Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #72 - bigsteamingpile (08/31/2013) [-]
Wow, this was absolutely not funny.
#75 to #72 - coldfusion (08/31/2013) [-]
I don't get it, can you explain it?
User avatar #76 to #75 - bigsteamingpile (08/31/2013) [-]
Sure! I assumed that it was supposed to be funny. It just had that tone and it's on frontpage. It wasn't funny imo. Does that help?
User avatar #78 to #76 - bbbegley (08/31/2013) [-]
No, I'm sorry, could you explain it further?
User avatar #86 to #78 - guywithafork (08/31/2013) [-]
I'll do it for him, he seems busy. He thought that the content was going to be funny. As the website is FunnyJunk after all. But it wasn't funny, atleast was his opinion. Seeing as in this website there are 2 ways of rating, Funny, or Junk. He thought it was going to be funny, as getting your content rated 'Junk' Too many times can lead to a ban, so very few people actually want to be rated 'Junk'. If few people want to be rated 'Junk', then you would expect they want to be rated 'Funny', as good things can come from being rated 'Funny' a large amount of times. It is almost implied that you are posting content because it is funny, not because you wanted to share it. Because it is implied that it is suppose to be funny, as is expected, he also thought that the content was suppose to be funny. He thought that this was absolutely not funny, which is a very peculiar thing. How could something that someone else thought was so funny that they had to share it to the Funny Junk community, not have been funny? I know opinion's vary and all, but the general thought is that certain things are good, and certain things are bad. A lot of things can instantly be shown without a doubt bad. Although some people think it is bad, some people may think it is good. I understand that. But how could a post be so unfunny, that it was completely devoid of funniness?
Surely it must be atleast partially funny, to most people atleast. If not then why would he have posted this. He is just stating that this post was absolutely devoid of funniness, or is absolutely not funny.
User avatar #87 to #86 - bbbegley (08/31/2013) [-]
Oh my god, you made it so clear! Thanks. Sometime I just so eh-stupid.
#88 to #87 - guywithafork (08/31/2013) [-]
You asked to explain it further, I explained it further.
#105 to #88 - Rascal (08/31/2013) [-]
you stupid **** . it just went over you ******* head
User avatar #89 to #88 - bbbegley (08/31/2013) [-]
Yes, I see that.
 Friends (0)