the sad truth. not mine but thought i'll share.. "Hurr durr music isn't real anymore my generation sucks muh mtvees." Listen you , this has been getting old for years now. music has, and always will  TAGS ARE FOR FAG


Anonymous comments allowed.
#104 - perdition (11/07/2013) [-]
Well there's your problem.
#106 to #104 - mondprinzessin (11/07/2013) [-]
he could be playing classical guitar

you pluck the strings more than anything and its more precise

gahwd get youre freakin faks straight
#113 to #106 - reycall (11/07/2013) [-]
i don't know if your joking..... and im gonna assume your not for the sake of an argument,

...... he could start by getting his ******* thumb where it should be, behind the neck.

and although there are some techniques for left hand plucking (or right hand if you are left pole.) they are not as common. unless you are thinking of hammers and pulls... but thats not really what people would call plucking.

so get your **** straight fag.
#243 to #113 - agonix (11/07/2013) [-]
_>Implying you can't play D minor chord without putting your thumb behind the neck.
Get a load of this pleb
#312 to #243 - reycall (11/07/2013) [-]
you are not on 4chan bub. no green text to be had here.

and sure you can do that, if you want to make it needlessly harder for no good reason.

1/10 for getting me to reply.
#29 - aerialcharles (11/07/2013) [-]
"Hurr durr music isn't real anymore my generation sucks muh mtvees."

Listen you ***** , this has been getting old for years now. ****** music has, and always will exist. Amazing music always has, and always will exist. Just stop listening to the top 40 on Pandora you ***** .
#152 to #29 - drdisrespect (11/07/2013) [-]
thumbed for donkey kong
#180 to #29 - claudius has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #199 to #29 - makethingsworse (11/07/2013) [-]
I disagree. I don't think the music of today is **** . I think my music taste is great and everyone else listens to **** . That's the beauty of music- there's a lot of it to go around.
User avatar #235 to #29 - blokrokker ONLINE (11/07/2013) [-]
I'm pretty certain people have been making this claim at the VERY LEAST since Elvis became popular. That's, what, sixty years minimum of the same damn thing? I'll start believing these people when I see it.
User avatar #204 to #29 - lordfluffs (11/07/2013) [-]
Amazing music thread? Throw in a couple of your favorite songs/artists that someone might not have heard of.
Here we go
Savant - Prelude / Living Ipod / Splinter
Twenty One Pilots - Vessel (the whole album)
Feed Me - Lonely Mountain
also I completely agree aerialcharles
User avatar #307 to #204 - elitehacker (11/07/2013) [-]
How about Kill Paris - Slap Me (Griz remix)
Twenty One Pilots?
How about Now, Now - Threads (the whole album)
Feed me?
How about Prototyperaptor - Drive Hard?

Look at that, even in the similar styles, there is plenty of good music to go around.. If you just look into it...
User avatar #223 to #204 - doublicious (11/07/2013) [-]
twenty one pilots are amazing
User avatar #213 to #29 - trojandetected (11/07/2013) [-]
I agree and then there are the faggots who complain about how **** this generations tv is yet they themselves watch MLP.
#78 to #29 - holmesc (11/07/2013) [-]
******		 music probably didn't get so much 			*******		 attention back in medieval ages, they probably all got executed by lords or some 			****		.
****** music probably didn't get so much ******* attention back in medieval ages, they probably all got executed by lords or some **** .
#157 to #78 - bann (11/07/2013) [-]
Well in the last 50 years there has been plenty of ****** music. "I ran" by the seagulls...awful song, was in the top 10 for weeks. You know what's beautiful? The ****** songs of yesterday are gone and the gems remain. The same will happen with today's music, I have faith.
User avatar #176 to #157 - claudius (11/07/2013) [-]
Last time I checked "I Ran" is still fondly remembered as solid 80's synth pop.
#182 to #176 - bann (11/07/2013) [-]
Also less than 2 million views from what i saw on youtube for the combined total, hardly the hit it was in the 80's
#181 to #176 - bann (11/07/2013) [-]
As much as wreaking ball will fondly be remembered by a select few, but try to find a station that plays I Ran. At least several classic rocks songs have their own stations devoted to them, hard to find much 80's pop unless they slip it into a yesterday hits and today's favorites station. I suppose we won't know what's considered history worthy music til long after we're gone, could all be forgotten.
User avatar #183 to #181 - claudius (11/07/2013) [-]
I don't know where you live, but the stations where I am play 80's music all the time.
#184 to #183 - bann (11/07/2013) [-]
sheeeeeit, I'm out of the loop yo. Maybe New England just dosn't like the 80's much.
User avatar #187 to #184 - claudius (11/07/2013) [-]
And when most people think of the 80's, I Ran by A Flock of Seagulls is one of the first songs that pop into people's minds.
#191 to #187 - bann (11/07/2013) [-]
I'd say Micheal Jackson, Van Halen or even Billy Joel, but I suppose they work to. I'll go ask people around town, I'll get back to you with results if I remember.
User avatar #194 to #191 - claudius (11/07/2013) [-]
This guy gives a pretty good outline of the band and their hit song.
#275 to #157 - omnipotentsoap (11/07/2013) [-]
Don't you be talking 			****		 bout I Ran I'll put you in the ground homeboy
Don't you be talking **** bout I Ran I'll put you in the ground homeboy
User avatar #229 to #157 - trivdiego (11/07/2013) [-]
that's kinda beautiful
#98 to #78 - lionti (11/07/2013) [-]
unfortunately the B52's were not executed and they gave us rock lobster
User avatar #282 to #78 - ryderjbudde (11/07/2013) [-]
>no internet
>no tv
>no ipod

That's why.
User avatar #2 - bigstick (11/06/2013) [-]
He wears a fedora thats why, hes 2euphoroc for god monwy
#35 - deletedmyaccount (11/07/2013) [-]
Who wants to give money to someone with a fedora.
#48 - zzRedzz (11/07/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #200 to #48 - makethingsworse (11/07/2013) [-]
I don't think people appreciate how dangerous that sport used to be. I mean, holy **** , and you thought getting hit in the head with a baseball might be bad...
#7 - Nahyon ONLINE (11/06/2013) [-]
Honestly, the song wrecking ball isn't bat, the music video is just unecessary
User avatar #164 to #7 - haroldsaxon ONLINE (11/07/2013) [-]
Have you even listened to that **** ? Some people just shouldn't sing.
#290 to #7 - chromefile (11/07/2013) [-]
I love that song, it's like sneezing during an orgasm.
#16 to #7 - ichitoten ONLINE (11/06/2013) [-] that supposed to be Ichigo in his vasto lorde hollow form?
#19 to #16 - anon (11/06/2013) [-]
Nope, it is Juggernaut form DotA 2 you should try dota, it is awesome
User avatar #26 to #16 - bjornkrage (11/07/2013) [-]
what the **** does that even mean?

but no, it's the ************* juggernaut
User avatar #17 to #16 - Nahyon ONLINE (11/06/2013) [-]
N-no, that's Yurnero the Juggernaut
it was just ... yes
#18 to #17 - ichitoten ONLINE (11/06/2013) [-]
Yurnero? What am i missing here? :p
User avatar #20 to #18 - Nahyon ONLINE (11/06/2013) [-]
Just from a Vidya gaem called dota 2. it's not really related or something don#t worry ^^
#81 to #7 - holmesc (11/07/2013) [-]
it's ******* terriable with or without the music video
User avatar #237 to #81 - Nahyon ONLINE (11/07/2013) [-]
Why ?
#313 to #237 - holmesc (11/07/2013) [-]
You kids coming in all hard thumbing me down and 			****		, lol how 			*******		 pathetic.   
You really get hard from her?   
She's a 			*******		 media whore that sings with empty lyrics and you're trying to defend her?   
			****		 she doesn't even have a good voice. Go get some real music kid.
You kids coming in all hard thumbing me down and **** , lol how ******* pathetic.

You really get hard from her?
She's a ******* media whore that sings with empty lyrics and you're trying to defend her?
**** she doesn't even have a good voice. Go get some real music kid.
User avatar #39 to #7 - doctorhue (11/07/2013) [-]
It's not bat, it's ****** terrible.
#203 to #7 - anon (11/07/2013) [-]
The video isn't bad it's aestethically pleasing and over all pretty good it's just a bit over the top
#230 to #7 - jamiemsm ONLINE (11/07/2013) [-]
walk off the earth made a really good cover of it
User avatar #9 to #7 - samthediv ONLINE (11/06/2013) [-]
James Arthur  - Wrecking Ball (Miley Cyrus Cover)
Aye, James Arthur's cover is decent.
User avatar #10 to #9 - Nahyon ONLINE (11/06/2013) [-]
People like arthur are proofing it, a lot of good cover sout there
User avatar #272 to #9 - melioracogito (11/07/2013) [-]
Decent? It's amazing!
#85 to #7 - sovereignaggron (11/07/2013) [-]
I was afraid to get thumbed to death, so thanks for saying it.
User avatar #28 to #7 - harbingerwolf (11/07/2013) [-]
The parodies seem pretty common aswell.

"I came in like a pooooookeball, and now i just have to caaaaaaaaatch them all..."
User avatar #358 to #28 - keatontheghostfox (11/10/2013) [-]
"I'm riding on a wreeeeckingball, not wearing any clothes at all"
#128 - BeaverBalls (11/07/2013) [-]
i feel like im beating a dead horse with content like this, you think there is no such thing as good music anymore? well how about you put down your old CD's, stop looking up the same bands on youtube, and GO FIND SOME NEW MUSIC! there are hundreds of new bands out there for every genre of music, all you have to do is get out of your comfort zone and go ******* find some.
#232 to #128 - srvhendrix (11/07/2013) [-]
I agree. I hate it when pretentious little turds go on about how the music industry is so **** nowadays. If you really set your mind to it, you can find such good music hidden in the depths of the Internet.
#67 - swagloon (11/07/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#68 to #67 - swagloon (11/07/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#69 to #68 - swagloon (11/07/2013) [-]
sorry about this gif being a three parter.  However as far as I known the music industry has always been about money.
sorry about this gif being a three parter. However as far as I known the music industry has always been about money.
User avatar #88 to #69 - elyiia (11/07/2013) [-]
Dara Ó Briain is a funny man.
User avatar #82 to #69 - mitchr (11/07/2013) [-]
Not necessarily. Foo Fighters, Beatles, they write music to write music. That's the noble thing about it. The money's just a side effect.
#305 to #82 - mayoroftownsville (11/07/2013) [-]
"It should have been 'Can Buy Me Love' "
- Paul McCartney
User avatar #325 to #305 - mitchr (11/07/2013) [-]
That's a joke, for one, and for another, did they write the music for the money? They wrote because they wanted to have fun. They ended up famous because of it.
#344 to #325 - mayoroftownsville (11/08/2013) [-]
No, they did it for the money. John for one was pretty desperate for success, and all of them were willing to drop Pete Best in an instant when he couldn't keep up. Their early music was ridiculously commercially catered, it was only about 5 albums in that it became more about the art than about the money.

"John and I literally used to sit down and say, "Now, let's write a swimming pool""
- Paul McCartney
User avatar #345 to #344 - mitchr (11/08/2013) [-]
You know, you've got bias one way, I've got bias the other way, and we really won't ever agree on this, especially since I can see him being desperate for success and not money-hungry. It'll just be pulling a rope back and forth without a goal, so shall we shake hands and go our separate ways?
User avatar #87 to #82 - Sethorein (11/07/2013) [-]
well there music made the industry money so the industry made them big.
User avatar #89 to #87 - mitchr (11/07/2013) [-]
Pearl Jam - Yellow Ledbetter
Yes, but that isn't the point- the point is that they wrote to write. There wasn't a point to them doing it. It was just their dream. It is just their dream, for the Foo Fighters.
Music is a way to communicate emotions without face, without understanding. It is a way to hear all the way into a person's soul, their very core. It is a bridge between people, a connection that exists above language and nationality.
It is not a business, and should not be viewed as such. It is being turned into one, though, and that is what is wrong.
User avatar #90 to #89 - Sethorein (11/07/2013) [-]
everyone wants some money. Anyone who says they don't is lying. Nobody wants to starve y'know...
User avatar #92 to #90 - mitchr (11/07/2013) [-]
I never said they didn't. But they, the best artists, the ones who put every fiber of their being into their music, don't write to make money, they write to write, and then money comes along with it.
User avatar #94 to #92 - Sethorein (11/07/2013) [-]
not for the vast majority of them, bud. They need to be hella lucky to stand out in a crowd. The mentality of an artist does not dictate their success.
User avatar #218 to #94 - mitchr (11/07/2013) [-]
I never said it dictates their success. However, it does help, because when they can put their all into a song, make it emotional, put their heart and soul into it, that is when a song is best.
But they don't do that anymore, a lot of them. A lot of songs now, there is no passion in it, beccause they don't see it as such, they see it as a way to get rich quick.
User avatar #316 to #218 - Sethorein (11/07/2013) [-]
or you've arbitrarily decided that you think musicians who you don't like aren't passionate about their work.
User avatar #323 to #316 - mitchr (11/07/2013) [-]
Nah, there aren't many I actively dislike.
The main ones are Justin Beiber- because he's an asshole- and Chris Brown- because he's a ******* asshole.
If I don't like their music, that's all well and good, doesn't mean I dislike the musician themselves. I just don't fancy their music, really.
User avatar #346 to #323 - Sethorein (11/08/2013) [-]
Would you say those two aren't passionate about their music?

The only musician who I think fits your model is ke$ha, who literally made her millions then disappeared.
User avatar #348 to #346 - mitchr (11/08/2013) [-]
Ke$ha actually got a near-perfect score on her SAT; she's an extremely intelligent person who also attended Cold War history classes for fun. Her entire career may or may not be a parody of pop culture.

And I would say they aren't- Chris Brown seems to enjoy the power, seeing how he's used it to be a total ******* . Justin Beiber, the same to a lesser extent.
User avatar #353 to #348 - Sethorein (11/08/2013) [-]
but that doesn't mean they aren't passionate about what they do. Biebs says that all the time.
User avatar #356 to #353 - mitchr (11/08/2013) [-]
Perhaps so. I'll accept that he is.
But **** Chris Brown, though. He's a ******* asshole.
#127 to #89 - anon (11/07/2013) [-]
And yet the Foo Fighters are not doing those things for free. Do you honestly believe they don't want money? Of course they want. Do they have a passion for music? Sure.
User avatar #217 to #127 - mitchr (11/07/2013) [-]
Did I ever say or imply they are doing it for free? They want money, yeah, but that is not the reason they started making music.
User avatar #76 to #69 - rocksteady (11/07/2013) [-]
Every industry is about money, or it wouldn't be an industry. It would be a charity.
User avatar #74 to #69 - slumberdonkey (11/07/2013) [-]
Although I agree with the fact that you can "like" whatever music you want, i find it much easier to like music that had a lot of time and effort put into it.
#245 - IcRetoast (11/07/2013) [-]
MS Piant master race
#55 - slunchy (11/07/2013) [-]
You know what's really sad? Half of the ************* parroting this sentiment are the ones downloading music for free. More than half are buying Miley Cyrus and Nicki Minaj audio commodities (I refuse to call it music).
Want to know how to bolster the music industry? Go ******* buy some goddamned music. Find some band that speak to you, and go support them. The radio is not going to play good music unless it seems profitable. The music industry is so uptight, it's not willing to invest in the growth and evolution of their artists, so they have to churn out an endless array of Cher Lloyds and Miley Cyrus' to keep itself going. And it is working way too well. But if more people supported good new artists, underground acts can get more traction and maybe we'd see a shift in the next wave of popular music from ****** dance/hiphop/rap to something that's worth listening to.
I'm about to express an extremely unpopular opinion.

Stop downloading music. Legally or illegaly, downloading sucks big-time. So many people are approaching their music with the attitude "Why buy music? I can just download it for free or with iTunes" There's plenty of reasons to buy. Revenues are a huge sign to the music industry of what the public is generally into. The more a type of music sells, the more it's represented to the mainstream and the more it's promoted. Buying music gets you a physical object that you can feel and you truly own. It brings you closer to the artist than hosting digital files on a cold machine. Journeying to your local music store is a great way to meet people who share your musical interests. It's a great place to talk music or even get introduced to great new bands. Having a big collection of CDs or vinyls or tapes, while more spacious is a hell of a lot better to me than files on a computer.

Go support music, guys.
User avatar #80 to #55 - kylekez (11/07/2013) [-]
I do.
Stop assuming.
#115 to #55 - mogex (11/07/2013) [-]
Downloading is a infinitely edged sword that gives much more power to the consumer over the producer of digital content. I agree the music industry needs to be supported and that people SHOULD support the artists digital content revenues through paying instead of pirating. But it is truly unwise to try and stop piracy directly as downloading is just another medium of information distribution and copying. Therefore I believe that the music industry should begin moving their primary revenue models farther and farther away from digital content files and begin simply encouraging the use of physical investments such as concerts and real-time investments.

Though another theory is that the caveman principle may hold true for the music industry and downloading/pirating/manufacturing your own copies of content, with the encouragement of paying for the full thing online and with easy to access mediums to pay for such a thing. So in theory the publicity brought in through piracy will override the so-called lost money, which is actually lost potential buyers by:

Normal buyers who continue the normal revenue trends + Revenue and popularity brought by publicity from the pirates to people who DON'T pirate and weren't originally interested with the music in the first place without the spread of information from piracy + Pirates who respect the artists whereas they manufacture their own copies from that artist.

All of this may very well outweigh the pirates who just pirate music for free and don't create any social or conscious effort to tell anyone about the content they used, if by a 'somehow reliable source of statistics' can tell us whether or not that group is a small minority or a grand majority.

For this theory to possibly happen the artist would have to have very admirable and can easily become viral just from that one factor.

These are just some of my theories and possible solutions on the future of downloading and how piracy can affect the music industry.

User avatar #118 to #55 - retardedboss ONLINE (11/07/2013) [-]
I can't be arsed. Seriously tough, there isn't a problem with the music industry. The music industry is a business. It, by nature, is about making money. Since when has a business cared about the quality of their product? Never, only that it sells. The way of the internet is allowing people to make money off of their music without involving big labels. That's the way of the future.If you want to listen to good music, do so. But people are entitled to listen to ****** music if they want.
User avatar #166 to #55 - haroldsaxon ONLINE (11/07/2013) [-]
Pirating music helps the music industry. This is not always true when it comes to smaller artists, but even then
User avatar #174 to #166 - toensix (11/07/2013) [-]
#168 to #55 - qwertywtf (11/07/2013) [-]
I see it has sharing cds with people instead of buying them, it's just over the internet. it still hurts the artist, and if I hear a band I want to support, I will.
Personally, if I was the artist, I would rather have people who can't afford to buy the music, like me, to listen to it even though they can't pay for it. Not deprive someone of joy because they don't have the money for it. Concerts and merch support the artists more than music sales, anyway.
User avatar #209 to #55 - mondominiman (11/07/2013) [-]
I only buy music from up and coming artists or artists that haven't yet hit it big but are still well known. If they make several millions with each album I'll just pirate it.
User avatar #304 to #55 - venoshto (11/07/2013) [-]
Most who support this idea are angsty teenagers who don't really feel at place in today's society (regarding music, fashion trends, whatever). Most of these teenagers don't really have the money to efficiently support the industry. I know I'd buy lots of albums from new bands that I like if I could afford it. I don't think I'll find too many well-off people complaining about the music industry. They just support the music they like simply because they have the money to.
User avatar #185 to #55 - iridium (11/07/2013) [-]
Nothing wrong with buying music online legally. You just have to know where to do it and which sites actually give most of the royalties to the artists.

Doesn't beat a hard copy though.
User avatar #212 to #185 - iridium (11/07/2013) [-]
Big thing about distribution is how many middlemen it cuts out. No dealing with shipping or manufacturing or anything.
User avatar #201 to #55 - mans (11/07/2013) [-]
You just mad because you can't see your forehead.
#292 - screamingdemon (11/07/2013) [-]
This isn't like guitar hero at all...
User avatar #139 - mrjunebug (11/07/2013) [-]
It's not about the music anymore. It's the looks and the wealth the media cares about. You can be the most ********* rapper or musician on the face of the planet. Just as long as you're either hot or rich, or both, doesn't matter, just as long as you have one of those features, you'll do fine in the mainstream.

I personally tend to stay away from stupid ******** songs. Yet, everyday on the internet I see people who claim to hate "Miley Cyrus" or "Justin Bieber" or "Lil' Wayne" or whatever, constantly make stupid unfunny jokes about these "musicians", not knowing that it is small jokes like that that make them even more famous than they already are.
#162 to #139 - agena (11/07/2013) [-]
The fact that Paris Hilton is making another album proves you right, good sir.
User avatar #210 to #162 - mondominiman (11/07/2013) [-]
Is that what she does? I've always thought she was famous for being famous. Makes no sense but thats what I thought
#266 to #210 - agena (11/07/2013) [-]
She's famous for being rich, but a few years ago her dad (who owns all the Hilton hotels) bought her a record deal. Her album was awful. Now she's doing the same thing again, because she's a blonde, skinny, rich bitch.
#12 - anon (11/06/2013) [-]
You realize talent does not equate to entertainment value, right? I respect good music and talented musicians, but if your quality principal were to hold true, then how dare you watch The SImpsons without having read the complete works of Shakespeare yet. Simply because one media is "better" I must consume it first, meanwhile ignoring entertainment value? That is your premise. It is foolish.
User avatar #13 - Vandeekree ONLINE (11/06/2013) [-]
It's because that guy with the guitar is doing nothing new. Artists sing the same songs over or make slight changes to already established ideas of what music is and expect to get some kind of reaction to it. It's like the Johnny Cash movie where the guys preform for the studio owner and once done he says something like "yeah it was perfect, you sang it exactly the way the artist wrote it to be sung, exactly the way everyone else sings it"

Not everything that's new is good, but nothing that's old will go anywhere anymore, it had its time. Innovation takes failure and sometimes you have to swing naked on a wrecking ball to get there.
User avatar #22 to #13 - noblexfenrir (11/06/2013) [-]
Absolutely agree. There is a difference between appreciative entertainment and monetary entertainment. You can desire to be applauded and thanked for (While quite a vain idea) your hard work and accomplishment, you however have no right to think people should have to pay for things they don't want to or that your specific product is special in some way and that inherently makes you under appreciated and unnoticed.
User avatar #30 to #13 - Sataria (11/07/2013) [-]
Only a slight part of me agrees with that, look at all the musicians now, everything is exactly the same
User avatar #108 to #30 - Vandeekree ONLINE (11/07/2013) [-]
No, most of it is the same, but there are a few innovators. All time periods had this. A few people making good songs and a bunch of people copying them and ruining it. But, like how the oldies are still remembered and how the great composers of old are still famous, the greats of this age will out live the rest.
User avatar #37 to #13 - plutobr (11/07/2013) [-]
How can you possibly know he is not doing anything new? This picture have no sound.
User avatar #107 to #37 - Vandeekree ONLINE (11/07/2013) [-]
Because he's on the street. Good artists get noticed. poor artists complain about how the good artist's music is different than established types of music.
#1 - mudkipfucker (11/06/2013) [-]
Yeah, because music has never been about show over actual talent

Nothing against Kiss, they are better than Miley
User avatar #41 to #1 - Sperit (11/07/2013) [-]
i liked kiss
User avatar #4 to #1 - sinery (11/06/2013) [-]
You ****** for comparing Kiss to it.
#21 to #4 - anon (11/06/2013) [-]
kiss sucks dick tho
User avatar #49 to #1 - zzRedzz (11/07/2013) [-]
******* love KISS.
User avatar #3 to #1 - nynewars (11/06/2013) [-]
Those dudes were the ultimate mix between flashy and good for there time.
User avatar #36 to #3 - masterboll (11/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #47 to #36 - nynewars (11/07/2013) [-]
was wondering when somebody would correct that..
User avatar #5 to #3 - mudkipfucker (11/06/2013) [-]
I agree, they are great, but the showy stuff is what they are known for
User avatar #6 to #5 - nynewars (11/06/2013) [-]
Oh yeah, definitely.
User avatar #308 - thecarter (11/07/2013) [-]
There is plenty of amazing music out there, you just need to look in the right ******* places. Top videos on youtube and iTunes top 10 is pretty much useless
User avatar #309 to #308 - ilcecchino (11/07/2013) [-]
That's the point he's making. the good music is out there. but it's not popular because the artists don't do publicity stunts and stupid ****
User avatar #310 to #309 - thecarter (11/07/2013) [-]
Exactly, they just play and get on with it
User avatar #311 to #310 - ilcecchino (11/07/2013) [-]
Yeah. but his point by "music industry" is just what is making the most money atm isn't based on how good the music is. but by how much stupid **** the artist can do to be popular
User avatar #172 - cosmicapprentice (11/07/2013) [-]
TBH, as much as I like underground music and not-so-known bands/artists, there are also a lot of mainstream and commercial bands/artist that I like and I'll never stop liking. Don't thump me down just because this is an opinion pls.
#257 to #172 - funmanigro (11/07/2013) [-]
ice cube for example
#103 - senglish (11/07/2013) [-]
yep the video for wrecking ball embodies the music industry
User avatar #186 to #179 - justmedude (11/07/2013) [-]
This. So much this.
User avatar #189 to #179 - huffe ONLINE (11/07/2013) [-]
*protip* go to /mu/ and ask about neutral milk hotel
User avatar #192 to #179 - awesomescorpion (11/07/2013) [-]
You should post this as content. You really should. More people need to see this. If you don't, I will.
User avatar #193 to #192 - deathgaze (11/07/2013) [-]
Alright then, I'll post as content
User avatar #195 to #193 - awesomescorpion (11/07/2013) [-]
Great. Can you reply with the link so I can show other people it, as well as thumb and favourite it myself?

Really though, I was always annoyed by those pretentious idiots who complain about the lack of variety in today's music... ON THE ************* INTERNET!!! If there was any place for accessible variety, it would be the internet. I myself have found thousands of great artists, each making works of musical art in their own way, and that's just the music discipline.

Thank you so much for this picture showing people what the real problem is.
User avatar #205 to #195 - deathgaze (11/07/2013) [-]
htt p:// Here you go, just remove the space. Also, no problem, happy to do so. Glad you liked the pic.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)