x
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #19 - wedgehead (08/04/2015) [-]
Ban schnizel.
Ban takebackthewest.
Ban straightpride.
And whoever follows in their steps.

This is not /pol/.

And **** YOUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
Freedom of speech is two things:
1.: A tool to prevent a government from becoming a tyranny
2.: A toxic weapon for assholes.

We are no government.
So please get rid of this "Say what you want"- ******** . It made FunnyJunk WAY WORSE.
User avatar #52 to #19 - leonhardt (08/12/2015) [-]
How about you go to reddit if you want to censor things you don't like.
User avatar #41 to #19 - akkere ONLINE (08/08/2015) [-]
The site isn't "turning into /pol/", or rather simply attracting users of similar mindset, because a few users that demonstrate the views frequently. It's doing so rather because of the rising overextension of moderation to suppress all views remotely contradictory to certain key elements, elements that are simply summarized with the buzzphrase "SJW". 4chan's moderators, reddit's moderators, and the like have increasingly adopted the policy of suppression you propose to an exaggerated extent.

If you're perturbed by their increasing number, than simply take advantage of the policy of free speech by discussing it out. Scrutinize sources and methodology of information acquisition, check facts, and present support to opposing idea. I guarantee there are others like you who don't like what they post (I myself don't like the numerous racial infographics that have flawed methodology or simply aren't cited to begin with, or the pretentious "factual falcon vs. progressive parrot" spiel that had been posted quite frequently a while back), and if enough people join in a discussion ground of fair etiquette, the posts might even out to simply reposts of current events with follow-up discussion instead of buzzword-filled political cartoons and the like.

Free speech doesn't just create a ground where any opinion can be voiced; it also creates a ground where any opinion can be disagreed with, scrutinized, and put to the test against other opinions. By suppressing one opinion, you disgrace the others by removing a proper proving ground.
Besides, say you ban takebackthewest and schnizel and whoever else, then what? What guidelines do you set to "those who follow in their steps"? Anyone who posts opinions that are racist in nature, or anyone who posts opinions that have potential to harm in the long run? And to what extent?
User avatar #34 to #19 - peanutsaurusrex (08/08/2015) [-]
someones triggered
#33 to #19 - anon (08/08/2015) [-]
I understand that I shat on you pretty hard that day, but in my defense you were being an insufferable prick. But c'mon I see **** on here everyday that I don't like and don't agree with. That is what the thumbs are for.

Btw I have not banned you and you are always free and welcome to comment on my posts. I may not agree with you, but I will not go out of my way to silence you.

Respect homie peace im out.

TBTW
User avatar #35 to #33 - wedgehead (08/08/2015) [-]
Not sure if you're schnizel or takebackthewest, but it's not the stuff that you guys say that's my problem.
In that case, hide-all and block would have solved it.

No, the real problem is that you are getting more and more.
The current state is fine, but if admin let you guys continue your ******** , the site will be /pol/ in a few years.
And that's what bothers me.
#38 to #35 - anon (08/08/2015) [-]
But as you have blocked me I will respect your wishes and leave you alone now. Just remember when you mention our names we will get an alert, and we may respond. So if you wish this to end then I would recommend that in the future you either making a purposeful slight spelling error in our names or just not mentioning us by name, as to avoid the alert system.


TBTW
#37 to #35 - anon (08/08/2015) [-]
I wonder, would you act the same towards Tibetans if they were posting content on the genocidal policy of the Chinese against their people?

Slippery slope? I've got news for you. Yes, we will become larger in numbers as the continuation and escalation of genocidal policy towards Whites will anger more and more people, more and more will speak out against it.
But I suspect there will be at least an attempt to shut down free speech on the interwebs, and if things go the way i presume you would like them to, we will no longer have the right to speak of these things anymore.
But then you will see more and more of us speaking out in real life, you don't want that do you?

This is takebackthewest as was the previous comment.
User avatar #39 to #37 - wedgehead (08/08/2015) [-]
"But then you will see more and more of us speaking out in real life, you don't want that do you?"
As if any of you would ever have the guts to display you're racist thoughts in real life.
Sorry, but I still think that all of you are nothing but trolls.
That might make me the guy who falls for them, but meh, **** it.
#40 to #39 - anon (08/08/2015) [-]
I do it all the time and you would be surprised. Black folk generally agree with me. It's only the sjw faggots and mostly Whites who are afraid of being socially ostracized that dont. But whatever man have fun with your assumptions and ad hominems. Its pretty clear that you have no argument whatsoever, as you always ask questions but never answer them. I have tried to be civil and debate this with you, but that effort has been completely one sided.

Do trolls generally try to argue with civility? I think not. You can attempt to dismiss me as a troll, but you are the one using trolling tactics such as blocking me and then asking me questions. Or posting a string of ad-hominem attacks and pretending that you are in some way refuting our assertions.
#32 to #19 - anon (08/08/2015) [-]
You do realize that Admin has stated his intentions of not becoming like tumblr or 4chan, by specifically upholding a free speech policy don't you?
User avatar #25 to #19 - shedinja (08/06/2015) [-]
Mate if you don't like them blocking and hide all were made for a reason

you won't see their *********** and they can't reply to you
#20 to #19 - anon (08/04/2015) [-]
*roll picture*>I support freedom of speech and democracy only when everything is done my way and all opinions are valid as long as they are trivial.
User avatar #21 to #20 - wedgehead (08/04/2015) [-]
What do you try here, satire?
I never said that I support freedom of speech at all. And democracy was never part of anything here.
I just think that the immense hate speech slowly ruins this site.
And NO, I on't mind racist humor. But those guys don't do racist humor. They straight up pump out fascist propaganda.

Freedom of speech in the internet = bad
Get over it.
#42 to #21 - anon (08/08/2015) [-]
OY VEY THINK OF THE 600000000000000000 GORILLION!
 Friends (0)