Politics - politics news, political issues, recent political news. Politics - politics news, political issues, recent political news.. Guise Gabe Newell for president No World War 3 I'll show myself out
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

Politics - politics news, political issues,...

Comments(57235):

[ 57235 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #68849 - feelythefeel ONLINE (1 hour ago) [-]
Who hacked and posted celebs nude pics? Host: "Who is this 4chan?"
User avatar #68847 - feelythefeel ONLINE (3 hours ago) [-]
>remember Canada's land in Vimy Ridge
>swell with Canadian empire pride
User avatar #68843 - teoanon ONLINE (5 hours ago) [-]
For my American National Government class I have to do a 1000 word paper choosing Republican or Democrat, in no point in my life have I truly cared about politics and i'm at a a loss as to how i'm going to be able to churn out a 5 page paper on a topic i care little about.
User avatar #68846 to #68843 - pebar (3 hours ago) [-]
Power of the Market - The Pencil First, watch this brief video.
User avatar #68841 - ribocoon (7 hours ago) [-]
Filthy JIDF propaganda stunt
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVg2EJvvlF8
User avatar #68848 to #68841 - feelythefeel ONLINE (3 hours ago) [-]
There are so many things wrong with what you just said.
#68837 - jewishcommunazi (11 hours ago) [-]
Looks like Political Test is working now:
www.politicaltest.net
User avatar #68845 to #68837 - ecomp (5 hours ago) [-]
not n e more
User avatar #68844 to #68837 - ablueguy (5 hours ago) [-]
MDB2 Error: unknown error...
#68838 to #68837 - youregaylol (10 hours ago) [-]
Better than the last one but it's still kinda off.
#68829 - youregaylol (12 hours ago) [-]
1 nazi VS 50 antifa around 50 leftist thugs corner a Spanish nationalist on the metro. It's fairly common for these anti fascist gangs to corner and assault party members on their way to rallies and the subway is a perfect spot because you can blend into the crowd relatively easily after you and your gang members finish beating someone up.

So around 50 or so of these thugs see this lone nationalist (who has also taken notice of them) and he prepares to defend himself with a knife if confronted. Sure enough a younger one wearing a red hat points at his party member shirt and attempts to intimidate him before the inevitable beat down. The party member is having none of it and stabs the kid in the chest before he can be beaten, sure enough as soon as the leftists see that they don't have their advantage they run away, all 50 of them.

A memorial is made for the red hat, calling him a "hero", and some party members vandalize the leftwing martyrs grave with "Heroes don't travel in packs."

All in all on less thug in the world and the anti fascists pissed their pants. Good times.
#68834 to #68832 - youregaylol (11 hours ago) [-]
"In other news bad things happen to ethnics, it must be a hate crime. Black on white murder completely race free."
#68835 to #68834 - anonymous (11 hours ago) [-]
When people I don't like act irrationally, it's motivated by politics.

When Nationalists murder a minority child in cold blood, there could be a million other reasons for it.
#68836 to #68835 - youregaylol (11 hours ago) [-]
The metro fight was completely motivated by politics, they were coming back from a rally and they attacked him because of a party shirt.

Please give me evidence that suggest that this girls kills was a racial attack besides them being brown, because I couldn't find any in the article. Maybe I missed something.
#68830 to #68829 - youregaylol (12 hours ago) [-]
Also at around 1:50 or so you can see a funny moment. One of the cowards throws something at the nationalist while his back is turned, and when the nationalist approaches him he runs away and then a few of his friends start spitting in party members general direction like a bunch of women.

Antifa=coward.
User avatar #68822 - ecomp (18 hours ago) [-]
daily reminder that swedes are pussies
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bkt1vAX0MRM#t=50
User avatar #68828 to #68822 - tredbear (12 hours ago) [-]
**tredbear rolled comment #38 ** :
Forklifts have a lot of weight and power, it would be incredibly impractical to fill warehouses with racking that could withstand being rammed with a forklift. Much better to just not ram it with a forklift.
User avatar #68821 - hellomynameisbill (19 hours ago) [-]
The Australian prime minister Tony Abbott is planning on sending weapons to the Kurdish forces in the middle east against radicals. What are your thoughts and predictions about the possible political outcomes of this aid? The Kurds are cool, but what will the other side think and/or do about it? will Australia face terrorist attacks? because that's what Abbott fears despite there being low reason of which for that to happen despite a radicalised vendetta against western civilisation.
User avatar #68824 to #68821 - jewishcommunazi (16 hours ago) [-]
They don't do shit to NATO countries, so I'm sure Australia can get away with sending weapons.
#68820 - anonymous (20 hours ago) [-]
Comment Picture
#68795 - anonymous (09/01/2014) [-]
User avatar #68840 to #68795 - jewishcommunazi (8 hours ago) [-]
I can't deny I had fun...
0
#68839 to #68795 - jewishcommunazi has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #68800 to #68795 - Shiny (09/01/2014) [-]
/pol/ must really want everyone to hate Wilson.
#68796 to #68795 - byposted (09/01/2014) [-]
Third place ebin
#68798 to #68796 - byposted (09/01/2014) [-]
pop pop pop watchin niggas drop
#68801 to #68798 - byposted (09/01/2014) [-]
96 high score.
#68793 - anonymous (08/31/2014) [-]
Congress Forgets How To Pass A Law
#68786 - jewishcommunazi (08/31/2014) [-]
It's been a long time since our last Political Compass thread. I was expecting to be more authoritarian.
#68806 to #68786 - marinepenguin (09/01/2014) [-]
I seem pretty balanced. A ton of the questioned really depended on a specific situation for me though, so it could vary depending.
#68805 to #68786 - liberalgodess (09/01/2014) [-]
Wow.... I didn't know I was that far left
User avatar #68804 to #68802 - tredbear (09/01/2014) [-]
you communist
#68825 to #68804 - alimais (12 hours ago) [-]
"In saying this, I promise you I am quite free of ail
racial hatred. It is, in any case, undesirable that one
race should mix with other races. Except for a few
gratuitous successes, which I am prepared to admit,
systematic cross-breeding has never produced good
results. Its desire to remain racially pure is a proof of
the vitality and good health of a race. Pride in one's
own race — and that does not imply contempt for other
races — is also a normal and healthy sentiment. I have
never regarded the Chinese or the Japanese as being
inferior to ourselves. They belong to ancient civiliza-
tions, and I admit freely that their past history is
superior to our own. They have the right to be proud
of their past, just as we have the right to be proud
of the civilization to which we belong. Indeed, I
believe the more steadfast the Chinese and the
Japanese remain in their pride of race, the easier I
shall find it to get on with them. "
"Der
Rassenstolz ist, wenn er sieh beim Deutschen bemerkbar
macht und gar aggressive Formen annimmt, nur eine
ausgleichende Reaktion auf die Minderwertigkeitsgefühle
zahlreicher Deutscher." this part was translated wrongly in the English version
"The racial pride when it is noticeable of the German and even gets aggressive forms is only a balancing reaction of the inferior complex many Germans" ~ Adolf Hitlers political testament before the war was lost
User avatar #68826 to #68825 - tredbear (12 hours ago) [-]
I was just giving you a hard time, because my political point is simular to yours.
User avatar #68827 to #68826 - tredbear (12 hours ago) [-]
or his, sorry.
#68794 to #68786 - ablueguy (09/01/2014) [-]
I don't think its 100% accurate.
#68831 to #68794 - youregaylol (12 hours ago) [-]
Congratulations on making it into glorious blue square, I was stuck in gross commie red.
User avatar #68823 to #68794 - jewishcommunazi (16 hours ago) [-]
Yeah, not very accurate. I think the social issues questions have too much weight on the result.
#68789 to #68788 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
I don't buy it.
User avatar #68790 to #68789 - jewishcommunazi (08/31/2014) [-]
What do you mean by that? This serves only to see where people stand.
#68791 to #68790 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
I mean that I don't think it's accurate when it comes to labeling beliefs.

For instance the questions that would indicate a far right perspective are obvious, like whether you oppose homosexual marriage or oppose immigration, but other things like social security over charity and the regulation of big business as well as a one party system can be far right ideals as well as left wing ideals.

I was placed in the authoritarian left column because they associated any social program with marxism.
User avatar #68792 to #68791 - jewishcommunazi (08/31/2014) [-]
I prefer the political test myself, it's more accurate and specific, but it wasn't working. I consider myself sort of authoritarian as I might advocate for a one-party system myself, but I like to see where people stand on the political compass and how the older members have progressed.
User avatar #68759 to #68754 - marinepenguin (08/31/2014) [-]
I've heard from unofficial sources that China's regime and economy is extremely fragile right now. They've compromised their economic security and their powers systems by trying to speed economic growth at a level that can't be maintained. If they cannot maintain this current level of growth (which is impossible in the long-term), their economy and markets will essentially collapse.

I'm not sure if that is 100% accurate, but it would explain their aggressive behavior on a world scale, economically, and militarily.
User avatar #68757 to #68754 - economicfreedom (08/31/2014) [-]
Democracy should be suppressed if its goal is mob rule.
Do not compromise the free market.
User avatar #68758 to #68757 - feelythefeel ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
Drop the free market,
(Don't) pick up the free market.
BWAAA BWABWA BWAAA BWABWA BWAAA BWABWA BWAABWAA
#68748 - alimais (08/31/2014) [-]
Haha , everyone discussed how a video showing jets destroying a vessel are Russian jets but Ukraine claims that vessel was destroyed by rebel artillery.   
   
  And now everyone is confused.   Meh, could be still through because I saw mostly birds and I'm not sure if I see a plane    
   

			
			You need to login to view this link
Haha , everyone discussed how a video showing jets destroying a vessel are Russian jets but Ukraine claims that vessel was destroyed by rebel artillery.

And now everyone is confused. Meh, could be still through because I saw mostly birds and I'm not sure if I see a plane

You need to login to view this link
#68749 to #68748 - byposted (08/31/2014) [-]
RIP Ukraine navy
RIP Ukraine navy
#68750 to #68749 - alimais (08/31/2014) [-]
Reminds me of this one
Reminds me of this one
#68747 - anonymous (08/31/2014) [-]
#68745 - alimais (08/31/2014) [-]
syrianassassin this might interest you

#68752 to #68745 - anonymous (08/31/2014) [-]
Yes, I'm sure the Tsarnaevs, who had lived in the United States nearly their entire lives got their weapons directly from Chechnya.
#68753 to #68746 - syrianassassin ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
Obama is trying to attack the ISIS in Syria using airstrike   
   
Just try it Obama, i dare you!   
   
let him touch a single part of syria and im sure the world war III will start
Obama is trying to attack the ISIS in Syria using airstrike

Just try it Obama, i dare you!

let him touch a single part of syria and im sure the world war III will start
User avatar #68760 to #68753 - marinepenguin (08/31/2014) [-]
There have already been airstrikes on targets in Iraq.

If we did it in Syria without Syrias permission they would probably only have harsh words for us and claim that it was a declaration of war. Syria doesn't have the capabilities to do much damage to the US. They're only big ally is Russia, and they aren't willing to risk all out war with another nuclear power.
#68755 to #68753 - anonymous (08/31/2014) [-]
IT'S HABBENING 4 REAL THIS TIME GUISE
#68729 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
www.funnyjunk.com/we+need+a+new+word/funny-pictures/5277356/126#126

Take a moment to thank the strong walls of politics for protecting you from the rest of ShillJunk.
User avatar #68733 to #68729 - Shiny (08/31/2014) [-]
It did have positive aspects, but so does every stable society. The Nazis were horrendously inefficient as a bureaucracy and batshit insane as a movement.

As a fascist, you should probably be embarrassed of Hitler. He was a mediocre leader that was good at giving speeches.
User avatar #68763 to #68733 - marinepenguin (08/31/2014) [-]
I had always been taught that the Germans kept impeccable records and were generally a very well run nation, up until they were incredibly strained for resources.

As for Hitler, you can't really say he wasn't a good leader. He managed to take an economy that was unbelievably worse then the US's in the darkest hours of the depression, and managed to turn it into a nation capable of taking over the entirety of Europe in less then a decade. Although when it came to the war itself he should have listened to Rommel and all the other heavily talented German commanders instead of the batshit crazy battle plans he drew up. There were several times when the Germans could have caused incredible losses to the British, French, and Russians that would have altered the history of the war, but Hitler was stubborn and stupid in that regard.

I really don't think Hitler was as horrible of a Human being as much as he is demonized, but that's what happens when you lose a war.
User avatar #68771 to #68763 - Shiny (08/31/2014) [-]
The thing is that Hitler didn't revitalize the economy with new infrastructures or policies, he got everyone riled up and spending money with promises he could only keep if the entire planet became Nazi territory. He didn't invade other nations simply out of jingoistic pride, a fascist state needs to constantly expand to remain economically viable.

Hell, if the Gemans won, it's entirely possible that they would have burned out again a few decades later, and the Nazi nation would become just like any other, leaving its national socialist roots behind.

"I really don't think Hitler was as horrible of a Human being as much as he is demonized, but that's what happens when you lose a war."

He wasn't any more horrible than, say, Ted Bundy... or, y'know, Stalin. Some people simply get bigger and better chances to be monsters. It's scary to think that anyone could grow up to be the leader of a genocidal war state.
User avatar #68773 to #68771 - marinepenguin (08/31/2014) [-]
That was a point that I was going to make in my next response. The whole reason that they went to war was to continue to fuel their economic growth, otherwise it would all collapse. Which is why I'm a little nervous about China and their explosive growth.

It's hard to tell what would have happened if they had won though. Interesting topic though.

I agree with that last point. Stalin and Mao killed just about as many of their own people during peacetime compared to the total death toll of world war 2. That's the whole reason that we demonize him, Hitler wasn't some god awful person who was evil to his core. He was a human being who loved his country, his mother, and wanted to be an artist. We just demonize him so that we can distance ourselves from the fact that we all have the capability of being monsters.
User avatar #68777 to #68773 - Shiny (08/31/2014) [-]
Meh, I don't think Mao, Stalin and Hitler can really be compared simply by death tolls. We'll never truly know whether any of them really meant well or were simply despots killing for their own gain. The Great Leap Forward, after all, only killed people that Zedong wanted to thrive.

China is also quite openly capitalistic and cronyist despite their insistence that they're fulfilling Marx's dream. Hu Jintao was probably more right wing than Santorum.
User avatar #68781 to #68777 - marinepenguin (08/31/2014) [-]
I'm aware of the Chinese being more Capitalist then Communist in practice, but I'm talking just general economic growth wise. The growth that they are going through right now is not sustainable, and most economies don't just level off when it comes to erratic growth like that, they crash and burn. With the US and Germany pre WW2 as perfect examples of that. They're currently doing all they can to try and sustain these gains in their economy, which is evident in their aggressiveness economically over markets and militarily over resources. My whole issue is that with China rising, the power of that whole area will destabilize and may cause issues, especially if China only sees war as the only viable option to save their economy and all their growth from crashing and going back to square one.
User avatar #68735 to #68734 - Shiny (08/31/2014) [-]
tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FascistButInefficient
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism_and_occultism
coffeecuphistory.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/the-myth-of-nazi-efficiency/

This is what my evidence would be if reality didn't bend to retroactively make all thought contrary to yours part of a grand conspiracy.
#68736 to #68735 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
mhm sure man
mhm sure man
User avatar #68761 to #68736 - akkere (08/31/2014) [-]
The horseshoe theory has proven itself once again.
#68762 to #68761 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
not really
User avatar #68764 to #68762 - akkere (08/31/2014) [-]
No? Then how is it then in your quest to fight the leftist degenerates, you have adopted their petty tactics of "I will not argue against someone of lower ideology who clearly won't learn anything from my superior intellect".

In your quest to fight left degeneration, you have become the right-wing degenerate.
#68766 to #68764 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
A degenerate is usually defined as someone of low moral character. I don't enjoy arguing with a wall, if you think I'm a degenerate because I won't acknowledge every single thing leftists spits out you're a moron.
User avatar #68768 to #68766 - akkere (08/31/2014) [-]
I'm sure the leftist degenerates would say something along those lines as well. Probably throw in some kooky tumblr reaction picture to mirror the one you gave Shiny along with it.
#68769 to #68768 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
I think you're just using false equivalency to demean those who won't spend hours arguing baseless leftwing arguments.

"oh u wont argue dat hitler was a nerd haha dat means ur a degenerate hypocrite"

2/10
User avatar #68770 to #68769 - akkere (08/31/2014) [-]
You already spend hours looking at POV videos of a guy and his adventures into ghetto degeneracy, no reason to partake in a fair discussion on a post that warranted no childish actions.

Not even a number/10
#68772 to #68770 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
Providing commentary on a video a few days ago = participating in a non discussion with a person who literally never listens or attempts to understand the other side of an argument?

Thats some retarded logic, did it ever occur to you that I had the energy at one point and I didn't at another? Or that maybe I'm just not in the mood for another Shiny teaching session that always boils down to "but im right", or that maybe his past insults (now that we're talking about childishness) could have possibly caused me to have a distaste for talking with him?

No, of course not. Dude just fuck off, I know your deal. You're just a leftist trying to score points for your team, you don't even care about this and you don't have a leg to stand on.
User avatar #68778 to #68772 - akkere (08/31/2014) [-]
Do you ever think that maybe people insult you because you declare anyone who so much as argues with you a leftist shill? I don't see how you could have a distaste for anyone that delivers in kind, and I recall some of your first posts here being that kind of degenerate behavior.

You wouldn't believe me, but I do care about topics like this because I am confident there's going to be some serious tides in racial issues in the future, and I am legitimately curious as to the full groundwork of your reasoning and ideals are (you'll remember I commented on a thread recently but for whatever reason you never responded; I just assumed you might've been busy). But if you'd rather be hostile, be hostile. I can understand if you don't want to bother taxing yourself in long discussion, I just don't understand why you run this circle of insult and then wonder why people do so in kind.
#68780 to #68778 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
Maybe the reason I don;t argue with you people is because you strawman to no end. Like I know that some people misuse that term, but seriously it's completely applicable in most our conversations. For instance I don't call everyone I disagree with a leftist shill, thats bullshit. When you say that crap over and over again I don't want to deal with you because you're lying. You also misuse terms constantly, again you use degenerate when I've done nothing that shows a lack of moral character.

You don't give a shit about me responding to Shiny, you just want to fight about pointless shit and because you're a leftist you want to defend your spectrum, that's the only reason you'd attack me for choosing not argue with a wall.

If I don't respond to you it means I'm either tired/busy. or I dont think you'd provide me with a beneficial discussion. If I can gain something from arguing with others I'll do it, but I'm not a teacher and I'm not going to spend 3 hours going back and forth with a moron.

And you called me a degenerate first so cut that hostile bullshit out, you set the tone so just deal with it, seriously. If you want an argument start up your own thread, quit bitching about shit you know is meaningless.
User avatar #68783 to #68780 - akkere (08/31/2014) [-]
I do give a shit actually, because I did want to remark on the referenced thread's remark on the internal dysfunctionality of the leadership of the Nazi Party despite the accomplishments they had initially made, but then I read how you reacted to Shiny's post and figured I'd throw in the Horseshoe remark to see if you understood what I meant, then add the degenerate bit to point out how your reaction wasn't much different than a tumblr twats shitposting.

I know for a fact you called me a leftist shill in the very first response you ever gave me when you came to this board, rather out of the blue if memory serves right. You might've been trolling then, but if you want to understand the stem of thought of your behavior in shill declaratives, that's probably it.

But hey, if you'd rather not argue the posts, then don't argue the posts. I'm just pointing out that you'd hardly be proving yourself to anyone outside of your ideals - like the occasional drifter that finds their way in this board - when you just simply go "mhm yeah okay buddy" on the occasions that those you claim to be moronic shills calmfully engage in a fair discussion with fair source material. But I suppose you wouldn't have to prove your point to some random lurkers, right? I'm sure these leftist degenerates will blow over in time and the Internet will gladly take these posts to heart.
#68785 to #68783 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
I called you a leftist shill because I believe you're a leftist shill based upon what I've observed, I don't deny that, but I don't call everyone a leftist shill for disagreeing with me. Syrian and me argue all the time but I don't think he's a shill. Lulz and me disagree but I don't consider him a shill. It's not a valid claim, it's a lie, and it's one of the reasons I avoid conversations with your type.

My reaction was mocking because I don't respect him and I don't want to waste my time on him. I also find it ironic that you and him both keep spitting out tumblr when really your type thrives in those places, not mine.

I don't have to prove my ideals to anybody who doesn't want to learn. If someone wants to asks me about my beliefs I will discuss with them, but if they won't listen then I have no obligation to talk with them, and you know that but you just want to take issue because you're biased, which is fine I don't care. Just don't pretend that this has to do with anything other than you wanting to stand up for the left.
User avatar #68807 to #68785 - akkere (09/01/2014) [-]
But they do agree with you on racial policy to one extent or another, which is most of what you post about anyway. Lulz (athough I'm pretty sure you have called him a shill a few times initially) hates mudslimes and niggers, Syrianassassin hates Jews and (possibly) niggers. So it's not a lie, you still call people who utmost disagree with you on racial policy a shill.

But very well, I realize this is a very late response but I wanted to get that out there and to say, yeah, you do call everyone who disagrees with you (at least on racial policy) a shill.
#68811 to #68807 - syrianassassin ONLINE (23 hours ago) [-]
i hate jews and possibly niggers?   
   
hey hey. my manager is black, and i dont hate jews but i hate zionism
i hate jews and possibly niggers?

hey hey. my manager is black, and i dont hate jews but i hate zionism
User avatar #68818 to #68811 - akkere (22 hours ago) [-]
Jews are behind lots of things but not every things.
User avatar #68816 to #68811 - akkere (23 hours ago) [-]
That's valid, as do I. Not to the sense I'd chalk it up as being behind anything and all things degenerate, but recognizing it as a rather troubling force in the political winds.
User avatar #68817 to #68816 - syrianassassin ONLINE (23 hours ago) [-]
be less complicated
#68810 to #68807 - youregaylol (23 hours ago) [-]
See, why bother even attempting to talk to you if you're going to lie about me over and over again after I've attempted to correct you.

I reply back and forth to you over and over again and I still get "Nope you call everybody a shill" without any shit to back it up.

Nobody want's to waste time on people who aren't interested in talking.

Anyway convo is over.
User avatar #68814 to #68810 - akkere (23 hours ago) [-]
"Without anything to back it up"
Well, in this thread someone presented back up for their own post, and you didn't so much as acknowledge it. Why waste the effort? Isn't that what your point was? Wasted effort?

I'm plenty interested in talking, you just reply back and forth over and over that "no I'm not the degenerate, I have high moral character, look at how I reacted to this response, I've declared him a moron and will respond to him like one. Nothing about the way I've judged and responded is anything like those degenerates who do the same thing"

But hey, if you want to end the convo without much to gain, be my guest. I've realized you insulate yourself to those that at least run parallel in your ideas of racial policy - even if it's not perfect - you'll be more likely to consider them less of a shill, so I got something out of this. You already thought of me as a moronic shill from the get-go, so chances are nothing about anything I could post would've changed that.
#68815 to #68814 - youregaylol (23 hours ago) [-]
Anyway convo is over.
User avatar #68812 to #68810 - syrianassassin ONLINE (23 hours ago) [-]
wtf is he talking about?
#68813 to #68812 - youregaylol (23 hours ago) [-]
He's saying that I call everyone I disagree with shills so i pointed out how I don't call you and lulz shills, but now he's saying that you're both racists so it doesn't mater.

It's all bullshit.
User avatar #68774 to #68772 - Shiny (08/31/2014) [-]
"youregaylol" calling me childish. Classic.
#68775 to #68774 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
"ur username on an image sharing website is dumb, lul owned"

Nevermind the fact that you jack off to cartoon animals, I'd say I'm way ahead of you in the adult department.
User avatar #68776 to #68775 - Shiny (08/31/2014) [-]
I keep the fact that I jack off to stupid shit off of this board. You're the one that's keen on labeling himself some kind of crusader of societal purity, despite the fact that he can't have a rational discussion without "drurr hurr dis is wut u sond like".
#68779 to #68776 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
Irony and strawmans galore.

You can't even stay on point with your own lame insults. You said that my name made me childish, I pointed out that you jack off to furry shit, you said that it didn't matter because it's off the board. So if my username was off the board it wouldn't be childish, and because you don't talk about your dog fetish I can't hold it against you?

This is why I don't like talking with you, you don't make any sense, you just say things in the hopes that you'll win.
User avatar #68782 to #68779 - Shiny (08/31/2014) [-]
"strawmans galore"

33 minutes ago: "oh u wont argue dat hitler was a nerd haha dat means ur a degenerate hypocrite"

Yeah, that figures.

No, I'm calling you childish because you have the gall to call others degenerate useful idiots, but recoil in bitter angst when someone throws a few punches at you and dig around on someone else's profile for dirt against them when they make even a vaguely accurate point. You pretend to be some enlightened bastion of truth then turn around and spam "sassy" Tumblr animations between passive aggressive remarks. I wouldn't even care if you were a Nazist if you had a tenth of the mental fortitude of byposted or schnizel.
User avatar #68808 to #68782 - schnizel (09/01/2014) [-]
he didn du nutin
he a good boy
#68784 to #68782 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
Satire is a bit different than actively attempting to portray a false perception of someone. By using quotes and typing like a retard I'm obviously mocking you, but when you say in passing "You say you're a crusader for social purity and a bastion of truth" you knowingly distort my position in a way that will make others accept it as fact if I don't correct it, thereby creating distorting my position and attacking me. You do this all the time and it's basic as fuck and boring.

And no, you actually called me childish because of my username, you were that dumb. I do believe that you're a useful idiot but I didn't recoil in bitter angst, I just refused to acknowledge your ridiculous argument, and then you were the one who started flipping shit. Let me be clear, I don't think I would gain anything from talking with you and I believe that our conversations are more of me educating you than a real discussion. You don't interest me.

And I don't give a shit if you think some other people are smarter than me or whatever, it's the equivalent of a kid telling his dad that he likes his uncle better when the dad makes him angry. You're only saying that because I'm the one who has given you the most smackdowns as of late, I'm sure if byposted would be the one with the whip you'd say that youregaylol is a super genius. It's pointless chitter chatter that you spew out when you don't know what to say.

Also I didn't check you profile, go ahead and look at the recent visitors. I've been here long enough to know that you're a furfag.
User avatar #68799 to #68784 - Shiny (09/01/2014) [-]
Shitposting is not "satire". The Producers is satire. Intentionally misquoting another person is, in fact, technically considered libel.
#68809 to #68799 - youregaylol (23 hours ago) [-]
Man you're toxic.
4/10 for getting me to respond to your idiocy.
User avatar #68737 to #68736 - Shiny (08/31/2014) [-]
So, no argument?
#68738 to #68737 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
>arguing with the ignorant   
>debating shills   
>correcting leftists   
>expecting them to learn anything
>arguing with the ignorant
>debating shills
>correcting leftists
>expecting them to learn anything
User avatar #68739 to #68738 - Shiny (08/31/2014) [-]
You might win a debate now and then if you tried to argue on common talking points instead of making it impossible to agree with literally anything you say without admitting that nonwhites should be killed en masse. :^)
#68740 to #68739 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
>implies I ever said that non whites should be killed   
>implying that I haven't destroyed you in every discussion we've had   
>implying I need to find common ground with mongoloids   
>acts like hes a troll   
>being this base   
>"why don't you talk to me?"
>implies I ever said that non whites should be killed
>implying that I haven't destroyed you in every discussion we've had
>implying I need to find common ground with mongoloids
>acts like hes a troll
>being this base
>"why don't you talk to me?"
User avatar #68741 to #68740 - Shiny (08/31/2014) [-]
I think you spend too much time on 4chan, son. That shit rots your brain.
#68742 to #68741 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
2012/10 best unslut evar so owned gg
User avatar #68743 to #68742 - Shiny (08/31/2014) [-]
Also, you should stop browsing 4chan because you are clearly not old enough to. At least not mentally.
#68744 to #68743 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
omg I didn't think you could trump your "u go on da 4chan 2 much" argument but you just devastated me with the "stop browsing 4chan kid" defense.   
   
pls don't call me a nazi racist again or i might cry.
omg I didn't think you could trump your "u go on da 4chan 2 much" argument but you just devastated me with the "stop browsing 4chan kid" defense.

pls don't call me a nazi racist again or i might cry.
#68765 to #68744 - anonymous (08/31/2014) [-]
Nazi racist
#68731 to #68729 - economicfreedom (08/31/2014) [-]
The walls weren't strong enough to protect us from immature hipster faggots like you who just want an ideology that's not mainstream.
"Hurr durr Hitler was so great!!! Race should play a major factor in policy making. OMG this shit is delicious!!!"
Seriously?
Grow up.
#68732 to #68731 - youregaylol (08/31/2014) [-]
>calls me a hipster and a faggot   
>strawmans the shit out of something he doesn't understand   
>tells other to grow up   
>says that others are butthurt   
   
gg ron paul 2016 libertardanism 4 lyfe
>calls me a hipster and a faggot
>strawmans the shit out of something he doesn't understand
>tells other to grow up
>says that others are butthurt

gg ron paul 2016 libertardanism 4 lyfe
#68726 - feelythefeel ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
So I was playing RFC, and it made me think of this. What would happen in a crazy alternate universe where the Mayans survived to do the kind of thing shown?
User avatar #68730 to #68726 - princessren ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
RFC?
what does that stand for? It looks like Civ.
User avatar #68751 to #68730 - feelythefeel ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
Rhye's and Fall of Civilizations. It's a history mod for Civ 4.
User avatar #68728 to #68722 - oxan (08/31/2014) [-]
I'm sure the Watchmen militias rounding up illegals in their tacticool gear can handle it.
User avatar #68725 to #68722 - Shiny (08/31/2014) [-]
I'm far more afraid of the Mexican cartels that cross that same border than some jihadi "invasion" that will more than likely fizzle.
User avatar #68727 to #68725 - marinepenguin (08/31/2014) [-]
I'm not worried about an invasion, ISIS doesn't have that kind of capability. I'm worried about a terrorist attack on a civilian center, and how that would effect the current political atmosphere.
 Friends (0)