Rank #14796 on CommentsLevel 261 Comments: Pure Win
OfflineSend mail to Carthusia Block Carthusia Invite Carthusia to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||1/29/2010|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#17739|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#2485|
|Content Thumbs:||14 total, 17 , 31|
|Comment Thumbs:||6670 total, 7772 , 1102|
|Content Level Progress:|| 0% (0/1) |
Level -13 Content: Sort of disliked → Level -12 Content: Sort of disliked
|Comment Level Progress:|| 55% (55/100) |
Level 261 Comments: Pure Win → Level 262 Comments: Pure Win
|Times Content Favorited:||3 times|
|Total Comments Made:||1301|
latest user's comments
|#44 - This, gentlemen, is how the game is meant to be played. [+] (8 new replies)||08/21/2016 on Random shit on my phone 106||+34|
|#1916 - Picture||08/17/2016 on Roll for the biggest ass||0|
|#90 - yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.||08/16/2016 on Teen Titans||0|
|#14 - >Venezuela > Socialist pick one [+] (1 new reply)||08/11/2016 on Fagy coomies||-1|
|#185 - Nice Strawman.||08/11/2016 on Liberal's on the religion...||0|
|#64 - Picture [+] (2 new replies)||07/13/2016 on Fucking Comey||+17|
#85 - kanadetenshi (07/13/2016) [-]
If a socialist party is implementing socialist policies, promotes nationalization of private property, collectivization of land, put together a constitution based around socialism, when the very ideology of Chavismo is described as "Socialism in The 21st Century" then you would need a lot of mental gymnastics to pretend Venezuela hasn't been implementing socialism just because the juvenile utopian idea of no private property hasn't happened.
#167 - anon (07/14/2016) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image***roll picture*The issue with Venezuela is that its government doesn't give a crap about anyone. It's just knockoff Stalinism.
The economic system is just crazy; the government takes over all private companies, imports all goods, and all the products made in Venezuela are sold to other countries at a cheap price. Meanwhile, supermarkets and stores here either don't have products or have them at a really high price (a bag of Doritos is 700-900Bs.), stores have long lines of people, and the government (consisting of military leaders, drug dealers, and nepotic retards) is just circlejerking in front of everybody.
I'm a Venezuelan currently living through all this
This video shows the president falling off a bicycle. Sorry for bad quality
|#6 - Picture||07/07/2016 on Hey there, sexy||+2|
|#107 - If the media are so liberal, why did they run the fake ACORN v… [+] (1 new reply)||06/23/2016 on Sit In||-6|
#192 - mindyourownbusines (06/24/2016) [-]
For the sake of it, let's look at these.
ACORN. The articles you posted note, some facts were misrepresented - but not everything was untrue. One left-source makes hay of a NY Times correction not going far enough - "What exactly would be the hold up?"
The Times article indicates reason for a "hold up" here:
Acorn’s supporters appear to hope that the whole story will fall apart over the issue of what O’Keefe wore: if that was wrong, everything else must be wrong. The record does not support them. If O’Keefe did not dress as a pimp, he clearly presented himself as one: a fellow trying to set up a woman — sometimes along with under-age girls — in a house where they would work as prostitutes. In Washington, he said the prostitution was to finance his future in politics. A worker for Acorn Housing, warned him to stay away from the brothel lest someone “get wind that you got a house and that your girlfriend is over there running a house of women of the night. You will not have a career.”
FAIR said that in Brooklyn, O’Keefe and Giles seemed to be telling Acorn staffers that “they are attempting to buy a house to protect child prostitutes from an abusive pimp.” That’s right, but FAIR left out the part about their clear intention to operate a brothel, which the Acorn workers seemed to take in stride, with one warning: “Don’t get caught, ’cause it is against the law.”
This after the author consulted the same sources as your link, etc.
why run campaign ads? For the money?
"why do they keep covering-up for Wall Street" Because the NY Times didn't sensor a single article by one of their reporters that drew different conclusion than a liberal blog?
Why was Thatcher coverage one sided? Possibly (a) media generally focuses on the positives of the recently deceased except Hitler , (b) the coverage was not as one sided as the 5 excerpts in your source which itself seems limited in opposition materials , and (c) you wouldn't be so concerned if Thatcher was someone you liked.
"why did they ignore proven and admitted GOP election fraud?"
You mean the alleged fraud which (a) was reported on hence all the sources your blogs link back to and (b) worked against Republicans and (c) were seemingly not politically motivated and had all legal charges dropped?
TPP controversy cover-up? You're link just redirected me to the main TPP page, but even there I saw at least 5 mainstream articles linked condemning one "controversial" aspect of the bill.
Why did they ignore the anti-Keystone Pipeline protests? The ones your own source notes received live coverage on CNN and got a 5 page write up in the NY Post along with coverage on PBS, NY Times, and NPR, among other sources. That's probably more media than Glenn Beck's "Restoring Love" rally received with 65,000 people (as opposed to the estimated 20 - 35,000 at this rally, including "religious leaders, climate campaigners and Canadian indigenous rights activists.")
Why was Occupy Wall Street treated worse in the media than the Tea Party?
#1. Was it?
#2. Occupy protests actually got out of hand/resulted in rapes, assault, vandalism and arson with over 7,000 arrests unlike the Tea Party.
Finally, arguing that Jefferson chose a path of political expediency doesn't undermine the arguments he made regarding the constitution.
|#106 - If the media are so liberal, where are all the Union-friendly … [+] (3 new replies)||06/23/2016 on Sit In||-5|
#112 - youregaylol (06/23/2016) [-]
I'm guessing the tactic now is to spam as much text as possible so I wont feel like addressing it all?
Thats fine, I think I can see the trend in your argument.
I'll divide it into parts.
1. If the media is liberal, why do they post things that I think is anti liberal?
a)There are exceptions to every rule. The Nazis were a right wing group that paid homage to several right wing policies, for instance. Nothing is resolute. However, there is a glaring trend toward progressive ideology in the mainstream media
b) The instances that you believe are anti liberal simply aren't. For instance, Wall Street has supported both liberals and conservatives in the US. The Trans Pacific Partnership is opposed and supported by both sides for different reasons, Trump opposes it as well. Also I know for a fact that Occupy was propped up when it was around, the sheer amount of liberal losers shitting on cars and being praised as revolutionaries was nauseating. Your sources are bullshit.
2. It looks like you got most of this drivel from 2 websites. I am not "proving your point" by pointing out that your sources are retarded. The claims of those two sites are simply wrong. It looks like the equivalent of a huffington post blog. Someone on the far left claiming the media is right wing does not make the media right wing. 7% of journalists are republicans. That statistic, not anecodotal evidence like you're providing, says it all.
3. As I said all you have is anecdotes. You or this "fair" site not seeing union guests does not mean they dont exist. Also liberals invest as well, George Soros is a prime example.
I'm not going to go one by one clicking every link to every blog. The "questions" you ask are ridiculous. The media routinely portrays the tea party as the new KKK with no evidence, they back Obamas liberal war in syria right now, they shit on Paul Ryan 24/7.
Notice how all of your "sources" are either youtube or liberal blogs. You're basically pointing to every crazy you can find online and representing their opinions, or at least the opinions you credit to them, as fact.
There is no evidence in any of these. No stats, no polls, no nothing. You copy and pasted a manifesto you found on the DailyKos.
|#93 - Then who? [+] (3 new replies)||06/23/2016 on Sit In||-1|
#143 - anon (06/24/2016) [-]
you'll do it? I thought you said no Bias? so far it seems like you are hard fast for everyone having a gun..
we could at least Start with letting the CDC do their job, but NRA stop that. It's like there's something to hide..
#158 - atusek (06/24/2016) [-]
Yes because I seriously intended to visit every person in th3 country after I finished the tendies i got from my good boy points. The cdc as a federal agency can be easily controlled by an agenda. An independent private company should do so unaffiliated with the govt or media and publish their detailed methods as well to attempt to be as impartial as possible