Upload
Login or register

Deavas

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 21
Youtube Channel: Deavas86
Steam Profile: kelevra22
Consoles Owned: ps4, ps3, ps2, n64
Video Games Played: Dark Souls, Witcher 3, GTA V, CiV, Payday 2
PSN: Deavas86
Interests: guitar, metal, music
Date Signed Up:1/13/2010
Location:New York
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#4740
Comment Ranking:#348
Highest Content Rank:#2487
Highest Comment Rank:#177
Content Thumbs: 515 total,  618 ,  103
Comment Thumbs: 15321 total,  29229 ,  13908
Content Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 26 Content: Peasant → Level 27 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 7% (7/100)
Level 308 Comments: Lord Of Laughs → Level 309 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Subscribers:436
Content Views:626893
Times Content Favorited:2770 times
Total Comments Made:54300
FJ Points:11274
Favorite Tags: funny (6) | FUNNYJUNK (6) | Long (5) | read (5) | the (5) | worth (5) | admin (4) | Fresh (4) | Life (4) | meme (4) | prince (4) | red (4) | my (3) | Park (3) | Pokemon (3) | roll (3) | south (3) | Stupid (3) | win (3) | Wolf (3)

latest user's comments

#24 - i am metalhead, and my hair is amazing. ive been told so by so…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/22/2016 on /fit/ gets real -1
User avatar
#62 - rockamekishiko (05/22/2016) [-]
i'm kinda glad you're not reproducing, actually.
User avatar
#63 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
[no correlation intensifies]
User avatar
#67 - biscuitsunited (05/23/2016) [-]
This entire conversation started as girl advice
Considering you're being an arsehole the corrrelation off the fucking charts
User avatar
#68 - Deavas (05/23/2016) [-]
i dont think i want to legit take girl advice from people on here
User avatar
#69 - biscuitsunited (05/23/2016) [-]
Considering you're on here its pretty evident you need girl advice
User avatar
#70 - Deavas (05/23/2016) [-]
Then the same could be said for every single person on here and therefore my point still stands
#22 - yes it is i always see those guys who are even shorter tha…  [+] (7 new replies) 05/22/2016 on /fit/ gets real -1
User avatar
#25 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Then you are seeing some different people than me.
User avatar
#27 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
because youre a liftfag
User avatar
#29 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Is there really any problem with someone improving themseld physically
User avatar
#31 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
course not
but being a gymrat and changing your entire physique for some dumbass aesthetic is retarded
User avatar
#32 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
It doesnt matter if they want to lift for aesthetics. They are lifting and improving themselfs.
User avatar
#34 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and looking and acting like douchetastic faglords
i dont just say this from afar, i lived with these people in college in my room and surrounding dorm. im well aware of the life
User avatar
#41 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Hey all im saying is ive never encountered these types of people. The only douchebag asshole lifters ive seen are the older guys who lift.
#19 - lifting is for faggots no haircut because i have godly long hair  [+] (8 new replies) 05/22/2016 on /fit/ gets real -2
User avatar
#23 - biscuitsunited (05/22/2016) [-]
Godly long hair?
Most girls, fuck most people, think long hair is pretty disgusting on a guy
It doesnt matter what metalheads think.
Look you want pussy? stop being an absolute dick about it, here is a solution, take it or leave it.
User avatar
#24 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
i am metalhead, and my hair is amazing. ive been told so by so many people including random strangers who walk up to me and comment on it
lol fuck your ugly ass having to settle for short hair
User avatar
#62 - rockamekishiko (05/22/2016) [-]
i'm kinda glad you're not reproducing, actually.
User avatar
#63 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
[no correlation intensifies]
User avatar
#67 - biscuitsunited (05/23/2016) [-]
This entire conversation started as girl advice
Considering you're being an arsehole the corrrelation off the fucking charts
User avatar
#68 - Deavas (05/23/2016) [-]
i dont think i want to legit take girl advice from people on here
User avatar
#69 - biscuitsunited (05/23/2016) [-]
Considering you're on here its pretty evident you need girl advice
User avatar
#70 - Deavas (05/23/2016) [-]
Then the same could be said for every single person on here and therefore my point still stands
#18 - short muscular guys are ******* faggots  [+] (9 new replies) 05/22/2016 on /fit/ gets real -1
User avatar
#21 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Lolno. Im not even short and i know thats not true.
User avatar
#22 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
yes it is
i always see those guys who are even shorter than me who think they can validate themselves by lifting and they just look retarded
i will never stoop that low
User avatar
#25 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Then you are seeing some different people than me.
User avatar
#27 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
because youre a liftfag
User avatar
#29 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Is there really any problem with someone improving themseld physically
User avatar
#31 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
course not
but being a gymrat and changing your entire physique for some dumbass aesthetic is retarded
User avatar
#32 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
It doesnt matter if they want to lift for aesthetics. They are lifting and improving themselfs.
User avatar
#34 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and looking and acting like douchetastic faglords
i dont just say this from afar, i lived with these people in college in my room and surrounding dorm. im well aware of the life
User avatar
#41 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Hey all im saying is ive never encountered these types of people. The only douchebag asshole lifters ive seen are the older guys who lift.
#14 - haha lol no uck physical activity im a musician  [+] (13 new replies) 05/22/2016 on /fit/ gets real -2
User avatar
#33 - yatush (05/22/2016) [-]
So if you're a musician you can't have time for improving the looks of your body? I'd be glad to consider myself one and I still workout a few times a week and run almost every evening.
User avatar
#36 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
no i mostly just say that as a joke because musicians and physical activity dont mix but in all srsns fuck lifting
User avatar
#17 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Lol stop with the excuses. Lifting is for everyone. Just inagine walking around and being a fucking alpha. Being able to tell people you bench 305.
User avatar
#18 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
short muscular guys are fucking faggots
User avatar
#21 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Lolno. Im not even short and i know thats not true.
User avatar
#22 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
yes it is
i always see those guys who are even shorter than me who think they can validate themselves by lifting and they just look retarded
i will never stoop that low
User avatar
#25 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Then you are seeing some different people than me.
User avatar
#27 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
because youre a liftfag
User avatar
#29 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Is there really any problem with someone improving themseld physically
User avatar
#31 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
course not
but being a gymrat and changing your entire physique for some dumbass aesthetic is retarded
User avatar
#32 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
It doesnt matter if they want to lift for aesthetics. They are lifting and improving themselfs.
User avatar
#34 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and looking and acting like douchetastic faglords
i dont just say this from afar, i lived with these people in college in my room and surrounding dorm. im well aware of the life
User avatar
#41 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Hey all im saying is ive never encountered these types of people. The only douchebag asshole lifters ive seen are the older guys who lift.
#20 - its game mechanics and fact stuff. opinion would be whether yo…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/22/2016 on Found this in Far Harbor 0
#21 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Story is certainly not objective. There are a great deal of aspects which can influence your enjoyment of a story- relatability, personal genre preference, detail fixation, lore preferences, impact on the story, how in depth the story is, how frequently you play, and other things that I don't really feel like thinking of. Point is that there's a lot that can influence how a person feels about a game's story, and it certainly is by no means objective.
As for overall betterness, that's once again subjective- that's composed of enjoyment of story, mechanics, graphics, play-style, replayability, atmosphere, and other aspects of a game.

There's no way you can say one game is better than the other- it's all personal preference.
You can definitively say that one game has higher quality graphics than the other, that one game has a longer duration of content than the other, or that one game has better ratings- but those things do not form the quality of a game as a whole
User avatar
#22 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and fallout had none of it. story was shit. witcher story was godly. its not even a question
#23 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
I'm not sure why you feel your opinion is the only right one.

Fallout had a story that could be called really good- based on the list of things I mentioned- in that it:
Could be easily relatable to some people- the search for a family member, the ideas of what makes a human human, and trying to find a place with a group could all be very relatable.
Personal genre preference is something I'm not sure how you could argue fallout had none of it. It has a pretty distinct science fiction feeling to it.
Detail fixation could be a case of someone not caring too much for games with a larger amount of details- whether it's because they don't want to have to keep up with too much, or perhaps they simply don't play very often
Lore is also something I'm not sure you could argue fallout had none of it- granted, the lore of the newer games is a bit contradictory to the lore of the older games, but it certainly does have lore behind it, and one could simply prefer the lore of fallout to the lore of witcher.
For impact on story, you have a pretty decent impact on the story. Of the factions, you determine which of them gets to succeed, and the fate of Boston as a whole. That could very well be enough for some people.
In depth of story relates back to detail fixation- some people may prefer less depth.
How frequently you play is something that once again, I can't say how you could argue fallout had none of it, since this isn't really something related to the game itself but the person. I feel like you didn't really read it.

As for the overall betterness section, let's go into that like I did with story.
Enjoyment of the story is complete preference. I found the story for Fallout 4 to be really enjoyable as I really like the ideas of synthetic humans, themes of humanity as a whole, whether or not genocide can be justified, science fiction, and an apocalypse. Thus, for me Fallout 4 has a very enjoyable story.
With mechanics, one thing that really stands out are the power armor mechanics- it did feel like it was supposed to, which is the wearer being a walking tank. The fusion cores, lack of fall damage, incredible defense, and newer tech all felt really cool compared to the power armor of the previous games. Customization was also fun- with weapons, armor, and towns alike.
For playstyle, fallout fit me better than either of the witcher games I played- they tended to be much slower and more constricted, whereas fallout is a lot more of a sandbox and seems to get really quick in some of the areas.
I find the graphics of fallout to be nice- it doesn't feel very real, but it still looks good. I enjoy my games like that.
Fallout has great replayability with the different factions and fighting styles.
The run-down atmosphere of fallout is something I find exciting.

That's not to say that the witcher series is bad, but personal preference can result in somebody preferring one game to another.


Also, something I didn't mention previously, is modding. Modding can add whole new aspects and stories to games, sometimes adding DLC sized content as was the case with fallout 3 and NV. Fallout lends itself much better to these than witcher does, and that can add to replayability and enjoyment as well.
User avatar
#24 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
modding isnt part of the game.
#25 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Good to see that out of that whole thing, you commented one one small aspect of it.

And for whether or not it's part of the game, it's irrelevant- certain games lend themselves better to modding than others, and that can add enjoyment of a game.
User avatar
#26 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
well i wasnt going to read all that
#18 - no, its not an opinion thing i really got the feeling fall…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/22/2016 on Found this in Far Harbor 0
#19 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
But... it actually is a complete opinion.
While I haven't played the third witcher, and thus can't speak for it, I've played the first two, and definitely prefer the gameplay of any of the fallout games, including the fourth one. I just find them more enjoyable. I prefer the combat, I prefer the stories, and I prefer the atmosphere of it all.

I'm not quite sure how one could think that enjoyment of a game is actually not an opinion.
User avatar
#20 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
its game mechanics and fact stuff. opinion would be whether you think gameplay is better or not
story and overall betterness is objective
#21 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Story is certainly not objective. There are a great deal of aspects which can influence your enjoyment of a story- relatability, personal genre preference, detail fixation, lore preferences, impact on the story, how in depth the story is, how frequently you play, and other things that I don't really feel like thinking of. Point is that there's a lot that can influence how a person feels about a game's story, and it certainly is by no means objective.
As for overall betterness, that's once again subjective- that's composed of enjoyment of story, mechanics, graphics, play-style, replayability, atmosphere, and other aspects of a game.

There's no way you can say one game is better than the other- it's all personal preference.
You can definitively say that one game has higher quality graphics than the other, that one game has a longer duration of content than the other, or that one game has better ratings- but those things do not form the quality of a game as a whole
User avatar
#22 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and fallout had none of it. story was shit. witcher story was godly. its not even a question
#23 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
I'm not sure why you feel your opinion is the only right one.

Fallout had a story that could be called really good- based on the list of things I mentioned- in that it:
Could be easily relatable to some people- the search for a family member, the ideas of what makes a human human, and trying to find a place with a group could all be very relatable.
Personal genre preference is something I'm not sure how you could argue fallout had none of it. It has a pretty distinct science fiction feeling to it.
Detail fixation could be a case of someone not caring too much for games with a larger amount of details- whether it's because they don't want to have to keep up with too much, or perhaps they simply don't play very often
Lore is also something I'm not sure you could argue fallout had none of it- granted, the lore of the newer games is a bit contradictory to the lore of the older games, but it certainly does have lore behind it, and one could simply prefer the lore of fallout to the lore of witcher.
For impact on story, you have a pretty decent impact on the story. Of the factions, you determine which of them gets to succeed, and the fate of Boston as a whole. That could very well be enough for some people.
In depth of story relates back to detail fixation- some people may prefer less depth.
How frequently you play is something that once again, I can't say how you could argue fallout had none of it, since this isn't really something related to the game itself but the person. I feel like you didn't really read it.

As for the overall betterness section, let's go into that like I did with story.
Enjoyment of the story is complete preference. I found the story for Fallout 4 to be really enjoyable as I really like the ideas of synthetic humans, themes of humanity as a whole, whether or not genocide can be justified, science fiction, and an apocalypse. Thus, for me Fallout 4 has a very enjoyable story.
With mechanics, one thing that really stands out are the power armor mechanics- it did feel like it was supposed to, which is the wearer being a walking tank. The fusion cores, lack of fall damage, incredible defense, and newer tech all felt really cool compared to the power armor of the previous games. Customization was also fun- with weapons, armor, and towns alike.
For playstyle, fallout fit me better than either of the witcher games I played- they tended to be much slower and more constricted, whereas fallout is a lot more of a sandbox and seems to get really quick in some of the areas.
I find the graphics of fallout to be nice- it doesn't feel very real, but it still looks good. I enjoy my games like that.
Fallout has great replayability with the different factions and fighting styles.
The run-down atmosphere of fallout is something I find exciting.

That's not to say that the witcher series is bad, but personal preference can result in somebody preferring one game to another.


Also, something I didn't mention previously, is modding. Modding can add whole new aspects and stories to games, sometimes adding DLC sized content as was the case with fallout 3 and NV. Fallout lends itself much better to these than witcher does, and that can add to replayability and enjoyment as well.
User avatar
#24 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
modding isnt part of the game.
#25 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Good to see that out of that whole thing, you commented one one small aspect of it.

And for whether or not it's part of the game, it's irrelevant- certain games lend themselves better to modding than others, and that can add enjoyment of a game.
User avatar
#26 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
well i wasnt going to read all that
#16 - wait no ull thing was 30, far harbor was 20 blood and wine…  [+] (10 new replies) 05/22/2016 on Found this in Far Harbor 0
#17 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Witcher being better in every single way is really just an opinion thing. Maybe he doesn't much care for Witcher.

But even with the full thing being 30, that's really good for 6 DLC.
User avatar
#18 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
no, its not an opinion thing
i really got the feeling fallout 4 tried to copy some things from witcher and failed
like giving you the illusion that your choice matters. it doesnt. in witch.er , every decision you make at certain points affects the outcome of the game, and it doest tell you where. in fallout, this is basically given to you depending on what faction you join
witcher story blows fallout's out of the water. which really isnt hard to do because fo4s story sucked
witcher is self immersed in the witcher lore and fallout4 sorta just gave elder maxon a cameo.
then theres less important game length and graphics which witcher is clearly better and longer
tldr; like i said, every single aspect is better. and there is no way a fallout dlc is worth more than a witcher dlc
#19 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
But... it actually is a complete opinion.
While I haven't played the third witcher, and thus can't speak for it, I've played the first two, and definitely prefer the gameplay of any of the fallout games, including the fourth one. I just find them more enjoyable. I prefer the combat, I prefer the stories, and I prefer the atmosphere of it all.

I'm not quite sure how one could think that enjoyment of a game is actually not an opinion.
User avatar
#20 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
its game mechanics and fact stuff. opinion would be whether you think gameplay is better or not
story and overall betterness is objective
#21 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Story is certainly not objective. There are a great deal of aspects which can influence your enjoyment of a story- relatability, personal genre preference, detail fixation, lore preferences, impact on the story, how in depth the story is, how frequently you play, and other things that I don't really feel like thinking of. Point is that there's a lot that can influence how a person feels about a game's story, and it certainly is by no means objective.
As for overall betterness, that's once again subjective- that's composed of enjoyment of story, mechanics, graphics, play-style, replayability, atmosphere, and other aspects of a game.

There's no way you can say one game is better than the other- it's all personal preference.
You can definitively say that one game has higher quality graphics than the other, that one game has a longer duration of content than the other, or that one game has better ratings- but those things do not form the quality of a game as a whole
User avatar
#22 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and fallout had none of it. story was shit. witcher story was godly. its not even a question
#23 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
I'm not sure why you feel your opinion is the only right one.

Fallout had a story that could be called really good- based on the list of things I mentioned- in that it:
Could be easily relatable to some people- the search for a family member, the ideas of what makes a human human, and trying to find a place with a group could all be very relatable.
Personal genre preference is something I'm not sure how you could argue fallout had none of it. It has a pretty distinct science fiction feeling to it.
Detail fixation could be a case of someone not caring too much for games with a larger amount of details- whether it's because they don't want to have to keep up with too much, or perhaps they simply don't play very often
Lore is also something I'm not sure you could argue fallout had none of it- granted, the lore of the newer games is a bit contradictory to the lore of the older games, but it certainly does have lore behind it, and one could simply prefer the lore of fallout to the lore of witcher.
For impact on story, you have a pretty decent impact on the story. Of the factions, you determine which of them gets to succeed, and the fate of Boston as a whole. That could very well be enough for some people.
In depth of story relates back to detail fixation- some people may prefer less depth.
How frequently you play is something that once again, I can't say how you could argue fallout had none of it, since this isn't really something related to the game itself but the person. I feel like you didn't really read it.

As for the overall betterness section, let's go into that like I did with story.
Enjoyment of the story is complete preference. I found the story for Fallout 4 to be really enjoyable as I really like the ideas of synthetic humans, themes of humanity as a whole, whether or not genocide can be justified, science fiction, and an apocalypse. Thus, for me Fallout 4 has a very enjoyable story.
With mechanics, one thing that really stands out are the power armor mechanics- it did feel like it was supposed to, which is the wearer being a walking tank. The fusion cores, lack of fall damage, incredible defense, and newer tech all felt really cool compared to the power armor of the previous games. Customization was also fun- with weapons, armor, and towns alike.
For playstyle, fallout fit me better than either of the witcher games I played- they tended to be much slower and more constricted, whereas fallout is a lot more of a sandbox and seems to get really quick in some of the areas.
I find the graphics of fallout to be nice- it doesn't feel very real, but it still looks good. I enjoy my games like that.
Fallout has great replayability with the different factions and fighting styles.
The run-down atmosphere of fallout is something I find exciting.

That's not to say that the witcher series is bad, but personal preference can result in somebody preferring one game to another.


Also, something I didn't mention previously, is modding. Modding can add whole new aspects and stories to games, sometimes adding DLC sized content as was the case with fallout 3 and NV. Fallout lends itself much better to these than witcher does, and that can add to replayability and enjoyment as well.
User avatar
#24 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
modding isnt part of the game.
#25 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Good to see that out of that whole thing, you commented one one small aspect of it.

And for whether or not it's part of the game, it's irrelevant- certain games lend themselves better to modding than others, and that can add enjoyment of a game.
User avatar
#26 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
well i wasnt going to read all that
#14 - yes and even then far harbor was still more expensive than Blo…  [+] (12 new replies) 05/22/2016 on Found this in Far Harbor 0
#15 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
But I mean, 20 bucks for 6 DLC is pretty reasonable. I think I remember that bethesda said at least one of the unreleased ones is a story one, so that's at least two decently sized DLC plus 4 or so smaller DLC for 20 bucks. That's a pretty good deal.
I don't really know the size of Blood and Wine, so I can't comment on it.
User avatar
#16 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
wait no ull thing was 30, far harbor was 20
blood and wine was fucking huge, basically adding an entire previously unsearchable area of map equal to about a third of the mainland map, and was only $15. and also its witcher.
ive played both. i can honestly say witcher is far better in every single way, with the exception of roleplaying, which even then is only based on the nature of the games, and fallout 4 still failed here for anything other than mercenary
#17 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Witcher being better in every single way is really just an opinion thing. Maybe he doesn't much care for Witcher.

But even with the full thing being 30, that's really good for 6 DLC.
User avatar
#18 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
no, its not an opinion thing
i really got the feeling fallout 4 tried to copy some things from witcher and failed
like giving you the illusion that your choice matters. it doesnt. in witch.er , every decision you make at certain points affects the outcome of the game, and it doest tell you where. in fallout, this is basically given to you depending on what faction you join
witcher story blows fallout's out of the water. which really isnt hard to do because fo4s story sucked
witcher is self immersed in the witcher lore and fallout4 sorta just gave elder maxon a cameo.
then theres less important game length and graphics which witcher is clearly better and longer
tldr; like i said, every single aspect is better. and there is no way a fallout dlc is worth more than a witcher dlc
#19 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
But... it actually is a complete opinion.
While I haven't played the third witcher, and thus can't speak for it, I've played the first two, and definitely prefer the gameplay of any of the fallout games, including the fourth one. I just find them more enjoyable. I prefer the combat, I prefer the stories, and I prefer the atmosphere of it all.

I'm not quite sure how one could think that enjoyment of a game is actually not an opinion.
User avatar
#20 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
its game mechanics and fact stuff. opinion would be whether you think gameplay is better or not
story and overall betterness is objective
#21 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Story is certainly not objective. There are a great deal of aspects which can influence your enjoyment of a story- relatability, personal genre preference, detail fixation, lore preferences, impact on the story, how in depth the story is, how frequently you play, and other things that I don't really feel like thinking of. Point is that there's a lot that can influence how a person feels about a game's story, and it certainly is by no means objective.
As for overall betterness, that's once again subjective- that's composed of enjoyment of story, mechanics, graphics, play-style, replayability, atmosphere, and other aspects of a game.

There's no way you can say one game is better than the other- it's all personal preference.
You can definitively say that one game has higher quality graphics than the other, that one game has a longer duration of content than the other, or that one game has better ratings- but those things do not form the quality of a game as a whole
User avatar
#22 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and fallout had none of it. story was shit. witcher story was godly. its not even a question
#23 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
I'm not sure why you feel your opinion is the only right one.

Fallout had a story that could be called really good- based on the list of things I mentioned- in that it:
Could be easily relatable to some people- the search for a family member, the ideas of what makes a human human, and trying to find a place with a group could all be very relatable.
Personal genre preference is something I'm not sure how you could argue fallout had none of it. It has a pretty distinct science fiction feeling to it.
Detail fixation could be a case of someone not caring too much for games with a larger amount of details- whether it's because they don't want to have to keep up with too much, or perhaps they simply don't play very often
Lore is also something I'm not sure you could argue fallout had none of it- granted, the lore of the newer games is a bit contradictory to the lore of the older games, but it certainly does have lore behind it, and one could simply prefer the lore of fallout to the lore of witcher.
For impact on story, you have a pretty decent impact on the story. Of the factions, you determine which of them gets to succeed, and the fate of Boston as a whole. That could very well be enough for some people.
In depth of story relates back to detail fixation- some people may prefer less depth.
How frequently you play is something that once again, I can't say how you could argue fallout had none of it, since this isn't really something related to the game itself but the person. I feel like you didn't really read it.

As for the overall betterness section, let's go into that like I did with story.
Enjoyment of the story is complete preference. I found the story for Fallout 4 to be really enjoyable as I really like the ideas of synthetic humans, themes of humanity as a whole, whether or not genocide can be justified, science fiction, and an apocalypse. Thus, for me Fallout 4 has a very enjoyable story.
With mechanics, one thing that really stands out are the power armor mechanics- it did feel like it was supposed to, which is the wearer being a walking tank. The fusion cores, lack of fall damage, incredible defense, and newer tech all felt really cool compared to the power armor of the previous games. Customization was also fun- with weapons, armor, and towns alike.
For playstyle, fallout fit me better than either of the witcher games I played- they tended to be much slower and more constricted, whereas fallout is a lot more of a sandbox and seems to get really quick in some of the areas.
I find the graphics of fallout to be nice- it doesn't feel very real, but it still looks good. I enjoy my games like that.
Fallout has great replayability with the different factions and fighting styles.
The run-down atmosphere of fallout is something I find exciting.

That's not to say that the witcher series is bad, but personal preference can result in somebody preferring one game to another.


Also, something I didn't mention previously, is modding. Modding can add whole new aspects and stories to games, sometimes adding DLC sized content as was the case with fallout 3 and NV. Fallout lends itself much better to these than witcher does, and that can add to replayability and enjoyment as well.
User avatar
#24 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
modding isnt part of the game.
#25 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Good to see that out of that whole thing, you commented one one small aspect of it.

And for whether or not it's part of the game, it's irrelevant- certain games lend themselves better to modding than others, and that can add enjoyment of a game.
User avatar
#26 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
well i wasnt going to read all that
#11 - its fallout being more expensive than witcher huge red flags  [+] (14 new replies) 05/22/2016 on Found this in Far Harbor 0
#13 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
The dude may just really enjoy fallout- having different tastes doesn't make his actions stupid.
Also, he could have gotten the season pass earlier on. Wasn't it like 20 bucks some time ago?
User avatar
#14 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
yes and even then far harbor was still more expensive than Blood and Wine
#15 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
But I mean, 20 bucks for 6 DLC is pretty reasonable. I think I remember that bethesda said at least one of the unreleased ones is a story one, so that's at least two decently sized DLC plus 4 or so smaller DLC for 20 bucks. That's a pretty good deal.
I don't really know the size of Blood and Wine, so I can't comment on it.
User avatar
#16 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
wait no ull thing was 30, far harbor was 20
blood and wine was fucking huge, basically adding an entire previously unsearchable area of map equal to about a third of the mainland map, and was only $15. and also its witcher.
ive played both. i can honestly say witcher is far better in every single way, with the exception of roleplaying, which even then is only based on the nature of the games, and fallout 4 still failed here for anything other than mercenary
#17 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Witcher being better in every single way is really just an opinion thing. Maybe he doesn't much care for Witcher.

But even with the full thing being 30, that's really good for 6 DLC.
User avatar
#18 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
no, its not an opinion thing
i really got the feeling fallout 4 tried to copy some things from witcher and failed
like giving you the illusion that your choice matters. it doesnt. in witch.er , every decision you make at certain points affects the outcome of the game, and it doest tell you where. in fallout, this is basically given to you depending on what faction you join
witcher story blows fallout's out of the water. which really isnt hard to do because fo4s story sucked
witcher is self immersed in the witcher lore and fallout4 sorta just gave elder maxon a cameo.
then theres less important game length and graphics which witcher is clearly better and longer
tldr; like i said, every single aspect is better. and there is no way a fallout dlc is worth more than a witcher dlc
#19 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
But... it actually is a complete opinion.
While I haven't played the third witcher, and thus can't speak for it, I've played the first two, and definitely prefer the gameplay of any of the fallout games, including the fourth one. I just find them more enjoyable. I prefer the combat, I prefer the stories, and I prefer the atmosphere of it all.

I'm not quite sure how one could think that enjoyment of a game is actually not an opinion.
User avatar
#20 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
its game mechanics and fact stuff. opinion would be whether you think gameplay is better or not
story and overall betterness is objective
#21 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Story is certainly not objective. There are a great deal of aspects which can influence your enjoyment of a story- relatability, personal genre preference, detail fixation, lore preferences, impact on the story, how in depth the story is, how frequently you play, and other things that I don't really feel like thinking of. Point is that there's a lot that can influence how a person feels about a game's story, and it certainly is by no means objective.
As for overall betterness, that's once again subjective- that's composed of enjoyment of story, mechanics, graphics, play-style, replayability, atmosphere, and other aspects of a game.

There's no way you can say one game is better than the other- it's all personal preference.
You can definitively say that one game has higher quality graphics than the other, that one game has a longer duration of content than the other, or that one game has better ratings- but those things do not form the quality of a game as a whole
User avatar
#22 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and fallout had none of it. story was shit. witcher story was godly. its not even a question
#23 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
I'm not sure why you feel your opinion is the only right one.

Fallout had a story that could be called really good- based on the list of things I mentioned- in that it:
Could be easily relatable to some people- the search for a family member, the ideas of what makes a human human, and trying to find a place with a group could all be very relatable.
Personal genre preference is something I'm not sure how you could argue fallout had none of it. It has a pretty distinct science fiction feeling to it.
Detail fixation could be a case of someone not caring too much for games with a larger amount of details- whether it's because they don't want to have to keep up with too much, or perhaps they simply don't play very often
Lore is also something I'm not sure you could argue fallout had none of it- granted, the lore of the newer games is a bit contradictory to the lore of the older games, but it certainly does have lore behind it, and one could simply prefer the lore of fallout to the lore of witcher.
For impact on story, you have a pretty decent impact on the story. Of the factions, you determine which of them gets to succeed, and the fate of Boston as a whole. That could very well be enough for some people.
In depth of story relates back to detail fixation- some people may prefer less depth.
How frequently you play is something that once again, I can't say how you could argue fallout had none of it, since this isn't really something related to the game itself but the person. I feel like you didn't really read it.

As for the overall betterness section, let's go into that like I did with story.
Enjoyment of the story is complete preference. I found the story for Fallout 4 to be really enjoyable as I really like the ideas of synthetic humans, themes of humanity as a whole, whether or not genocide can be justified, science fiction, and an apocalypse. Thus, for me Fallout 4 has a very enjoyable story.
With mechanics, one thing that really stands out are the power armor mechanics- it did feel like it was supposed to, which is the wearer being a walking tank. The fusion cores, lack of fall damage, incredible defense, and newer tech all felt really cool compared to the power armor of the previous games. Customization was also fun- with weapons, armor, and towns alike.
For playstyle, fallout fit me better than either of the witcher games I played- they tended to be much slower and more constricted, whereas fallout is a lot more of a sandbox and seems to get really quick in some of the areas.
I find the graphics of fallout to be nice- it doesn't feel very real, but it still looks good. I enjoy my games like that.
Fallout has great replayability with the different factions and fighting styles.
The run-down atmosphere of fallout is something I find exciting.

That's not to say that the witcher series is bad, but personal preference can result in somebody preferring one game to another.


Also, something I didn't mention previously, is modding. Modding can add whole new aspects and stories to games, sometimes adding DLC sized content as was the case with fallout 3 and NV. Fallout lends itself much better to these than witcher does, and that can add to replayability and enjoyment as well.
User avatar
#24 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
modding isnt part of the game.
#25 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Good to see that out of that whole thing, you commented one one small aspect of it.

And for whether or not it's part of the game, it's irrelevant- certain games lend themselves better to modding than others, and that can add enjoyment of a game.
User avatar
#26 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
well i wasnt going to read all that
#9 - he can be both people spend money on that kardashian game  [+] (16 new replies) 05/22/2016 on Found this in Far Harbor 0
#10 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
True, it's definitely possible to be both, but simply spending money on something he believes he'll enjoy- as opposed to holding off a few months (assuming months- I don't really know how long it tends to take for prices to start to drop off) for it to be cheaper does not make him stupid.
User avatar
#11 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
its fallout
being more expensive than witcher
huge red flags
#13 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
The dude may just really enjoy fallout- having different tastes doesn't make his actions stupid.
Also, he could have gotten the season pass earlier on. Wasn't it like 20 bucks some time ago?
User avatar
#14 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
yes and even then far harbor was still more expensive than Blood and Wine
#15 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
But I mean, 20 bucks for 6 DLC is pretty reasonable. I think I remember that bethesda said at least one of the unreleased ones is a story one, so that's at least two decently sized DLC plus 4 or so smaller DLC for 20 bucks. That's a pretty good deal.
I don't really know the size of Blood and Wine, so I can't comment on it.
User avatar
#16 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
wait no ull thing was 30, far harbor was 20
blood and wine was fucking huge, basically adding an entire previously unsearchable area of map equal to about a third of the mainland map, and was only $15. and also its witcher.
ive played both. i can honestly say witcher is far better in every single way, with the exception of roleplaying, which even then is only based on the nature of the games, and fallout 4 still failed here for anything other than mercenary
#17 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Witcher being better in every single way is really just an opinion thing. Maybe he doesn't much care for Witcher.

But even with the full thing being 30, that's really good for 6 DLC.
User avatar
#18 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
no, its not an opinion thing
i really got the feeling fallout 4 tried to copy some things from witcher and failed
like giving you the illusion that your choice matters. it doesnt. in witch.er , every decision you make at certain points affects the outcome of the game, and it doest tell you where. in fallout, this is basically given to you depending on what faction you join
witcher story blows fallout's out of the water. which really isnt hard to do because fo4s story sucked
witcher is self immersed in the witcher lore and fallout4 sorta just gave elder maxon a cameo.
then theres less important game length and graphics which witcher is clearly better and longer
tldr; like i said, every single aspect is better. and there is no way a fallout dlc is worth more than a witcher dlc
#19 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
But... it actually is a complete opinion.
While I haven't played the third witcher, and thus can't speak for it, I've played the first two, and definitely prefer the gameplay of any of the fallout games, including the fourth one. I just find them more enjoyable. I prefer the combat, I prefer the stories, and I prefer the atmosphere of it all.

I'm not quite sure how one could think that enjoyment of a game is actually not an opinion.
User avatar
#20 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
its game mechanics and fact stuff. opinion would be whether you think gameplay is better or not
story and overall betterness is objective
#21 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Story is certainly not objective. There are a great deal of aspects which can influence your enjoyment of a story- relatability, personal genre preference, detail fixation, lore preferences, impact on the story, how in depth the story is, how frequently you play, and other things that I don't really feel like thinking of. Point is that there's a lot that can influence how a person feels about a game's story, and it certainly is by no means objective.
As for overall betterness, that's once again subjective- that's composed of enjoyment of story, mechanics, graphics, play-style, replayability, atmosphere, and other aspects of a game.

There's no way you can say one game is better than the other- it's all personal preference.
You can definitively say that one game has higher quality graphics than the other, that one game has a longer duration of content than the other, or that one game has better ratings- but those things do not form the quality of a game as a whole
User avatar
#22 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and fallout had none of it. story was shit. witcher story was godly. its not even a question
#23 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
I'm not sure why you feel your opinion is the only right one.

Fallout had a story that could be called really good- based on the list of things I mentioned- in that it:
Could be easily relatable to some people- the search for a family member, the ideas of what makes a human human, and trying to find a place with a group could all be very relatable.
Personal genre preference is something I'm not sure how you could argue fallout had none of it. It has a pretty distinct science fiction feeling to it.
Detail fixation could be a case of someone not caring too much for games with a larger amount of details- whether it's because they don't want to have to keep up with too much, or perhaps they simply don't play very often
Lore is also something I'm not sure you could argue fallout had none of it- granted, the lore of the newer games is a bit contradictory to the lore of the older games, but it certainly does have lore behind it, and one could simply prefer the lore of fallout to the lore of witcher.
For impact on story, you have a pretty decent impact on the story. Of the factions, you determine which of them gets to succeed, and the fate of Boston as a whole. That could very well be enough for some people.
In depth of story relates back to detail fixation- some people may prefer less depth.
How frequently you play is something that once again, I can't say how you could argue fallout had none of it, since this isn't really something related to the game itself but the person. I feel like you didn't really read it.

As for the overall betterness section, let's go into that like I did with story.
Enjoyment of the story is complete preference. I found the story for Fallout 4 to be really enjoyable as I really like the ideas of synthetic humans, themes of humanity as a whole, whether or not genocide can be justified, science fiction, and an apocalypse. Thus, for me Fallout 4 has a very enjoyable story.
With mechanics, one thing that really stands out are the power armor mechanics- it did feel like it was supposed to, which is the wearer being a walking tank. The fusion cores, lack of fall damage, incredible defense, and newer tech all felt really cool compared to the power armor of the previous games. Customization was also fun- with weapons, armor, and towns alike.
For playstyle, fallout fit me better than either of the witcher games I played- they tended to be much slower and more constricted, whereas fallout is a lot more of a sandbox and seems to get really quick in some of the areas.
I find the graphics of fallout to be nice- it doesn't feel very real, but it still looks good. I enjoy my games like that.
Fallout has great replayability with the different factions and fighting styles.
The run-down atmosphere of fallout is something I find exciting.

That's not to say that the witcher series is bad, but personal preference can result in somebody preferring one game to another.


Also, something I didn't mention previously, is modding. Modding can add whole new aspects and stories to games, sometimes adding DLC sized content as was the case with fallout 3 and NV. Fallout lends itself much better to these than witcher does, and that can add to replayability and enjoyment as well.
User avatar
#24 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
modding isnt part of the game.
#25 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Good to see that out of that whole thing, you commented one one small aspect of it.

And for whether or not it's part of the game, it's irrelevant- certain games lend themselves better to modding than others, and that can add enjoyment of a game.
User avatar
#26 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
well i wasnt going to read all that
#1321310 - Oh **** Nick Menza died ****** 2016, man  [+] (2 new replies) 05/22/2016 on Pony Thread 15. 0
User avatar
#1321348 - Princess Celestia (05/22/2016) [-]
collapsing on stage? oh fuck
User avatar
#1321313 - zependium (05/22/2016) [-]
May he rust in peace
#7 - That means he grew up stupid. Poor guy  [+] (18 new replies) 05/22/2016 on Found this in Far Harbor 0
#8 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Or he has money to spend on what he wants.
You're pretty judgemental for someone who spends his time on funnyjunk
User avatar
#9 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
he can be both
people spend money on that kardashian game
#10 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
True, it's definitely possible to be both, but simply spending money on something he believes he'll enjoy- as opposed to holding off a few months (assuming months- I don't really know how long it tends to take for prices to start to drop off) for it to be cheaper does not make him stupid.
User avatar
#11 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
its fallout
being more expensive than witcher
huge red flags
#13 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
The dude may just really enjoy fallout- having different tastes doesn't make his actions stupid.
Also, he could have gotten the season pass earlier on. Wasn't it like 20 bucks some time ago?
User avatar
#14 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
yes and even then far harbor was still more expensive than Blood and Wine
#15 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
But I mean, 20 bucks for 6 DLC is pretty reasonable. I think I remember that bethesda said at least one of the unreleased ones is a story one, so that's at least two decently sized DLC plus 4 or so smaller DLC for 20 bucks. That's a pretty good deal.
I don't really know the size of Blood and Wine, so I can't comment on it.
User avatar
#16 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
wait no ull thing was 30, far harbor was 20
blood and wine was fucking huge, basically adding an entire previously unsearchable area of map equal to about a third of the mainland map, and was only $15. and also its witcher.
ive played both. i can honestly say witcher is far better in every single way, with the exception of roleplaying, which even then is only based on the nature of the games, and fallout 4 still failed here for anything other than mercenary
#17 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Witcher being better in every single way is really just an opinion thing. Maybe he doesn't much care for Witcher.

But even with the full thing being 30, that's really good for 6 DLC.
User avatar
#18 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
no, its not an opinion thing
i really got the feeling fallout 4 tried to copy some things from witcher and failed
like giving you the illusion that your choice matters. it doesnt. in witch.er , every decision you make at certain points affects the outcome of the game, and it doest tell you where. in fallout, this is basically given to you depending on what faction you join
witcher story blows fallout's out of the water. which really isnt hard to do because fo4s story sucked
witcher is self immersed in the witcher lore and fallout4 sorta just gave elder maxon a cameo.
then theres less important game length and graphics which witcher is clearly better and longer
tldr; like i said, every single aspect is better. and there is no way a fallout dlc is worth more than a witcher dlc
#19 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
But... it actually is a complete opinion.
While I haven't played the third witcher, and thus can't speak for it, I've played the first two, and definitely prefer the gameplay of any of the fallout games, including the fourth one. I just find them more enjoyable. I prefer the combat, I prefer the stories, and I prefer the atmosphere of it all.

I'm not quite sure how one could think that enjoyment of a game is actually not an opinion.
User avatar
#20 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
its game mechanics and fact stuff. opinion would be whether you think gameplay is better or not
story and overall betterness is objective
#21 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Story is certainly not objective. There are a great deal of aspects which can influence your enjoyment of a story- relatability, personal genre preference, detail fixation, lore preferences, impact on the story, how in depth the story is, how frequently you play, and other things that I don't really feel like thinking of. Point is that there's a lot that can influence how a person feels about a game's story, and it certainly is by no means objective.
As for overall betterness, that's once again subjective- that's composed of enjoyment of story, mechanics, graphics, play-style, replayability, atmosphere, and other aspects of a game.

There's no way you can say one game is better than the other- it's all personal preference.
You can definitively say that one game has higher quality graphics than the other, that one game has a longer duration of content than the other, or that one game has better ratings- but those things do not form the quality of a game as a whole
User avatar
#22 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and fallout had none of it. story was shit. witcher story was godly. its not even a question
#23 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
I'm not sure why you feel your opinion is the only right one.

Fallout had a story that could be called really good- based on the list of things I mentioned- in that it:
Could be easily relatable to some people- the search for a family member, the ideas of what makes a human human, and trying to find a place with a group could all be very relatable.
Personal genre preference is something I'm not sure how you could argue fallout had none of it. It has a pretty distinct science fiction feeling to it.
Detail fixation could be a case of someone not caring too much for games with a larger amount of details- whether it's because they don't want to have to keep up with too much, or perhaps they simply don't play very often
Lore is also something I'm not sure you could argue fallout had none of it- granted, the lore of the newer games is a bit contradictory to the lore of the older games, but it certainly does have lore behind it, and one could simply prefer the lore of fallout to the lore of witcher.
For impact on story, you have a pretty decent impact on the story. Of the factions, you determine which of them gets to succeed, and the fate of Boston as a whole. That could very well be enough for some people.
In depth of story relates back to detail fixation- some people may prefer less depth.
How frequently you play is something that once again, I can't say how you could argue fallout had none of it, since this isn't really something related to the game itself but the person. I feel like you didn't really read it.

As for the overall betterness section, let's go into that like I did with story.
Enjoyment of the story is complete preference. I found the story for Fallout 4 to be really enjoyable as I really like the ideas of synthetic humans, themes of humanity as a whole, whether or not genocide can be justified, science fiction, and an apocalypse. Thus, for me Fallout 4 has a very enjoyable story.
With mechanics, one thing that really stands out are the power armor mechanics- it did feel like it was supposed to, which is the wearer being a walking tank. The fusion cores, lack of fall damage, incredible defense, and newer tech all felt really cool compared to the power armor of the previous games. Customization was also fun- with weapons, armor, and towns alike.
For playstyle, fallout fit me better than either of the witcher games I played- they tended to be much slower and more constricted, whereas fallout is a lot more of a sandbox and seems to get really quick in some of the areas.
I find the graphics of fallout to be nice- it doesn't feel very real, but it still looks good. I enjoy my games like that.
Fallout has great replayability with the different factions and fighting styles.
The run-down atmosphere of fallout is something I find exciting.

That's not to say that the witcher series is bad, but personal preference can result in somebody preferring one game to another.


Also, something I didn't mention previously, is modding. Modding can add whole new aspects and stories to games, sometimes adding DLC sized content as was the case with fallout 3 and NV. Fallout lends itself much better to these than witcher does, and that can add to replayability and enjoyment as well.
User avatar
#24 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
modding isnt part of the game.
#25 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Good to see that out of that whole thing, you commented one one small aspect of it.

And for whether or not it's part of the game, it's irrelevant- certain games lend themselves better to modding than others, and that can add enjoyment of a game.
User avatar
#26 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
well i wasnt going to read all that
#1321308 - Lol kingbradleylover deleted my comment and blocked me from hi… 05/22/2016 on Pony Thread 15. 0
#7 - And I'm not cutting my hair **** off 05/22/2016 on /fit/ gets real -5
#6 - No **** lifting Lifting is for faggots  [+] (26 new replies) 05/22/2016 on /fit/ gets real -6
User avatar
#16 - biscuitsunited (05/22/2016) [-]
No haircut and no lifting? Because 'its for faggots'?

You're the worst kind of person, the kind that complains about a problem, sees a solution but thinks its below their dignity.

Remember to write your mum a note as to why you wasted her bleach on something worthless instead of cleaning the toilet.

User avatar
#19 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
lifting is for faggots
no haircut because i have godly long hair
User avatar
#23 - biscuitsunited (05/22/2016) [-]
Godly long hair?
Most girls, fuck most people, think long hair is pretty disgusting on a guy
It doesnt matter what metalheads think.
Look you want pussy? stop being an absolute dick about it, here is a solution, take it or leave it.
User avatar
#24 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
i am metalhead, and my hair is amazing. ive been told so by so many people including random strangers who walk up to me and comment on it
lol fuck your ugly ass having to settle for short hair
User avatar
#62 - rockamekishiko (05/22/2016) [-]
i'm kinda glad you're not reproducing, actually.
User avatar
#63 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
[no correlation intensifies]
User avatar
#67 - biscuitsunited (05/23/2016) [-]
This entire conversation started as girl advice
Considering you're being an arsehole the corrrelation off the fucking charts
User avatar
#68 - Deavas (05/23/2016) [-]
i dont think i want to legit take girl advice from people on here
User avatar
#69 - biscuitsunited (05/23/2016) [-]
Considering you're on here its pretty evident you need girl advice
User avatar
#70 - Deavas (05/23/2016) [-]
Then the same could be said for every single person on here and therefore my point still stands
User avatar
#13 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Lol fuck off skinnyfat or regular fat. Lifting is the best thing ever.
User avatar
#14 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
haha lol no uck physical activity im a musician
User avatar
#33 - yatush (05/22/2016) [-]
So if you're a musician you can't have time for improving the looks of your body? I'd be glad to consider myself one and I still workout a few times a week and run almost every evening.
User avatar
#36 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
no i mostly just say that as a joke because musicians and physical activity dont mix but in all srsns fuck lifting
User avatar
#17 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Lol stop with the excuses. Lifting is for everyone. Just inagine walking around and being a fucking alpha. Being able to tell people you bench 305.
User avatar
#18 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
short muscular guys are fucking faggots
User avatar
#21 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Lolno. Im not even short and i know thats not true.
User avatar
#22 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
yes it is
i always see those guys who are even shorter than me who think they can validate themselves by lifting and they just look retarded
i will never stoop that low
User avatar
#25 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Then you are seeing some different people than me.
User avatar
#27 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
because youre a liftfag
User avatar
#29 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Is there really any problem with someone improving themseld physically
User avatar
#31 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
course not
but being a gymrat and changing your entire physique for some dumbass aesthetic is retarded
User avatar
#32 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
It doesnt matter if they want to lift for aesthetics. They are lifting and improving themselfs.
User avatar
#34 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and looking and acting like douchetastic faglords
i dont just say this from afar, i lived with these people in college in my room and surrounding dorm. im well aware of the life
User avatar
#41 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Hey all im saying is ive never encountered these types of people. The only douchebag asshole lifters ive seen are the older guys who lift.
User avatar
#10 - fluffypain (05/22/2016) [-]
well, looks like you're set on suicide
good luck
#1321145 - Do you think if I sent Gaben a letter asking for dark souls 2 …  [+] (2 new replies) 05/22/2016 on Pony Thread 15. 0
User avatar
#1321154 - thisiskevinhanian (05/22/2016) [-]
I think if you sent a letter to fromsoft, they might talk to gaben about it and it might happen. just don't across as a katana weilding weeaboo
User avatar
#1321152 - ironmercenary (05/22/2016) [-]
Probably not.
#30 - **Deavas rolled user ihateeveryhing ** plopdumps and wagglesacks  [+] (1 new reply) 05/22/2016 on Your memes suck 0
User avatar
#34 - ihateeveryhing (05/22/2016) [-]
Gays and traps
#3 - **** being 5'6 too short for like half of all girls a…  [+] (50 new replies) 05/22/2016 on /fit/ gets real +4
#65 - anon (05/22/2016) [-]
admin is that you?
User avatar
#45 - xsirwafflezx (05/22/2016) [-]
So what are you looking for, exactly?
a 5'6 long haired metalhead narrows your range quite significantly.
I have a friend who is also a long-haired metalhead, he has a wonderful girlfriend, however he's 6 1/2 feet tall.
User avatar
#48 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
im a metalhead but i give off a totally stoner vibe. nobody knows until they actually know me
User avatar
#52 - xsirwafflezx (05/22/2016) [-]
Are you a stoner, or are you just really laid-back?
#54 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
yes i just look like one and am really goofy
User avatar
#56 - xsirwafflezx (05/22/2016) [-]
I can see
I'm hoping this superiority complex you have shown to other users is confined to this site? That may be a problem in the real world.
User avatar
#58 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
its an act. for fum
where else in the world can i act like this and get away with it
User avatar
#59 - xsirwafflezx (05/22/2016) [-]
Depends what you mean by 'get away with it'
but yeah that stoner vibe is gonna get you stoner vibe people
However just being you and going to events and whatnot will eventually land you a female, its how my uncle did it, it's how my friend did it, and it may be how you'll do it.
Wear mini-stilts or something idk
User avatar
#60 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
it means there are no repercussions
User avatar
#35 - thechosentroll (05/22/2016) [-]
Do it. Not because you're short, just because you're you.
User avatar
#37 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
but being me is the greatest gift to humanity
User avatar
#38 - thechosentroll (05/22/2016) [-]
Wow, no wonder we're doomed.
#40 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
**Deavas used "*roll picture*"**
**Deavas rolled image**
User avatar
#26 - nustix (05/22/2016) [-]
If being short is the reason for you to contemplate suicide you have a pretty easy life you asshole.
User avatar
#28 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
its not
but everything is a reason to contemplate suicide
#20 - rererererere (05/22/2016) [-]
you want girls, manlet?

get fcking rich
#11 - ponchies (05/22/2016) [-]
I'd consider that a gift.
With that height, you're bitch repellent.
You have a better chance of flattering and being with a more genuine and nicer lady.
Also you're less likely to have terrible back or knee pain as you grow older.

pic only related depending on how you think it'll work for this comment
User avatar
#4 - biscuitsunited (05/22/2016) [-]
Listen here fuckwit, being tall only helps the goodlooking, a lanky fuck is ugly and a tall fat fuck is also ugly
You want girls?
Start fucking lifting
Get a fucking decent haircut, like a 5 on the sides and a nice amount on the top
Buy a new outfit, a trendy one, and more than one
Develop normie faginterests
Basic hygine, even more grooming, fucking do something about your achne
Pussy has just arrived at your doorstep

#12 - raunchyftw (05/22/2016) [-]
That's a simple yet effective HOW TO on grills
User avatar
#7 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
And I'm not cutting my hair
Fuck off
User avatar
#6 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
No fuck lifting
Lifting is for faggots
User avatar
#16 - biscuitsunited (05/22/2016) [-]
No haircut and no lifting? Because 'its for faggots'?

You're the worst kind of person, the kind that complains about a problem, sees a solution but thinks its below their dignity.

Remember to write your mum a note as to why you wasted her bleach on something worthless instead of cleaning the toilet.

User avatar
#19 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
lifting is for faggots
no haircut because i have godly long hair
User avatar
#23 - biscuitsunited (05/22/2016) [-]
Godly long hair?
Most girls, fuck most people, think long hair is pretty disgusting on a guy
It doesnt matter what metalheads think.
Look you want pussy? stop being an absolute dick about it, here is a solution, take it or leave it.
User avatar
#24 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
i am metalhead, and my hair is amazing. ive been told so by so many people including random strangers who walk up to me and comment on it
lol fuck your ugly ass having to settle for short hair
User avatar
#62 - rockamekishiko (05/22/2016) [-]
i'm kinda glad you're not reproducing, actually.
User avatar
#63 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
[no correlation intensifies]
User avatar
#67 - biscuitsunited (05/23/2016) [-]
This entire conversation started as girl advice
Considering you're being an arsehole the corrrelation off the fucking charts
User avatar
#68 - Deavas (05/23/2016) [-]
i dont think i want to legit take girl advice from people on here
User avatar
#69 - biscuitsunited (05/23/2016) [-]
Considering you're on here its pretty evident you need girl advice
User avatar
#70 - Deavas (05/23/2016) [-]
Then the same could be said for every single person on here and therefore my point still stands
User avatar
#13 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Lol fuck off skinnyfat or regular fat. Lifting is the best thing ever.
User avatar
#14 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
haha lol no uck physical activity im a musician
User avatar
#33 - yatush (05/22/2016) [-]
So if you're a musician you can't have time for improving the looks of your body? I'd be glad to consider myself one and I still workout a few times a week and run almost every evening.
User avatar
#36 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
no i mostly just say that as a joke because musicians and physical activity dont mix but in all srsns fuck lifting
User avatar
#17 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Lol stop with the excuses. Lifting is for everyone. Just inagine walking around and being a fucking alpha. Being able to tell people you bench 305.
User avatar
#18 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
short muscular guys are fucking faggots
User avatar
#21 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Lolno. Im not even short and i know thats not true.
User avatar
#22 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
yes it is
i always see those guys who are even shorter than me who think they can validate themselves by lifting and they just look retarded
i will never stoop that low
User avatar
#25 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Then you are seeing some different people than me.
User avatar
#27 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
because youre a liftfag
User avatar
#29 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Is there really any problem with someone improving themseld physically
User avatar
#31 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
course not
but being a gymrat and changing your entire physique for some dumbass aesthetic is retarded
User avatar
#32 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
It doesnt matter if they want to lift for aesthetics. They are lifting and improving themselfs.
User avatar
#34 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and looking and acting like douchetastic faglords
i dont just say this from afar, i lived with these people in college in my room and surrounding dorm. im well aware of the life
User avatar
#41 - thejusticar (05/22/2016) [-]
Hey all im saying is ive never encountered these types of people. The only douchebag asshole lifters ive seen are the older guys who lift.
User avatar
#10 - fluffypain (05/22/2016) [-]
well, looks like you're set on suicide
good luck
User avatar
#5 - etfhan (05/22/2016) [-]
One thing everyone forgets is how to make the move. Wait too long and overthink things, and she'll lose interest and find someone else. Even a few minutes can make a huge difference.

btw if anyone has any tips on this, I need them cuz that's my biggest problem. Waiting too long to do something.
#51 - xsirwafflezx (05/22/2016) [-]
Don't do what I did and let your schoolfriends see you making moves.
They'll tell everyone and make it really awkward.
User avatar
#66 - etfhan (05/23/2016) [-]
Being young is tough man. Not only do you have to worry about parents, but also about your peers. It gets a lot easier with age; no one cares much about what you do as long as it's legal and not too out there .
#5 - lol "he ded" sure yeah but thats a fish. in afri…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/22/2016 on Lovely day for a nice... +2
User avatar
#8 - teratorn (05/22/2016) [-]
holy fug
#6 - dont those drain your health  [+] (3 new replies) 05/22/2016 on Ds3 secret covenant 0
#9 - AnimalsConscience (05/22/2016) [-]
They do, I know that much, but if you watch his health bar it looks like it drops and then refills. Must have passive regen of some manner.
User avatar
#16 - naiqu (05/22/2016) [-]
Probably wearing pontiff's left eye ring
User avatar
#64 - xanzaroth (05/23/2016) [-]
He's using one of the health regen miracles, at the end on the stat screen you can see it, and on the equip screen you can see his chime, probably Bountiful Sunlight or the like.
#5 - i will not take coke or pepsi dr pepper master race and in… 05/22/2016 on Analogies 0
#2 - PARASITES SWIMMIN UP YO DIIIIIIIIICK  [+] (4 new replies) 05/22/2016 on Lovely day for a nice... +18
User avatar
#7 - electrickwalrus (05/22/2016) [-]
gotta wear a condom going in there
User avatar
#5 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
lol "he ded"
sure yeah but thats a fish. in africa theres smaller parasites that swim up there and lay eggs n shit
User avatar
#8 - teratorn (05/22/2016) [-]
holy fug
#4 - HAHAH you paid more money for this than the entire witcher 3 d…  [+] (28 new replies) 05/22/2016 on Found this in Far Harbor -5
#27 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
commenting on this one because the last comment chain ran out of room

If you're going to take a list of things, and say that all of them are absent, I'm going to comment on each one. It's just how it works.
But, to boil it down for someone like you, it comes to this- all of the listed aspects are related to personal preference, some more than others. These preferences can result in viewing one game as better or worse than the other.
User avatar
#28 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
i already said every aspect of witcher 3 is objectively better than fallout 4, what more do you want
#29 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
See, here's the thing- I went into detail on every aspect, and why one could view them as better in fallout than in witcher, but you're too lazy to actually read it.
User avatar
#30 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
i already commented about those things tho
#31 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
No... you didn't. You made a blanket statement and refused to read the counterargument.
You're so cemented with your mindset that you don't even want to view anything which may contradict it.
User avatar
#32 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
i havent read anything youve posted in the last couple things i sorta dipped out a while ago to fill out job aps lol
#33 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
lol
Well, good luck with your job apps then
#12 - anon (05/22/2016) [-]
Yah but then i had to play Witcher 3.
#5 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
What if he, and hear me out here
what if he has the ability as a free adult to use his money as he pleases
User avatar
#7 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
That means he grew up stupid. Poor guy
#8 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Or he has money to spend on what he wants.
You're pretty judgemental for someone who spends his time on funnyjunk
User avatar
#9 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
he can be both
people spend money on that kardashian game
#10 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
True, it's definitely possible to be both, but simply spending money on something he believes he'll enjoy- as opposed to holding off a few months (assuming months- I don't really know how long it tends to take for prices to start to drop off) for it to be cheaper does not make him stupid.
User avatar
#11 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
its fallout
being more expensive than witcher
huge red flags
#13 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
The dude may just really enjoy fallout- having different tastes doesn't make his actions stupid.
Also, he could have gotten the season pass earlier on. Wasn't it like 20 bucks some time ago?
User avatar
#14 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
yes and even then far harbor was still more expensive than Blood and Wine
#15 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
But I mean, 20 bucks for 6 DLC is pretty reasonable. I think I remember that bethesda said at least one of the unreleased ones is a story one, so that's at least two decently sized DLC plus 4 or so smaller DLC for 20 bucks. That's a pretty good deal.
I don't really know the size of Blood and Wine, so I can't comment on it.
User avatar
#16 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
wait no ull thing was 30, far harbor was 20
blood and wine was fucking huge, basically adding an entire previously unsearchable area of map equal to about a third of the mainland map, and was only $15. and also its witcher.
ive played both. i can honestly say witcher is far better in every single way, with the exception of roleplaying, which even then is only based on the nature of the games, and fallout 4 still failed here for anything other than mercenary
#17 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Witcher being better in every single way is really just an opinion thing. Maybe he doesn't much care for Witcher.

But even with the full thing being 30, that's really good for 6 DLC.
User avatar
#18 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
no, its not an opinion thing
i really got the feeling fallout 4 tried to copy some things from witcher and failed
like giving you the illusion that your choice matters. it doesnt. in witch.er , every decision you make at certain points affects the outcome of the game, and it doest tell you where. in fallout, this is basically given to you depending on what faction you join
witcher story blows fallout's out of the water. which really isnt hard to do because fo4s story sucked
witcher is self immersed in the witcher lore and fallout4 sorta just gave elder maxon a cameo.
then theres less important game length and graphics which witcher is clearly better and longer
tldr; like i said, every single aspect is better. and there is no way a fallout dlc is worth more than a witcher dlc
#19 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
But... it actually is a complete opinion.
While I haven't played the third witcher, and thus can't speak for it, I've played the first two, and definitely prefer the gameplay of any of the fallout games, including the fourth one. I just find them more enjoyable. I prefer the combat, I prefer the stories, and I prefer the atmosphere of it all.

I'm not quite sure how one could think that enjoyment of a game is actually not an opinion.
User avatar
#20 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
its game mechanics and fact stuff. opinion would be whether you think gameplay is better or not
story and overall betterness is objective
#21 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Story is certainly not objective. There are a great deal of aspects which can influence your enjoyment of a story- relatability, personal genre preference, detail fixation, lore preferences, impact on the story, how in depth the story is, how frequently you play, and other things that I don't really feel like thinking of. Point is that there's a lot that can influence how a person feels about a game's story, and it certainly is by no means objective.
As for overall betterness, that's once again subjective- that's composed of enjoyment of story, mechanics, graphics, play-style, replayability, atmosphere, and other aspects of a game.

There's no way you can say one game is better than the other- it's all personal preference.
You can definitively say that one game has higher quality graphics than the other, that one game has a longer duration of content than the other, or that one game has better ratings- but those things do not form the quality of a game as a whole
User avatar
#22 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
and fallout had none of it. story was shit. witcher story was godly. its not even a question
#23 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
I'm not sure why you feel your opinion is the only right one.

Fallout had a story that could be called really good- based on the list of things I mentioned- in that it:
Could be easily relatable to some people- the search for a family member, the ideas of what makes a human human, and trying to find a place with a group could all be very relatable.
Personal genre preference is something I'm not sure how you could argue fallout had none of it. It has a pretty distinct science fiction feeling to it.
Detail fixation could be a case of someone not caring too much for games with a larger amount of details- whether it's because they don't want to have to keep up with too much, or perhaps they simply don't play very often
Lore is also something I'm not sure you could argue fallout had none of it- granted, the lore of the newer games is a bit contradictory to the lore of the older games, but it certainly does have lore behind it, and one could simply prefer the lore of fallout to the lore of witcher.
For impact on story, you have a pretty decent impact on the story. Of the factions, you determine which of them gets to succeed, and the fate of Boston as a whole. That could very well be enough for some people.
In depth of story relates back to detail fixation- some people may prefer less depth.
How frequently you play is something that once again, I can't say how you could argue fallout had none of it, since this isn't really something related to the game itself but the person. I feel like you didn't really read it.

As for the overall betterness section, let's go into that like I did with story.
Enjoyment of the story is complete preference. I found the story for Fallout 4 to be really enjoyable as I really like the ideas of synthetic humans, themes of humanity as a whole, whether or not genocide can be justified, science fiction, and an apocalypse. Thus, for me Fallout 4 has a very enjoyable story.
With mechanics, one thing that really stands out are the power armor mechanics- it did feel like it was supposed to, which is the wearer being a walking tank. The fusion cores, lack of fall damage, incredible defense, and newer tech all felt really cool compared to the power armor of the previous games. Customization was also fun- with weapons, armor, and towns alike.
For playstyle, fallout fit me better than either of the witcher games I played- they tended to be much slower and more constricted, whereas fallout is a lot more of a sandbox and seems to get really quick in some of the areas.
I find the graphics of fallout to be nice- it doesn't feel very real, but it still looks good. I enjoy my games like that.
Fallout has great replayability with the different factions and fighting styles.
The run-down atmosphere of fallout is something I find exciting.

That's not to say that the witcher series is bad, but personal preference can result in somebody preferring one game to another.


Also, something I didn't mention previously, is modding. Modding can add whole new aspects and stories to games, sometimes adding DLC sized content as was the case with fallout 3 and NV. Fallout lends itself much better to these than witcher does, and that can add to replayability and enjoyment as well.
User avatar
#24 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
modding isnt part of the game.
#25 - steampoweredbot (05/22/2016) [-]
Good to see that out of that whole thing, you commented one one small aspect of it.

And for whether or not it's part of the game, it's irrelevant- certain games lend themselves better to modding than others, and that can add enjoyment of a game.
User avatar
#26 - Deavas (05/22/2016) [-]
well i wasnt going to read all that
#7 - A WIIIIIITCH 05/22/2016 on Just a drop of this magic... +1
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (1663)
[ 1663 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
71 comments displayed.
#1439 - Deavas ONLINE
(05/05/2014) [-]
stickied by Deavas
5/4/2014 - Never Forget
#1999 - twi ONLINE (04/29/2016) [-]
smelly lizard
#2000 to #1999 - Deavas ONLINE (04/30/2016) [-]
I... Guess?
#2001 to #2000 - twi ONLINE (04/30/2016) [-]
leggo my eggo
#1991 - twi ONLINE (04/23/2016) [-]
can I pee on you
#1992 to #1991 - Deavas ONLINE (04/23/2016) [-]
#1993 to #1992 - twi ONLINE (04/23/2016) [-]
is that a yed
#1994 to #1993 - twi ONLINE (04/23/2016) [-]
yes
#1995 to #1994 - Deavas ONLINE (04/24/2016) [-]
GIF
#1996 to #1995 - twi ONLINE (04/24/2016) [-]
please
#1997 to #1996 - Deavas ONLINE (04/24/2016) [-]
GIF
#1998 to #1997 - twi ONLINE (04/24/2016) [-]
please please
#1983 - twi ONLINE (04/09/2016) [-]
accept my friend request you skinny ************
#1984 to #1983 - Deavas ONLINE (04/09/2016) [-]
Yo what
We're already friends aren't we
#1985 to #1984 - twi ONLINE (04/09/2016) [-]
i deleted all my friends on accident, thought i was clicking change password
#1986 to #1985 - Deavas ONLINE (04/09/2016) [-]
Twi omg mot
#1987 to #1986 - twi ONLINE (04/09/2016) [-]
love u deavybun
#1988 to #1987 - Deavas ONLINE (04/09/2016) [-]
Lub u twilikun
#1989 to #1988 - twi ONLINE (04/09/2016) [-]
would you tongue her sweaty butthole
#1990 to #1989 - Deavas ONLINE (04/09/2016) [-]
Nah mang das where poop come from
#1980 - quantumranger (03/26/2016) [-]
I feel bad about calling you a dumbass. I just liked the way it rhymed
#1981 to #1980 - Deavas ONLINE (03/26/2016) [-]
Shut up faggot
And it doesn't rhyme
#1959 - kokanum (03/17/2016) [-]
oh **** I just realized I unfriended you
sorry, bruh
#1960 to #1959 - Deavas ONLINE (03/17/2016) [-]
Bruh
#1961 to #1960 - kokanum (03/17/2016) [-]
how you
#1962 to #1961 - Deavas ONLINE (03/17/2016) [-]
Amgud. Almost spring break. Going home on Friday. Not soon enough though. How's you
#1963 to #1962 - kokanum (03/17/2016) [-]
I forgot, when is it?
#1964 to #1963 - Deavas ONLINE (03/17/2016) [-]
What, spring break? Technically starts Monday but it's a weekend first so I'm skipping classes Friday and just going home
#1965 to #1964 - kokanum (03/17/2016) [-]
Huh alright
Well the long break sounds like a good opportunity.
You have fun plans?
#1966 to #1965 - Deavas ONLINE (03/17/2016) [-]
Well I was planning on getting laid but now I don't know. The bitch is certifiable. I'm pretty sure she's desperate and crazy but she also might be bipolar. It'll get interesting for sure. If she ever texts me back again

But I am applying for Big Brother on Sunday. There's open casting in NYC. Can't actually compete this year but I figured I'd see how far I could get anyway lol
#1967 to #1966 - kokanum (03/17/2016) [-]
Don't do it, crazy bitches aren't **** but ho's n' tricks

Hell yeah, that sound sawesome. If you do make the cut, what if?
#1969 to #1967 - Deavas ONLINE (03/17/2016) [-]
*Yeah but the seck
#1970 to #1969 - kokanum (03/17/2016) [-]
Seck yourself off damn, that sounds like an insult , its way worth it than a crazy girl.

Don't forget what you want to do, make sure you make what you strive for.
#1971 to #1970 - Deavas ONLINE (03/17/2016) [-]
1p games are great but I've played them for years and I'm bored of them. I want a p2.
#1972 to #1971 - kokanum (03/17/2016) [-]
Games are fun to play with nice people, not anyone who spawn kills you when they get the chance.
#1973 to #1972 - Deavas ONLINE (03/17/2016) [-]
Double. D's.
Chubby
Septum piercing
Easy

Worth it
#1974 to #1973 - kokanum (03/17/2016) [-]
Just being sure you won't make a mistake.

Hows schooling going?
#1975 to #1974 - Deavas ONLINE (03/17/2016) [-]
Oh it most definitely is.

Sucky. Failed a physics test today. Got a 14. Needed an 18 for a D. Tfw
#1976 to #1975 - kokanum (03/17/2016) [-]
What kind of physics?
#1977 to #1976 - Deavas ONLINE (03/17/2016) [-]
Like. Physics. Idk. Electronics mostly. Electromagnetism. Waves. ********
#1978 to #1977 - kokanum (03/17/2016) [-]
Ahh
Thats fun ****, I used to do pretty well in physics. Now I'm working with Watts and electronic engineering
Now that ***** hard
#1979 to #1978 - Deavas ONLINE (03/17/2016) [-]
Yes it is. Gj. Doin good at things. Tryin hard. I suck lol.
#1968 to #1967 - Deavas ONLINE (03/17/2016) [-]
Yeah but the deck

Nothing really. If I get accepted after going to NYC they'd let me know some time in April and then I'd have to go to semifinals, probably also in NYC there's a bunch but that's closest to me and then if I made it past that, they'd let me know and send me to LA for finals, but I'd stop there because they pay for you to go to LA and I don't need to waste their time and money like that. If I did make it that far, of just try again next year.
But I have to get on soon before they do another all-star season. I'd like a chance to be eligible for one
#1956 - anon (03/10/2016) [-]
GIF
wassup hoe
#1957 to #1956 - Deavas ONLINE (03/10/2016) [-]
I saw your notification and I thought, ooh I hope it's the black lady gif anon
And it was
Noice
#1958 to #1957 - anon (03/11/2016) [-]
GIF
I'm here hoe, u my boo boo son.

what y'all been doin?
#1947 - anon (03/04/2016) [-]
hey ugly ********, what was your old troll account? if i remove the time limit on negative accounts will you post again on it?
#1949 to #1947 - Deavas ONLINE (03/04/2016) [-]
And also it's banned
#1950 to #1949 - anon (03/05/2016) [-]
link me to it and ill unban
#1951 to #1950 - Deavas ONLINE (03/05/2016) [-]
thumbs first, addy bby
#1952 to #1951 - anon (03/05/2016) [-]
no
#1953 to #1952 - Deavas ONLINE (03/05/2016) [-]
And the same to you then
#1954 to #1953 - PopcornViking (03/06/2016) [-]
admin i think you should ban this guy for noncompliance
#1955 to #1954 - Deavas ONLINE (03/06/2016) [-]
there it is gary
the ***** i dont give
stop stalking me
#1948 to #1947 - Deavas ONLINE (03/04/2016) [-]
No
Because you deleted all the thumbed on that one too
#1944 - twi ONLINE (02/26/2016) [-]
FART BUTT ****** POOP
#1945 to #1944 - Deavas ONLINE (02/26/2016) [-]
Poetry. Such a way with words
#1935 - giffythetoad (02/23/2016) [-]
#1936 to #1935 - Deavas ONLINE (02/23/2016) [-]
#1940 to #1936 - giffythetoad (02/23/2016) [-]
Take it.
Take the toads like you took that plunger.
#1941 to #1940 - Deavas ONLINE (02/23/2016) [-]
it was shopped
#1942 to #1941 - giffythetoad (02/23/2016) [-]
I CAN DREAM!
#1932 - twi ONLINE (02/23/2016) [-]
DEAVY
#1933 to #1932 - Deavas ONLINE (02/23/2016) [-]
YES
#1934 to #1933 - twi ONLINE (02/23/2016) [-]
YOU ARE MY ****
#1937 to #1934 - Deavas ONLINE (02/23/2016) [-]
IMAWOT
#1938 to #1937 - twi ONLINE (02/23/2016) [-]
**twi screeches**
#1939 to #1938 - Deavas ONLINE (02/23/2016) [-]
**Deavas oh **** i forgot we could still do that. or even how to do that**
#1943 to #1939 - twi ONLINE (02/23/2016) [-]
deavykun