Thanks Obama!. Such Hope! Such Change!. INNS I HEARD SYRIA BOMBER SYN! so mm sauna Bums mun arenas} swam Swain men swan star gunman swam


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#28 - AnonymousDonor (09/06/2013) [-]
guys stop making jokes this is syrias
#12 to #1 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#44 - pwnmissilereborn **User deleted account** (09/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #50 to #44 - dedaluminus (09/07/2013) [-]
Coincidentally, that pile of money he's burning is about the amount of money it takes to upkeep the Nimitz carrier group we just moved into the red sea for about a week.
User avatar #67 to #50 - spinaltap (09/07/2013) [-]
or to maintain them anywhere else. we're payin for them regardless might as well use em
#51 to #50 - pwnmissilereborn **User deleted account** (09/07/2013) [-]
Yep, and guess who is going to pay for it.

YOUUUUU! The american tax payers!
User avatar #52 to #51 - dedaluminus (09/07/2013) [-]
Pssh. I don't pay taxes.
#80 to #44 - anon (09/07/2013) [-]
WHY SO SYRIAS :"D............ ill shut up now
User avatar #65 - ihatem (09/07/2013) [-]
So much political ********* almost nobody is making "Obomba" jokes.
Come on.
It's right there.
#3 - pokemonstheshiz (09/06/2013) [-]
If you can simplify political things into an image macro   
you probably don't fully understand the context of the situation
If you can simplify political things into an image macro

you probably don't fully understand the context of the situation
#5 to #3 - davidavidson (09/06/2013) [-]
But you can always simplify lies and hidden agendas in image macros ya dingus!

Seems pretty Maymay in here rite nao
#6 to #5 - anon (09/06/2013) [-]
#7 to #3 - icheatjews (09/06/2013) [-]
I can't take you seriously with that username.

All I can think about is Pamperchu...
#9 to #7 - teranin (09/06/2013) [-]
It'd probably be best not to ask this but... wtf is "pamperchu"
#11 to #9 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#13 to #11 - teranin (09/06/2013) [-]
Yeah, I probably could have gone ahead and continued not knowing about that guy.
#14 to #13 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#15 to #14 - teranin (09/06/2013) [-]
Yeah, he's making things worse for anyone who is into any of those baseline fetishes individually, by being this effigy of the worst, most ****** up versions of them.

I'm grossed out, and that's not easy to do.
User avatar #95 to #15 - arstya (09/07/2013) [-]
The main thing that bothers me is that his fursona (the anthropomorphic pikachu for those who don't know) is drinking carrot juice from a carrot bottle...a pikachu is a mouse-like animal.

All of it is ****** up on so many levels, I know...just...ugh...I really dislike this man.
User avatar #81 to #15 - ugottanked (09/07/2013) [-]
that is true...this guy is just...

what the ****
#63 to #11 - adplum has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #49 to #9 - syrenthra (09/07/2013) [-]
I didn't know I needed this picture until now
User avatar #16 to #7 - pokemonstheshiz (09/06/2013) [-]
i could say the same
#19 to #3 - anon (09/06/2013) [-]
If you don't realize this a was joke posted on a site specifically made for jokes you probably don't understand much of anything.
#39 to #30 - azinfoo (09/07/2013) [-]
But... It's not to teach Syrians not to kill Syrians.

it's to tell Syrians not to kill Syrians using methods prohibited by the Geneva Protocol
#61 - etonix **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #54 - markertemp (09/07/2013) [-]
Can't help but laugh at the fact that a Xzibit post was uploaded by a "davidavidson"
#22 - anon (09/06/2013) [-]
The bombing didn't trigger this whole fiasco you uneducated **** .
The release of chemical weapons is what caused it.
Sorry if i seem mean, tired as a sloth right now.
User avatar #35 to #22 - aqproductions (09/06/2013) [-]
its a joke
User avatar #23 to #22 - flemsdfer ONLINE (09/06/2013) [-]
but no proof was released that there actually were chemical weapons. So far just some talk of "Oh yeah they got sum kemecal weapons and we got proof but it's sooper secret so we can't share it"
User avatar #45 - avatarsarefornoobs (09/07/2013) [-]
do you guys have any idea why he's even doing it? it doesnt have anything to do with Syria itself. hes not trying to alter the course of the war in any way.

its about the use of chemical weapons, and trying to do something to temper its use by punishing offenders. and here comes that opinion oh booooy i think that its not such a terrible idea. if nobody does anything about it, then its just going to keep happening, and the Geneva Conventions go right out the window
#91 to #45 - urbemarmis (09/07/2013) [-]
did you say the same thing with the iraq war?
User avatar #96 to #91 - avatarsarefornoobs (09/07/2013) [-]
iraq war put boots on the ground, these are missile strikes. the difference is enormous
#100 to #96 - urbemarmis (09/07/2013) [-]
yeah. in the iraq war we would actually try to arrest people instead of just killing them straight out. and if we had to kill someone it was more likely we would be killing a bad guy rather than a bad guy an innocent family a shop keeper and a few dogs. obama talks about peace while calling innocent men women and children that are killed by his drones "collateral damage"
#70 to #45 - twofreegerbils (09/07/2013) [-]
>It's about chemical weapons

Yes goy, good goy.
#55 to #45 - anon (09/07/2013) [-]
Or it could just embolden them, if you go in and royal **** the country up Syrians aren't going to be happy about it and it could embolden a response.

Secondly using military action on either the rebels or the government is going to influence the war there.

Thirdly the US government doesn't give a **** about chemical weapons, we continued funding Saddam after he used them, this is about israel plain and simple.
User avatar #57 to #55 - avatarsarefornoobs (09/07/2013) [-]
thats a fair point, it could cause them to lash out against assets in the middle east but they would likely be too tied up in the war to do that.

however whether your right or not about the intent of the US government depends on whether or not you choose to believe them. In this instance, i choose to believe, because it makes sense.
also this is an idea of Obama and his administration, how the US reacted to Saddam's use of chemical weapons is different because we had different people in office.
#58 to #57 - anon (09/07/2013) [-]
And what happens after the war, Syria is literally right on Israel, if the rebels win they'll almost assuredly attack israel seeing as they're comprised of Al Qaeda and at that point they'll have chemical weapons if it truly was the government that launched them.

Just look at other crimes against humanity around the globe, if we really gave a **** about international law we'd have been in africa with force since the 80's.

And Obama isn't radically different from anyone in the last 30 years, they're all pale shades of grey, there isn't much if any difference.
User avatar #97 to #58 - avatarsarefornoobs (09/07/2013) [-]
this particular incident is about chemical weapons
sure there is no way we can stop all humanitarian crimes but this is a biggie that cant be allowed to continue

And if the rebels DO take over Syria, they hopefully wont think about using chemical weapons because they wont want to get smashed up by cruise missiles.

and im not saying obama is a huge difference, you are right they arent that much different sadly but obama is still a different person who will make different judgement calls
#83 to #58 - ajweston ONLINE (09/07/2013) [-]
A small percentage of Syria's rebels are affiliated with Al Qaeda. ISIS (the group you are referring to) is the group associated with organizing the insurgency in Iraq. The majority of the opposition is comprised of the various Turkish, Arab, and Kurd organizations (that are a mix of democratic and Islamist groups) working with defected Syrian military forces.
User avatar #74 - Endofzeeworld (09/07/2013) [-]
While it really shouldn't be the US being the world police, if someone doesn't enforce the chemical weapons ban, then there is, in effect, no chemical weapons ban.
#79 to #74 - tyroneisanigger (09/07/2013) [-]
That's true. Take into account that the U.S is the head of the United Nations. The U.S simply cannot "isolate" themselves and back out from world conflicts. We have a reputation of "Policing the world" which most of that comes from being the head of the U.N.
I saw this video stating that mainly, after World War II, the U.S changed from being the 19th strongest military power, to the top #1 and for a couple years the only world and nuclear power, until the Soviet Union. My point is for a country that powerful, it would make the U.S have less of a reputation. The U.S is known as "The Arsenal of Democracy" got it's name from FDR during WWII I believe. That name has a lot of meaning to it.
#88 to #79 - urbemarmis (09/07/2013) [-]
the UN is essentially its own body. were like the main country in the UN but the UN has its own army, as well as its own board of directors and even has its own laws that they try to enforce on the us. the only thing that doesnt make it its own country/empire is the fact that theres no land called "he united nations" and instead of citizens its just the nations themselves "hey do this" other than that
User avatar #48 - mrcowll (09/07/2013) [-]
Idk... I think it's good to start worrying about the world on a global scale. I don't think it's as simple as caring about our own countries anymore, especially when we can be affected or dragged into it whether we want it or not. It's only natural as humanity as always done this. We went from tribes to kingdoms to countries and we'll probably unite more.
#59 to #48 - anon (09/07/2013) [-]
It would be nice if the world could come together, but right now it's just the US.
User avatar #60 to #59 - mrcowll (09/07/2013) [-]
Well I think the UK and France are also looking into it. I'm Canadian so if they are all involved it wouldn't be the biggest surprise if we showed support for them. But I still want more evidence I don't think we should jump the gun.
User avatar #37 - sircool (09/07/2013) [-]
are people so stupid here that it's not about the bombings, it's about the supposed chemical weapons being used? if it's try, it can't be ignored. If it is, it shows that any country with such weapons can be used for any reason, and thousands to millions more may die.
#27 - uzbekistan (09/06/2013) [-]
Yeah because we are totally bombing the ENTIRE country and not the government who is using chemical weapons to slaughter their people like animals. I hate people who over simplify things to make themselves seem smart.
#34 to #27 - spokenwun (09/06/2013) [-]
Or the Iranians have used this as a way to sabotage Syria - in order to gain support from western powers in their current conflict with the aforementioned country.
User avatar #66 to #27 - Flammenwerfer (09/07/2013) [-]
>Implying Assad actually did it.
>Implying the Rebels aren't shady as ****
>Implying that the US has released solid evidence that Assad actually has launched chemical weapons.
>Implying the Rebels couldn't have received them from other Arab Countries
>Implying we actually know the facts.
User avatar #38 - glorinar (09/07/2013) [-]
The real reason we're getting into Syria is because the USA is the modern Roman Empire. We have so many god damn military bases around the world in hundreds of countries. Look at the map of the middle east and what do you see? A country who hates us (Iran) surrounded by other countries we've either A.) Already invaded or B.) Pay off to be our "friends".

Why Syria? It's right next to Iran and a military base in Syria would give the US a port really close to Syria. All of that "We're going to attack them because chemical weapons were used" is utter ******** .
User avatar #77 to #38 - kingrayne ONLINE (09/07/2013) [-]
...You are aware theres a chemical weapons ban right? If nobody enforces the ban, then theres no ban.
User avatar #98 to #77 - glorinar (09/07/2013) [-]
If Assad really used chemical weapons, he'd go after/kill a hell of a lot more people initially since he knows it would draw the US in. Wouldn't be surprised if the CIA went and planted those chemical weapons with the excuse "Assad used chemical weapons!" so we can attack Syria and look like "Good ol' 'merica enforcing the world rules" when really we don't give a **** .
User avatar #99 to #98 - kingrayne ONLINE (09/07/2013) [-]
Its not like the United States is the only country investigating the chemical weapons, the UN is also looking into it to see if its real. We're not attacking until its confirmed.
#41 to #38 - anon (09/07/2013) [-]
Wrong, we're bombing Syria because Obama would rather go down in history as the guy who ****** up Syria than the guy who ****** up America.
User avatar #53 - WHATTHEPISSTRAINE (09/07/2013) [-]
The world would be a better place without assad, a simple missile through the window would send a much clearer message than boots on the ground putting our troops, planes , ect -thats for any country that would intervene- at risk.Assad needs to be dropped though, period
User avatar #73 to #53 - noblexfenrir (09/07/2013) [-]
and what is your plan after that?

Come on I'm waiting. Because this isn't something you can do one step at a time, you need to be 20 steps down the road before you even make a decision.
User avatar #101 to #73 - WHATTHEPISSTRAINE (09/11/2013) [-]
Who in the hell ever said i wanted us to do it? My greatest hope is the moderates regain control. and to the guy below, Yeah i got a decent idea, You got a **** ball of factions trying to pull power from one tyrant. And the sensible factions are currently pounded into dust.
User avatar #69 to #53 - thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (09/07/2013) [-]
You have no clue what's going on in Syria, do you?
#47 - sloot (09/07/2013) [-]
I really just give up pretending like there is any reason to give a **** . The Government will continue being corrupt and making decisions based on the lobbyist's agendas that actually own this country. All the while stupid people will eat up yet another distraction and aimlessly spend countless hours debating another issue we have no control over instead of focusing on a way to change how our Government is actually run...
#90 to #47 - urbemarmis (09/07/2013) [-]
you see this is the problem. the people who are fed up with it are also the people who say "im done caring" or "i dont have ime" if we could get people who actually made sense (i.e. ron paul not to be a ron paul fag but its true) into congress we could turn **** around. the thing is everyones either purely democrat or purely republican, so it would be tough getting people who support more middle ground in there
User avatar #40 - zorororonoa (09/07/2013) [-]
It is because of the Chemical Weapons, not because they were just killing each other.
#62 to #40 - anon (09/07/2013) [-]
The US doesn't give a **** about chemical weapons, this is about protecting Israel.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)