two Mommys. . I have two whammies, I know where the apostrophe gnaw. ". My sister is a lesbian and I'm pretty much the only one in my family that accepts it. It irks me that people are still so stupid even today.
x
Click to expand

Comments(181):

[ 181 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#56 - soundofwinter (11/18/2013) [-]
Actually the teacher would be right in this case. It doesn't matter the kid has two mothers because the holiday is still officially "Mother's Day". You can have two mothers but that won't change the name of the holiday you little cunt with your spaghetti jaw.
User avatar #72 to #56 - nevolmon (11/18/2013) [-]
not only that, but one of the females still takes on the role of the "father" since mother refers to the one who gave birth.
#161 to #72 - anon (11/18/2013) [-]
What if no birth? What if he was adopted as a baby? or just cloned in some future?
User avatar #61 to #56 - zorororonoa (11/18/2013) [-]
He's right you know

*insert picture of morgan freeman*
#77 to #61 - aliapheese (11/18/2013) [-]
Here you go.
#83 to #56 - germanstodamaxja (11/18/2013) [-]
Thanks Mussolini!
Thanks Mussolini!
User avatar #84 to #83 - soundofwinter (11/18/2013) [-]
Technically I would be a "Grammar Fascist"
#70 to #56 - xolotyl **User deleted account** (11/18/2013) [-]
"you little cunt with your spaghetti jaw"
#35 - GabeAsher (11/18/2013) [-]
Oh lightbulb...
#36 to #35 - supercookieduster (11/18/2013) [-]
ha that was a good one
#37 to #35 - manwithmanynames (11/18/2013) [-]
yes! I caught that too!
yes! I caught that too!
#155 to #35 - anon (11/18/2013) [-]
User avatar #38 - rhc (11/18/2013) [-]
i would say it's mothers' day regardless of how many mothers you have. it's not your mother's day, it's all mothers' day.
User avatar #93 to #38 - pokemonstheshiz (11/18/2013) [-]
I think the current spelling is referring to mother's as a collective whole, or as a concept. So either way it's correct, just depends on how you want to look at it
#23 - EmperorColo (11/18/2013) [-]
My sister is a lesbian and I'm pretty much the only one in my family that accepts it. It irks me that people are still so stupid even today.
#52 to #23 - anon (11/18/2013) [-]
Mellow?
#90 to #23 - tabarzins (11/18/2013) [-]
relevant pic
User avatar #120 to #23 - lasmamoe (11/18/2013) [-]
Well have to see some pictures to verify that she is indeed a lesbian.
User avatar #135 to #23 - noahnicholson (11/18/2013) [-]
ok... this is not directed to you at all, but sometimes (even though i chose to be always signed in) funnyjunk signs me out every now and then, and whilst i was signed out i noticed that one of the words in your comment was censored. I signed back in, and "lesbian" was censored!! why the **** !! is the word lesbian censored. its not a bad word whatsoever, i can SOMEWHAT understand flagged images of stuff that vaguely represents what might be considered nudity. I cannot understand why words to describe someones sexuality (in an appropriate way) are censored.
#143 to #135 - princessren ONLINE (11/18/2013) [-]
I have no idea
it might have to do with google searches and porn and whatnot
but I really don't know
#153 to #23 - anon (11/18/2013) [-]
Faggot enablers detected....
#169 to #23 - taurusguy ONLINE (11/18/2013) [-]
Take pics and post as proof.
User avatar #54 to #23 - wunderboner (11/18/2013) [-]
is she fat
#110 to #23 - thorsballs (11/18/2013) [-]
You just expressed the same stupidity of your parents by exclaiming that anyone who doesn't share your currently popular and trending belief is stupid.
User avatar #121 to #110 - yetiyitties (11/18/2013) [-]
Sounds like you're the only one expressing stupidity.
#138 to #121 - thorsballs (11/18/2013) [-]
that's a great post

"your stupid"
User avatar #147 to #138 - yetiyitties (11/18/2013) [-]
What
User avatar #44 to #23 - mistafishy (11/18/2013) [-]
...Do you talk about chicks together, then?
User avatar #136 to #44 - EmperorColo (11/18/2013) [-]
Actually yes haha
User avatar #151 to #23 - lordmoldywart (11/18/2013) [-]
Not accepting homosexuality doesn't make you stupid

There is no scientific evidence behind it, for all we know all gay people are a secret alien lifeform from a galaxy far far away that infiltrated the human race millions of years ago
#154 to #151 - anon (11/18/2013) [-]
What the **** does that mean? "There is no scientific evidence behind it"?

I'd say the fact that two people with the same reproductive organs like ******* each other is evidence enough. It's even found in animals, ffs.
User avatar #168 to #154 - lordmoldywart (11/18/2013) [-]
There is no biological way of determining who is homosexual or not. That's 'what the **** it means' you hormonal buttmuncher

For all we know, all gay people are a secret alien lifeform from a galaxy far far away that infiltrated the human race millions of years ago

User avatar #43 to #23 - hoponthefeelstrain ONLINE (11/18/2013) [-]
My friend is white and her parents accept her sister being a lesbian but wont let either of them date anyone who isn't white. I though that was weird.
#73 to #43 - anon (11/18/2013) [-]
Because dating black guys is even bad for black women
User avatar #123 to #43 - yetiyitties (11/18/2013) [-]
My friend's family life went to **** briefly when he came out to his parents and his sister got a hispanic boyfriend. Their father didn't want them to marry anybody who wasn't white, and he didn't approve of gays. My friend and his sis were both venting to me about it, they said their father's reason was that he wanted to keep his bloodline pure. His ******* wife left him because she didn't know he was such a bigot. Years later she remarried with a black guy, and my friend is a full out fabulous gay boy, and his sister is still with the black guy, nice fellow. I'm sure their mom's ex has his jimmies russeled x100
#28 to #23 - adu ONLINE (11/18/2013) [-]
I accept straight guys.
I accept gay guys.
I accept lesbian girls.
But I accept bi and straight girls twice as much.

I accept everyone, just unequally.
Don't act like you don't do it too.
User avatar #39 to #28 - linktheherooftime (11/18/2013) [-]
What about bi guys?
User avatar #41 to #39 - adu ONLINE (11/18/2013) [-]
I accept them twice as much as half of the median between gay and straight.
User avatar #75 to #41 - pseudobob **User deleted account** (11/18/2013) [-]
top geg
User avatar #91 to #28 - staticstork (11/18/2013) [-]
what about guys who like owls.
#40 to #28 - lildo (11/18/2013) [-]
I treat everyone equally. Now let me bitch slap every nationality, sexuality, race, and ethnicity in the face.
User avatar #42 to #40 - linktheherooftime (11/18/2013) [-]
I'm not prejudice. I hate everyone equally.
User avatar #1 - superhatch (11/17/2013) [-]
Haha lightbul. Whammies...
User avatar #2 to #1 - longdongofhongkong (11/17/2013) [-]
haha superhatc. Whammies...
User avatar #4 to #2 - wickkles (11/17/2013) [-]
haha people still circlejerk over the lightbulb.
User avatar #14 to #1 - goldenrodent ONLINE (11/17/2013) [-]
watch out because i have two of them.
Also kinda sounds like a unique weapon for fallout
#31 to #30 - vgmddg (11/18/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #19 - princessren ONLINE (11/18/2013) [-]
um....so?
maybe I am just stupid
but...it is still Mother's Day
The day for Mothers
it doesn't matter if you have 1, 2 , 3 or 0
#20 to #19 - funnyjunkyeahyeah (11/18/2013) [-]
From his point of view, it's a day for HIS mothers.

/shrug
User avatar #92 to #20 - pokemonstheshiz (11/18/2013) [-]
the holiday belongs to either mothers as a collective whole (in which case it would be Mothers' , but referring to all not his specific mothers)
or it belongs to the general idea/concept of a mother, in which case it would be Mother's, as it is now. The kid's making it according to his worldview, but the artist is just trying to be edgy when it's actually correct the way it is
#48 to #19 - anon (11/18/2013) [-]
he is adding a double plural making it mothers's day a day for his mothers
#98 to #19 - incoming (11/18/2013) [-]
0 mothers you say? Obligatory Batman.
User avatar #21 to #19 - solitaryweasel (11/18/2013) [-]
I think it should be Mothers' Day anyway.
It's the day for mothers
User avatar #33 to #21 - demonictoasters (11/18/2013) [-]
I agree.
User avatar #9 - explore (11/17/2013) [-]
I too have 2 whammies, and I know where the apostrophe gnaws.
#51 - randomwanker (11/18/2013) [-]
the lightbulb posses not one but two "whamies" beware FJ... beware
the lightbulb posses not one but two "whamies" beware FJ... beware
#57 to #51 - nignogatron (11/18/2013) [-]
He knows where the apostrophe gnaw.
#3 - schnizel ONLINE (11/17/2013) [-]
Reminded me of this.
#65 to #3 - anon (11/18/2013) [-]
what does that have to do with this?
User avatar #86 to #65 - schnizel ONLINE (11/18/2013) [-]
IDK
#104 - LocoJoe (11/18/2013) [-]
Still doesn't change the fact that it says "Mother's Day" on my calendar does it ya little **** ?
User avatar #26 - charagrin (11/18/2013) [-]
The teacher was clearly discriminating by not automatically assuming the girl had two moms. QUICK! SUE HER! It's what you're good at.
#96 - redbannerman (11/18/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Honestly, just hurry the **** up and legalize the ******* thing. I'm tired of this ceaseless bitching about something that I personally couldn't care any less about. There are worse problems out there, but no, THIS is the **** we focus on because it's SOOOOOO ******* important that everyone can pick a person and random and say, "I can marry that!"

I honestly wouldn't even bother if it weren't for the fact that I see one-sided ******** propaganda for each ******* side all over the ******* place. "Gay's are against God!" No **** , so is a great variety of other things that we do on a daily basis. Lying, stealing and other such sins. Wanna hear a fun fact? According to the good book they're all the ******* same in God's eyes. So you lying about picking your nose in public? Yeah, rates right up there with being gay apparently. HOLY ******* **** , looks like our **** stinks after all.

And to you stupid ******** trying to justify it by using a child as a medium, you can very well go soak your fat, illogical head in a sewage drain. It's a child, not ******* Plato. Justify your actions logically or don't justify them at all. **** BOTH sides of this argument, you're both filled to the brim with moronic, ******* ************* .

/rant
User avatar #157 to #96 - dbrak (11/18/2013) [-]
Well you know what? It matters for some people. It's not just about "oooh look! I've got a ring! Yaaaaay!!!" There are a lot of legal protections that married couples get, and they're sort of really important. There are families getting financially screwed over because the parents are of the same gender. For instance, if I die young, I would prefer that my family is NOT dicked over financially. You know why? A lot of rights are passed on to your spouse after you die. It's not fair, it isn't logical, it's ancient and it's completely unethical to ignore these rights for some people. Sorry if you don't care about a huge population of people being denied their rights on a daily basis, but for those of us who are actually affected by it, it matters. I want to have a family and I want to make sure we are just as protected as anybody else's.

Read up on these, maybe.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rights_and_responsibilities_of_marriages_in_the_United_States
#170 to #157 - redbannerman (11/19/2013) [-]
I'm not against those who want it for legal protection, I'm against those who want it for, and I'm using this term very loosely, "bragging rights." I honestly despise those who, just because they're homosexual, have the need to shove it in other people's faces.
User avatar #171 to #170 - dbrak (11/19/2013) [-]
Well yeah, some straight people also brag about being married though.
#172 to #171 - redbannerman (11/19/2013) [-]
******* really? I swear, that sounds like walking into a KKK meeting and shouting "White power".


"OOOOH, HEY LOOK AT ME! I'M PART OF A MAJORITY!"

Of course depending on HOW they're bragging. "Hehe, I'm rather happy I'm married" or " **** MINORITIES FOR NOT BEING MARRIED WARHARHAR!" Kinda depends on the context, yeah?
User avatar #175 to #172 - married (11/19/2013) [-]
You ******* are reason i get a **** ton of notifications
#176 to #175 - redbannerman (11/19/2013) [-]
.... Why'd you pick such a common word for your name then?
#178 to #176 - married (11/19/2013) [-]
Because I'm a common man
User avatar #173 to #172 - dbrak (11/19/2013) [-]
I suppose. But you're talking about people who are assholes, who are evenly spread through every race, gender, and sexual orientation. You need to think about all the people who aren't assholes, who have lost so much because they're denied equal rights. No wonder you don't care, I wouldn't care about a minority's rights if I just focused on their weakest links either. You need to look at the bigger picture.
#174 to #173 - redbannerman (11/19/2013) [-]
Ah, but you see, I don't care about equal rights as explained by a person who NEEDS them what irks me is people who wish to flaunt and abuse those equal rights to put them in a position where no one else can touch them. I.E. A gay guy gets fired and he blames his boss for discrimination, sues, and then walks out of it much richer. Albeit if used for actual discrimination it works. I am not against the good arguments to support gay rights, I'm against all the bad arguments. Same goes for the legalization of Marijuana, by all means get as high as you want I could care less, but don't ******** me about how "You can use it to make clothes" as an argument winning topic. Please don't take it like I'm against your rights. I'm against the stupidity of others unable to argue their case.
User avatar #177 to #174 - dbrak (11/19/2013) [-]
Being against stupidity is fine, just don't let it get in the way of the fact that there's ****** discrimination. Care just a little bit. People are hurting.
#179 to #177 - redbannerman (11/19/2013) [-]
*Sigh* Fine. If it's one thing I despise more than ignorant dickheads, it's innocent people being hurt. Despite being a Christian I can find no more wrong in being gay than straight with evil in our hearts. I honestly have no idea on how I'm supposed to think on this subject. It is love, yet I cannot fathom why I have this aversion to it. As I am told, I am to call it evil, but how can I morally look at two who are obviously willing to spend their lives together and possibly die for each other and tell them they are wrong. I really can't, it is not my place nor is it in my moral code. I cannot describe to you what it feels like to be caught between yourself. Part of me wishes to spit upon it, while the other cannot find anything wrong. I can't really support it, nor can I be against it. My place is neutrality, and that, is why I don't care. It is beyond my place to decide what is right and wrong for others.
User avatar #180 to #179 - dbrak (11/19/2013) [-]
You are not obligated to think ANYTHING. I don't mean that anti-religiously, I'm a Christian too. But a few things have brought me to believe that the whole gay-is-a-sin thing is faulty. First of all, the only mentions of gay being a sin are in the Old Testament. Among that writing lies several other nonsensical laws. Why is being gay a sin but wearing two fabrics at once not? They're both in the same writing.

Also, God is just, right? Would he do such a cruel thing as to give two humans a deep love for each other and tell them that it cannot be fulfilled? That's torment. God would never twist His gift of love into a weapon in such a way. Homosexuality isn't just about sex. It's about love. People don't realize that.
#181 to #180 - redbannerman (11/19/2013) [-]
I DO realize this though, and that is why it bothers me so. I suppose I'll grind my teeth in frustration while I wait for inspiration. I understand that it IS indeed love, given different interpretations of the scripture, different viewpoints on biology and even inner questioning part of me still wonders if it is correct. So I will continue on as I have, but know you have given me some insight and you better damn well be proud of it.
User avatar #182 to #181 - dbrak (11/19/2013) [-]
No problem If you have any questions about any of that stuff, let me know. I'm quite (nonaggressively) open about it!
#183 to #182 - redbannerman (11/19/2013) [-]
Eh, you seem like an alright sort. 'Spose I'll keep in contact.
#167 - sanguinesolitude (11/18/2013) [-]
lightbulbs fw
lightbulbs fw
User avatar #95 - Katzie (11/18/2013) [-]
I feel like this is the vindictive ******** the whole 'equal rights' movement is taking now. No, she wasn't being insensitive, she didn't know the kid had two moms.
User avatar #97 to #95 - Katzie (11/18/2013) [-]
Also it feels kind of stupid. The only reason to change the name of Mother's Day to Mothers' Day is when you have an unusual need to tell people your parents' sexualities.
User avatar #81 - undeadwill (11/18/2013) [-]
Sometimes. I see where the gay rights movement is going and it scares me. Because they don't know what "peace" is they are still angry upset and looking for blood. This war has made us bitter where we should be joyous that we are succeeding. We have made great victories but in our victory we have grown hateful of our enemies. We have made the greatest mistake any one has ever made. We grew to hate the enemy to the point the hatred was our cause rather than reaction. We would strike the shadows of the tombstone of the dead sooner than stop fighting.

In a movement that only wanted love and acceptance I fear as become bitter and hateful. It scares me as a gay man. Because I fear that our hatred will lead to our destruction. We are few and the masses are growing. And ultimately we are isolated of each other. We do not seek out understanding but lash out in hatred. And both sides are calling on emotions rather than logic or reason. The voice echoes within the sides growing louder and louder as one hated the other is met.

We have come so far and I fear it will all be for nothing if we continue down the path of anger. We will destroy our enemy and all that they had feared would have come true and every promise would have been for nothing.

If we are to win in the long run we must fight to overcome and not destroy to coexist and not dominate, to seek understanding that both sides will be sated.
#88 to #81 - yorker (11/18/2013) [-]
"IT WAS SAID THAT YOU WOULD DESTROY THE SITH, NOT JOIN THEM."
User avatar #29 - infinitereaper (11/18/2013) [-]
Cheeky little ******
User avatar #149 - tuckthisphit (11/18/2013) [-]
WOW DAS REARRY #ROOD OF HER
User avatar #140 - wizzerdofaus (11/18/2013) [-]
Technically it should always be mothers' day
User avatar #89 - Scythe (11/18/2013) [-]
wow, is funny. very laugh. lol out loud

who the **** cares
User avatar #82 - desuforeverlulz (11/18/2013) [-]
It would actually still be Mother's Day, no matter how many mommies you have. It's about all mothers in the world, the day of "mother", not your specific mom(s).
[ 181 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)