Upload
Login or register

Blargosnarf

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:3/21/2010
Last Login:9/21/2016
Location:Windsor Vermont USA
Stats
Comment Ranking:#11115
Highest Content Rank:#10503
Highest Comment Rank:#555
Content Thumbs: 131 total,  226 ,  95
Comment Thumbs: 22672 total,  26504 ,  3832
Content Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 12 Content: New Here → Level 13 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 52.6% (526/1000)
Level 320 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 321 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:7
Content Views:6260
Times Content Favorited:32 times
Total Comments Made:5671
FJ Points:21476

latest user's comments

#21 - How the hell do you shave it properly!? Every time I do these …  [+] (10 replies) 09/30/2014 on Blackcat +6
#37 - justleaving (09/30/2014) [-]
I shave onder the shower, first along the hair and then against it. Most of the time after drying there are some hairs left so gently dry shave the last hairs off. And I use showergel/soap as shavingcream (DON'T get it on your dick/near the top, it stings!!!) Oh, and I use Wilkinson Sword protector 3 blades, they have those safety wires across the blades, so you don't nipp of some skin. I use them for my face too.

But yeah, within 2-3 days I got stubs again.
User avatar
#46 - zombifier (09/30/2014) [-]
can't let shit like veet and nair sit for too long, sensitive area, will start to burn fast
User avatar
#48 - heartlessrobot (09/30/2014) [-]
It's the one specifically made for that area.
#31 - BloodAwaits (09/30/2014) [-]
Stop shaving against the grain, shower first so hair is softer and if all else fails get a trimmer. A clean trim looks better than 9 year old smooth anyways.
User avatar
#34 - heartlessrobot (09/30/2014) [-]
>implying 9 year old smooth isn't the best
User avatar
#29 - atomschlumpf (09/30/2014) [-]
Well I dunno how it is for you but my hairs have a direction in which they grow, mostly downwards (towards my feet). If I shave with the direction there's no problem. If I shave against it my crotch will get all these swellings, little fucking pimples and it itches like goddamn fucking piss.

Problem is, if you shave with the direction the hairs won't get cut down to the skin, so a little bit of hair is still there, but that's no problem for me, at least it's not like a fucking junngle. On the balls and shaft however you can mostly shave how you want, just be careful not to cut yourself. You can also grab the sack a little and strech the skin, makes it easier.

Also if you want none of that there's also hair removal creme, but I haven't much experience with that and I don't know if you can also use that for the balls and stuff but definitely for the crotch area. You can probably google that.

Any more questions?
#22 - levitatingscrotum (09/30/2014) [-]
Also, can you wax the other ares than just balls? Shaving is really the worst. Also asking for a friend of mine, ofc.
User avatar
#24 - Silver Quantum (09/30/2014) [-]
there's this part on your face that grows hair too. it's called a beard. you can shave that too
User avatar
#23 - RipperMan (09/30/2014) [-]
things might be easier for you, if you live up to your name that is
#21 - Funny how someone sleeping in a cryo chamber in the middle of …  [+] (4 replies) 09/30/2014 on Evolution of the Halo series. +2
User avatar
#39 - tankerdude (09/30/2014) [-]
Cortana says she updated while he was asleep
User avatar
#40 - Blargosnarf (09/30/2014) [-]
...Oh? Guess I missed that part, too busy wondering why the fuck she suddenly looks like a porn star instead of her usual holographic self.
User avatar
#41 - tankerdude (09/30/2014) [-]
it's one of those you only hear while playing alone and it is easily missed
#26 - cherubium (09/30/2014) [-]
Well it is the same mark VI armor from Halo 3 but 343 decided to change it a little.
#46 - I understand I'm hardly in a position to criticize, as all I k…  [+] (1 reply) 09/30/2014 on Nasa 0
User avatar
#47 - propanex (09/30/2014) [-]
you're right about that.
#5 - But... that's how everyone pronounces it where I'm from.  [+] (6 replies) 09/30/2014 on Zach 0
#14 - ndj (09/30/2014) [-]
User avatar
#12 - youregaylol (09/30/2014) [-]
then everyone around you is wrong
User avatar
#11 - testaburger (09/30/2014) [-]
That means you're black
User avatar
#9 - penguinstampede (09/30/2014) [-]
then accordion to the logic of the situation you and everyone else where you are from is a nigger. (regardless of skin color)
User avatar
#21 - ledd (09/30/2014) [-]
Are you playing that tumblr thing with substituting words for instruments? get out
#15 - bigblacknegro (09/30/2014) [-]
>everyone is a nigger
>regardless of skin color
#5 - I just prefer to live in a time where we're spending more mone…  [+] (4 replies) 09/30/2014 on Nasa +13
User avatar
#29 - ledd (09/30/2014) [-]
It's hard to imagine how far we would be if we had 44BLN a year for research instead of military, but it's hard to deny that we have better scientific development now than anytime before.
User avatar
#72 - besle (09/30/2014) [-]
Well technically, war gives better research. History shows that. I am still against all the wars though, but looking back at WWI & WWII, we probably wouldn't have had as capable airplanes, jet engines, complex suspension systems, rocket technology (For good and worse), and a lot of technologies i forgot about.
User avatar
#74 - ledd (09/30/2014) [-]
The point from which humanity started to care about science well enough for it to be relevant happens to be just few hundred years away from now. Science used to have to rely on private funding only so obviously war research, conducted by powerful countries with huge investments would appear to be more efficient. Note that wars you pointed out are pretty recent. But times are changing and we invest more and more into science.
#25 - anon (09/30/2014) [-]
you prefer fantasy to reality...? cool story
#2 - But a scuffling and embarrassingly incompetent conflict in so…  [+] (31 replies) 09/30/2014 on Nasa +250
User avatar
#123 - bjornkrage (09/30/2014) [-]
gotta be honest here, if the radical mr. abdul "super religious and uneducated" muhammed gets his hands on nuclear weapons without any resistance, i'd say it is woth $44 billion to keep him from getting those and throwing them on everybody that isn't as stupid as him.
User avatar
#128 - Blargosnarf (09/30/2014) [-]
But the incompetence of the several decade mission is very prominent, it's true that if Muhamed had access he would be more than willing, but when we investigated there was very little sign of any nuclear activity within the entire country... and it took ten years to determine that. We just "so happen" to find some good resources we could secure for ourselves with the excuse of fighting the Taliban. Before it's said that we could be securing the resources for ourselves so that the Taliban never received them, the oil fields belong to the fucking people of the country, not the invaders, until a trade for equal payment is established.
#103 - lazypaul (09/30/2014) [-]
Logical fallacy alert.
User avatar
#118 - Blargosnarf (09/30/2014) [-]
Hm, I suppose I did use "Tu quoque", I apologize.
User avatar
#120 - lazypaul (09/30/2014) [-]
It's more like a strawman. Misinterpreting his argument to mean 'We should cut spending on NASA to continue funding the Iraq war' to make it easier to attack.
User avatar
#121 - Blargosnarf (09/30/2014) [-]
That wasn't really my intention for my argument, I guess I wanted to make it look like he's barking up the wrong tree, bringing more attention to a small problem as a big problem get's brushed away.
User avatar
#130 - lazypaul (09/30/2014) [-]
But in the context of this post the Iraq war is irrelevant because we are talking about NASA. If you believe that NASA is a problem then it is still a problem regardless of bigger problems existing.
User avatar
#132 - Blargosnarf (09/30/2014) [-]
I never intended this post to blow up so much >.>, I don't believe NASA spending is a problem, in fact I stated lower that I believe it should receive more funding than what it does. He was talking as if 18.4 B is a huge number wherein I shown that it's quite insignificant compared to other spending numbers.
#67 - jakeattack (09/30/2014) [-]
$rekt
User avatar
#44 - propanex (09/30/2014) [-]
If it means saving innocent lives and stopping evil groups from gaining more power... yes.
User avatar
#49 - salihzzz (09/30/2014) [-]
then why fund the evil terrorists in the first place, the US has no interest in helping poor people under attack anywhere don't kid yourself
User avatar
#46 - Blargosnarf (09/30/2014) [-]
I understand I'm hardly in a position to criticize, as all I know is from third party talking and biased media coverage, but if I may speak my opinion... we're not doing a very good job.
User avatar
#47 - propanex (09/30/2014) [-]
you're right about that.
User avatar
#39 - sirowlington (09/30/2014) [-]
To be fair, India managed to get a probe around Mars at the same time as NASA did, using like one-tenth of the budget.
User avatar
#51 - Snowplows (09/30/2014) [-]
But India's mission is simply a satellite orbiting mars. The US landed a mobile science laboratory capable of teaching us about the history of mars. Not to mention how hard it is to get something to land safely on a different planet.
User avatar
#93 - thewulfman (09/30/2014) [-]
Especially Mars. Thanks to Mars' atmosphere being a little bitch and being so relatively thin, it's been hard to deal with. We've lost several satellites and landers on Mars missions.
User avatar
#53 - sirowlington (09/30/2014) [-]
I had a feeling there might've been a difference like that but I was too lazy to look into it. Thank you for posting.
#137 - anon (09/30/2014) [-]
oh wait forgot the most important thing!

it has a dedicated camera for taking selfies
#136 - anon (09/30/2014) [-]
they had to land that thing a different planet and not crash it with about 20 minute delay.

that thing is like the other guy said is a mobile science laboratory, it is 899 kg (1,982 lb) heavy and can continously work for a minimum of 14 years day and night.

it a has a powerful laser which can vaporize rocks at over 7m (23 ft) away. it can analyize everything by itself. and it also has 17 different cameras on it.

and that's not even close to be all... so yea... there is a difference
#90 - anon (09/30/2014) [-]
Yeah Indias satellite does jack and shit 30lbs of instruments compared to the U.S. 140 lbs. Also the instruments on the Indian satellite are cheap and simple but provide nothing really useful (it's a proof they can do it more then anything else) . Also India used a shitty orbit to cheapen the mission (72 hour orbit (mostly spent too far away form the planet) compared to the U.S. 4.5 hour orbit. And they pay engineers somewhere near what would be called minimum wage in the U.S.
User avatar
#33 - tomahawkkit (09/30/2014) [-]
I think we all can agree our government has no idea how to manage money
#117 - billburr (09/30/2014) [-]
They know exactly how to manage money, it's just that they don't give a fuck about 99% of the population
'Nam, Iraq 3 times, Syria, other middle Eastern countries, half of South America can't all be a coincidence
#24 - anon (09/30/2014) [-]
apparently so since you're still free to mouth off on the internet like a jackass
#28 - slias (09/30/2014) [-]
Which is something that the various hostile factions in the middle east had the actually had the capacity to threaten? As far as I'm aware we've lost freedoms as a result of our own politicians using these conflicts to terrorise people into docility. Overall we've suffered a net loss in freedom, rather than the preservation of freedom that you seem to be implying.
User avatar
#23 - lurg (09/30/2014) [-]
Those wars will never stop nor will other countries involvement stop.
in fact the only way i could see war stopped would be uniting the world under one banner and that...that wont work.
User avatar
#4 - betars (09/30/2014) [-]
I think there are enough problems back here at the homefront.
User avatar
#5 - Blargosnarf (09/30/2014) [-]
I just prefer to live in a time where we're spending more money on reasearch and development of daily technology, and not quite so much on the art of death.
User avatar
#29 - ledd (09/30/2014) [-]
It's hard to imagine how far we would be if we had 44BLN a year for research instead of military, but it's hard to deny that we have better scientific development now than anytime before.
User avatar
#72 - besle (09/30/2014) [-]
Well technically, war gives better research. History shows that. I am still against all the wars though, but looking back at WWI & WWII, we probably wouldn't have had as capable airplanes, jet engines, complex suspension systems, rocket technology (For good and worse), and a lot of technologies i forgot about.
User avatar
#74 - ledd (09/30/2014) [-]
The point from which humanity started to care about science well enough for it to be relevant happens to be just few hundred years away from now. Science used to have to rely on private funding only so obviously war research, conducted by powerful countries with huge investments would appear to be more efficient. Note that wars you pointed out are pretty recent. But times are changing and we invest more and more into science.
#25 - anon (09/30/2014) [-]
you prefer fantasy to reality...? cool story
#7 - None of these are corrupted, they're edited, you moron.  [+] (1 reply) 09/29/2014 on Corrupted Gif Comp 0
User avatar
#10 - leeon (09/30/2014) [-]
"Edited Gif Comp" would have implied something else
#5 - Well, since sex without intent of procreation is seen as sin i…  [+] (1 reply) 09/29/2014 on Not as planned +1
User avatar
#11 - imadeanaccountforu (09/30/2014) [-]
From what i understand,
If you follow the ten commandments then your fine.
Everything else is just frowned apon. EXCEPT MASTURBATING.
Never ever for never masturbate. Because that cum is reserved for jesus when he sucks you off in heaven.