x
Click to expand

Deeticky

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:3/29/2010
Last Login:7/31/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#9654
Highest Content Rank:#4157
Highest Comment Rank:#416
Content Thumbs: 2400 total,  2750 ,  350
Comment Thumbs: 8835 total,  9968 ,  1133
Content Level Progress: 96% (96/100)
Level 123 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 124 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 9% (9/100)
Level 286 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 287 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:0
Content Views:110065
Times Content Favorited:164 times
Total Comments Made:2489
FJ Points:940
Favorite Tags: lol (8) | troll (5) | chan (3) | Four (3) | anonymous (2) | black (2) | Christianity (2) | comic (2) | forever (2) | murder (2)

latest user's comments

#72 - Makes sense. America's tortillas can be pretty sub-par. 07/29/2015 on Bench Mark 0
#61 - Trump's campaign is based on goals. Specifically, his goals in… 07/29/2015 on Bench Mark 0
#60 - You're voting for Trump? Why?  [+] (2 new replies) 07/29/2015 on Bench Mark 0
User avatar #64 - rockamekishiko (07/29/2015) [-]
I think i'm gonna move back to Mexico on my own if trump wins.
Mexico also has a dumbass as president but at least i get better tortillas
User avatar #72 - Deeticky (07/29/2015) [-]
Makes sense. America's tortillas can be pretty sub-par.
#141 - You're from Texas, right? Perhaps the Democratic party in Texa… 07/28/2015 on -_-' 0
#139 - Notice how I said I was against hate-speech codes. I am agains…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/27/2015 on -_-' 0
User avatar #140 - youregaylol (07/27/2015) [-]
I've seen too many liberal pundits justify racial violence by saying that the offenders were provoked by the victims (muh institutionalized racism, muh confederate flag, muh police brutality) to trust that liberals care about speech or violence anymore.

The democratic party is filled with radical progressives who drive the agenda, my father was a democrat for many years until he realized that they were chastising Christians for refusing to serve gay weddings, justifying race riots and inflaming racial violence, making terrorists look like freedom fighters or sympathetic, dickriding muslims while blasting anything christian, refusing to defend the border with mexico and calling anyone who wanted to a racist, demonisizing the american police force while idolizing thugs, supporting gay pride parades that have half naked men running around in public making out, forcing people to give money to planned parenthood, the bullshit list goes on and on and on.

It's not the working mans party anymore, its just bullshit progressive dogma over and over again.
User avatar #141 - Deeticky (07/28/2015) [-]
You're from Texas, right? Perhaps the Democratic party in Texas is far different from the party here in Minnesota? I have seen people become upset at businesses who refuse to serve gays, but it had nothing to do with the fact that they were Christians. These people would be just as upset if it were a Muslim business refusing to serve gays, etc. I also have not seen any liberals call terrorists freedom fighters. I'm sure that there are probably liberal bloggers online who do that. It's no different from conservative bloggers who support the KKK. There are extremists on both sides.

While I have seen a lot of people complaining about police brutality (Which I would say is a justified complaint at this point in time), I have never seen a single person "idolize thugs." I'm not even 100% sure what that means.

Also, I think it's unfair to pretend that liberal pundits speak for all liberals. The media always takes things to the extreme because rage always generates revenue. The right has just as many pundits of its own (Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, etc).

Overall, I feel like you seem to be lumping liberals into one big stereotype. The reason I don't like that is because it hurts our ability to work together and get things done. We need to be able to have an open and honest dialogue. I get equally frustrated whenever I hear people make stereotypes about conservatives (they're racists, bigots, greedy, etc). I believe that most conservatives, just like most liberals, love this country and just want the best for it.
#137 - Those are not laws. Even the Wikipedia page states that these …  [+] (4 new replies) 07/27/2015 on -_-' 0
User avatar #138 - youregaylol (07/27/2015) [-]
They're in public universities using public funds in public places and you can be removed by force for saying things in public.

Nothing anti-free speech at all.
User avatar #139 - Deeticky (07/27/2015) [-]
Notice how I said I was against hate-speech codes. I am against them for the very same reason that you are, because they are taking place at public universities using public funds. I think they'll end up at the Supreme Court some day. It will be an interesting case to watch. At the same time, it is important to remember that universities are allowed to set their own codes of conduct (within limits as dictated by the courts). Again, these are codes, not laws. It is very important to differentiate between the two.

I attend one of the more Liberal Universities in the country (University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities). I am a liberal. I have a lot of liberal friends and classmates. I am an active volunteer in the DFL (Minnesota's version of the Democratic party). I have definitely met a few people who want to see hate speech laws expanded, but they are definitely in the minority. The majority of us do support laws that make it illegal to threaten people with violence. That has been the law of the land for a long time though.

All I'm trying to show is that most liberals, just like most conservatives, love and value the First Amendment.
User avatar #140 - youregaylol (07/27/2015) [-]
I've seen too many liberal pundits justify racial violence by saying that the offenders were provoked by the victims (muh institutionalized racism, muh confederate flag, muh police brutality) to trust that liberals care about speech or violence anymore.

The democratic party is filled with radical progressives who drive the agenda, my father was a democrat for many years until he realized that they were chastising Christians for refusing to serve gay weddings, justifying race riots and inflaming racial violence, making terrorists look like freedom fighters or sympathetic, dickriding muslims while blasting anything christian, refusing to defend the border with mexico and calling anyone who wanted to a racist, demonisizing the american police force while idolizing thugs, supporting gay pride parades that have half naked men running around in public making out, forcing people to give money to planned parenthood, the bullshit list goes on and on and on.

It's not the working mans party anymore, its just bullshit progressive dogma over and over again.
User avatar #141 - Deeticky (07/28/2015) [-]
You're from Texas, right? Perhaps the Democratic party in Texas is far different from the party here in Minnesota? I have seen people become upset at businesses who refuse to serve gays, but it had nothing to do with the fact that they were Christians. These people would be just as upset if it were a Muslim business refusing to serve gays, etc. I also have not seen any liberals call terrorists freedom fighters. I'm sure that there are probably liberal bloggers online who do that. It's no different from conservative bloggers who support the KKK. There are extremists on both sides.

While I have seen a lot of people complaining about police brutality (Which I would say is a justified complaint at this point in time), I have never seen a single person "idolize thugs." I'm not even 100% sure what that means.

Also, I think it's unfair to pretend that liberal pundits speak for all liberals. The media always takes things to the extreme because rage always generates revenue. The right has just as many pundits of its own (Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, etc).

Overall, I feel like you seem to be lumping liberals into one big stereotype. The reason I don't like that is because it hurts our ability to work together and get things done. We need to be able to have an open and honest dialogue. I get equally frustrated whenever I hear people make stereotypes about conservatives (they're racists, bigots, greedy, etc). I believe that most conservatives, just like most liberals, love this country and just want the best for it.
#135 - What laws are you referring to? There are laws against hate sp…  [+] (6 new replies) 07/27/2015 on -_-' 0
User avatar #137 - Deeticky (07/27/2015) [-]
Those are not laws. Even the Wikipedia page states that these codes are being implemented in the workplace, Universities, and private institutions. These codes are not being implemented by the Legislative, Executive, or Judicial branches (Which are all bound by the Constitution). They are being implemented by the governing bodies of Universities and private institutions, which are not bound by the same constitutional limits as the government is.

Long story short, hate speech codes are not the same as hate speech laws. I say this as a liberal who is generally against hate speech codes.
User avatar #138 - youregaylol (07/27/2015) [-]
They're in public universities using public funds in public places and you can be removed by force for saying things in public.

Nothing anti-free speech at all.
User avatar #139 - Deeticky (07/27/2015) [-]
Notice how I said I was against hate-speech codes. I am against them for the very same reason that you are, because they are taking place at public universities using public funds. I think they'll end up at the Supreme Court some day. It will be an interesting case to watch. At the same time, it is important to remember that universities are allowed to set their own codes of conduct (within limits as dictated by the courts). Again, these are codes, not laws. It is very important to differentiate between the two.

I attend one of the more Liberal Universities in the country (University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities). I am a liberal. I have a lot of liberal friends and classmates. I am an active volunteer in the DFL (Minnesota's version of the Democratic party). I have definitely met a few people who want to see hate speech laws expanded, but they are definitely in the minority. The majority of us do support laws that make it illegal to threaten people with violence. That has been the law of the land for a long time though.

All I'm trying to show is that most liberals, just like most conservatives, love and value the First Amendment.
User avatar #140 - youregaylol (07/27/2015) [-]
I've seen too many liberal pundits justify racial violence by saying that the offenders were provoked by the victims (muh institutionalized racism, muh confederate flag, muh police brutality) to trust that liberals care about speech or violence anymore.

The democratic party is filled with radical progressives who drive the agenda, my father was a democrat for many years until he realized that they were chastising Christians for refusing to serve gay weddings, justifying race riots and inflaming racial violence, making terrorists look like freedom fighters or sympathetic, dickriding muslims while blasting anything christian, refusing to defend the border with mexico and calling anyone who wanted to a racist, demonisizing the american police force while idolizing thugs, supporting gay pride parades that have half naked men running around in public making out, forcing people to give money to planned parenthood, the bullshit list goes on and on and on.

It's not the working mans party anymore, its just bullshit progressive dogma over and over again.
User avatar #141 - Deeticky (07/28/2015) [-]
You're from Texas, right? Perhaps the Democratic party in Texas is far different from the party here in Minnesota? I have seen people become upset at businesses who refuse to serve gays, but it had nothing to do with the fact that they were Christians. These people would be just as upset if it were a Muslim business refusing to serve gays, etc. I also have not seen any liberals call terrorists freedom fighters. I'm sure that there are probably liberal bloggers online who do that. It's no different from conservative bloggers who support the KKK. There are extremists on both sides.

While I have seen a lot of people complaining about police brutality (Which I would say is a justified complaint at this point in time), I have never seen a single person "idolize thugs." I'm not even 100% sure what that means.

Also, I think it's unfair to pretend that liberal pundits speak for all liberals. The media always takes things to the extreme because rage always generates revenue. The right has just as many pundits of its own (Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, etc).

Overall, I feel like you seem to be lumping liberals into one big stereotype. The reason I don't like that is because it hurts our ability to work together and get things done. We need to be able to have an open and honest dialogue. I get equally frustrated whenever I hear people make stereotypes about conservatives (they're racists, bigots, greedy, etc). I believe that most conservatives, just like most liberals, love this country and just want the best for it.
#133 - I think the important thing to note is that they are not flyin…  [+] (8 new replies) 07/27/2015 on -_-' 0
User avatar #134 - youregaylol (07/27/2015) [-]
"Liberals care about the First Amendment just as much as everybody else. "

Explain hate speech laws.
User avatar #135 - Deeticky (07/27/2015) [-]
What laws are you referring to? There are laws against hate speech in Europe, but most American Liberals I know are vehemently against many of them.

Threats of violence are illegal. But those are not protected under Free Speech anyway. The Supreme Court ruled on that long ago.
User avatar #137 - Deeticky (07/27/2015) [-]
Those are not laws. Even the Wikipedia page states that these codes are being implemented in the workplace, Universities, and private institutions. These codes are not being implemented by the Legislative, Executive, or Judicial branches (Which are all bound by the Constitution). They are being implemented by the governing bodies of Universities and private institutions, which are not bound by the same constitutional limits as the government is.

Long story short, hate speech codes are not the same as hate speech laws. I say this as a liberal who is generally against hate speech codes.
User avatar #138 - youregaylol (07/27/2015) [-]
They're in public universities using public funds in public places and you can be removed by force for saying things in public.

Nothing anti-free speech at all.
User avatar #139 - Deeticky (07/27/2015) [-]
Notice how I said I was against hate-speech codes. I am against them for the very same reason that you are, because they are taking place at public universities using public funds. I think they'll end up at the Supreme Court some day. It will be an interesting case to watch. At the same time, it is important to remember that universities are allowed to set their own codes of conduct (within limits as dictated by the courts). Again, these are codes, not laws. It is very important to differentiate between the two.

I attend one of the more Liberal Universities in the country (University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities). I am a liberal. I have a lot of liberal friends and classmates. I am an active volunteer in the DFL (Minnesota's version of the Democratic party). I have definitely met a few people who want to see hate speech laws expanded, but they are definitely in the minority. The majority of us do support laws that make it illegal to threaten people with violence. That has been the law of the land for a long time though.

All I'm trying to show is that most liberals, just like most conservatives, love and value the First Amendment.
User avatar #140 - youregaylol (07/27/2015) [-]
I've seen too many liberal pundits justify racial violence by saying that the offenders were provoked by the victims (muh institutionalized racism, muh confederate flag, muh police brutality) to trust that liberals care about speech or violence anymore.

The democratic party is filled with radical progressives who drive the agenda, my father was a democrat for many years until he realized that they were chastising Christians for refusing to serve gay weddings, justifying race riots and inflaming racial violence, making terrorists look like freedom fighters or sympathetic, dickriding muslims while blasting anything christian, refusing to defend the border with mexico and calling anyone who wanted to a racist, demonisizing the american police force while idolizing thugs, supporting gay pride parades that have half naked men running around in public making out, forcing people to give money to planned parenthood, the bullshit list goes on and on and on.

It's not the working mans party anymore, its just bullshit progressive dogma over and over again.
User avatar #141 - Deeticky (07/28/2015) [-]
You're from Texas, right? Perhaps the Democratic party in Texas is far different from the party here in Minnesota? I have seen people become upset at businesses who refuse to serve gays, but it had nothing to do with the fact that they were Christians. These people would be just as upset if it were a Muslim business refusing to serve gays, etc. I also have not seen any liberals call terrorists freedom fighters. I'm sure that there are probably liberal bloggers online who do that. It's no different from conservative bloggers who support the KKK. There are extremists on both sides.

While I have seen a lot of people complaining about police brutality (Which I would say is a justified complaint at this point in time), I have never seen a single person "idolize thugs." I'm not even 100% sure what that means.

Also, I think it's unfair to pretend that liberal pundits speak for all liberals. The media always takes things to the extreme because rage always generates revenue. The right has just as many pundits of its own (Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, etc).

Overall, I feel like you seem to be lumping liberals into one big stereotype. The reason I don't like that is because it hurts our ability to work together and get things done. We need to be able to have an open and honest dialogue. I get equally frustrated whenever I hear people make stereotypes about conservatives (they're racists, bigots, greedy, etc). I believe that most conservatives, just like most liberals, love this country and just want the best for it.
#132 - In the event of another Civil War, I think the draft would not… 07/27/2015 on -_-' 0
#130 - 1: A second Civil War could happen many different ways. I supp…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/27/2015 on -_-' 0
#131 - ByeliVolk (07/27/2015) [-]
Civil wars do happen in the world all the time but usually in third world / developing countries, they very rarely ever happen in modern first world countries and a forced conscription as known as the Draft would have many negative consequences that would result in a backlash and lowering the popularity of current holding president in term at that time and would be more infamous then Zachary Taylor. I know of maybe one country that would sell to the South Rebels in the case of it happening and that would be the French for they really do not give a shit since they have sold to our enemies before they will sell to them again and they would repeat their sells like the did in the First American Civil War. The Rebels would have allies but it would be in countries that oppose us or no longer care for us. China would definitely do it and so would Russia if it meant they could claim American Soil.

You bring up good points but what I am pointing out here is that in the current situation if a Civil War was to break out now in modern times the amount of casualties would be high and the amount of backlash and problems would be too high.

Your second point I think I want to point out is that unless you put out a forceful Draft the idea of making up enough recruits to replace defectors would be astronomical. And to win a war that you enemy has forcefully captured your assets that you have garnered and use the same tech as you it becomes hard to field enough assets to cover the deficit. Also the same State in the past would be the most valuable state again in the case of the Secession which is Virgina since it has closet proximity to the Capital and fastest access to the leader.
User avatar #132 - Deeticky (07/27/2015) [-]
In the event of another Civil War, I think the draft would not be as unpopular as you think. The reason for this is that the rebels would be an immediate threat to the American people and would be actively trying to take over American land. During WW2, the draft was not especially unpopular due to the fact that soldiers viewed themselves as defending America against the Japanese and the Nazis. The Vietnam War, which saw an extremely unpopular draft, was not a defensive war. Our soldiers were not being viewed as defending America in that war. Instead, people just saw young men getting shipped off to die in a far away land.

I will say that I would not be surprised if China and Russia sold weapons to both the U.S. government and the rebels. Both of those countries have historically been very willing to make money off of others' wars (much like the U.S.). However, I don't see any basis to assume that either China or Russia would be interested in trying to take U.S. territory for themselves. First, both China and Russia are located on the other side of the planet. It would be extremely difficult for either country to transport the sheer volume of troops and supplies across the Pacific Ocean required to conquer America. Second, both China and Russia have their own local territorial disputes already. I think if they were to gain any territory from a U.S. civil war, it would only be within their own continents. Third, the U.S. has nukes stationed all over the world, which makes invasion an extremely bad idea. If either China or Russia were to invade, they could probably count on being nuked at some point.

Also, what are you referring to when you say France has sold to our enemies before? I'm not talking about the previous Civil War, because that was before NATO. If the French government were to do that openly nowadays, it would be a breach of the NATO treaty like I mentioned before.

I think it is important to point out that while the rebels would have many of the same assets as the U.S. government, they would be missing a very important piece. The Navy. The U.S. has a massive navy. The rebels would quickly see their ports blockaded and would be subject to airstrikes and landing parties from the sea.

I will definitely say that I agree with you in terms of the potential for casualties. They would definitely be massive and catastrophic for both sides.

items

Total unique items point value: 1870 / Total items point value: 2370
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #7 - atomicman (01/17/2014) [-]
If only we got to meet each other in person. I'm sure we'd be become great friends.
#4 - traffy (01/02/2014) [-]
**traffy rolls 65**
**traffy rolls 65**
User avatar #1 - CannonFodder (10/26/2012) [-]
I hadn't been on FJ for ~ 1.5 years so I don't know what has/hasn't been done. Just couldn't be ****** studying so drew that instead. Didn't mean to annoy peeps but cheers for the feedback man
User avatar #5 to #1 - traffy (01/02/2014) [-]
you should shut the **** up
User avatar #6 to #5 - CannonFodder (01/04/2014) [-]
Lol care
 Friends (0)