Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#10 - omninickk
Reply 0
(09/01/2013) [-]
Then they just do tests on her and find your DNA traces inside her vagina and around the area. Also, where did the 'rapist' go? Don't you think she would expect him to be there as you undid the blindfold?
#12 to #10 - commonlyrare
Reply +1
(09/01/2013) [-]
"kicked the rapists ass" she wouldve assumed the rapist ran away or something
#13 to #12 - omninickk
Reply 0
(09/01/2013) [-]
Yeah, fair point. But still, DNA traces, man.
#27 to #13 - Pryda
Reply 0
(09/01/2013) [-]
For a dna test to work they would need someone elses dna to compare it ..
#14 to #13 - commonlyrare
Reply 0
(09/01/2013) [-]
dont DNA traces still cost a lot, too much for only a rape? not sure though
#22 to #14 - animalsgreenberet
Reply 0
(09/01/2013) [-]
too much for a rape? uh, that's kinda ****** up dude. rape is a serious thing.
#23 to #22 - commonlyrare
Reply +1
(09/01/2013) [-]
yeah, i know, but imagine if they had to pay for DNA traces for every rape victim in detroit? how would that work out?
#16 to #14 - omninickk
Reply 0
(09/01/2013) [-]
You would think that, having been sexually assaulted, you shouldn't have to pay for it. It's like a service that logically SHOULD be provided by the government, just like contraception and abortion services when acceptable. It might cost, but a rape victim shouldn't have to pay for it. If they want to catch a rapist, they have to put money in.
#17 to #16 - commonlyrare
Reply 0
(09/01/2013) [-]
i didnt mean the victim should pay, but that the government wouldnt pay for an expensive procedure like that for a common (depending on place) crime
#20 to #17 - omninickk
Reply 0
(09/01/2013) [-]
I don't know how much it costs. However, rape isn't REALLY that common, but I guess I don't have enough knowledge on it to really go into the subject and defend my point. It was only just common sense.
#21 to #20 - commonlyrare
Reply 0
(09/01/2013) [-]
point taken. i dont have much knowledge on the topic either and was just giving logical counter argument
#29 to #21 - cheatmasterjunk
Reply 0
(09/02/2013) [-]
That's a very level-headed discussion you're having, but wouldn't you expect the DNA of a woman's husband to be on her vagina anyway?
#34 to #29 - omninickk
Reply 0
(09/02/2013) [-]
But the rape happened BEFORE they were in a relationship and got married.
#35 to #34 - cheatmasterjunk
Reply 0
(09/02/2013) [-]
Since the story ended with them being married I was assuming the discussion started at that point in time, presumably some months later.
#36 to #35 - omninickk
Reply 0
(09/03/2013) [-]
The way I am looking at it is this:

Rape > DNA Test > Relationship > Marriage
#33 to #29 - commonlyrare
Reply 0
(09/02/2013) [-]
They only became husband and wife long after the rape. The DNA trace wouldve been done right after, i would expect, so before they even had sex again