/pol explains ISIS. i found this on /pol and thought you might wanna see this stop oppressing me. Say hi to evil I' seen a lot on Imgur about corrupt government sandniggers
Click to expand

/pol explains ISIS

/pol explains ISIS. i found this on /pol and thought you might wanna see this stop oppressing me. Say hi to evil I' seen a lot on Imgur about corrupt government

i found this on /pol and thought you might wanna see this

stop oppressing me

Say hi to evil
I' seen a lot on Imgur about
corrupt governments killing their
own people, but I haven' t seen
anything yet about a, bloodthirsty
called ISIS.
I put this together to change that.
This is ISIS
Short for The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
ISIS is a terrorist organization whose goal is to create a
Sunni state that stretches from Baghdad to the
Mediterranean Horrifyingly, they are succeeding
ISIS started out as in Iraq. After the US left, they
regrouped and became so murderous that even the head Al-
Qaida organization said that they were too extreme Al-
Qaida broke all ties with them. Let me repeat that.: even AL-
QAIDA wont stomach the **** these guys do
You might' heard about how the Syrian uprising was co-
opted by terrorists who impose Sharia law on the cities they
wrest from Brasher ? That' s ISIS When they take a
city, they Shiites, Christians, and anybody who
rejects them as the new government.
Aim Bakr
This evil ****** is the leader of ISIS He makes Bin Laden look
tame by comparison He Christians, Shiites,
jews, and anybody who rejects ISIS or does not comply with
Sharia law once he imposes it on a city, Today, ISIS released
gruesome photographs and claimed that they
1, 700 Shiites in a captured Iraqi city,
I Vernal in mm., i. m
r. mm....; Picture source: l
s attempt to create a state that stretches to the
Mediterranean is underway Disturbingly, ISIS now completely
controls over 30 cities. Most recently, they took Mosul, Bani, Takeit,
Samara, and They are SIXTY MILES from Baghdad Let
me be clear ISIS has gone from being a terrorist group to a
terrorist state
Has US Military
As ISIS takes control of cities, it replenishes its resources by
emptying banks and incorporating military equipment that the US
left behind for the Iraqi military, They have humvees tanks, and
even some Fighter jets, though it is believed that they do not
know how to pilot them
an They We cargo panes it - in Tstape
Mass Murder in Iraq and Syria
As in Syria, ISIS is anybody
who resists their rule, as well as Shiites and
Christians. ISIS publicize; videos and pictures of
its murders online, in an attempt to foment a
sectarian war, Google at your own risk. NSFL,
With ISIS consolidating its forces 60 miles from
Baghdad, Shiite militias have begun forming to
prepare for a siege against the city, Food prices
have doubled. Energy prices have increased .
Citizens in Iraq and Syria are stuck between their ****** power-
hungry governments and terrorists. It seems like a
crime for other countries to look on from the sidelines and do
nothing But what can be done, and who should do it? I dent have
the answer to that, but I hope that this will at least educate you to
the point where, if the government does propose intervention to
destroy ISIS, you can evaluate whether its worth it or not
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 42477
Favorited: 153
Submitted: 06/27/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to narcomancer submit to reddit


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #34 - Blargosnarf ONLINE (06/27/2014) [-]
The very second US seeks to step foot in the desert again, the media will explode with anti war propaganda once again, even though the same people would be screaming "help them!"
#528 to #34 - fragman ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
The people are usually dumb when it comes to that sort of thing.
I say let them.
There are way too many interventions going on every year by the US and European forces. Just let them sort the **** out themselves. Yes it will take a long time and yes many innocent people will die. But it will force the local people to create the change they want.

How long did it take Europe to get rid of ****** oppressing monarchs? Centuries. But it worked. Because the change came from within the people. Marching in and "helping" leads to either colonizing the entire area or see the next ******* group take control once you leave. No real value added there.
User avatar #590 to #528 - cabbagemayhem ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
Except now, nuclear weapons and other WMDs are on the table. While they're figuring **** out, we'll have to worry about rogue extremists trying to ruin **** for us.
#663 to #34 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
It's their ******* religion. There is, in fact, a critical mass of muslims who support alqaeda and isis for the sake of Allah. Their problem as long as they don't try to surpass their "natural" borders (southern Spain). Aside from that: **** em. Why should America send a single slingshot to Syria because of that? Why should we (non freaky muslims as a whole, not just the US, I am not 'murican btw) go there and slap those people? We better mind our own internal problems, i.e the mass of potentially retarded people who actually ruin the country by voting for obvious liars and corrupted politicians over and over again, those who will never be troubled by massive north-african immigration because they make €150k a year and live in a private mansion surrounded by bodyguards.
User avatar #61 to #34 - hecatonchires (06/28/2014) [-]
Not this time, isis is too extreme.
#77 to #34 - ddturn (06/28/2014) [-]
It's called having your cake and eating it too...
User avatar #166 to #34 - zombiesnipertwo (06/28/2014) [-]
I just wonder, why is always US who have to go and save others?

I don't know much of military and leaderboard of power, hell where I live we don't even have an army and we are mostly neutral, but if **** hit the fan is US who will come and save our asses.
Even the commies should help, they truly need a public image boost, and killing ISIS would make that and prove they are actually a military force apart of having nukes.
User avatar #230 to #166 - mrhotwings (06/28/2014) [-]
The US is expected to "save" other countries because we spend so much money on our military. Here's a quote from meganinja about US military spending.

"Because the USA's massive spending is what allows every other country to have such small military spending. The reason there's no major wars going on is because the USA is so involved in everything, and is so much more powerful than any other nation that if two equalled countries were to go to war, the USA would intervene and wreck everybody's **** .

The USA is expected to keep up high defense spending, because they want to protect so many countries. They dedicate themselves to being the head of NATO, defending S.K., Japan, Israel, and many other countries. They need a large standing army because those areas are highly prone to war.

Many of the countries that the USA is in charge of protecting are the world's richest countries. the top Western European countries, Japan, Canada, S.K., Australia, are protected by the USA. That means they don't have to defend themselves as much, which means they spend less on percent of their GDP on military."

Please ask anything else if you're still curious or confused about something.
User avatar #269 to #230 - meganinja (06/28/2014) [-]
Wait somebody actually read the things I say?
User avatar #280 to #269 - mrhotwings (06/28/2014) [-]
Of course. I favorite that comment you made in case of a moment like this. Thanks by the way.
User avatar #64 to #34 - gibssowas (06/28/2014) [-]
I feel somehow very conflicted about this...
I mean yea probably someone should get down there and kick their asses but considering that this probably just happened because someone wrecked the country before (and I am not trying to bash the USA here).
Maybe we should let them handle it on their own, an intervention in this region most of the time completely backfires.
User avatar #65 to #64 - Blargosnarf ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
Most interventions have gone wrong, yes, but they have more than proven they can't handle this terrorist **** on their own. Perhaps if more than one country aided.
User avatar #85 to #65 - miklthepikl (06/28/2014) [-]
but who would intervene? im pretty sure the USA has kinda had it with the world police thing for at least a decade
User avatar #67 to #65 - gibssowas (06/28/2014) [-]
That would probably for the best, but when I consider my country (germany) we won't even intervene when they slaughter every single civilian in this country.
#252 - yuukoku (06/28/2014) [-]
Been a Yankees fan all my life. I knew the Red Sox were evil from the ******* start.
User avatar #584 to #252 - hatesmlp (06/28/2014) [-]
I do believe this is local Iraqi militia fighting the ISIS.
User avatar #788 to #584 - yuukoku (06/29/2014) [-]
I do believe that you need to read his shirt. He's obviously a Red Sox fan.
#638 to #252 - dronenortle (06/28/2014) [-]
Derek Jeter is love. Derek Jeter is life.
User avatar #254 to #252 - haeckal ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
I'm a Red Sox fan, but I loled.
User avatar #255 to #254 - yuukoku (06/28/2014) [-]
We should all share the lol here.
#5 - jackmanagan (06/27/2014) [-]
im sure your post was something serious and informative.   
but isis was mentioned
im sure your post was something serious and informative.

but isis was mentioned
#243 to #5 - lastweek (06/28/2014) [-]
I read half of it seriously then I went back and laughed at shiites and thought of this image.
I read half of it seriously then I went back and laughed at shiites and thought of this image.
User avatar #245 to #243 - jackmanagan (06/28/2014) [-]
all i could hear was demoman goin Ka-Bewm!
User avatar #498 to #243 - bastardusnorvegi (06/28/2014) [-]
is that his torso flying away?
#6 to #5 - narcomancer (06/27/2014) [-]
oh you
#8 - madsolar ONLINE (06/27/2014) [-]
I love that this dude is wearing a red sox shirt.
User avatar #428 to #8 - springbok (06/28/2014) [-]
His socks are presumably red from wading through the blood of the innocent.
User avatar #627 to #428 - donnybergerstory (06/28/2014) [-]
#385 to #8 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
as you can clearly see he´s probably not even an ISIlL fighter (yes ISIL not ISIS, people can´t even translate correctly), because the flags behind him are clearly the iraqis. the isil ones are the typical black
User avatar #1 - ishallsmiteyou (06/27/2014) [-]
What we need, and I'm not trying to sound like a jackass, but we need a reaction. I'm not talking full out invasion, I'm talking precision strikes on key targets (I.E bases, ammo dumps, vehicle depots, etc.) for the purpose of weakening their forces to such an extent that local governments can effectively defend against, and eventually eliminate ISIS forces. All an invasion would do is cause even more trouble and give ISIS an extra excuse.
User avatar #577 to #1 - grebllejk (06/28/2014) [-]
That's actually happening now tho. Iraq has purchased Russian fighters and the US has promised air strikes
User avatar #582 to #1 - hatesmlp (06/28/2014) [-]
They use civilians as shields, so precision strikes would in that case kill innocent people.
User avatar #621 to #582 - ishallsmiteyou (06/28/2014) [-]
they don't hold civilians in ammo dumps. They don't hold civilians in vehicle depots. The only place they might hold them is in combat and bases, and that's why you drop in CSOR or something instead of turning it into a crater.
#679 to #1 - becauseoprahsaidso (06/28/2014) [-]
We can't go straight to them and attack them, too many lives would be lost and many Americans wouldn't support it. But this is like a cancerous growth that needs to be stopped. Drones and robots could carry out this war. We could collect information via satellite and spies and bomb the **** out of their "government" officials. This is an engineering problem as much as it is a social and a political one.
User avatar #685 to #679 - ishallsmiteyou (06/28/2014) [-]
Too much collateral damage, can't just turn it into a crater. Air dropped infantry would likely be more effective and if done right result in extremely low collateral damage and almost none, if any, casualties. And who said it would be Americans?
#14 to #1 - Rascal (06/27/2014) [-]
Theres no need for a reaction. 1 in 4 able bodied, fighting age iraq men have volunteered to fight ISIS. So far they have raised an army of over 2 million strong. Thats over 150 times the army ISIS can field in size. Its bigger than the entire US military actually. They dont have the equipment no, but numbers should way more than make up for that with that kind of quantity difference. (and before you say anything about them not being professional soldiers, professionalism is over valued. It helps reduce losses in the early stages yes, but the survivors will learn to fight, and fast. And they've got the manpower to deal with ISIS already there.
User avatar #110 to #14 - ishallsmiteyou (06/28/2014) [-]
But those 1 in 4 able bodied people aren't properly trained, have inadequate equipment, low morale, and poor leadership. They don't care about Iraq, it's a foreign concept to them. They care about the territory of whatever group they come from, not the Shiite government's territory. The ISIS insurgents have proven to be far more effective in combat and although their numbers are small they've taken the middle east by storm thus far and are nearly impervious to combat losses as for every one that falls there's one more picking up a rifle to take his place. One adequately trained soldier can take down any number of civilian militia before he gets killed himself.
#87 to #14 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
So we should react with supplies then?
#2 to #1 - narcomancer (06/27/2014) [-]
we shuld 720° no scoep dem fags
#113 - singsing (06/28/2014) [-]
Alright strap in, this might be long but I find it fascinating.

I'm currently taking an ethnic conflict course at an amazing university (known for its Poly Sci department) and we are now discussing methods of diffusing the situation. We have proposed some 40 options but they categorize into something like this:

Direct boots on the ground intervention (highly unlikely, American pop would hate it. Plus, it would most likely solidify Sunni opposition and turn them more rapidly towards Isis)

Sanctions on oil (not at all optimal, as Sunni and Shiites alike would suffer—Isis is the best funded terrorist organization in history, so sanctions are kinda useless)

Drone strikes (Isis knows this tactic and has begun integrating with normal Sunni civilian population—this would absolutely backfire)

Most importantly, we could build up the Shia army under Maliki(the current Shia president who is a dick towards Sunni) and vow to depose him. Sunnis would hopefully then integrate into the Iraqi army. This is probably the option that the U.S. will run with—you can quote me on that! Direct intervention would backfire. Studies show that collateral damage by the Talliban is forgiven significantly more easily than that of foreign forces, such as ISAF (the U.S. force).

One of the biggest problems we face is that Iraq has no national identity. Discriminatory policies of Maliki prove to estrange Sunnis from a coherent state identity, which compels soldiers of the army to abandon their posts or switch sides much more easily.

The short is that there is no good answer. We are choosing from a plethora of ****** options. The important thing to remember is that no matter what resolution you can conceive there is a significant consequence. Intervention is beyond complex.
User avatar #250 to #113 - garymotherfingoak ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
well said.
#392 to #113 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
"sunnis will hopefully then integrate into the iraqi army"

sorry but what you´re saying or trying to figure out at your university or whatever won´t help to calm the situation there and clearly you know knothing about the religion and why there is hate amongst these groups.

Shia are considered a sect by sunni muslims because they integrate things into the islamic beliefs wich were not tradionally written in the quran and the sunna ( a book of things the prophet muhammed said, did and told everyone to do, a very important book for the muslims not everybody knows that it exists)
User avatar #786 to #392 - singsing (06/29/2014) [-]
I'm well aware of that difference..think of the countries that exist in which different religious sects can set aside an ethnic identity and replace it with a national identity. (hint hint, America). I studied Sunni & Shia relationships for nearly two weeks. I get that its rooted deep, but you need to study a hell of a lot more ethnic integration to make the claim that we can't integrate Sunni into a national identity (and thereby a national army)
#650 to #113 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
"Iraq has no national identity"

"The pledge of allegiance is so weird!"

This is why.
#329 to #113 - wthree (06/28/2014) [-]
Alternative solution.
#727 to #329 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
No need to bomb Iran and Lebanon, you piece of ****
#637 - dronenortle (06/28/2014) [-]
When the United States get's involved:
When the United States backs off:
What the **** has Europe done bout Isis?
#50 - nyeeeh (06/27/2014) [-]
what does NSFL mean? Not safe for life?
#585 to #50 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
Not safe for lawns
User avatar #606 to #50 - fukkendragonite (06/28/2014) [-]
I guessed Not Safe For Lunch (cos you'll throw up, see?)
User avatar #81 to #50 - pabloenis (06/28/2014) [-]
I watched a execution video once that was posted on reddit. Trust me, that's something you don't want to see. These images stick in my head now and they just give me fear, anger and sadness.
#481 to #81 - xravishi (06/28/2014) [-]
As someone who's browsed execution websites. I hope you do not attempt to watch any other content, because you've "experienced it already" or something. You just end up being a careless ****** who doesn't take small incidents too seriously. Like i did.
User avatar #780 to #481 - pabloenis (06/28/2014) [-]
What's the worst thing you ever saw? What's stuck in your mind forever?
User avatar #422 to #81 - demonican (06/28/2014) [-]
I saw a beheading once, the victim started to throw up midway. Am i sick for not caring?
#601 to #81 - cabbagemayhem ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
Ouch. You got raped all the way over at Reddit.
User avatar #56 to #50 - gameshredder (06/28/2014) [-]
National Soccer/Football League
#3 - Rascal (06/27/2014) [-]
assad is not even a tenth as bad as media makes him out to be
meanwhile ISIS is pretty much ignored besides some small posts from time to time that is out-topic'd by kanye naming his kid something retarded
User avatar #4 to #3 - narcomancer (06/27/2014) [-]
who is kenya?
User avatar #97 to #4 - rokkarokkaali (06/28/2014) [-]
kanye west
User avatar #558 to #3 - senseofpurpose (06/28/2014) [-]
Kanye West named his kid something retard?

What am I doing wasting my time here instead of researching this amazing development!
#195 - leonhardt (06/28/2014) [-]
>ISIS mentioned
>Swell with alcohol and hostile work environments
User avatar #570 to #195 - wearethedead (06/28/2014) [-]
Oh that is classic YOU, isn't it?
User avatar #211 to #195 - bendingtimeisgood ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
Our ISIS could totally kick they're ISIS's ass.
#237 - hybridxproject (06/28/2014) [-]
America's fw leaving Iraq
America's fw leaving Iraq
User avatar #222 - malific ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
What can be done and who should do it?

The Us is always the ones that pull everyone's asses out of the fire when this **** goes down, but the entire world turned on us when we went into Iraq for legitimate reasons (if you say for oil you're a stupid ******** , we are getting LESS oil from Iraq since the war than before it).

After the planet pulled the rug out from under us (after going in WITH US), the political fall out forced us to withdraw far sooner than we should have and we were unable to allow the new government to stabilize enough to support itself. So now this is happening.

What should be done? The First world needs to go back in Wipe ISIS the **** out and then STABILIZE the country before withdrawing again.

Who should do it? Obviously the US... But **** it, after we tried helping once you **** for brains can deal with it yourself.

You made your ******* bed of blood and bodies, now go sleep in it. We get less than 5% of our oil from Iraq, we can easily turn to Canada to make up the loss.
#182 - onewithpokerface (06/28/2014) [-]
How America feels about this after all the ******** of being called the world police and angry warmongers.
User avatar #192 to #182 - legocompiler (06/28/2014) [-]
Implying foreign policy is determined by level of butthurt. It goes a bit deeper than that, but the only clear factors are economic drivers. If it didn't seem so absurd, one might think our involvement in the middle east was being dictated by jihadists themselves. Even domestic policy seems to reflect elements hellbent on destabalizing Democracy at home.
#199 to #182 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
We get bitched at when we don't help other people, then when we do help, we get bitched at for getting to involved in their business.
User avatar #248 to #199 - garymotherfingoak ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
That's because we only listen to the whiners, and whining is what gets media their viewscount.
User avatar #303 to #248 - huntergriff ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
User avatar #84 - muffaletta (06/28/2014) [-]
As an American, I hope we don't get involved. Because the second we do, everyone in europe will say we invaded for oil.
#457 to #84 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
well let's be honest, you did invade Iraq originally and also Afghanistan for oil. Stop pretending you didn't
User avatar #629 to #457 - noooooooooo ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
Implying Afghanistan has oil
User avatar #154 to #84 - envinite (06/28/2014) [-]
Gee, it's like American and every hippie people from every continents don't say that.
#434 to #84 - springbok (06/28/2014) [-]
You’re lucky; you only have to deal with corrupt narcissistic Middle Eastern regimes. We get our oil from this guy!
User avatar #414 to #84 - abstractpink (06/28/2014) [-]
"I don't want my country to save million of lifes, because we might look a bit bad in the media for a couple of years and get made fun of on the internet"

Okay, I totally understand.
#109 to #84 - nsfwanon (06/28/2014) [-]
No, you were bringing democracy! Everyone knows that..
User avatar #242 to #84 - hoponthefeelstrain (06/28/2014) [-]
why the **** don't the Europeans handle it? **** they're closer.
#391 to #242 - captainp (06/28/2014) [-]
Europe was involved in both Afghanistan(as part of the Nato) and Iraq(some european allies joined us forces) wars. Europe doesn't have the economy or manpower to support such a war and a lot of the bigger countries are multicultural as of lately. For example France and Germany probably would have lots of trouble keeping peace on their own territory.
The real question is why 'super power' Russia never does anything, but plotting against their neighbors.
#690 to #242 - followtheworms (06/28/2014) [-]
Well, Iraq has turned to Russia in the wake of this ISIS **** . I haven't heard what Russia's response is/was.
#278 to #242 - youngsterman ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
with how well prepared and superior America's army is I'd imagine they'd still be able to get there quicker. If we can circumnavigate the globe in 16 hours it should no longer matter how fast it would take to deploy. I'm not entirely certain how old this map is, but it's post 9/11 in the least.
User avatar #282 to #278 - hoponthefeelstrain (06/28/2014) [-]
but still, we're in so much debt, and they're not. Starting another war would just be causing more debt for other countries to laugh at us about.
User avatar #311 to #282 - toosexyforyou (06/28/2014) [-]
The US is in a lot more debt than European countries but most European countries have a far worse economy than the US. The exceptions would be the obvious Sweden and Norway
User avatar #417 to #311 - abstractpink (06/28/2014) [-]
You're forgetting Denmark.

Denmark is the only Scadninavian country willing to actually join wars like these, which is why they helped the US so much in the past in the Middle East
User avatar #718 to #417 - toosexyforyou (06/28/2014) [-]
With Sweden and Norway, I was talking about economy
User avatar #719 to #718 - abstractpink (06/28/2014) [-]
There's something wrong with the Danish economy now?
User avatar #722 to #719 - toosexyforyou (06/28/2014) [-]
Nah, man. I was giving a couple of examples
User avatar #504 to #417 - bastardusnorvegi (06/28/2014) [-]
hey norway bombed libya with as many planes as you denmark norway got the highest number of targets destroyed in relation to troops deployeden.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_military_intervention_in_Libya
User avatar #505 to #504 - abstractpink (06/28/2014) [-]
Well then I guess it's Norway and Denmark
Sweden does nothing
User avatar #506 to #505 - bastardusnorvegi (06/28/2014) [-]
bloody svenskjævler
User avatar #68 - Maroon (06/28/2014) [-]
How are a bunch of illiterate dirt farmers winning against an actual government army? Even if it is the Iraqi army.
#231 to #68 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
In Iraq the government army is only 10 years old at most when the US invaded they disbanded most of Saddam's experienced and well trained army...those guys are now fighting for ISIS! Iraq's army isn't even putting up a fight they out numbered ISIS massively (15000 vs 500 or something ridiculous) and they ended up taking off their uniforms dropping their weapons and running away.
#645 to #68 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
US revolutionary war, too.
User avatar #127 to #68 - hasanaat (06/28/2014) [-]
>See US-Vietnam war
>See US-war in Afghanistan
>See Afghani-British war (All 3)
>See Soviet-Afghani war
User avatar #189 to #127 - mrbuu ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
the us kind of smacked Vietnam around returned the boarders to the rightful spot regardless of the huge limitations put on the military and then left. then the war started again and the north act like they won. regardless of killing about 2million of them. thats like in civ getting all but 1 of your cities destroyed and claiming you won because you where not completely destroyed.

if we where not limited or continued to fight and didn't back out after returning boarders to the original spot. we would of ended up fighting china and thats not good for anybody.
User avatar #339 to #189 - tavafanduvill (06/28/2014) [-]
North Vietnam controls all of Vietnam today. It might be one hell of a pyrrhic victory but it is still a victory.
#459 to #339 - jvcjvc (06/28/2014) [-]
The major objective was to avoid a communist chain-reaction in east-asia, only NV went commie and not every other country.
User avatar #348 to #339 - mrbuu ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
that was after we left and china started supporting them. south vit was about 10% of its land then we started fighting got it back to 95% then the congress started getting on our case we sighned a peace treaty and left. and the north started attacking again. thats like kicking the **** out of a kid giving him a broken nose. calling a truth and when you leave he claims to be the victor. just because somebody doesn't kill you doesn't mean they didn't win the fight.
User avatar #100 to #68 - combatplatypus (06/28/2014) [-]
Because the Iraqi army is also a bunch of illiterate dirt farmers
#72 to #68 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
I'm sure the Persians, Romans, and English can answer that question for you.
#408 - pappathethird (06/28/2014) [-]
You could almost say that the Middle East is increasingly becoming a ...   
You could almost say that the Middle East is increasingly becoming a ...

#268 - idoliam (06/28/2014) [-]
MFW Isis
#302 to #268 - urapooper (06/28/2014) [-]
XD Ceril(I think that's how you spell his name) becoming el presidente of an island.

Best final season.
#276 to #268 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#156 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
This looks like a job for SUPER-JEW!
User avatar #670 to #156 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
What's your super power?
User avatar #212 to #156 - roflstorm ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
Jew-per man
User avatar #18 - fuckyeahxd (06/27/2014) [-]
good luck conquering israel like that went well the last thousand times
#114 to #18 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
Would be nice if they could so we wouldn't have to deal with the jews. The sand ******* will die quick after the rest of the world intervenes.
#19 to #18 - stoneshit (06/27/2014) [-]
Few chemical projectiles on Israel aaaaannnnndddd they're gone
User avatar #20 to #19 - fuckyeahxd (06/27/2014) [-]
well not so much, we have anti missiles. anything you shoot can be detonated mid air.
User avatar #247 to #20 - garymotherfingoak ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
whats the actual accuracy of those types of defense systems though?
User avatar #449 to #247 - fuckyeahxd (06/28/2014) [-]
about 98%. they destroy every missile that is going to impact a civilized place, when there is no danger for human lives it does not interferes with the rockets.
User avatar #22 to #20 - stoneshit (06/27/2014) [-]
That **** fast, yo
User avatar #21 to #20 - stoneshit (06/27/2014) [-]
What about heavy artillery?
User avatar #23 to #21 - fuckyeahxd (06/27/2014) [-]
you mean like atomic bomb? i dont think there is someone dumb enough to use that ****
User avatar #42 to #23 - fuckyouthatswhy (06/27/2014) [-]
well ISIS seems pretty dumb to me
User avatar #24 to #23 - stoneshit (06/27/2014) [-]
Something like that, I heard Russians have artillery that shoots a balistic head.

You really think those dumb ***** would not do that?
Hurrr durr, for the name of peace and love, hurrr.
aaannnndddd you're gone
User avatar #25 to #24 - fuckyeahxd (06/27/2014) [-]
they wont do because it will bring a world war and they have no chance against america in full rage in a side note they are dumb enoug to do so.
User avatar #26 to #25 - stoneshit (06/27/2014) [-]
They have an IQ of a bacteriophage, they would do it. Besides, they can bring a lot of resistance to other countries since USA doesn't want to get involved.
User avatar #28 to #26 - fuckyeahxd (06/27/2014) [-]
agree. oh and here a video of the "iron dome" start in 00:50 for less talking www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrlsCE4Bdn0
User avatar #30 to #28 - stoneshit (06/27/2014) [-]
Skip to 0:20
User avatar #29 to #28 - stoneshit (06/27/2014) [-]
I agree with stopping the rockets, but, tell me, can the iron dome stop this?

Those ***** probably have it, or will get it for the attack on Israel, don't underestimate them.
User avatar #33 to #29 - fuckyeahxd (06/27/2014) [-]
lets agree that in a legit' fight (no nuclear bombs) israel will win.
and about the chemical projectiles, every household have by law some gas masks due to a real danger that those bombs would have gotten us in the 90'. i will show a picture of mine tomorrow.
User avatar #38 to #33 - stoneshit (06/27/2014) [-]
Israel would win in a legit fight, I guarantee, but what makes you think they wouldn't try to capture Jerusalem and Israel by playing dirty? Let's look at this way. Israel is the strongest force on that area, right? If they destroy you guys, they will show how strong they are and will push fear in bones of other nations, plus, get a nice position for further plans. If they push fear in other nations, they will destroy them easier, like France killed by Germany in WW2, by a simple surrender.

User avatar #39 to #38 - fuckyeahxd (06/27/2014) [-]
they will try to capture jerusalim but they will never destroy her. naha, too important to islam for that to happen.
User avatar #41 to #39 - stoneshit (06/27/2014) [-]
Okay, not Jerusalem, but destroy other mayor or important cities, and Jerusalem will be a piece of cake.
User avatar #44 to #41 - fuckyeahxd (06/27/2014) [-]
yes it could happen, but then again only by playing dirty.
p.s it is nice to have a convo' without be called dumb,stupid,filthy jew and etc.
you da real MVP
User avatar #297 to #44 - stoneshit (06/28/2014) [-]
Why would I call you that? We had a nice civilised conversation, not a traditional FJ rant.
#60 to #44 - arreatface (06/28/2014) [-]
mfw fithy jew
#340 to #28 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
iron dome is impressive but to my knowledge is far from full deployment and of course could still only intercept so much. However I completely agree with you that Israel would most certainly be able to defend itself against ISIS.

Also why is the other guy bringing up nukes? The only country in the region with nukes IS Israel so i don't get how they even apply...

The only reason ISIS is doing so well is that they are fighting the incompetent Iraqi military and the war torn Syrian military. against competent militaries such as the ones possessed by Israel, Jordon, Iran, or the U.S. I just couldn't see anything even similar occurring.
User avatar #359 to #340 - inyourmind ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
forgot to log in and was damn near impossible to find this comment again.
User avatar #141 to #19 - donthepotato (06/28/2014) [-]
Do you even Samson Option?
User avatar #31 to #19 - paranoidmuffin (06/27/2014) [-]
They don't even need projectiles. They just need to get a **** ton of sarin gas and a few dozen vans and do some suicide bombings at key military & government locations.
User avatar #35 to #31 - fuckyeahxd (06/27/2014) [-]
like that never happened to israel
User avatar #36 to #35 - fuckyeahxd (06/27/2014) [-]
besie the sarin gas all this allready heppened. didn't stop us ptriotism to the top
User avatar #37 to #35 - paranoidmuffin (06/27/2014) [-]
I've yet to hear of a chemical attack in isreal. I think recently isreal found out about some guys in syria that wanted to do it but other than that, i don't thinks it's happened yet.
User avatar #40 to #37 - fuckyeahxd (06/27/2014) [-]
there was a big threat for this to become real, so we are very prepared for this.
User avatar #688 to #19 - asschwitz (06/28/2014) [-]
From what I understand though, attacking Israel equates basically to forcing the U.S. to come in and **** **** . Not the wisest move on ISIS's part in my opinion.
User avatar #643 to #19 - kristovsky ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
Yeah, NEVER bet against Israel.
#271 to #19 - Rascal (06/28/2014) [-]
Not even America would **** with Israel.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)