay and they wont grow up to think that it's ok to be gay.
6. The statistics in the original picture is 100% true.
#71 - shadowgandalf (09/24/2014) [-]
1. Thats retarded.
2. Ok, then we agree.
3. Theres always idiots in all groups. WBC, Tea party and modern feminist are all great examples.
4. Implying that our current nations as we know them, won't fall sooner or later.
5. Yes, because thats totally how humans work. Just tell them not to do something, and they TOTALLY won't do it. Thats why NO ONE have ever broken a law. Oh wait...
6. I'll take your word for it, i'm too tired to research it.
User avatar #75 - garymotherfingoak (09/24/2014) [-]
You understand that you're talking to a /pol/tist, right?
#79 - shadowgandalf (09/24/2014) [-]
Thats what make this an actual debate, and not a circle jerk...
User avatar #82 - garymotherfingoak (09/24/2014) [-]
What I mean is, you're talking to a brick wall.
#84 - shadowgandalf (09/24/2014) [-]
How is that different from debating with a stricktly political correct person?
User avatar #86 - garymotherfingoak (09/24/2014) [-]
they're both kind of pointless. when you realize the person isn't going to budge in his beliefs, that's when you cut off the discussion so it doesn't turn into a pointless argument.
#42 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/24/2014) [-]
No they're a result of being homosexual.
#74 - Picture 09/23/2014 on awkward zombie's skyrim comics +51
#94 - Plus, his dad is Jed Bartlet 08/21/2014 on Two and a half fucks given +2
#37 - Scuse me. I need to go hug my fat old kitty 08/20/2014 on A Sad Day - My Kitten +1
#60 - Picture 08/04/2014 on oBAMA +1
#1 - Britfag here. Can a helpful colonist explain?  [+] (24 new replies) 08/03/2014 on oBAMA +65
User avatar #38 - haeckal (08/04/2014) [-]
Yeah rakaka is right, a customer leaning on or reaching over the glass or plastic barrier is a huge safety/hygiene hazard.

~ A helpful colonist
User avatar #4 - rakaka (08/03/2014) [-]
In all seriousness you're not allowed to reach over the roof thing above the food as things can fall off and shit
#60 - Delthan (08/04/2014) [-]
User avatar #2 - PubLandlord (08/03/2014) [-]
black people aren't allowed to eat in the same section as white people
User avatar #48 - theexplodingcheez (08/04/2014) [-]
first time a comment has made me crack up on here in a while
#46 - masterchiefawesome (08/04/2014) [-]
you right now
#34 - sheiladikshit (08/04/2014) [-]
#32 - xcoreyx (08/04/2014) [-]
MFW a nignog tries to sit in the Pure Section
#28 - kulamia (08/04/2014) [-]
#22 - ompalomper (08/04/2014) [-]
stay classy FJ
#21 - dorfdorfdorf (08/04/2014) [-]
oh god do i try
#19 - Digitalphear (08/04/2014) [-]
User avatar #16 - sideism (08/04/2014) [-]
#15 - thatguyontheright (08/03/2014) [-]
#12 - theonlytinman (08/03/2014) [-]
#11 - xxxsonic fanxxx (08/03/2014) [-]
#9 - cweepew (08/03/2014) [-]
#7 - onewithpokerface (08/03/2014) [-]
#59 - kingdaniel (08/04/2014) [-]
The gif doesn't move for me? fucking firefox
User avatar #54 - xplosevdiarrhea (08/04/2014) [-]
If I had never seen this gif move before I would assume that man to be made of plastic. That's a straight up mannequin face.
User avatar #29 - broswagonist (08/04/2014) [-]
why does the gif not move
User avatar #40 - onewithpokerface (08/04/2014) [-]
It's on strike.
#6 - agentmoleman (08/03/2014) [-]
#3 - crystalblue (08/03/2014) [-]
#148 - (1966)  [+] (1 new reply) 07/05/2014 on Dafuq +7
#152 - freejumper (07/05/2014) [-]
[ 88 Total ]



Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)