Thanks, feminism!. . twenty Of San Luis Obispo v. Nathaniel J. (1996) so Cal. App. tth 342 [STE Cal, Rptn. 843] me. . Second Dist., Div. Six. Nov 4, 19960 COUNT Thanks feminism! twenty Of San Luis Obispo v Nathaniel J (1996) so Cal App tth 342 [STE Rptn 843] me Second Dist Div Six Nov 4 19960 COUNT
Upload
Login or register

Thanks, feminism!

twenty Of San Luis Obispo v. Nathaniel J. (1996)
so Cal. App. tth 342 [STE Cal, Rptn. 843]
me. . Second Dist., Div. Six. Nov 4, 19960
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NATHANIEL J., a Minor,
etc., Defendant and Appellant.
Superior Court or Gan Luis County, Na. , Paul H. Comets, Judge.)
Opinion by Gilbert, IL, with Stone (G. 20, P. 1., and Megan, l, concurring.)
COUNSEL
Patrick J. Perry far Defendant and Appellant.
Daniel E. Longrun, Attorney General, Roderick E. Dalston, Chief Assistant Attorney
General, Carrol Ann White and Mary A. Roth, Deputy Attorneys General, far Plaintiff and
Respondent.
OPINION
GILBERT, J.
victims have rights. Here, the victim also has responsibilities.
A WOMEN seduces a boy and becames pregnant. She gives birth
to a daughter and thereafter applies far Aid to Families with Dependent Children. Is the
child' s Father obligated ta my child support even thaugh he is a victim of statutory
rape? (Pen. Code, (ii EELS, subd. id).) We conclude he is liable far child support.
Defendant Nathaniel J. appeals a judgment establishing paternity and reserving an
order of child support. We affirm.
the victim also has responsibilities
the victim were has responsibilities
...
+671
Views: 41156 Submitted: 09/20/2013