war never changes. not many people make that much.. $80,000??? I know research and developing the weapon will cost a lot but just the materials and labor cost $80,000??? What kind of metal and explosives is it ma war never changes not many people make that much $80 000??? I know research and developing the weapon will cost a lot but just materials labor What kind of metal explosives is it ma
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (282)
[ 282 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
User avatar #11 - jeengak
Reply +227 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
$80,000??? I know research and developing the weapon will cost a lot but just the materials and labor cost $80,000??? What kind of metal and explosives is it made of???
#134 to #11 - kroko
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Freedom
User avatar #159 to #11 - lieutenantderp
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
I thought it's more like 200,000
User avatar #227 to #11 - BeaverBalls
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
its made out of explosive unicorn ***** and gold plating
User avatar #52 to #11 - kievbutcher
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
a lot of it has to do with the advanced targeting system
User avatar #129 to #11 - pockettacos
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Its the guidance system and electronics that make it so expensive
#12 to #11 - TARDIS
Reply +54 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Freedomite.
#21 to #11 - anon id: 75f326d7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
A javelin rocket and rearm costs quarter of a million actually. not 80k.
User avatar #56 to #21 - MythBuster
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
no.
User avatar #132 to #11 - wargeneralwest
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
eight hundred $100 bills.
#163 to #11 - ballertron
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
One of those can obliterate a tank. Seems worth it to me...
#149 to #11 - thornberry
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
There are little computers inside all of them, they aren't just explosives.
There are little computers inside all of them, they aren't just explosives.
#228 to #11 - spetsnazvymple
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
well i have used a javelin before and its a dual war head, one to punch through the armor and one to kill whats inside, plus the guide system is top of the line. its not what its made of its how its made
#106 to #11 - tazzerz
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Really good ones.
#121 to #11 - shaddowmarshal
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
freedioum, a rare material only found in america
#16 to #11 - bakerboytom
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Alot of the money that the government pays for these things with goes into researching new technology, its much easier to keep new developments quiet if they buy stuff at an inflated cost rather than going through endless red tape and bureaucracy in order to give companies research grants.
#94 to #16 - dross
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Also, the companies who aren't bringing the best new **** to the table get dropped pretty quick. Just because it takes the average person an extra decade to find out about the new ****, doesn't mean they're not pumping billions into making brand new ways of blowing **** up.
Also, the companies who aren't bringing the best new **** to the table get dropped pretty quick. Just because it takes the average person an extra decade to find out about the new ****, doesn't mean they're not pumping billions into making brand new ways of blowing **** up.
#75 to #16 - anon id: 28df490a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Alot isn't a word :<
#260 to #75 - thebesttrumpeteer
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
#122 to #11 - legitimately
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#62 to #11 - highfocus
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #60 to #11 - propanex
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Freedom and death.
User avatar #240 to #60 - dsrtpnk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
Shock and Awe.
User avatar #99 to #11 - lumpymandude
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Made of pure diamond
User avatar #19 to #11 - DmOnZ
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Targeting and guiding tech as well as stabilization and some other ********. While that might make add up to quite a bit of money, I don't think the missile itself costs 80, 000 dollars. Maybe both the launcher and the missile cost that much, but even still...
User avatar #13 to #11 - lockstin
Reply +103 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Privately made by a single company to a government who wants specific specifications, the company can charge whatever they want for them and America will still pay it. American capitalism.
User avatar #58 to #13 - bensho
Reply +128 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
>specific specifications
>lel
User avatar #221 to #13 - drunkasaurus
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
um no. Government contracts aren't just given out like that, they're sell to the lowest bidder.
User avatar #234 to #221 - zombifier
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
we buy from the highest seller, unforutnated the quality doesn't come with the price
User avatar #258 to #13 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
Crony*
User avatar #14 to #13 - jeengak
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
wow... i honestly thought there would be not only government produced weapons but multiple weapons manufacturing companies instead of one single company who has the monopoly for weapons in the U.S government....Thanks for the Info!
User avatar #15 to #14 - lockstin
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Our stealth bombers cost over a billion dollars a pop when it should only be half that at most, but the company is like "why dont we sextuple our profits?
User avatar #17 to #15 - egosumproxi
Reply +31 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
But profits are sexier when you sextuple them.
User avatar #57 to #14 - bensho
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
No company has a monopoly on weapons. Just one company has the monopoly on Javelin missiles because they patented that ****. Once a better one is produced, America will buy that.
#146 to #57 - anon id: 2cd4b35a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Better? America will buy? Hahaha silly people who think military gear is "top of the line" because it's used by the military... Military gear is what is cheap and what can be bought in bulk. Quality is not a specification for military gear... Semi-functional is combat ready...
User avatar #278 to #146 - bensho
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
Who said better meant more effective at taking lives? When I said better, I meant better in general, including a better price.
#91 to #14 - dbjorgo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
There are design companies in the U.S who manufacture and design arms. Fun fact, the Javelin was designed by Texas Instruments, you probably have a couple of their calculators
#3 - brobathehutt
Reply +139 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
I don't see the problem here.
#251 to #3 - yaybacon
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
User avatar #35 - Milvath
Reply +117 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
the $80,000 javelin is designed and targeted to destroy a 10'000,000 tank. Pretty much modern day military is about making the enemy drain money to death
#25 - twofreegerbils
Reply +98 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
War.

War never changes.
User avatar #224 to #25 - metalgross
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
It would be nice if Obama and whoever the **** he has a problem with could just extend massive heavy artillery weapons from their penises, and just fire in all directions until either one dies.
The whole thing will be televised
#96 to #25 - arrowinurbutt
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#123 to #96 - twofreegerbils
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Unless you're Old Snake, in which case, war has changed.
Unless you're Old Snake, in which case, war has changed.
#39 - anon id: af8ec67f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Bulldozers cost $100,000 and their drivers don't make 100,000 a year this isn't that strong of an argument.
#213 to #39 - ekiouja
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
But it only took me $1 to bulldoze your mom last night.
But it only took me $1 to bulldoze your mom last night.
#95 to #39 - anon id: 7ce72969
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Well, Bulldozers don't explode on impact
User avatar #193 to #95 - coolcalx
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
they do if they impact against a javelin missile.
User avatar #269 to #39 - donkeypoop
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
Bulldozers help in the process to maybe make something better, while a javelin is used to make something much worse
#145 to #39 - neznanc **User deleted account**
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Bulldozers aren't meant for killing people.
Bulldozers aren't meant for killing people.
#71 to #39 - thelastelephant
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
BULLDOZER!
User avatar #42 to #39 - natanhiel
Reply +82 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Bulldozers last a lot longer
#97 - tyroneisanigger
Reply +74 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
I thought of this.
#143 to #97 - newforomador
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#103 to #97 - justanotherpsyco
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
If i remember correctly, wasn't that on a loading screen of either cod 4 or mw?
#112 to #103 - tyroneisanigger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Niko Bellic said that quote during the very first mission on GTA IV.
Not sure if it was said on CoD or not.
#119 to #112 - justanotherpsyco
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
I'm not doubting that. I just feel like i've read that on a screen before and I've never played GTA.
User avatar #107 to #103 - vgmddg
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
GTA 4
#223 to #97 - tomdupes
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
would you prefer the young and intelligent convince the old to fight our wars?
#128 to #97 - justanotherpsyco
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
I knew it. I knew I had seen it before.
"Older men declare war. But it is the youth that must fight and die."
— Herbert Hoover
Yes, different. But it's the same idea and remember,
"A man may die, nations may rise and fall, but an idea lives on."
— John F. Kennedy
#157 to #97 - sirbutterballs
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
#252 to #157 - yaybacon
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
#179 to #97 - mikoli
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
nico jawagwaan che fi me breda.
-little jacob
#115 to #97 - bouazizforever
+11 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#130 to #115 - anon id: 12cf1d84
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
What if I told that what he means by the old and bitter he meant you who control,ed him
User avatar #80 - slapchoppin
Reply -31 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
he'll very likely make that in his lifetime

in Canada our recruits make $3000 a month

and the pay keeps getting higher theres a mandatory promotion to corporal in 4 years which is about 5 pay scales higher
User avatar #189 to #80 - exclamation
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
I don't think that US Soldier is firing on Canadian soldiers... Probably at a soldier of a third-world country.
#102 to #80 - dross
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Javelin ($80 000), fired by (in this case) American Soldier, who doesn't make $80k a year.

That Javelin, $80 000, is fired at someone who probably herds goats for a living, until he was recruited. Geezer probably lives in a tent as well. Probably earns a couple dollars a day. IE, never going to make that much money.
User avatar #135 to #80 - greenstrongworld
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
To be perfectly fair, if that thing is fired at him, he won't make 80,000 in a lifetime because he will be dead.
#101 to #80 - EvilPixelKillr
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Fired at a guy who doesnt make that in a lifetime. Most likely referring to soldiers of 3rd world countries such as Iran or Iraq.__
#87 to #80 - ihatecarltonbanks
Reply +49 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
mfw there are people like you who don't even take the time to read something before they respond to it.
User avatar #280 to #87 - slapchoppin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
reading is hard and they only teach canadians to read french
User avatar #281 to #280 - ihatecarltonbanks
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
It's not about your understanding the message. The fact that you didn't understand it and still chose to attempt and correct it is the problem. There's a lot I don't understand, and when I don't I keep my mouth shut about it.
User avatar #282 to #281 - slapchoppin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
and thats why you'll never be able to read french
User avatar #284 to #282 - ihatecarltonbanks
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/11/2013) [-]
what a valid argument.
User avatar #285 to #284 - slapchoppin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/11/2013) [-]
i'm glad you can see reason
User avatar #286 to #285 - ihatecarltonbanks
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/11/2013) [-]
So what is your reasoning? I am interested in how you found a correlation between me not talking about things I don't understand and me learning french. How are they related?
User avatar #287 to #286 - slapchoppin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/12/2013) [-]
well if you don't understand my reasoning shouldn't you not be talking about it?
User avatar #288 to #287 - ihatecarltonbanks
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/12/2013) [-]
How can i ever learn unless I ask. I'm not giving a bigoted ignorant opinion about it whatsoever. I'm asking that you explain it. What I do understand is that you are an ignorant human who can never accept that they are wrong. Who will continue to find points to argue where there are none. I'm merely asking that you explain your reasoning. This will result in one of two outcomes 1. You will not give a satisfactory explanation resulting in proving my point (that you are an ignorant person who gives rash opinions on topics he doesnt understand) 2. you will actually prove your point and I will have learned something from it.
User avatar #289 to #288 - slapchoppin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/12/2013) [-]
TL;DR
#23 - semperkillusmc
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
I like firing the M32. cant take out a tank with it but you can **** someone's world up and put a 40mm HEDP round in a window easy at 200 meters. HEDP rounds are about 8 dollars a pop too. 6 shots as fast as you can pull the trigger
User avatar #81 to #23 - toadkillerdog
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
pretty sure 44 mm grenades cost a lot more then 8 bucks. You ever actually use that thing in country, either? 203 overall is faster, as reloading the M32 takes a long ass time, and if you ever see enough afghanis that you can actually use 6 grenades on em at once, you've wandered into some serious ****.
Also, M32 is heavy and awkward as balls to carry as extra gear.
User avatar #118 to #81 - semperkillusmc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
ammo tech said they are around 8 bucks each. and yes my main weapon is the M16with the 203 but the M32 is great in the defense or if you are going somewhere you know ur gonna need the firepower.
#28 to #23 - anon id: c2e14be9
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
brony faggot
User avatar #61 to #28 - muffinmolester
Reply +31 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
It probably isn't smart to insult the sexuality of a man who's holding a ******* grenade launcher...
User avatar #167 to #61 - rockamekishiko
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
what is he going to do? launch it over the internet?
#70 to #28 - semperkillusmc
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
love you too
User avatar #133 to #23 - BowChickaBowWow
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Of all the rounds I got to fire, I liked the buckshot the most. The airburst round was a close second, though I'm sure a thermobaric would've taken the cake over any of them.
Would've been fun to have gotten to fire a M32 instead of a 203, though.
User avatar #214 to #23 - zaboo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
war machine deployed
User avatar #239 to #23 - nickypickle
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
That pictures not you, is it?
User avatar #241 to #239 - semperkillusmc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
it is
User avatar #242 to #241 - nickypickle
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure I saw this on a 4chan thread a while ago, but I guess its just coincidence
User avatar #246 to #242 - semperkillusmc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
someone probably shared it.
User avatar #259 to #23 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
How is the military

I am considering joining.
User avatar #262 to #259 - semperkillusmc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
its what you make of it
User avatar #265 to #262 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/10/2013) [-]
I figured it be something I'm good at for once.
User avatar #34 to #23 - hemming
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
What does HEDP stands for..?
High Explosive Dick Penetrating?
User avatar #44 to #34 - lilnuggetbob
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
"High Explosive Dual Purpose"
User avatar #45 to #44 - hemming
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Dual Penetrating Purposes?
User avatar #47 to #45 - lilnuggetbob
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
In the way of damaging small structures, while still have Anti Personnel purposes.

Don't worry i get the sexual reference, im not that retarded.
User avatar #48 to #47 - hemming
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
....
Anti Personnel Penetration purposes?
User avatar #51 to #48 - lilnuggetbob
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
You are persistent at trying to make really bad sexual references.
User avatar #63 to #51 - hemming
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
Persistent bad sexual penetration purposes?
#26 - FrozenOreo
Reply +25 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
#43 to #26 - imofcnotharveydent
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
I feel that's the wrong use of it, since the joker likes his explosives and weapons quite cheap, and would rather use them tactically instead of:" hey let's just blow up every meter or so to see what we kill"
#292 to #43 - rachelrayinator
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/10/2014) [-]
I think he'd still enjoy blowing up every meter or so to see what he kills
I think he'd still enjoy blowing up every meter or so to see what he kills
#183 to #26 - minntas
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]
It's not about the money, it's about sending a missile
#67 - waitiknowthisone
Reply +24 123456789123345869
(09/09/2013) [-]