Login or register


Last status update:
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:3/29/2010
Last Login:6/29/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#12127
Highest Content Rank:#4157
Highest Comment Rank:#416
Content Thumbs: 2399 total,  2750 ,  351
Comment Thumbs: 8913 total,  10070 ,  1157
Content Level Progress: 96% (96/100)
Level 123 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 124 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 61% (61/100)
Level 286 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 287 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Content Views:111305
Times Content Favorited:163 times
Total Comments Made:2563
FJ Points:1048
Favorite Tags: lol (8) | troll (5) | chan (3) | Four (3) | anonymous (2) | black (2) | Christianity (2) | comic (2) | forever (2) | murder (2)

latest user's comments

#303 - So does that mean if an 18 year old man repeatedly has sex wit…  [+] (14 new replies) 04/19/2014 on gg feminists 0
User avatar
#305 - thirdjess (04/19/2014) [-]
..that would be the definition of statutory, yes.
User avatar
#309 - Deeticky (04/19/2014) [-]
Ok, I wasn't looking for the definition, but I can see how my question was worded to make it seem like I was.

What I'm trying to say is that in a case like the hypothetical example I mentioned in my previous comment, the state would likely pursue higher charges than simple statutory. Statutory is most often used in cases involving adolescents. Also, if the older person holds a position of authority over the minor (like a teacher), then it would likely be prosecuted as rape of a child, ( the child being between 3-13 years of age), which is a class-A felony and punishable by a minimum of 25 years in prison. Even if rape of a child wasn't used, the perp could still be charged with criminal sexual conduct in the first degree (which carries up to 30 years in prison and/or a fine of $40,000).
User avatar
#310 - thirdjess (04/19/2014) [-]
I knew what you were asking
User avatar
#312 - Deeticky (04/19/2014) [-]
Then why did you reply as if I had been asking for the literal definition?
User avatar
#313 - thirdjess (04/19/2014) [-]
Because if I voice my opinion on the topic I'd either be labelled a feminazi or a paedophile, which I'd rather avoid.
#320 - anon (04/19/2014) [-]
And now you just seem like a dumb cunt.
#321 - thirdjess (04/19/2014) [-]
User avatar
#323 - Deeticky (04/19/2014) [-]
That guy is just a troll.
User avatar
#324 - Deeticky (04/19/2014) [-]
I guess that was obvious enough.
User avatar
#318 - Deeticky (04/19/2014) [-]
I certainly wouldn't call you either of those things. I know I've been called a lot of mean names on the internet for voicing my opinion on various issues. I've been called a feminazi myself simply because I think women have it harder than men in a lot of ways. I just want to see equality. I don't let the names get to me. I would hope you don't either. I've found that the more respectful I am towards others, even if they make me mad, the better they treat me. I've actually gotten a few people to apologize for calling me names, and on the internet, that's a pretty big deal.
User avatar
#319 - thirdjess (04/19/2014) [-]
You misunderstand, it's not from fear of the name, but for apathy. I know what it will lead to and I can't be bothered being just.
User avatar
#322 - Deeticky (04/19/2014) [-]
Ok., with respect, doesn't that simply make you part of the problem as opposed to part of the solution? I guess I hold a personal belief that people who complain or stress over an issue, but then don't at least try something to solve it are hypocrites. Again, I'm not trying to be hostile, but I feel like you're intelligent enough to realize that your opinions are either wrong or right, and the only way you can find that out is by voicing them, and thereby subjecting them to discourse.
User avatar
#327 - thirdjess (04/19/2014) [-]
I realise that guy was a troll, I wasn't born yesterday.

I do not do nothing, but this is not the place to do something. What would me telling you that up until recently I was friends with a paedophile change, hm? What good would me telling you that I sign up to various petition sites and spend a good portion of my day signing the ones I deem relevant, do? Funnyjunk is a waste of energy and a happy distraction, but it is rarely ever the forum of intelligent discussion - I learnt that the hard way. Outside of a few smart assed comments, or answering questions where I can, I tend to reserve my intelligent conversation for elsewhere.
User avatar
#335 - Deeticky (04/19/2014) [-]
See, even if it was obvious, I was just trying to do something nice by telling you that the guy was a troll. I know you realize that, but sometimes it just helps to know that others see through his crap too, I guess.

I will tell you that Funnyjunk can often be a forum for intelligent discussion. I've had hundreds of them on here. You just have to be respectful and open to others' ideas. It's obvious that you've had experiences related to this matter that I haven't had, such as being friends with a pedophile. What would telling me others about it accomplish? Well, for starters it could offer us some unique/rare perspectives on the issue. I know I've had my opinions changed before by people who showed me their own perspective. I also know that simply talking about things which are emotionally significant to you can be therapeutic, especially on the internet where you don't have to worry about how others perceive you. On the other hand, if you want funnyjunk to be just a happy distraction, then that's your choice, but I think that you opened the door for a discussion like we're having with your initial comment. If you'd like to tell me your story and opinions, I'd love to hear them.
#176 - There are just as many creative people out there as there alwa… 04/19/2014 on Creepy +3
#180 - Picture 04/15/2014 on .......... +1
#179 - People just bitch a lot in general. It doesn't … 04/15/2014 on .......... +1
#136 - Normally, you'd be right, but in Minnesota, it actually is jus… 04/09/2014 on The human gif (description) 0
#162 - Interesting comp, but it's not OC, dude. These pictures weren'… 03/31/2014 on OC Random Stuff Comp pt.3... 0
#137 - I wasn't trying to say that teen pregnancies should always lea…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/30/2014 on How little sense... 0
#142 - feddafella (04/01/2014) [-]
Oh, okay. Well then no doubts for the thumb. Thank you for the clarification! C:
#59 - Here's the problem with that. People who have the hi…  [+] (3 new replies) 03/30/2014 on How little sense... +15
#75 - feddafella (03/30/2014) [-]
Thumb for free/subsidised contraception. Disputing with myself whether it's appropriate though for assuming teen pregnancies should lead to marriage.
User avatar
#137 - Deeticky (03/30/2014) [-]
I wasn't trying to say that teen pregnancies should always lead to marriage, (Those marriages don't tend to work out) if that's what you're saying. I'm sorry if it looked that way. What I was saying is that single-motherhood is more expensive for us than contraception, since the child-support system isn't great and supporting children is an extremely expensive and time consuming effort that most people simply cannot handle alone.
#142 - feddafella (04/01/2014) [-]
Oh, okay. Well then no doubts for the thumb. Thank you for the clarification! C:
#71 - Protip: If you're gonna troll, don't put the word "bait&q… 03/30/2014 on duuuude -3
#236 - Thank you, friend. 03/30/2014 on the aftermath of war 0