Upload
Login or register

Deavas

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:1/13/2010
Location:New York
Stats
Content Ranking:#758
Comment Ranking:#159
Highest Content Rank:#656
Highest Comment Rank:#155
Content Thumbs: 2139 total,  2423 ,  284
Comment Thumbs: 25565 total,  42382 ,  16817
Content Level Progress: 55% (55/100)
Level 113 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 114 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 63.7% (637/1000)
Level 320 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 321 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:438
Content Views:678711
Times Content Favorited:2843 times
Total Comments Made:57193
FJ Points:19930
Favorite Tags: funny (6) | FUNNYJUNK (6) | Long (5) | read (5) | the (5) | worth (5) | admin (4) | Fresh (4) | Life (4) | meme (4) | prince (4) | red (4) | my (3) | Park (3) | Pokemon (3) | roll (3) | south (3) | Stupid (3) | win (3) | Wolf (3)

latest user's comments

#39 - youll see  [+] (1 reply) 09/24/2016 on Anon wants to destroy Youtube -1
User avatar
#40 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
I hope you're right, but I'm a pretty big pessimist when it comes to these things.

I'd love for another video sharing website to become popular, though.
#37 - google+ wasnt censorship. this is  [+] (4 replies) 09/24/2016 on Anon wants to destroy Youtube 0
User avatar
#38 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
Hundreds of millions of people use YouTube. Most won't care. Hell, Google loses money on YouTube anyway, so they can run it however way they want to and it won't matter.
User avatar
#41 - malicemad (09/24/2016) [-]
I second Deavis here. Youtube hasn't experienced much censorship, even including the latest fiasco. But crashing youtube specifically to replace it with another site is a lot closer to censorship. Not that it will work, the plan is actually pretty silly...
User avatar
#39 - Deavas (09/24/2016) [-]
youll see
User avatar
#40 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
I hope you're right, but I'm a pretty big pessimist when it comes to these things.

I'd love for another video sharing website to become popular, though.
#34 - google+ was 2012. thats what i was thinking of i guess. they d…  [+] (6 replies) 09/24/2016 on Anon wants to destroy Youtube 0
User avatar
#36 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
Yeah, that was when they combined the two platforms, so to speak. That really made people mad. But people got over it, and YouTube didn't go anywhere. Same thing will happen now.
User avatar
#37 - Deavas (09/24/2016) [-]
google+ wasnt censorship. this is
User avatar
#38 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
Hundreds of millions of people use YouTube. Most won't care. Hell, Google loses money on YouTube anyway, so they can run it however way they want to and it won't matter.
User avatar
#41 - malicemad (09/24/2016) [-]
I second Deavis here. Youtube hasn't experienced much censorship, even including the latest fiasco. But crashing youtube specifically to replace it with another site is a lot closer to censorship. Not that it will work, the plan is actually pretty silly...
User avatar
#39 - Deavas (09/24/2016) [-]
youll see
User avatar
#40 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
I hope you're right, but I'm a pretty big pessimist when it comes to these things.

I'd love for another video sharing website to become popular, though.
#1385001 - hey cool admin got rid of the thing where you cant see how man…  [+] (1 reply) 09/24/2016 on Pony Thread 15. 0
User avatar
#1385003 - alicorn (09/24/2016) [-]
It's an unspoken fj ruoe that for every good thing we get admin must take another away
#32 - i know they did. but in 2008 there was still Google Video, tha…  [+] (8 replies) 09/24/2016 on Anon wants to destroy Youtube +1
User avatar
#33 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
Ok, all I'm saying is Google bought YouTube in 2006, not 7 years later like you said.
User avatar
#34 - Deavas (09/24/2016) [-]
google+ was 2012. thats what i was thinking of i guess. they didnt really do anything with it before then
User avatar
#36 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
Yeah, that was when they combined the two platforms, so to speak. That really made people mad. But people got over it, and YouTube didn't go anywhere. Same thing will happen now.
User avatar
#37 - Deavas (09/24/2016) [-]
google+ wasnt censorship. this is
User avatar
#38 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
Hundreds of millions of people use YouTube. Most won't care. Hell, Google loses money on YouTube anyway, so they can run it however way they want to and it won't matter.
User avatar
#41 - malicemad (09/24/2016) [-]
I second Deavis here. Youtube hasn't experienced much censorship, even including the latest fiasco. But crashing youtube specifically to replace it with another site is a lot closer to censorship. Not that it will work, the plan is actually pretty silly...
User avatar
#39 - Deavas (09/24/2016) [-]
youll see
User avatar
#40 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
I hope you're right, but I'm a pretty big pessimist when it comes to these things.

I'd love for another video sharing website to become popular, though.
#30 - i dont think thats accurate at all  [+] (11 replies) 09/24/2016 on Anon wants to destroy Youtube 0
#31 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
Google made the creators fuckin rich.

Pic related.
User avatar
#65 - infinitereaper (09/24/2016) [-]
I heard one of the founders was posting some years later, said he was depressed with what Youtube had become, fuckin jewgle
User avatar
#32 - Deavas (09/24/2016) [-]
i know they did. but in 2008 there was still Google Video, that wasnt youtube
User avatar
#33 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
Ok, all I'm saying is Google bought YouTube in 2006, not 7 years later like you said.
User avatar
#34 - Deavas (09/24/2016) [-]
google+ was 2012. thats what i was thinking of i guess. they didnt really do anything with it before then
User avatar
#36 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
Yeah, that was when they combined the two platforms, so to speak. That really made people mad. But people got over it, and YouTube didn't go anywhere. Same thing will happen now.
User avatar
#37 - Deavas (09/24/2016) [-]
google+ wasnt censorship. this is
User avatar
#38 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
Hundreds of millions of people use YouTube. Most won't care. Hell, Google loses money on YouTube anyway, so they can run it however way they want to and it won't matter.
User avatar
#41 - malicemad (09/24/2016) [-]
I second Deavis here. Youtube hasn't experienced much censorship, even including the latest fiasco. But crashing youtube specifically to replace it with another site is a lot closer to censorship. Not that it will work, the plan is actually pretty silly...
User avatar
#39 - Deavas (09/24/2016) [-]
youll see
User avatar
#40 - russianapathy (09/24/2016) [-]
I hope you're right, but I'm a pretty big pessimist when it comes to these things.

I'd love for another video sharing website to become popular, though.