Seems like a plan. - #76214538 added by marinepenguin at American Politics

Reply0

(12/05/2012)[-]

Does anyone else wish we could just wipe the plate clean and start with a fresh new system, instead of having to work with a system that's centuries old and has been corrupted.

#15418 to #15345 - marinepenguin

Reply+1

(12/07/2012)[-]

Isn't that basically a revolution?

#15422 to #15418 - threeeighteen

Reply0

(12/07/2012)[-]

Pretty much.

#15429 to #15422 - marinepenguin

Reply0

(12/07/2012)[-]

Seems like a plan.

#15436 to #15429 - threeeighteen

Reply0

(12/08/2012)[-]

It's a bit risky though, look at all the past revolutions that either failed or let something worse take control.

#15437 to #15436 - marinepenguin

Reply0

(12/08/2012)[-]

The Roman revolution against the Equestrians, but you know the end to that story. The French Revolution, but Napoleon was considered a tyrant. The American Revolution turned out good, but now it's kind of shitty.

#15446 to #15437 - threeeighteen

Reply0

(12/08/2012)[-]

The French Revolution wasn't all that good, mass executions and all, then you have he Bolshevik one - can't really call that a good revolution.

#15447 to #15446 - marinepenguin

Reply0

(12/08/2012)[-]

Plus the whole close-to-nuclear-war thing in the cold war wasn't fun..

#15449 to #15447 - threeeighteen

Reply0

(12/08/2012)[-]

Then you got the chance of some far right/left wing wankers taking over.

#15377 to #15345 - techketzer

Reply+1

(12/06/2012)[-]

I can't think of anything I'd wish for more.

#15351 to #15345 - Yardie

Reply+3

(12/05/2012)[-]

The system is dynamic, it has been changing. Every amendment to the Constitution is a huge change in our system. If we were to switch systems it would only provide more corruption in my opinion, because the ones making the decisions would be the already corrupt politicians, or the mislead general public.

#15346 to #15345 - threeeighteen

Reply+2

(12/05/2012)[-]

Forgot the fucking question mark, now it shall never be a proper question.