x
Click to expand

Deeticky

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:3/29/2010
Last Login:8/03/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#9608
Highest Content Rank:#4157
Highest Comment Rank:#416
Content Thumbs: 2400 total,  2750 ,  350
Comment Thumbs: 8835 total,  9968 ,  1133
Content Level Progress: 96% (96/100)
Level 123 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 124 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 9% (9/100)
Level 286 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 287 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:0
Content Views:110077
Times Content Favorited:164 times
Total Comments Made:2489
FJ Points:940
Favorite Tags: lol (8) | troll (5) | chan (3) | Four (3) | anonymous (2) | black (2) | Christianity (2) | comic (2) | forever (2) | murder (2)

latest user's comments

#31 - They don't. That would be highly illegal. 02/07/2015 on Seriously Steve +1
#99 - Not to mention the fact that the beams did not have to melt in… 02/06/2015 on Investigate 3/11 +5
#98 - The planes hit pretty close to the top of the towers. The stee…  [+] (4 new replies) 02/06/2015 on Investigate 3/11 +12
User avatar #222 - kornonthecob (02/09/2015) [-]
These are pretty good points, I must admit. But there are many other questions that need to be answered, and things that were obviously lied about need to be brought up again. just to give an example, the 9/11 commission report. It is filled with false information. thank you for your straight forward answers.
User avatar #223 - Deeticky (02/09/2015) [-]
No problem, friend. I'm sure there's a lot more information out there that has not yet been revealed or may never be revealed. I guess we just have to try an learn from the past as best as we can.
User avatar #224 - kornonthecob (02/09/2015) [-]
oh yeah and you have a kickass avatar, just saying.
#115 - deathtofj (02/07/2015) [-]
Not to mention eyewitness accounts are usually inaccurate and considered a poor form of evidence. Plus people do just lie.
#58 - The main problem with this "best for the majority" m…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/05/2015 on Mitt Romney +1
User avatar #74 - obviousxplains (02/05/2015) [-]
not only that, but the majority is uninformed and doesnt know whats best for them sometimes.
im not saying im a political genius, but i know that 15$ minimum wage is retarded and will hurt the lower class
User avatar #75 - thewalruss (02/05/2015) [-]
Well, that's because the minorities in the US are, in fact, the majority (if you add them up)
#14 - Hmm... I don't know about that. There are all kinds of fat peo…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/01/2015 on Christ Pratt on weight loss +19
User avatar #65 - apurpleliger (02/01/2015) [-]
I'd still say it gives a good insight to their lifestyle, it just doesn't tell the whole story
#21 - anon (02/01/2015) [-]
Willpower is a hell of a drug.
User avatar #72 - hudis (02/01/2015) [-]
Willpower doesn't magically give you more than the 24 hours of the day.
#338 - By that logic, it's impossible for you to like anyone then. … 01/31/2015 on rekdify the situation 0
#336 - I could not find any article saying she "apologized"… 01/31/2015 on rekdify the situation 0
#335 - So you're saying that you and many others now think less of ga…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/31/2015 on rekdify the situation 0
User avatar #337 - toosexyforyou (01/31/2015) [-]
Because of the approval she got from the gay community.
User avatar #338 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
By that logic, it's impossible for you to like anyone then.

Take Ron Paul for instance, a lot of people on the internet love him, yet he's been outed as one of the most corrupt politicians in congress. Does that mean you dislike all of the Ron Paul supporters too?

What about members of the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Islam, Judaism)? They approve of the God of Abraham. yet according to scripture, that god killed many innocent people. Do you dislike all those people because of that?

My point is, people can still respect and celebrate a figurehead, even if they don't agree with everything that figurehead has done.
#330 - You have a right to your own feelings, but I recommend that yo…  [+] (4 new replies) 01/30/2015 on rekdify the situation 0
User avatar #333 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
My opinion (and many others) of gay people has gone significantly over this. Openly accepting blackmail in politics, what a joke.
User avatar #335 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
So you're saying that you and many others now think less of gay people because of the actions of just one woman?
User avatar #337 - toosexyforyou (01/31/2015) [-]
Because of the approval she got from the gay community.
User avatar #338 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
By that logic, it's impossible for you to like anyone then.

Take Ron Paul for instance, a lot of people on the internet love him, yet he's been outed as one of the most corrupt politicians in congress. Does that mean you dislike all of the Ron Paul supporters too?

What about members of the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Islam, Judaism)? They approve of the God of Abraham. yet according to scripture, that god killed many innocent people. Do you dislike all those people because of that?

My point is, people can still respect and celebrate a figurehead, even if they don't agree with everything that figurehead has done.
#329 - I doubt she has any intention of doing that. Perhaps the cheat…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/30/2015 on rekdify the situation 0
User avatar #332 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
She legit apologized for her actions, took back everything she said, and she said she only said it because she was under pressure.
User avatar #336 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
I could not find any article saying she "apologized". All I could find was an article saying that she "backed off" from making the threats after her lawyer advised her to do so, fearing a lawsuit for defamation.

Do you have a link to the article where she "apologizes" for what she said?
#327 - Also, calling the people who support her "online losers&q…  [+] (6 new replies) 01/30/2015 on rekdify the situation 0
User avatar #328 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
Everyone who supported what she just did disgusts me
User avatar #330 - Deeticky (01/30/2015) [-]
You have a right to your own feelings, but I recommend that you avoid name-calling. It does not contribute to the argument, and actually just makes your own arguments seem less credible.
User avatar #333 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
My opinion (and many others) of gay people has gone significantly over this. Openly accepting blackmail in politics, what a joke.
User avatar #335 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
So you're saying that you and many others now think less of gay people because of the actions of just one woman?
User avatar #337 - toosexyforyou (01/31/2015) [-]
Because of the approval she got from the gay community.
User avatar #338 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
By that logic, it's impossible for you to like anyone then.

Take Ron Paul for instance, a lot of people on the internet love him, yet he's been outed as one of the most corrupt politicians in congress. Does that mean you dislike all of the Ron Paul supporters too?

What about members of the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Islam, Judaism)? They approve of the God of Abraham. yet according to scripture, that god killed many innocent people. Do you dislike all those people because of that?

My point is, people can still respect and celebrate a figurehead, even if they don't agree with everything that figurehead has done.
#325 - She doesn't have to out them if they don't change their stance…  [+] (4 new replies) 01/30/2015 on rekdify the situation 0
User avatar #326 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
Good thing she was smart enough to apologize and take back everything she said right?
User avatar #329 - Deeticky (01/30/2015) [-]
I doubt she has any intention of doing that. Perhaps the cheating politicians should apologize to their spouses, and apologize to their constituents for failing to maintain the "traditional family values" that they hold so near and dear?
User avatar #332 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
She legit apologized for her actions, took back everything she said, and she said she only said it because she was under pressure.
User avatar #336 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
I could not find any article saying she "apologized". All I could find was an article saying that she "backed off" from making the threats after her lawyer advised her to do so, fearing a lawsuit for defamation.

Do you have a link to the article where she "apologizes" for what she said?
#318 - Perhaps, but if that's the case, she's not very good at politi…  [+] (14 new replies) 01/29/2015 on rekdify the situation 0
User avatar #321 - toosexyforyou (01/29/2015) [-]
Also, tell me how she's making a case with this. Say her coworkers don't change their stance and she has to out them. She will have to prove exactly how she knows for a fact that they were cheating on their spouse. How well do you think that will look?
User avatar #325 - Deeticky (01/30/2015) [-]
She doesn't have to out them if they don't change their stance though. She can choose to, but she doesn't have to. Like I said earlier, it's likely that she's just using the threat of outing the cheaters as a rhetorical argument against the "sanctity" of marriage.
User avatar #326 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
Good thing she was smart enough to apologize and take back everything she said right?
User avatar #329 - Deeticky (01/30/2015) [-]
I doubt she has any intention of doing that. Perhaps the cheating politicians should apologize to their spouses, and apologize to their constituents for failing to maintain the "traditional family values" that they hold so near and dear?
User avatar #332 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
She legit apologized for her actions, took back everything she said, and she said she only said it because she was under pressure.
User avatar #336 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
I could not find any article saying she "apologized". All I could find was an article saying that she "backed off" from making the threats after her lawyer advised her to do so, fearing a lawsuit for defamation.

Do you have a link to the article where she "apologizes" for what she said?
User avatar #319 - toosexyforyou (01/29/2015) [-]
This news report is clearly putting her on a bad light to anyone that matters. Sure she's got the popularity of the online losers but what does that matter? Anyone in her field of work would be stupid to be near her after finding out she'd stoop this low.
User avatar #327 - Deeticky (01/30/2015) [-]
Also, calling the people who support her "online losers" does not make it true.
User avatar #328 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
Everyone who supported what she just did disgusts me
User avatar #330 - Deeticky (01/30/2015) [-]
You have a right to your own feelings, but I recommend that you avoid name-calling. It does not contribute to the argument, and actually just makes your own arguments seem less credible.
User avatar #333 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
My opinion (and many others) of gay people has gone significantly over this. Openly accepting blackmail in politics, what a joke.
User avatar #335 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
So you're saying that you and many others now think less of gay people because of the actions of just one woman?
User avatar #337 - toosexyforyou (01/31/2015) [-]
Because of the approval she got from the gay community.
User avatar #338 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
By that logic, it's impossible for you to like anyone then.

Take Ron Paul for instance, a lot of people on the internet love him, yet he's been outed as one of the most corrupt politicians in congress. Does that mean you dislike all of the Ron Paul supporters too?

What about members of the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Islam, Judaism)? They approve of the God of Abraham. yet according to scripture, that god killed many innocent people. Do you dislike all those people because of that?

My point is, people can still respect and celebrate a figurehead, even if they don't agree with everything that figurehead has done.
#195 - Let's be fair here. If it were actual blackmail, she wouldn't …  [+] (16 new replies) 01/28/2015 on rekdify the situation 0
User avatar #196 - toosexyforyou (01/28/2015) [-]
Or she doesn't realize the consequences of her actions.
User avatar #318 - Deeticky (01/29/2015) [-]
Perhaps, but if that's the case, she's not very good at political strategy. I expect that is not the case.
User avatar #321 - toosexyforyou (01/29/2015) [-]
Also, tell me how she's making a case with this. Say her coworkers don't change their stance and she has to out them. She will have to prove exactly how she knows for a fact that they were cheating on their spouse. How well do you think that will look?
User avatar #325 - Deeticky (01/30/2015) [-]
She doesn't have to out them if they don't change their stance though. She can choose to, but she doesn't have to. Like I said earlier, it's likely that she's just using the threat of outing the cheaters as a rhetorical argument against the "sanctity" of marriage.
User avatar #326 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
Good thing she was smart enough to apologize and take back everything she said right?
User avatar #329 - Deeticky (01/30/2015) [-]
I doubt she has any intention of doing that. Perhaps the cheating politicians should apologize to their spouses, and apologize to their constituents for failing to maintain the "traditional family values" that they hold so near and dear?
User avatar #332 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
She legit apologized for her actions, took back everything she said, and she said she only said it because she was under pressure.
User avatar #336 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
I could not find any article saying she "apologized". All I could find was an article saying that she "backed off" from making the threats after her lawyer advised her to do so, fearing a lawsuit for defamation.

Do you have a link to the article where she "apologizes" for what she said?
User avatar #319 - toosexyforyou (01/29/2015) [-]
This news report is clearly putting her on a bad light to anyone that matters. Sure she's got the popularity of the online losers but what does that matter? Anyone in her field of work would be stupid to be near her after finding out she'd stoop this low.
User avatar #327 - Deeticky (01/30/2015) [-]
Also, calling the people who support her "online losers" does not make it true.
User avatar #328 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
Everyone who supported what she just did disgusts me
User avatar #330 - Deeticky (01/30/2015) [-]
You have a right to your own feelings, but I recommend that you avoid name-calling. It does not contribute to the argument, and actually just makes your own arguments seem less credible.
User avatar #333 - toosexyforyou (01/30/2015) [-]
My opinion (and many others) of gay people has gone significantly over this. Openly accepting blackmail in politics, what a joke.
User avatar #335 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
So you're saying that you and many others now think less of gay people because of the actions of just one woman?
User avatar #337 - toosexyforyou (01/31/2015) [-]
Because of the approval she got from the gay community.
User avatar #338 - Deeticky (01/31/2015) [-]
By that logic, it's impossible for you to like anyone then.

Take Ron Paul for instance, a lot of people on the internet love him, yet he's been outed as one of the most corrupt politicians in congress. Does that mean you dislike all of the Ron Paul supporters too?

What about members of the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Islam, Judaism)? They approve of the God of Abraham. yet according to scripture, that god killed many innocent people. Do you dislike all those people because of that?

My point is, people can still respect and celebrate a figurehead, even if they don't agree with everything that figurehead has done.
#250 - So... Does that mean Apple and their products are Chinese too?  [+] (1 new reply) 01/28/2015 on World history 0
#251 - noonelikesdan (01/28/2015) [-]
Yeah basically. Though with most of these italian things they are owned by audi and made by audi but just have a an italien name etc
#180 - Rules of Engagement. 01/27/2015 on More Dank WebMs #2 0
#222 - I believe that movie is called "Chaos".  [+] (1 new reply) 01/26/2015 on For the morbid part 5 0
User avatar #223 - elcreepo (01/26/2015) [-]
Ah, I knew it started with a c...

The clip is everywhere on the internet now. Personally though, there's no such thing as a good fake snuff, and I don't ever want to come across a real one.
#13 - Different materials, different designs, etc. Read up: 01/24/2015 on shogun paper 0
#65 - It's a common trope in anime. 01/24/2015 on (untitled) +5
#147 - That spearhead style is Gallic (I own one similar to it). I im… 01/19/2015 on Roman 0
#144 - There are more than enough Roman artifacts to go around. I eve… 01/19/2015 on Roman 0
#227 - Ahh, that looks better. Thanks man. 01/18/2015 on USA! 0
#222 - Are you sure you did that right? If China has such a significa…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/18/2015 on USA! 0
#225 - anon (01/18/2015) [-]
Shit sorry, sorry. I missed in the calculations where it was to the power -5

2320x1000 = 2320000/320213000 = 0.007 people per 1000 in USA
116x1000 = 116000/53012456 = 0.002 people per 1000 in England
30x1000 = 30000/1339724852 = 0.000022 people per 1000 in China
792x1000 = 792000/3655084730 = 2.17 people per 1000 combined
#250 - brahdin (01/18/2015) [-]
how long did this take?
#257 - anon (01/18/2015) [-]
About 2 minutes, hence some of the mistakes.
#229 - anon (01/18/2015) [-]
*did it again with the combined total, it's 0.00022 for the countries combined.
User avatar #227 - Deeticky (01/18/2015) [-]
Ahh, that looks better. Thanks man.
#221 - Well, you said there were a "couple exceptions". I w… 01/18/2015 on USA! 0
#215 - More than a third of the countries on this list have a populat…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/18/2015 on USA! 0
#219 - tyroneisanigger (01/18/2015) [-]
I said most were under 100M, all those countries with the exception of china are at least 100M less people than USA. So we will have more crazies than others.
User avatar #221 - Deeticky (01/18/2015) [-]
Well, you said there were a "couple exceptions". I was just trying to point out that there are more than a couple exceptions on that list.

items

Total unique items point value: 1870 / Total items point value: 2370
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#8 - evilhomer ONLINE (06/21/2014) [-]
User avatar #7 - atomicman (01/17/2014) [-]
If only we got to meet each other in person. I'm sure we'd be become great friends.
#4 - traffy (01/02/2014) [-]
**traffy rolls 65**
**traffy rolls 65**
User avatar #1 - CannonFodder (10/26/2012) [-]
I hadn't been on FJ for ~ 1.5 years so I don't know what has/hasn't been done. Just couldn't be ****** studying so drew that instead. Didn't mean to annoy peeps but cheers for the feedback man
User avatar #5 to #1 - traffy (01/02/2014) [-]
you should shut the **** up
User avatar #6 to #5 - CannonFodder (01/04/2014) [-]
Lol care
 Friends (0)