Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:1/13/2010
Location:New York
Comment Ranking:#110
Highest Content Rank:#656
Highest Comment Rank:#119
Content Thumbs: 2139 total,  2423 ,  284
Comment Thumbs: 28461 total,  45911 ,  17450
Content Level Progress: 55% (55/100)
Level 113 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 114 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 53.3% (533/1000)
Level 323 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 324 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Content Views:678834
Times Content Favorited:2842 times
Total Comments Made:58064
FJ Points:22129
Favorite Tags: funny (6) | FUNNYJUNK (6) | Long (5) | read (5) | the (5) | worth (5) | admin (4) | Fresh (4) | Life (4) | meme (4) | prince (4) | red (4) | my (3) | Park (3) | Pokemon (3) | roll (3) | south (3) | Stupid (3) | win (3) | Wolf (3)

latest user's comments

#1 - Why do they always ruin it with a last comment  [+] (2 replies) 23 hours ago on Not sure if it's gonna work... +184
User avatar
#10 - thesweetape (8 hours ago) [-]
That's why its always the last comment.
#7 - anon (9 hours ago) [-]
last ditch effort of a save because the chick doesnt respond for 5minutes
#2 - I've been thinking a "scholar of the first sin" vers…  [+] (29 replies) 23 hours ago on git gud havel +69
#31 - anon (5 hours ago) [-]
Too bad DS3 is the last DS.
User avatar
#44 - nathanbiggs (3 hours ago) [-]
That's a good thing, anon. Not a bad thing
User avatar
#41 - hackhazardly (4 hours ago) [-]
I feel you, but I think that it's great.
User avatar
#26 - phantomonkey (10 hours ago) [-]
I'd love to see Dark Souls 1's awesome spiraling, looping level design remade with prettier visuals and a couple tweaks to enemy and item placement. Dark Souls 2 didn't deserve a "remake", and the remake we got was only slightly improved from the original garbage.
User avatar
#50 - mommamadeira (2 hours ago) [-]
Personally I thought the SotFS was quite more than "slightly improved". I thought the visuals at in the SotFS version were awe-inspiring at times, other times pretty dank. I personally preferred the PvP on DS2: SotFS over all others still. The level of shenanigans you could do was so legit. I didn't like the cost for it though, that was bull, at least give a discount on the people who bought DS2, and not 5 fucking percent.
User avatar
#3 - miscreant (23 hours ago) [-]
Isn't that what Prepare to Die was? More content and some changed enemy placements and whatnot.
User avatar
#4 - Deavas (23 hours ago) [-]
They just added the dlc in the base game and maybe added some enemies but sotfs was a total remake of ds2
User avatar
#18 - miscreant (22 hours ago) [-]
I wouldn't say it was a total remake, they really just released the original graphics for the game (it was massively downgraded before release so PS3s and 360s could run it better, and for some reason that was also applied for PC), they moved some enemies around, put the DLCs in the bundle and gave us some more lore along with an alternative ending.
Basically if you owned DS2+DLCs prior to SotFS, what you got in the upgrade was a visual upgrade that should've been there in the first place, some changed enemy placements and an alternative ending (which is, admittedly, great, but not worth the 20 dollar price tag they put on upgrading the bundle).
The only real difference between Scholar and Prepare is the more fleshed out Aldia story.
User avatar
#19 - Deavas (21 hours ago) [-]
Ng+ runs added extra enemies and items and npcs not in regular ds2
User avatar
#5 - magmon (22 hours ago) [-]
That's because DKS2 was shit. DKS doesn't need it because it was not shit.
User avatar
#45 - nathanbiggs (3 hours ago) [-]
>DKS2 was shit

User avatar
#6 - Deavas (22 hours ago) [-]
But apparently it got it anyway because half the game is remade in ds3 anyway
User avatar
#7 - magmon (22 hours ago) [-]
I don't think you've played DKS. What do you want to claim is identical in DKS3?
User avatar
#8 - Deavas (22 hours ago) [-]
Firelink, anor londo, all the famous ds1 items and gear etc
Also you got it backwards
User avatar
#42 - josuke (3 hours ago) [-]
I do agree, the entirety of Dark Souls 3 was all of their previous games in a single one.
I enjoyed Dark Souls 2 a lot more, it tried a lot of new things and they were really fun.
User avatar
#51 - mommamadeira (2 hours ago) [-]
I thought DS2 was alright but I much preferred SotFS version, I would actually have to say it's my favorite of all the games. Though I think I'd like Bloodborne more if I could actually play it. I watched EpinNameBro do a lore play through of the entire thing, it was so cool.
User avatar
#32 - vozel (5 hours ago) [-]
Main differences:

>Firelink Shrine in DS3 looks nothing like the original, it's as if it's named for nostalgia purposes
>Anor Londo is barely even a fucking thing
>DS2 also had gear that was from DS1, and it makes even more sense in DS3 since some of the plot elements from DS1 are tied in

and if I have to add another difference

>PvP is shit and sometimes fun in its own way
User avatar
#9 - magmon (22 hours ago) [-]
Firelink is entirely, 100% different than in the original. I'd argue it's closer to Majula.

Anor Londo is a fucking joke. "Here's like 10% of the castle, guys! Nostalgia? Fuck you!"
User avatar
#11 - Deavas (22 hours ago) [-]
Odds of a 4th ever?
User avatar
#12 - magmon (22 hours ago) [-]
DKS 4? 0%. From Software has said that DKS 3 is the last installment. A little disappointing to me, because I felt that the endings were entirely too vague to end a series on, but no one cares what I think. I'd like to see Bloodborne get a PC release and sequels, though.
User avatar
#25 - asbuff (10 hours ago) [-]
Do keep in mind that both bloodborne and demon's souls are exclusive to playstation, as would be their sequels. So you won't be getting a pc version of bloodborne.
Would love a sequel though.
User avatar
#20 - vigilum (19 hours ago) [-]
Heard something about that being just Myazaki and that we might get another "b-team" Dark Souls

I'd put my faith in a post DLC b-team. those were some nice DLC.
User avatar
#14 - Deavas (22 hours ago) [-]
Odds of Bloodborne 2?
User avatar
#15 - magmon (22 hours ago) [-]
I'd say fairly high. From Software doesn't have a lot of IPs to draw from. While there is certainly potential for new and great games, I find the potential of sequels to highly regarded games more likely in the short to medium term.
User avatar
#16 - Deavas (22 hours ago) [-]
Odds of yet another identical soulsborne game unique in name alone? DeS2
User avatar
#17 - magmon (22 hours ago) [-]
DeS 2 is unlikely in my opinion. They abandoned it in order to learn from its mistakes and create the masterwork that was DKS. It's just been too long now to be relevant. A clone? Possible. I'd be interested to see where they take it though (I'd like to see new environments. Dystopian cyberpunk perhaps?), and I for one would like more concrete story elements. Sure, make us work for them, but I just want one confirmed theory.
User avatar
#33 - vozel (5 hours ago) [-]
I'd like a DeS remake.

What would make it fucking godly is if they use Alex Roe's remixes.
User avatar
#22 - Nihatclodra (17 hours ago) [-]
You know what I want? FROMsoftware making a "Monster Hunter" and "Shadow of the Colossus"-esque game.

Just an Open-world game where you hunt down giant monsters and all that shit.
#10 - Deavas has deleted their comment.
#5 - Ah bummer  [+] (1 reply) 10/22/2016 on In a Perfect World 0
User avatar
#6 - WutsAtroll (10/22/2016) [-]
he gets to "fire" Obama though which could be even better
#1394028 - Well my computer is a ******* brick. Gonna have to total refre…  [+] (2 replies) 10/22/2016 on Pony Thread 15. 0
User avatar
#1394030 - starksbutt (10/22/2016) [-]
Got fucked?
#1394029 - notthefbi (10/22/2016) [-]
To much cp?
#7 - They really haven't said much about Hillary huh  [+] (14 replies) 10/22/2016 on South Park spreading the truth +24
User avatar
#36 - marioslmg (4 hours ago) [-]
It has only been like 5/10 or more episodes. For all you know they are gonne make her become a reptile and leave earth eating KFC. You never know what South park is gonna do.

Do you really think southpark is gonna pick a side on a political sidepoint? And does it really matter that much if they bash more on trump than hillary?
#19 - anon (11 hours ago) [-]
oh look, it's Deavas with his victim complex that has its own gravity well again.
#13 - funkwit (16 hours ago) [-]
User avatar
#24 - Deavas (9 hours ago) [-]
Wow so good. They've had 3 entire episodes dedicated to bashing trump, she's had an entire 2 lines
User avatar
#32 - millennial (5 hours ago) [-]
Trump is simply easier to mock of the two. Don't get me wrong, I'm not shilling for Hilary, but during this entire election cycle Trump has did a lot more "joke" worthy things than she has. Not to say ripping on her wouldn't be easy They could do some jokes about the debates and it set up like Weekend At Bernies, the suicide by gun shot to the back of the head, her flip flopping on her stances, etc. but it's just a lot easier, and there's more "pay off" to poking at Trump.
#29 - anon (6 hours ago) [-]
Quality over quantity. Hillary is just a dry politician, there is not much to go with. Trump is an easy hyperbolic. Whining about joke distribution is like being PC about satire.
South park have never promised to give an equal share of hits, they don't owe you anything.
If you can't handle it, don't watch it.
User avatar
#35 - tevansroskos (4 hours ago) [-]
No, she is not just a dry politician. She has been shown to be one of the most corrupt and disgusting individuals in our government who will gladly serve America to foreign interests on a silver platter for enough money. She is a warmongering liar and it's very sad that South Park isn't picking up on that more.
#8 - anon (23 hours ago) [-]
South Park tends to make fun of both presidential candidates
User avatar
#9 - Deavas (23 hours ago) [-]
Tend to, bit they haven't. All they're done with her is "my opponent is a liar and cannot be trusted"
#10 - anon (19 hours ago) [-]
to be fair they've also painted 'trump' as completely inept
User avatar
#11 - Deavas (19 hours ago) [-]
That's not too be fair, that's just one angle of the many things they've said about him, just like every other media type thing that talks about them
User avatar
#12 - limberlarry (16 hours ago) [-]
South park mocks things that are ridiculous, and of the two candidates Trump is by far the more absurd. Hillary is evil, but evil isnt that funny
User avatar
#15 - leonhardt (14 hours ago) [-]
This. It'd be hard to make jokes about the horrific atrocities she's committed.
Plus people don't watch South Park for accurate political commentary.
User avatar
#18 - pentol (13 hours ago) [-]
You'd be surprised.
The thing i find the most funny, is that after Mr.Garrison has done his very best to not become prez, stuff like the Project Veritas videoes are released, ensuring he can't avoid it.
#8 - Probably because of the illegal immigration rates being faster…  [+] (15 replies) 10/22/2016 on California Dreaming +111
#54 - doublepzk has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#55 - Deavas (6 hours ago) [-]
nice try. when the immigrant to birth rate in CALIfORNIA fits your claim, then you can talk
User avatar
#41 - FrankReal (8 hours ago) [-]
>more people means more crime but not more schools
Yeah, okay.
User avatar
#50 - grogovic (7 hours ago) [-]
Please tell me you're a troll. You don't have to say it in the comment section, you can friend/PM me that you're a troll.

I just can't belive you saying illegal immigrants are not... illegal?
User avatar
#46 - elsenortamatoe (7 hours ago) [-]
They arent citizens, therefore are criminals simply by being here. More prisons makes sense. more criminals = more prisons
User avatar
#48 - FrankReal (7 hours ago) [-]
People =/= citizens
>moving goalposts
User avatar
#49 - elsenortamatoe (7 hours ago) [-]
south california is filled will illegals. Who are criminals. I never said people.
And in order to move goalposts, I have to set goalposts, which I have not.
I SAID THAT ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ARE BREAKING THE LAW. Therefore more prisons are needed to remove said criminals from the streets. Sneak over here, die in a prison.
User avatar
#52 - fuckingtrolls (7 hours ago) [-]
That's not how it goes m8 they get deported not convicted
#62 - anon (5 hours ago) [-]
Not when they commit gang violence. As somebody from southern California it's a serious issue. You think Trump is racist? You should hear what people here have to say about Mexicans. Namely people in the black communities.
User avatar
#63 - fuckingtrolls (5 hours ago) [-]
Ye I'm from socal too. I went to school there I never heard anyone complain about them.
User avatar
#45 - assyria (8 hours ago) [-]
what if those new people dont go to college
User avatar
#47 - FrankReal (7 hours ago) [-]
What if those new people dont commit crime?
User avatar
#51 - elsenortamatoe (7 hours ago) [-]
They did getting here...
#43 - zeldamasterace has deleted their comment.
#40 - gottam (9 hours ago) [-]
Based on what evidence?