Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#87 - anon (08/23/2013) [-]
To be honest Europe has implemented these laws and have had a significant decrease with no draw backs. Yes, Criminals can always get guns, but the harder it is, the more expensive, the more expensive, the less likely the majority of people responsible for gun violence (excluding the US military) are to go and get one.....Then again I have a fully modded AR-15 with Auto receiver, one SIG P226, a Benelli Supernova, Two Taurus 24/7 pro's, .300 Winchester Magnum, and Two S&W 500's. The Shotgun and pistols for if they come in my house, the rifles for if they try to run. I live in Texas (Hurr Durr Murican Redneck, guns n mcdonalds.) I believe strongly in gun regulation, but the right to bear arms, TO ME, isn't mostly for small time crooks, it's for whatever else may come and knock on my front door, and when it does. Imma blow the **** out of it,
#96 to #87 - asasinmonkey (08/23/2013) [-]
The per capita rates of violent crime in general are higher in countries with strict gun control. In the US some thing like 400 people per 100,000 are affected by violent crime of any kind. In the UK its like 2000 per 100,000.
#103 to #96 - lordraine ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
I can't find the image I have of the data that supports this, so I hope you'll be happy with a thumb.
User avatar #99 to #96 - nazrain (08/23/2013) [-]
It may be true, but the US have almost 250 million population than the UK, so you do the math.
#311 to #99 - asasinmonkey (08/23/2013) [-]
Key word Per Capita.
#101 to #99 - Helle ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
not if only count by the 100.000 retard
#97 to #96 - asasinmonkey (08/23/2013) [-]
Also yay for Texas and our relatively low crime rates!
User avatar #89 to #87 - krasnogvardiech (08/23/2013) [-]
This, ladies and gentlemen, is a man prepared to defend his home.
 Friends (0)