Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
72 comments displayed.
#15 - ihateallofyoualot **User deleted account**
Reply +406
(09/03/2013) [-]
>gaming   
>wireless mouse   
   
lol casual
>gaming
>wireless mouse

lol casual
#461 to #15 - HypomanDan
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
Personally I dislike wireless mice because everyone I have had was terrible. I now use the Cyborg R.A.T. 7 and I love it
#384 to #15 - madmanslantern
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#405 to #384 - anon
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
Their*

Looking somewhat intelligent is not nearly as hard as you make it look.
#416 to #405 - madmanslantern
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#440 to #416 - Welshhobo
Reply +1
(09/04/2013) [-]
#383 to #15 - cryingchicken
Reply +2
(09/04/2013) [-]
suck mah low-latency dick biatch
#317 to #15 - saveavatar
Reply +1
(09/04/2013) [-]
I use a razer mamba for gaming, i guess that makes me a casual
I use a razer mamba for gaming, i guess that makes me a casual
#277 to #15 - matthewfjr **User deleted account**
+2
has deleted their comment [-]
#215 to #15 - rarityrarityrarity
Reply +1
(09/04/2013) [-]
wireless>wired
#218 to #215 - admiralen
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
no, just no, wireless is **** in comparison, a wired never needs to change batteries, its faster and more sensitive
#439 to #218 - cryingchicken
Reply +1
(09/04/2013) [-]
I use a wireless mouse and it's both those things along with the convenience of being usable more than 1m away from the pc.

>6400 dpi
>no input lag thanks to low latency reciever and transmitter.
>battery is recharchable and I've never needed to change it as it has a 50 hour battery life and comes with a spare battery which i keep on charge on the occasion that it does need to be changed... also you can connect a wire as well, although i never use it.
#219 to #218 - rarityrarityrarity
Reply +2
(09/04/2013) [-]
the speed and sensitivity feels exactly the same imo.
charging batteries also isn't that bad as long as you have an extra pair to use once the others run out & need charging.
#220 to #219 - admiralen
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
its so pointless and so much busy work, its worse and you dont need to sit 5 meters away from your computer anyway
#221 to #220 - rarityrarityrarity
Reply +1
(09/04/2013) [-]
well there aren't wires to get in your way but its all about preference.
#222 to #221 - admiralen
Reply -1
(09/04/2013) [-]
there wont be any wires in the way if you sort that **** out and put it right
#187 to #15 - cedrock
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
I've figured that out the hardway..It's so bad specially when you're playing CS..
#134 to #15 - marikthegunslinger
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
Lol he's having fun don't be a tool.
#139 to #134 - ihateallofyoualot **User deleted account**
Reply +3
(09/04/2013) [-]
but being a tool is what I do best
but being a tool is what I do best
#105 to #15 - cardanbar
Reply +2
(09/04/2013) [-]
i don't know much about PC gaming. why are wireless mice for casuals?
#382 to #105 - thenez ONLINE
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
its very rare for a wireless mouse to be superior to a wired mouse, because there is a lot of encoding and decoding that is going on between the emitter and the receiver. for example, if a company wanted to make their mice more "affordable", they could choose to include more "inexpensive" (slower) encoding and decoding chips in the emitter and receiver. where a wired mouse will send straight usb signals. granted, the movement must still be encoded and decoded, there is a lot less of it going on, and therefore lower chance for cheap parts.
#108 to #105 - ihateallofyoualot **User deleted account**
Reply +2
(09/04/2013) [-]
Wired Mice are superior in every way. Wireless mice are sometimes delayed, they're unreliable, and the batteries can die while you play. Those aren't all the reasons but I want to keep it somewhat short.
#113 to #108 - cardanbar
Reply +1
(09/04/2013) [-]
okay thanks. just curious. im getting a pretty good PC for gaming this christmas and i just wanna know more about them.
#68 to #15 - anon
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
Posting as anon because, well, you'll see.

But I'm an idiot when it comes to any sort of computer hardware, even basic **** like a goddamn mouse.
Why are wireless mouses bad? Not trying to argue, just curious.
(Isn't it something to do with a slight delay compared to wired?)
#72 to #68 - tomtomvdp
Reply -1
(09/04/2013) [-]
It's just useless , and except for a few exceptions from razer , they are usually poorly made , and won't last much, they are overpriced. And some of them work on double A batteries , so all in all . There is nothing to justify their purchase , except for presentations , some cheaper models have a lot of input lag , etc.

Besides for the price of a ****** wireless mouse you can get a really good wired mouse , with different dpi , weights , additional buttons , and built from better materials . And drivers to configure the buttons , or even if you are a piece of **** , configure Macros.
#174 to #72 - shairou
Reply +2
(09/04/2013) [-]
I have a wireless mouse
At first i thought nothing of it, i got it for free so it would probably break fast.
A year later, batteries, which i got with it, still work, works very smoothly.
Dont knock all wireless mouses
#179 to #174 - tomtomvdp
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
>they are usually poorly made
>usually poorly made
>usually , as opposed to ALL or ALWAYS .

I didn't.
#171 to #72 - nogphille
Reply +1
(09/04/2013) [-]
logitech G700.

**** you.
#386 to #171 - thenez ONLINE
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
You're forgetting the newer G700s.
#178 to #171 - tomtomvdp
Reply -1
(09/04/2013) [-]
Logitech , razer , etc . Specified brands are usually the exception , when i said "and except for a few exceptions from razer " i believed that would be clear , i meant logitech too, or any other specified brand.
#18 to #15 - poniesareghey
Reply +18
(09/04/2013) [-]
>Gaming
>Laptop
>i5
#412 to #18 - newall
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
the i5 2500-2600k series outperforms almost all i7's for pure gaming rigs.
#378 to #18 - fcrocker
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
MFW I'm currently gaming on an i5 laptop because I'm to poor to get a proper rig.
#417 to #378 - firesky
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
Too poor?
A regular PC is cheaper than any notebook with the same specs.
#447 to #417 - fcrocker
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
Yeah, but I needed a notebook for college, and couldn't afford to buy a Desktop as well.
#472 to #447 - firesky
Reply 0
(09/05/2013) [-]
I understand.

I bought myself a notebook for school and 2 years afterwords I saved up enough to build myself a decent gaming PC. It's now 5 years old and I can still play pretty much every new game.
#374 to #18 - thenez ONLINE
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
i5's are actually the sweet spot for gaming.

It's the laptop i5's you want to stay away from, since they are all hyperthreaded dual cores.
#367 to #18 - animedudej
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
not sure what youre getting at but i have a I5 in my desktop and laptop and the mobile version is a lump of **** compared to the desktop version
#377 to #367 - thenez ONLINE
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
that would be because laptop i5's are all hyperthreaded dual cores.

where the desktop i5's are all true quad cores.
#260 to #18 - olisaurus
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
I actually like i5 more than i7 for gaming
#256 to #18 - anon
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
The only difference between i5 and i7 is hyperthreading which is used by practically no games. A lot of people with i7's disable hyperthreading when playing games because it's completely useless. The only games you will even see a benefit going from an i3>i5 are big multiplayer games where player positions are handled by the cpu.

tldr: Unless you're getting at least a 770m/7970m, an i7 is a waste of money.
#88 to #18 - pandahuggrstabbr
Reply +3
(09/04/2013) [-]
You can game fine with even an i3. I just choose to play less graphically demanding games. Graphics =/= gaming (I know some people like graphics for immersion, but not everybody.)
#160 to #88 - legamethatyoulost
Reply +1
(09/04/2013) [-]
my *****.
#63 to #18 - buddhadom
Reply -1
(09/04/2013) [-]
Alienware m14xr2... Mine... i7 tho
#53 to #18 - completeaddiction **User deleted account**
Reply +85
(09/04/2013) [-]
Filthy casuals.
My hot-rod has the over-overclocked Gigacore i69 with added 10 terabites of ram that runs off of the boiling tears of African children. To cool this bad boy I pack my own tubes that cool the processor with the cum I give off when 360 quick-noscope spinning fakie-faking you bitches. The powersource that runs this bitch comes from the insults i get from bangin' your mom REPEATEDLY. To store all this advanced **** my harddrive plugs DIRECTLY INTO my ass and to get this surround sound **** I super-glue two guitar amplifiers to my ears.
#279 to #53 - matthewfjr **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#483 to #279 - spartusee
Reply -2
(09/06/2013) [-]
Lol you're dumb. Maybe not really but **** you.
#368 to #279 - ramnarainy
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
What's wrong with AMD?
#375 to #368 - thenez ONLINE
Reply -1
(09/04/2013) [-]
Nothing, unless you want to use emulators like PCSX2 or dolphin.

Assuming we are speaking of AMD's Vishera FX chips.
#150 to #53 - dagreatmax
Reply +15
(09/04/2013) [-]
hfw
#58 to #53 - poniesareghey
Reply +50
(09/04/2013) [-]
>Not getting the swiggety-swag-420-cod-computercase limited edition
>Not using quad-1080p gold/diamond-encrusted monitors
>Not sitting upon a throne of dicks while you game
**** off pleb this is for the big boys
#40 to #18 - SuperSixONE
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
Laptops can game, but not with i5.
I have an i7 laptop with a wired Razer Orisomethingerother
#181 to #40 - LePedobear
Reply +1
(09/04/2013) [-]
of course they could. hell a laptop with an i3 could run games well if paired with a good gpu
#138 to #40 - infineks
Reply +2
(09/04/2013) [-]
I have an i5 4670k and a GTX 770 and I run everything on ultra@1080p. i5's aren't that bad, i've never had my processor go over a 60%(ish) load.

It's a desktop though.
#273 to #138 - lolme
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
Try encoding a video into h264 @ 1080p and you'll see your processor work it's ass off, it even brings my 3770k to it's knees.
#470 to #273 - infineks
Reply 0
(09/05/2013) [-]
Is the 4670k not better than the 3770k? Or is the 3770k the cheaper i7 one?
#335 to #273 - weediemaan
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
why would you encode video with processor? GPU's are much faster at encoding video...
#339 to #335 - lolme
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
Because not everything has support for GPU processing.
#163 to #138 - EpicAnon
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
AMD FX-8350 and GTX 780 SC reporting in.
Can't wait to upgrade to a 4th gen i7 Intel, though.
#26 to #18 - pwnmissilereborn **User deleted account**
Reply +1
(09/04/2013) [-]
What's with the i5? The good models are great for gaming.
inb4 "i7 ftw". Many i7 are overkill when it comes to gaming. You most likely only need those if you do video and image conversion/edition.

I myself have an i5-2500k, not overclocked, and never had any kind of CPU lag even with high end games, and when I do I can still overclock it to a whoopin' 4.5 GHz
#29 to #26 - spartusee
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
Son, AMD Phenom II black edition is where it's at. Gaming mouse with 1ms response time is just as good as wireless.
#54 to #29 - eattherich ONLINE
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
Haha thats what I have in my computer right now.
#35 to #29 - sorenlolz
Reply +2
(09/04/2013) [-]
AMD master race. I got my AMD FX-6350 BLACK ED. 6 core threading, 3.9 Ghz.
#36 to #35 - spartusee
Reply -1
(09/04/2013) [-]
Hell yea. What gpu?
#37 to #36 - sorenlolz
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
My GPU is pretty weak at the moment. Nvidia 550ti. ASUS M5A97 R2.0 AM3+ ATX Mobo. 8Gb ballistix (2 x 4) RAM DDR3 Dual channel. Corsair 600m power supply. 500Gb HDD. Cheap writable disk drive. I forgot to say my processor was only $120, the I7 is like $300. I paid a total of $400 so far.
#115 to #37 - pwnmissilereborn **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
I have a 560 Ti and it handles Farcry 3 on High with pretty good fps, is there such a difference between the 550 and the 560?

Also, did your PSU ever give you any trouble? My PSU is going defective, and it's the second to do that this year, most likely because they were rather cheap ones. Anyway, are the Corsair PSUs reliable?
#122 to #115 - sorenlolz
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
I don't think so, it's just not as good as any of the 600 models. I have not even gotten to use my new computer yet. I've been re-installing everything on my laptop. If that is true I might buy a second one to SLI it with.
#185 to #122 - anon
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
www.sweclockers.com/recension/13964-asus-geforce-gtx-560-directcu-ii-top/14#pagehead

I read about computer stuff here, and its a pretty big defference between all gtx X50vs gtx X60 no matter what gen. sry, swedish site....
#70 to #37 - anon
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
We all know intel chipsets are ****, also why would you say what PSU you have; I'm sure noone cares.
#28 to #26 - poniesareghey
Reply -1
(09/04/2013) [-]
An i5 in a laptop generally means it's around 2.4ghz and really can't handle much. Not saying there aren't good i5's, but if you buy a laptop with an i5 it's probably more likely to be a 520. If you spend money on a laptop with a good i5, it's likely you overpayed for a "superior gaming laptop" advertisement. You can't really win.
#32 to #28 - pwnmissilereborn **User deleted account**
Reply +1
(09/04/2013) [-]
Truth is that whenever you pay for a gaming laptop, you have overpaid, whether you got an i5 or an i7, because the quality/price ratio for them is always inferior to desktop components, not to mention that pretty much every laptop only has onboard GPUs.

That said, the problem is in it being a laptop, not in the i5 series as those are more than adequate for gaming PCs.
#33 to #32 - poniesareghey
Reply 0
(09/04/2013) [-]
That's exactly what I was trying to say. "If you spend money on a laptop with a good i5, it's likely you overpayed for a "superior gaming laptop" advertisement".