super cheap chessboard. #justprisonthings. DEV. But then I can't create this monstrosity..
x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#32 - lordofthenash (06/12/2014) [-]
But then I can't create this monstrosity..
But then I can't create this monstrosity..
User avatar #39 to #32 - sabcy (06/12/2014) [-]
ooh... a beautiful swing.
User avatar #38 to #32 - jbabco (06/12/2014) [-]
How to play chess properly

If anyone wants it.
User avatar #41 to #38 - theturkeyburger (06/12/2014) [-]
digimon
#1 - shallowandpedantic (06/11/2014) [-]
This scene from the wire
#6 to #1 - Rascal (06/12/2014) [-]
the king stay the king.
#8 to #6 - Rascal (06/12/2014) [-]
**** you, other anon.
#9 to #8 - Rascal (06/12/2014) [-]
great minds think alike
User avatar #27 to #9 - nimblewalrus (06/12/2014) [-]
Samefags
#31 to #27 - Rascal (06/12/2014) [-]
they arent, just try using hide all and it will hide only 2 of the comments
#45 to #31 - givememoarpony (06/12/2014) [-]
When I samefag I always remember to use a different IP address by using my phone's data plan instead of my Wi-Fi.
#7 to #1 - Rascal (06/12/2014) [-]
"The king stay the king."
#4 - ximz (06/12/2014) [-]
.....not a bad idea

(sorta related)
User avatar #64 to #4 - fuzzysixx ONLINE (06/13/2014) [-]
I bet that took more than 1 man hour to create. Monopoly costs about $8. Though if you are in prison, kids in school, or something like that, I guess it's worth it.
#2 - disembodiedlord (06/12/2014) [-]
...That could work.
...That could work.
#5 - Rascal (06/12/2014) [-]
If you take the king with a castle do you get both checkmate and blackjack.
#3 - felixjarl (06/12/2014) [-]
Except that is 			*******		 smart.
Except that is ******* smart.
User avatar #11 - icameheretotroll (06/12/2014) [-]
XDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXD
XDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXD
XDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXD
XDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXD
XDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXD
XDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXD
User avatar #14 to #11 - thatsassygayfriend (06/12/2014) [-]
that was exactly what i thought
#24 to #11 - scopepp ONLINE (06/12/2014) [-]
#28 to #24 - xcoreyx (06/12/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#12 - sigmundisdabest (06/12/2014) [-]
The pawns should just be upside-down cards!
It doesn't cause as much pain to the brain and whatnot.
#26 to #12 - Rascal (06/12/2014) [-]
ya'd need 2 decks with different backs. Otherwise you're right.
#29 to #12 - Rascal (06/12/2014) [-]
Don't be silly... Have you ever looked at a deck of cards? The pawns on both teams would be identical.
User avatar #13 to #12 - sanbonzakura (06/12/2014) [-]
but than you'd need two decks with different backs
User avatar #15 to #13 - subaqueousreach (06/12/2014) [-]
I've got a pack with red backs and a pack with blue backs. cost me a dollar for each pack.

Some would say 2 dollars still constitutes for "super cheap".
User avatar #40 to #15 - mathmanchris (06/12/2014) [-]
That's still 15 dollars less than gangsta.
-7
#16 to #13 - ciacheczko has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #17 to #16 - sanbonzakura (06/12/2014) [-]
i dont know when was the last time you played chess but the pawns are all the same (on one side ofcourse) (in this discussion we are talking about pawns only, other cards are good as they are)
-6
#18 to #17 - ciacheczko has deleted their comment [-]
#19 to #18 - sanbonzakura (06/12/2014) [-]
my friend if you can not read that is not my problem but me and the kind sir above are talking about PAWNS (pic related) that is the front line and behind them are the rook the knight the bishop the queen and the king which dont need to be face down since cards represent them quite nicely
do you now understand?
-1
#20 to #19 - ciacheczko has deleted their comment [-]
#22 to #20 - Rascal (06/12/2014) [-]
dumbass
-2
#23 to #22 - ciacheczko has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #21 to #20 - sanbonzakura (06/12/2014) [-]
glad to hear that
#65 to #21 - sanbonzakura (06/13/2014) [-]
to all who want to know what this master mind said
enjoy the briliance
#25 - Rascal (06/12/2014) [-]
if you can't afford a chessboard AND you are eager enough to play it in some weitd circumstances, you have nothing to do among the living
User avatar #37 to #25 - thebestpieever (06/12/2014) [-]
There's poor people out there, though.
User avatar #30 to #25 - TwiztidNinja (06/12/2014) [-]
In a survival situation, nothing to do, have a deck of cards, play chess.
#33 to #30 - kladkake (06/12/2014) [-]
two dudes alone in the wild or whatever
>im bored what do
>i have a deck of cards man
>...
>oh cool that means we can play chess
User avatar #36 to #33 - thebestpieever (06/12/2014) [-]
At some point you gotta get bored of cards.
#42 to #36 - kladkake (06/12/2014) [-]
two dudes playing cards or whatever
>im bored of playing cards what do
>what if... what if we turn this deck of cards into a game of chess
>...
>...
>...nah
User avatar #43 to #42 - thebestpieever (06/12/2014) [-]
It's been 10 days with **** all to do, you've played poker to exaustion, you've done card tricks, magic tricks. You will take 10 minutes to draw a ****** board and do something different.
User avatar #44 - paulallen (06/12/2014) [-]
>implying bishops are jacks
#47 to #44 - derpination (06/12/2014) [-]
Oh, so you understood that a jack meant a bishop. Hmm. Interesting. You must just be a pedantic little prick then.
User avatar #48 to #47 - paulallen (06/12/2014) [-]
I'm not trying to be. Only the King and Queen are face cards.
You must not have gotten the content immediately.
#49 to #48 - derpination (06/12/2014) [-]
What else are they going to use for the bishops out of a deck of cards?
User avatar #50 to #49 - paulallen (06/12/2014) [-]
Bishops = 4
Knight = 3
Rook = 5
Pawns = Back of Cards
#51 to #50 - derpination (06/12/2014) [-]
And you're not being pedantic here?
User avatar #52 to #51 - paulallen (06/12/2014) [-]
Well it was a joke at first, but that design would be better.
I don't get why you're freaking out over this.
#53 to #52 - derpination (06/12/2014) [-]
Because you're pissing on their bonfire. They made a game of chess out of a pack of cards, and you're picking out the smallest details which don't matter.
User avatar #54 to #53 - paulallen (06/12/2014) [-]
Dude, calm down. The design would be FAR better if it were like this:
King = King
Queen = 9
Rook = 5
Bishop = 4
Knight = 3
Pawn = Back of Card

Just friendly advice. You don't need to freak out.
#61 to #54 - auryn (06/12/2014) [-]
Or... you know, a queen could be the queen.

Since it's a queen and and all.
User avatar #63 to #61 - paulallen (06/12/2014) [-]
A queens point value is nine.
#55 to #54 - derpination (06/12/2014) [-]
I do need to freak out. It's people like you that make the world a more irritating place to live. Quit sticking your rules on me.
User avatar #56 to #55 - paulallen (06/12/2014) [-]
I'm not imposing rules on you. You need to chill the hell out. I'm just suggesting what they should do to make their game easier to play.
User avatar #58 to #56 - shove (06/12/2014) [-]
But in my mind I'd consider bishops and knights 3s so by having bishops as 4s its just as confusing. I agree with the pawn idea but who really cares for the other pieces..?
User avatar #59 to #58 - paulallen (06/12/2014) [-]
According to the theory, a bishop is worth more than a knight more often than a knight is than a bishop. In other words, always trade a knight for a bishop. Technically they're worth the same in points, but it's more accurate for a Bishop to be a four.
User avatar #60 to #59 - shove (06/12/2014) [-]
That depends, if you're in a closed game no way am I trading a knight for a bishop, or if you get a knight on an outpost why would you trade? Bishops are good in open games and endgame but you can't really say they're THAT much better than knights.
User avatar #62 to #60 - paulallen (06/12/2014) [-]
If you trade your bishops off early and only have a knight in endgame, you're ****** . In some cases, a knight can be the most valuabe piece (especially in a closed game) but generally speaking, a bishop is more consistently valuable.
#57 to #56 - derpination (06/12/2014) [-]
NO U aef oiajgHQ9YQ[oj oug[ jpHTF NSK XN4NI HETOGN C 94YH
#46 to #44 - thesimonved (06/12/2014) [-]
>implying bishops aren't jacked   Protopriest Vasyl Kovaliov
>implying bishops aren't jacked Protopriest Vasyl Kovaliov
User avatar #34 - datmine (06/12/2014) [-]
That reminds me of warhammer 40k chess... Warhammer 40,000: Chess - Regicide Teaser Trailer
User avatar #10 - albinopanda (06/12/2014) [-]
Too many emoticons
 Friends (0)