that last panel…. immediate regret.. Of course he believes in talking snakes. He's a US Senator, he works with a room full of them almost every day.
x
Click to expand

Comments(511):

[ 511 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #21 - fargfive (04/30/2014) [-]
Of course he believes in talking snakes. He's a US Senator, he works with a room full of them almost every day.
#301 to #21 - Rascal (05/01/2014) [-]
edgy but funny
User avatar #302 to #301 - fargfive (05/01/2014) [-]
I try my best
#404 to #21 - dnf ONLINE (05/01/2014) [-]
SAHNAPP!
User avatar #214 to #21 - leonhardt (05/01/2014) [-]
OH HO!
User avatar #57 to #21 - futapirate (05/01/2014) [-]
OHHH KILL 'EM.

I'll see myself out.
User avatar #204 to #57 - ohhh (05/01/2014) [-]
But i don't fight.
#304 to #204 - broswagonist ONLINE (05/01/2014) [-]
Don't lie to us.
User avatar #308 to #304 - ohhh (05/01/2014) [-]
Okay fine there was this one time, with the whip.
#272 to #21 - rowdeemunkee (05/01/2014) [-]
This 			************		, i like this 			************
This ************ , i like this ************
#116 to #21 - ReverB ONLINE (05/01/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#1 - ketsianto (04/30/2014) [-]
the face of regret is the best face, sadly you cant see mine...
#247 to #1 - bertyhell (05/01/2014) [-]
little girl, come of here for a second
#26 - pappathethird (04/30/2014) [-]
Almost didn't have to caption this.

#220 - irico (05/01/2014) [-]
Ya dun goofed
#22 - warbirdnine (04/30/2014) [-]
**warbirdnine rolls 04**
User avatar #434 to #22 - checkedem (05/01/2014) [-]
i did.
User avatar #27 to #23 - aytoktonik (04/30/2014) [-]
**aytoktonik rolls 77**
#65 to #27 - syfygeek (05/01/2014) [-]
oh my god do i try
#30 to #27 - superphil (04/30/2014) [-]
**superphil rolls 25**
**superphil rolls 25**
#32 - mickeyfinder (04/30/2014) [-]
his face when he realized what he said
his face when he realized what he said
#415 to #32 - williamweatherford (05/01/2014) [-]
How did those Colombian coffee crystals make me feel?   
   
 Angry
How did those Colombian coffee crystals make me feel?

Angry
#50 to #32 - mayoroftownsville (05/01/2014) [-]
His actual face when
#311 - douthit (05/01/2014) [-]
The problem isn't that religious people run the country, it's that we have people running the country at all.
User avatar #472 to #311 - dyalibya (05/01/2014) [-]
What do you propose we do ?
User avatar #500 to #472 - douthit (05/02/2014) [-]
Get rid of the violent control that those in government possess over everyone else. I can't kidnap my neighbor for doing nonviolent things I don't like, but they call it "arrest". I can't charge everything to my kids' tab, but they call it "national debt". If everyone just realized that moral standards apply to all of us, and those in government aren't any different.
#3 - minelava (04/30/2014) [-]
I think it should be illegal or at least really frowned upon for a public official to give vague and ambiguous answers.

If they don't know, or don't care, then they should say that. Otherwise, just state your damn stance on the matter.
User avatar #267 to #3 - envinite (05/01/2014) [-]
"Let's put all the stupid people in the prison"

Yea that will work and won't backfire easily.
User avatar #369 to #3 - pseudobro (05/01/2014) [-]
Making it illegal would be really stupid. But making it socially unacceptable? That's the way it's headed right now.
User avatar #112 to #3 - kevinbieksa (05/01/2014) [-]
I completely agree with you, but there is no possible way to police that.
#117 to #112 - minelava (05/01/2014) [-]
A man can dream, can't he?
User avatar #147 to #112 - matamune (05/01/2014) [-]
All statements are to be recorded.
Any non-recorded statements are not considered such
Punishment is flogging, stoning or exposure to the elements.
User avatar #175 - hektoroftroy (05/01/2014) [-]
While I did think this is funny and I get the point he's making, Bill Maher is a huge asshole.
#198 to #154 - khrystalmeth (05/01/2014) [-]
here you go, man
here you go, man
0
#224 to #198 - irico has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #200 to #198 - zomaru (05/01/2014) [-]
I prefer mine, but would like it even more if someone made it a PNG and removed the black background.
#225 to #200 - irico (05/01/2014) [-]
Replied to the wrong comment, sos.
#226 to #225 - zomaru (05/01/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#227 to #226 - irico (05/01/2014) [-]
Share the love
Share the love
#374 - sierramistfourteen (05/01/2014) [-]
his face at the end
his face at the end
#56 - twotwelve (05/01/2014) [-]
My problem with religious anti-evolutionists is this:   
   
You're not allowed to reject the theory of evolution because there is "not enough evidence" if you believe in any religion, because there isn't any evidence for that.   
   
Either accept things on faith, or don't. Don't play favorites. Besides, the theory of evolution has ridiculous amounts of evidence supporting it.
My problem with religious anti-evolutionists is this:

You're not allowed to reject the theory of evolution because there is "not enough evidence" if you believe in any religion, because there isn't any evidence for that.

Either accept things on faith, or don't. Don't play favorites. Besides, the theory of evolution has ridiculous amounts of evidence supporting it.
#362 - mrgoodlove (05/01/2014) [-]
This will definitely come in handy
#33 - Rascal (05/01/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 92** his IQ
User avatar #36 to #33 - areo0420 (05/01/2014) [-]
**areo0420 rolls 00**
That's too high. try this one.
#179 to #36 - thekeeperofthumbs (05/01/2014) [-]
Roll 92, 0 thumbs   
Roll 0, 92 thumbs
Roll 92, 0 thumbs
Roll 0, 92 thumbs
#363 to #179 - Rascal (05/01/2014) [-]
more like 366 thumbs...
so far
User avatar #400 to #363 - superhatch (05/01/2014) [-]
more like 420 likes i wont dont worry
User avatar #47 to #36 - skinstiches (05/01/2014) [-]
very nice
User avatar #250 to #36 - danster (05/01/2014) [-]
**danster rolls 783,108,886**
Admins IQ
#350 to #250 - pentathengone (05/01/2014) [-]
After Admin approved tumblr **** for oc definitely not
#44 to #36 - Rascal (05/01/2014) [-]
Someone get a clapping .gif in here NOW
#48 to #44 - gtocforyou (05/01/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#38 to #36 - Rascal (05/01/2014) [-]
Wow. That was impressive.
#2 - letrollzor (04/30/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#14 - Rascal (04/30/2014) [-]
This is from Religulous, which is actually a pretty good movie if you like seeing Bill Maher being a complete asshole to religious people. Well, and a lot of other people, but mostly religious people.
#268 - Rascal (05/01/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #100 - butteredhamster (05/01/2014) [-]
I actually own this movie. It was more about showing how many of our political leaders or people with that type of power believe in God and how they conduct their day with their ideas firmly in front of them even though the law clearly states there needs to be a line between church and state. He does speak to a man who is Catholic and that man WANTS gay marriage to be legal. He doesn't just attack Christians, he goes after everyone. What is worse is that many of them make our nation's laws! He even admits that an actor at a god theme park caught him off guard and stopped him in his tracks for a moment. How many religious people do that?
#114 to #100 - puttman (05/01/2014) [-]
hey man im not trying to argue with you, but could you show\tell where the "law states there needs to be a line between church and state"
User avatar #127 to #114 - butteredhamster (05/01/2014) [-]
Totally fine. Don't worry, unless you call me an idiot or start the personal attacks, I will just think you are on for some fun debating."Separation of church and state" was a phrase used by Thomas Jefferson expressing an understanding of the intent and function of the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution. The First Amendment to the Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ". Jefferson wrote, "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thereby trying to build a wall of separation between Church & State." It has been used by Supreme Court several times.
What I interpret that as saying is that Law shouldn't take a stance either way. Though, I am sure, many read it differently. The original point that I was trying to get is that Bill Maher was an equal opportunity asshole. He goes after everyone and admits when others get him. There are a few people who he chose to interview who took it in stride and were happy that he was trying to understand their religion. There were those who were obviously using religion to gain fame and money. And of course there were those idiots who just opened mouth and inserted foot like this guy.
#499 to #127 - puttman (05/02/2014) [-]
thank you
User avatar #266 to #127 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (05/01/2014) [-]
So according to the principle of Separation of Church & State, it should be illegal to NOT allow 2 men or 2 women to marry each other, right?

Because, y'know, anti-gay dogmas ARE religious in nature. Pretty much only religious teaches you to be biased against gays.

At least that's how I see things. From my point of view, gays do not benefit from the same number of rights stipulated in the Constitution (or other organic laws) of a state.
User avatar #423 to #266 - butteredhamster (05/01/2014) [-]
I like to think of it as not being any of our business and they should be allowed to if they want to. As long as what a person does is not violent and harms no others, then who are we to say they cannot do it? And if the argument is that there is not point in their union because they cannot reproduce, what about the people who have diseases that make them sterile? Do they not deserve to find love because there is no "point"?
Just like Religion, Gay marriage is a loaded question.
#130 to #114 - kumiuchi (05/01/2014) [-]
President Jefferson's letter to the Baptists of Danbury CT, and the Treaty of Tripoli. Also the first amendment.
#178 to #130 - oedad (05/01/2014) [-]
See everyone cited the first amendment, but the first amendment makes no mention of a political leaders personal beliefs just that the state/government can make no laws that would restrict or unfairly promote one religion over another. whereas the suggestion was a politician must separate his religious beliefs from his intrinsic character to be a political leader.
User avatar #121 to #114 - matamune (05/01/2014) [-]
It's rule number one:
"Don't be stupid"
#99 - newzalaman (05/01/2014) [-]
Mfw i'm turkish
Mfw i'm turkish
User avatar #199 to #99 - kriszifcation (05/01/2014) [-]
This made me lulz more than most of the content on frontpage
User avatar #378 to #99 - nigeltheoutlaw (05/01/2014) [-]
It's ok, I'm murican...
#328 - dehumanizer (05/01/2014) [-]
Guess which one of them belives in vaccines.
[ 511 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)