Login or register
Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
7 comments displayed.
#29 - thehans
Reply +91
(09/03/2013) [-]
apparently small dicks were supposed to be regarded as the man being intelligent and regal, and big dicks were supposed to mean you were stupid and barbaric.

<- MFW
#78 to #29 - tailsx
Reply +3
(09/03/2013) [-]
**tailsx rolled a random image posted in comment #1 at Incest now this ** mfw
#50 to #29 - sackit
Reply 0
(09/03/2013) [-]
Well i`m sertenly stupid
#36 to #29 - chargrilledawesome
Reply -2
(09/03/2013) [-]
#34 to #29 - zafara
Reply +8
(09/03/2013) [-]
Along with that, small penises were supposed to be the ultimate in male beauty. Also, sexual relationships between wealthy grown men and prepubescent boys were considered the best relationships back then. Grown men with tiny penises were able to establish connections with the wealthiest people in the land, because they looked like the small boys gown men had sex with, only bigger.

Also, the think with David; while small penises being the ultimate in beauty may have been in play, there was another reason. When men are scared, our penis and balls kind of shrink. The statue is of David before he goes to fight Goliath. Undoubtedly, he would have been nervous, as he was about to fight a giant with only a slingshot. So it would only be natural that his privates would have shrunk.
#32 to #29 - wolfypolli ONLINE
Reply +3
(09/03/2013) [-]
Romans were very much into building muscle. And they thought the penis as well got larger the more you used it. Having a large penis meant you were barbaric because you spent all your time ******* instead of doing sophisticated things like reading and coming up with stuff.
#33 to #32 - thehans
Reply +2
(09/03/2013) [-]
that makes sense