Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #548 - imthepunkkid
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/17/2012) [-]
You should really review the flagged gifs FJdeveloper I have SFW gifs that are flagged because they are a large file size or they take a while to load, And another Thing we need to be able to flag channels

When the ************* channel was around it got the site a rating for Pornography for about a month on several rating systems from various websites and add ons for chrome
If people see that then they will not want to come on here if they are against that kind of thing or if they are part of the younger audience
Right now it is at social/gaming I can understand the Social aspect
Also when stuff like that gets uploaded we loose people wanting to put ads on the site and then you loose ad revenue to make it better and fund it
So the people need to have the power to flag a channel, which could then go to someone who will review it and decide if it should be flagged or not
(honestly you don't have to hire someone just get some people from the site that visit loyally and have been here for a while possibly higher leveled people who have made it obvious they enjoy the site) I am sure a good chunk would take that kind of a position at no payroll
But these are just suggestions that you probably wont see so, if you read this you are a trooper for reading that wall of text
#553 to #548 - discomufffin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/17/2012) [-]
You have a point even though you must be 18 or older to sign up. Don't matter though because this ******** is infested with "le reddit" 12 year olds trying to be le grown up and dark n edgeee fagets. ur also a feget
User avatar #552 to #548 - kusipaa
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/17/2012) [-]
Good points.
I don't even think the ************* channel should have been made. There's already a **** section that's full of boobs. As you said, that stops the younger audience from coming here because they see titties all over frontpage.
#549 to #548 - imthepunkkid
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/17/2012) [-]
<this is the rating